• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Bad Guy Bad Apple Craig Wyatt.

Craig Wyatt said:
Dan. Please stay off this. You have had it out for me since the Connor thread.
Click to expand...

I'm beginning to notice an emergent pattern of you lying when it suits your purposes. Not particularly relevant, but since you chose to play that card, I invite you to quote anything that supports the idea that I've "had it out for you" since the Connor thread. You can't, because no such supporting evidence exists. I've been nothing but civil to you since then. If you think anything I've posted in this thread constitutes an unreasonable attack, I suggest you dislodge your head from your rectum and pretend you have at least mediocre reading comprehension skills. You chose to lie about telling him he could keep the cham, plain and simple.

It's also pretty clear to me that you grossly exaggerated the "bullying" that took place. I didn't even begin to take it to a personal level in pointing these things out, so don't blame your wadded panties on me. If you can't handle the repercussions for the choices you knowingly made, maybe you should rethink the decision-making process that led you to making them. It would seem that all the coddling people have chosen to give you has made you feel overly entitled to more of the same.

Also, while I'm sure it gives you a nice warm-fuzzy to have someone blithely ignoring the simple truths I've pointed out while going to bat for you, Kennard he may not be quite the positive ally you're hoping for. Especially since you seem to have a problem with what you perceive to be ulterior motives.
keyboard worriors
Click to expand...
That's especially laughable and hypocritical, coming from someone as worthless as yourself.
 
To potentially stave off another Dan/Chris/ et al. rant that detracts from the overall thread topic, here is a summary of events.

- Craig Wyatt sold and shipped a chameleon to "Mark Dunner" for $200 (shipped? I think?)
- "Mark Dunner" received the chameleon and claimed the chameleon had MBD due to some mild front limb shaking.
- Craig Wyatt insisted "Mark Dunner's" diagnosis was incorrect, and that the chameleon was healthy. Craig offered to pay for shipping to get the animal back.
- "Mark Dunner" refused through omission.
- Craig Wyatt, in attempt to save his reputation, refunded the $200 with a caveat: if the animal appears healthy in 2 weeks, the animal must be returned to him. If the animal appears unhealthy after 2 weeks, "Mark Dunner" could keep it.
- "Mark Dunner" created this BOI thread about Craig Wyatt.
- "Mark Dunner" posted videos of the chameleon's "tremors", which viewers came to the consensus that the animal was exhibiting normal behaviors, looked healthy, and did not appear to have MBD.
- "Mark Dunner" created multiple accounts, using "James Bland" as an alias.
- "Mark Dunner" implicated a connection with Underground Reptiles. This connection is still being investigated and is suspected to be untrue.

Please keep posts to the topic at hand. If you do not have additional information, specifically regarding the implication of Underground Reptiles, please do not post. Please take arguments regarding unrelated conflicts of character to private messages.
 
I would like to clarify a point I made above. "Craig Wyatt, in attempt to save his reputation..." is too harshly worded. Instead, he was attempting to end the conflict as soon as possible by offering the refund and the return of the animal.
 
snowgyre said:
Please take arguments regarding unrelated conflicts of character to private messages.
Click to expand...
Lapses in character shouldn't be openly addressed? Very interesting perspective to have on the BOI. I've already said all I needed to, so it's all on the table for everyone to do with what they please. But please do me the favor of nothing telling me when and how I - or anyone else - should post. :thumbsup:
 
And you are also correct Vanessa about what I was initially trying to do. He appeared to be unsatisfied (which is bogus) So I immediately offered a return. No matter what, my goal is for my customer to be happy and get exactly what they paid for. Like I said before it doesn't matter why the customer is not satisfied. Because whatever the reason maybe will be always good enough for a full refund in a extremely timely manner. I never touch the money in PayPal until I know it's safe to spend.

This is also how I fully expect to be treated when dealing with sellers.

"Golden rule"
 
Fangthane said:
I'm beginning to notice an emergent pattern of you lying when it suits your purposes. Not particularly relevant, but since you chose to play that card, I invite you to quote anything that supports the idea that I've "had it out for you" since the Connor thread. You can't, because no such supporting evidence exists. I've been nothing but civil to you since then. If you think anything I've posted in this thread constitutes an unreasonable attack, I suggest you dislodge your head from your rectum and pretend you have at least mediocre reading comprehension skills. You chose to lie about telling him he could keep the cham, plain and simple.

It's also pretty clear to me that you grossly exaggerated the "bullying" that took place. I didn't even begin to take it to a personal level in pointing these things out, so don't blame your wadded panties on me. If you can't handle the repercussions for the choices you knowingly made, maybe you should rethink the decision-making process that led you to making them. It would seem that all the coddling people have chosen to give you has made you feel overly entitled to more of the same.

Also, while I'm sure it gives you a nice warm-fuzzy to have someone blithely ignoring the simple truths I've pointed out while going to bat for you, Kennard he may not be quite the positive ally you're hoping for. Especially since you seem to have a problem with what you perceive to be ulterior motives.

That's especially laughable and hypocritical, coming from someone as worthless as yourself.
Click to expand...

Wow! That is some condescending, angry diatribe. Mr. "I've been nothing but civil", has spoken. But only an angry, lonely person with a bug up his butt would post such nonsense. Doslodge your head from your rectum? Wadded panties? And by the way Mr. Voiceofreason(lmao), I have never had any correspondence with anyone here
Nice try.
 
Fangthane said:
Lapses in character shouldn't be openly addressed? Very interesting perspective to have on the BOI. I've already said all I needed to, so it's all on the table for everyone to do with what they please. But please do me the favor of nothing telling me when and how I - or anyone else - should post. :thumbsup:
Click to expand...

How egotistical to think that your interpretation of this thread is all that matters. The so called "table" that you so arrogantly think consists of your opinion only, exists only in your narcissistic mind. Good luck with that.
 
Oh, kennard. Thanks for so predictably illustrating the ulterior motives I'd previously alluded to. You just couldn't resist an opportunity to try to engage me. As per usual, your main interest is spamming a thread with consecutive posts, while adding little to nothing of any real substance; which is clearly supported by the fact that you're avoiding any salient points of the actual topic while focusing almost solely on me - ineptly and dishonestly, at that. You really are an absolute attention/karma-whoring, fake, twit of an individual.

With that, I really am done with this. You're simply one lump of shit that's better wiped off the sole of my shoes and quickly forgotten. The smell may linger a bit, but it's of no real consequence.

(sorry, Mods, but sometimes a spade needs to be called a spade in no uncertain terms. I won't argue my infractions)
 
This is a good illustration of why it is important to take screen shots and attach them instead of just delivering a link. He has changed his name on FB. He could delete his profile or hide in other ways.
 
Here is the Facebook thread linked above. All unrelated names have been obscured for privacy.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    118.9 KB · Views: 230
  • Capture1.PNG
    Capture1.PNG
    36.6 KB · Views: 227
Here is Facebook profile page of "James Soflo" aka "James Bland" aka "Mark Dunner" ....? These are all aliases of the same person, correct?

Note the photos of veiled chameleons, so he's a cham keeper. I looked through the images but most are obscured unless you're friends with him.
 

Attachments

  • Capture2.jpg
    Capture2.jpg
    202.9 KB · Views: 229
Yup. He likes his veileds. He sent this text to me before I shipped to him.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    115.4 KB · Views: 225
Fangthane said:
Oh, kennard. Thanks for so predictably illustrating the ulterior motives I'd previously alluded to. You just couldn't resist an opportunity to try to engage me. As per usual, your main interest is spamming a thread with consecutive posts, while adding little to nothing of any real substance; which is clearly supported by the fact that you're avoiding any salient points of the actual topic while focusing almost solely on me - ineptly and dishonestly, at that. You really are an absolute attention/karma-whoring, fake, twit of an individual.

With that, I really am done with this. You're simply one lump of shit that's better wiped off the sole of my shoes and quickly forgotten. The smell may linger a bit, but it's of no real consequence.

(sorry, Mods, but sometimes a spade needs to be called a spade in no uncertain terms. I won't argue my infractions)
Click to expand...

Wow! You really showed me up fangstain! So let's review. Have I spammed this thread with consecutive posts? No. Have I added less substance to this thread than you? No. Have I focused almost solely on you (lmao)? No. I won't repeat the names you illustrated here, but I'll just say that you are obviously not a voice of reason here. Thanks for displaying that obvious trurh!
 
Back
Top