• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Info *BEWARE* Jim Stelpflug-Questionable Ethics

David, you are reaching. Do something better with your free time.

That group you bash, is the same group you said had morals and ethics.
Tom can be intense, just like you can be abrasive.

So, in conclusion, you found exactly 2 instances where people were unhappy with their dealings with Jim. That's 2 people in his, what?, 30 years in this business. Sounds pretty good to me.

That second thread you dug up was a joke. Tons of he said, she said. Not to mention, they are OLD. You yourself said you've changed since the gecko incident, how is it that it's not possible that Jim has changed?

You brought FB drama to the BOI just to tarnish Jim's reputation & it backfired. You look petty & childish.
 
Pretty sure that I've also specified in this thread that I am involved sparingly in business transactions, mostly with people local to me these days (I met the person I recently reviewed/Trevor at a local show).

Try again Justin.
 
David, you are reaching. Do something better with your free time.

That group you bash, is the same group you said had morals and ethics.
Tom can be intense, just like you can be abrasive.

So, in conclusion, you found exactly 2 instances where people were unhappy with their dealings with Jim. That's 2 people in his, what?, 30 years in this business. Sounds pretty good to me.

That second thread you dug up was a joke. Tons of he said, she said. Not to mention, they are OLD. You yourself said you've changed since the gecko incident, how is it that it's not possible that Jim has changed?

You brought FB drama to the BOI just to tarnish Jim's reputation & it backfired. You look petty & childish.

Melissa, I'm not sure if you have been feeling like yourself lately or not, but you need to check your facts. There was no "he said she said" when it came down to Jim LOSING a lawsuit and signing/writing a letter to the government turning his former business partners into the authorities AFTER he lost the lawsuit.

Those are facts. Not hearsay. Jim KNEW they were breaking the law, because he even helped write it! LOL.....

:hair_on_fire:
 
Wow! You just cracked the case wide open! Cmon man. Is this really the ammo you want to use to shoot Billy the Kid? This is getting pathetic.
See, you keep saying how this is a waste of time and should end and it's pathetic but, you keep chiming in keeping it going. Not sure I understand that.
 
Speaking of deflecting. I find it really suspicious that a guy who claims he is really not even involved in the trade part of the hobby posted a glowing review of a purchase/trade he made here in the BOI exactly 4 days after he made this thread and many people accused him of just trolling.After a thread search of this forum I also found that that is the first positive review he has ever posted. HMMMMMMM.....:rolleyes:

:shootfoot

Did you learn how to use the search function yet, Justin? We won't hold it against you if you need more time to familiarize yourself with how to use basic site functions.
 
Fairly positive we understand. David exceeded the level of abrasiveness for a facebook group designed for opinionated, abrasive comments / individuals. Got it. I can’t say I am as shocked and appalled as you would like us all to be, but I am however glad you’ve come to the same conclusion many others have. That David is opinionated.

Does David’s character really have anything to do with the fact that Jim will conduct business with the shadiest of the shady in the industry? Why even get hung up on past debt / current debt / time frame of transaction with Frade? He made it clear he will conduct business with the worst anytime. To think he wouldn’t do a current deal with Frade is just silly. If that is fine with everyone defending Jim, than that is your choice. But for others, like me, who have the ability to pick and choose who we work with based on cool stuff like ethics, this is very important. Why attempt to take away David’s right to provide that information to all of us?

The lack of ability to be open minded in this thread is the only thing appalling to me. Had Jim come here and conducted himself professionally maybe we wouldn’t be at this point. But throwing dirt back and his comments against this forum are what escalated the situation. All traits I do not attribute to "good guys".
 
Well put Michael. Everything else aside, I would never have anything in my collection that came from Frade. Whether or not the animals were to settle a debt or not, where will they end up? Will Jim disclose where they came from? Although some hobbyists probably wouldn't care, most conscientious enthusiasts would. Just sayin'.
 
See, you keep saying how this is a waste of time and should end and it's pathetic but, you keep chiming in keeping it going. Not sure I understand that.

Please refer everyone here to the post or posts where I said this is a waste of time and should end. Thanks in advance. My "pathetic" comment was in regards to your posts. I did say "let it go" with regard to the mud slinging. And I am certainly not the one who is keeping this thread going, obviously. Did you understand all of that. I'll wait patiently for those quotes.
 
So what could possibly conclude this thread? The lack of intellect here is astounding. At this point, what has been accomplished? In the grand scheme of things, Jim and David will go on with their lives, unaltered by this thread, and continue to enjoy and perhaps profit from this trade. Monetarily or psychologically. Whatever. Let it go.

Oh, I'm sorry I didn't quote you pefectly. Here let me post what you did say to that effect. You state nothing has been accomplished yet here you are many pages later still posting. I really don't care at this point I don't know Jim or David. Have fun.
 
Oh, I'm sorry I didn't quote you pefectly. Here let me post what you did say to that effect. You state nothing has been accomplished yet here you are many pages later still posting. I really don't care at this point I don't know Jim or David. Have fun.

Do you put your own cute little spin on everything? I NEVER said "nothing has been accomplished". I asked "what has been accomplished", with regard to the postings of messages and the mud slinging. I know it's much harder to get away with twisting things here to suit your agenda than it is on FB.
 
Believe me I'm not whining. At this point I'm just enjoying your extremly juvenile antics. I was happy to keep it civil unitl you wanted to call me pathetic and then insult my intelligence.
 
I have been in this industry 35 years. The gentleman I named that I did past business with had issues with the law after my dealings. Fangthane if I were to purchase a animal from someone today. And the shoot and killed someone tomorrow. In your world I am a "bad guy"

My god this post is so ridiculous. Mr Beard got booted from a Facebook group we are in. Now he brings it here. All over his hatred of scaleless animals I am guessing? And we produce some

So back to the issue of the boas, and Manny Frade. I paid ZERO dollars for these animals to start with. It was a past trade, and these animals were sent to me yesterday. In some ways I am glad, and a few said I would never see anything. I was raised in a Christian home. I received them yesterday in perfect condition. Mr Frades past his just that. His past. He is the one that has to face the world daily for his actions. Not I, but now Mr Beard feels he needs to judge me without the facts????

I have no opinion specifically on the whole subject-- but I will say my 2 cents about something that caught my eye.


"Fangthane if I were to purchase a animal from someone today. And the shoot and killed someone tomorrow. In your world I am a "bad guy" "

I don't know if you read what you posted.... but.. there's quite a few things wrong with this...

If you were to buy an animal from someone today and then went on to shoot and kill someone tomorrow-- it would make you a bad person. Not for buying the animal but for shooting and killing someone.

(If this is what you meant).
 
I guess Justin is too busy eating his crow over being unable to properly use the search function to respond to me proving him wrong (again).

Its ok, you'll get the hang of the boards eventually....unless you don't.
 
I have no opinion specifically on the whole subject-- but I will say my 2 cents about something that caught my eye.


"Fangthane if I were to purchase a animal from someone today. And the shoot and killed someone tomorrow. In your world I am a "bad guy" "

I don't know if you read what you posted.... but.. there's quite a few things wrong with this...

If you were to buy an animal from someone today and then went on to shoot and kill someone tomorrow-- it would make you a bad person. Not for buying the animal but for shooting and killing someone.

(If this is what you meant).

Seriously? I'll be shocked if Fanfthane even entertains this incredibly ridiculous analogy.
 
I guess Justin is too busy eating his crow over being unable to properly use the search function to respond to me proving him wrong (again).

Its ok, you'll get the hang of the boards eventually....unless you don't.

WTF are you flapping your gums about now. I know how to use the search function here and everywhere else I'm a member of a forum. I'm no longer going to respond to either of you. You both act like children. This is not what this thread or the BOI is for. Have a good evening
 
I'll spell out for you since you're not too sure what I was referring to.....remember this post?

Speaking of deflecting. I find it really suspicious that a guy who claims he is really not even involved in the trade part of the hobby posted a glowing review of a purchase/trade he made here in the BOI exactly 4 days after he made this thread and many people accused him of just trolling.After a thread search of this forum I also found that that is the first positive review he has ever posted. HMMMMMMM.....:rolleyes:


I did the heard work for you, here are numerous positive reviews I have posted over the years, contrary to your post above. You didn't look very hard if your search did not pull even ONE of these, lol......

 
I feel like I’m watching one of those knock down, drag out talk shows. I want to look away, but it’s like a train wreck I can’t stop watching.

So, short version?
Jim got some snakes as payment for an old debt from Manny and posted it on FB.
David posted some negative stuff about Manny on Jim’s FB page and Jim deleted it. Jim then told David he didn’t agree with him, and also, he knows other people with records.

David thought this was something he should notify the BOI about and posted an Info thread.
Much drama filled posting ensued.

My take on this? Neither Jim nor David is exactly the worst person ever. In fact I think the worst you can say is that:

Jim - was once involved years ago in reporting some people who were keeping illegal species. Doesn’t refuse to do business with people with past records, or at least won’t publicly agree with David about doing so.

David: makes sarcastic posts on FB. Made this thread. Once got a gecko from petsmart.

Is it just me, or this all this kind of a non-issue on either side???? David is judging Jim for something he said on FB. Jim is fighting back by pointing out things David has said on FB. Logan is judging David for stuff he posts on FB. Justin is arguing with Chris. Etc. And why do we keep coming back to FB? There is a reason I avoid that place.
 
Back
Top