Chris Kennard
Well-known member
Markus, I'm pretty sure many people here want to know exactly what your relationship with Oskroba is. Is he your partner?
Garrett Thats my thoughts about this topic.
Again, offtopic to this thread. In the discussion sector it would surly be very interesting to talk about this topic in depth. But here it is off topic. Thats why here, in thread of Garrett and Mike, I will stick to the rules of faunaclassiefieds. I will not comment offtopic, I will not use name calling like we read here with every "smuggler" (without any prove of smuggling in my context), "princess",... I will not use hearsay (Lynns post 826, name the people), I will not put repetetive posts asking the same qustion over and over (to name a few 803, 805, 808, even with 813 highlighting this to you). Use the discussion forum for discussions about this report because thats where it belongs.
I know, Chris will ask 100+ questions now, but as I wrote. Offtopic. Use the discussion section. I will not answer one just to entertain you.
Not defending anyone here, but actually not naming your sources of information is against fuana rules is it not? So any one saying "someone told me his about you" and not naming them, is an anonymous third party quote and pretty sure that's not allowed.Markus,
You sure are a long winded fella!
All I want to address, in ALL your mumbo jumbo, is:
Let's address the name "Princess" What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
Let's address "Smuggler", that's not name calling by any stretch of the imagination, it's FACT, Garrett Smith is a known CONVICTED SMUGGLER.
Macies Oskroba, although wasn't convicted, he is also a known SMUGGLER.
So far the only two I know of associated with your name, are "SMUGGLERS", and although I'm not calling you a "SMUGGLER" I've always believed, what I've always heard, "birds of a feather".
In addition, you say I don't name, names as to where I get my information, NOT naming names, doesn't make it not so, or any less true. You know who you are, and now, so do we. IT IS, WHAT IT IS.....
Now back to the business at hand..........
Paying those you owe Princess? Times running out.....
Michael, with ALL this going on and being said, in addition to him owing you $6500, do you not have anything to say, about anything at all????
Lynn Peterson
Big Time Reptiles
Not defending anyone here, but actually not naming your sources of information is against fuana rules is it not? So any one saying "someone told me his about you" and not naming them, is an anonymous third party quote and pretty sure that's not allowed.
I've read this entire thread. No that's not the only issue I have, and apparently you don't like to be called out when you guys are doing something wrong. Other people have gotten on fractions for posting the same things over and over, you and Chris complain about him doing it, yet yall do it as well. And if you're talking about me mixing up Pakistan and Palestine very late at night and using that as a jab, just shows how petty you are when told constantly posting about other people yet not naming them is actually against them the rules, as much as you post hee you'd think you would have read the rules by now right? You 2 just cannot let this play out, but have to attack anyone and anything that is presented here, in those articles I saw nothing to call Markus a scammer yet you and Chris jumped on it like a slam dunk.WOW, with everything else going on, and being said in this thread, you're concerned about me not giving up my sources?
I'm not aware If that's one of the rules, if it is, I'm sure Rich, or one of the moderators, will contact me to let me know, at which time, I'll cease & desist, and never use a third party again.
I'd be more than happy to give up my sources, as soon as they're comfortable in me doing so, I have nothing to hide!
I hope my sources aren't the same ones that gave you, your history lesson....reference post #535.
Hey Princess, time is wasting......
Michael, I can't believe you have nothing for us?????????
Lynn Peterson
Big Time Reptiles
I've read this entire thread. No that's not the only issue I have, and apparently you don't like to be called out when you guys are doing something wrong. Other people have gotten on fractions for posting the same things over and over, you and Chris complain about him doing it, yet yall do it as well. And if you're talking about me mixing up Pakistan and Palestine very late at night and using that as a jab, just shows how petty you are when told constantly posting about other people yet not naming them is actually against them the rules, as much as you post hee you'd think you would have read the rules by now right? You 2 just cannot let this play out, but have to attack anyone and anything that is presented here, in those articles I saw nothing to call Markus a scammer yet you and Chris jumped on it like a slam dunk.
I've read this entire thread. No that's not the only issue I have, and apparently you don't like to be called out when you guys are doing something wrong. Other people have gotten on fractions for posting the same things over and over, you and Chris complain about him doing it, yet yall do it as well. And if you're talking about me mixing up Pakistan and Palestine very late at night and using that as a jab, just shows how petty you are when told constantly posting about other people yet not naming them is actually against them the rules, as much as you post hee you'd think you would have read the rules by now right? You 2 just cannot let this play out, but have to attack anyone and anything that is presented here, in those articles I saw nothing to call Markus a scammer yet you and Chris jumped on it like a slam dunk.
Chris you are very intagonistic on a lot of threads, you went after Markus like he killed your dog. You and Lyn are the ones who comment the most, and you know darn well I'm not going t go back threw 85 pages just to find it, and I know you did after garret posted the first post like 3 times, yet a lot of your questions are the same things over and over and over one after the other or every 3 posts, sometimes worded differently I guess to save you from an infraction of posting the same thing over and over?
You don't like what I had to say so are turning it around like I'm attacking you. Yea garret either need to pay Mike or get those animals in. But you 2 constantly posting every single day over and over the same things, name calling, etc aren't going to get that done. It just makes this long thread that much longer. I made a point because Lynn should obviously know the rules. Like I said I'm not defending anyone, but it does get old seeing you 2 ask he same things a hundred times right after one another when once is enough. He's obviously seen it, hasn't answered so why would asking a million more times make a difference?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
Chris you are very intagonistic on a lot of threads, you went after Markus like he killed your dog. You and Lyn are the ones who comment the most, and you know darn well I'm not going t go back threw 85 pages just to find it, and I know you did after garret posted the first post like 3 times, yet a lot of your questions are the same things over and over and over one after the other or every 3 posts, sometimes worded differently I guess to save you from an infraction of posting the same thing over and over?
You don't like what I had to say so are turning it around like I'm attacking you. Yea garret either need to pay Mike or get those animals in. But you 2 constantly posting every single day over and over the same things, name calling, etc aren't going to get that done. It just makes this long thread that much longer. I made a point because Lynn should obviously know the rules. Like I said I'm not defending anyone, but it does get old seeing you 2 ask he same things a hundred times right after one another when once is enough. He's obviously seen it, hasn't answered so why would asking a million more times make a difference?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
posting the same things over and over
It should, because this is one of the rare occasions that she's absolutely right. If you're not going to name all these shadowy figures who have supposedly confided their problems with Garrett Smith to you - as BOI rules clearly stipulate as a requirement - stop blabbing about it and carrying on like you're just about to lay down some cards that are going to blow this whole thing wide open. The inherent self-aggrandizement is pretty lame. Much like your cohort in this thread, you've been making a whole lot of posts that generally don't amount to much of anything particularly useful. I'm sure you'll just carry on with your regularly-scheduled buffoonery, as it seems to be all that a couple of you really have to offer.Big Time Reptiles said:Nothing you say or do, regardless of how late it is, doesn't bother me in the least, and means absolutely nothing to me......
Yeah, a couple of people in this thread have seriously taken their - what clearly seems to be - attention/karma-whoring to very irritating and disruptive levels. Between the constant "princess" spiel that's just a slightly-shuffled regurgitation of what he's already been posted ad nauseam and, Kennard's dim-witted inability to consolidate his spamming of successive posts into a single, cohesive reply, this thread is just getting even more convoluted and nonsensical. The repetitive blather is already well past the point where it's gotten old.
It should, because this is one of the rare occasions that she's absolutely right. If you're not going to name all these shadowy figures who have supposedly confided their problems with Garrett Smith to you - as BOI rules clearly stipulate as a requirement - stop blabbing about it and carrying on like you're just about to lay down some cards that are going to blow this whole thing wide open. The inherent self-aggrandizement is pretty lame. Much like your cohort in this thread, you've been making a whole lot of posts that generally don't amount to much of anything particularly useful. I'm sure you'll just carry on with your regularly-scheduled buffoonery, as it seems to be all that a couple of you really have to offer.
Unlike you two, I have no interest in further contributing to making this thread even more of a circus than it already is, so I won't waste my time replying to whatever defensive, pointless comments you'll surely make in reply. Having said what was needed, I don't need to keep making this about me. That's possibly something you could learn from.
Wow, the voice of reason has spoken. Do you think you speak for the majority here? I can think of 20,000 reasons why these guys should be kept under the microscope. But surely that doesn't concern such a mature intellectual like yourself. You came here for the sole purpose of taking a shot at two guys who obviously are going to bat for the victims here. Will you be sleeping better in your car tonight?
Speaking of the victims, nobody will be going to bat for you much longer if you won't stand up for yourselves. Your silence will hurt you more than help you. Good luck.
Yeah, a couple of people in this thread have seriously taken their - what clearly seems to be - attention/karma-whoring to very irritating and disruptive levels. Between the constant "princess" spiel that's just a slightly-shuffled regurgitation of what he's already been posted ad nauseam and, Kennard's dim-witted inability to consolidate his spamming of successive posts into a single, cohesive reply, this thread is just getting even more convoluted and nonsensical. The repetitive blather is already well past the point where it's gotten old.
It should, because this is one of the rare occasions that she's absolutely right. If you're not going to name all these shadowy figures who have supposedly confided their problems with Garrett Smith to you - as BOI rules clearly stipulate as a requirement - stop blabbing about it and carrying on like you're just about to lay down some cards that are going to blow this whole thing wide open. The inherent self-aggrandizement is pretty lame. Much like your cohort in this thread, you've been making a whole lot of posts that generally don't amount to much of anything particularly useful. I'm sure you'll just carry on with your regularly-scheduled buffoonery, as it seems to be all that a couple of you really have to offer.
Unlike you two, I have no interest in further contributing to making this thread even more of a circus than it already is, so I won't waste my time replying to whatever defensive, pointless comments you'll surely make in reply. Having said what was needed, I don't need to keep making this about me. That's possibly something you could learn from.

