• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Reptster.com experience with show sponsorship not good

BryonsBoas said:
Did you type that with a straight face? Your arguments have been one sided for a bit now.
Click to expand...

They really haven't been.

Just because I chose to ask questions and base my decisions on tangibles instead of "popular opinion" doesn't mean that I am taking sides. Because I didn't join in the witch hunt doesn't mean that I side with him.
 
ToshaMc said:
The $ is relevant -- If you agreed to pay $250 and someone tried to upsell you to $750 - what amount should you be expected to pay? If he intended on paying the $250 but realized that she was asking for the $750 is he obligated to pay it? Would it satisfy the masses if he paid the $250 that was according to him the agreed upon amount?
Click to expand...


Me said:
$100, $250, $750, doesn't matter once he said he paid, and it never showed.
Click to expand...


I made it bolder since you seemed to have missed my main point. :thumbsup:
 
ToshaMc said:
Would it satisfy the masses if he paid the $250 that was according to him the agreed upon amount?
Click to expand...


Why is it, that people keep on trying to negotiate for David? He has been caught in several lies and for someone who is launching a biz has made himself exceedingly scarce as far as customer service goes. HE is the one who needs to pay Kelly for her work, and settle up with her.

The longer all this goes on, the more readers will decide that they do not want to be customers in a business that makes it a nightmare to try to get some straight communication going if they need some help with something.
David, not Tosha, needs to be here solving the mess that he created.
 
Tosha,

You are trying too hard to become the devil's advocate. That's probably good when there's not enough information about a deal or person. In this case though, the person didn't pay for services agreed upon and said that he had paid ("payment has been sent"). This is what we know as "facts". This is not about popular opinion it's about whether you think is OK not to pay for something you agreed to or not.

Best.
 
lucille said:
Why is it, that people keep on trying to negotiate for David? He has been caught in several lies and for someone who is launching a biz has made himself exceedingly scarce as far as customer service goes. HE is the one who needs to pay Kelly for her work, and settle up with her.

The longer all this goes on, the more readers will decide that they do not want to be customers in a business that makes it a nightmare to try to get some straight communication going if they need some help with something.
David, not Tosha, needs to be here solving the mess that he created.
Click to expand...


I'm not negotiating anything for David. I'm just asking to find out what obligations he has breached.

If you have a contract with me for this service at this amount and midway through I realize I haven't charged you enough are you obligated to pay my new price because I screwed up?
 
ToshaMc said:
I'm not negotiating anything for David. I'm just asking to find out what obligations he has breached.

If you have a contract with me for this service at this amount and midway through I realize I haven't charged you enough are you obligated to pay my new price because I screwed up?
Click to expand...

I do not think that is the fact pattern here. However, HE needs to be here asking what obligations he breached. Instead of hiding out and paying nothing, after services were rendered by Kelly.
 
ToshaMc said:
If you have a contract with me for this service at this amount and midway through I realize I haven't charged you enough are you obligated to pay my new price because I screwed up?
Click to expand...

Of course not. Sheeze... Don't you get it? He clearly agreed to pay SOMETHING for the services he received, and when it was time to settle up, he skulked away. How much he owes is for Mr. Young and the Kordeks to work out, but the fact that he refuses to communicate says it all.

You might want to step away from the keyboard, and, as Shrap suggested, read this thread from post 1. :bandhead0
 
Tosha, if this were a criminal case, there probably wouldn't be enough evidence to convict David. But small claims court? Yeah, there's MORE than enough.

Remember when OJ got off? Then they took it to claims court and he had to pay millions to the victim's families?

Your arguments are filled with holes and what ifs. You just seem to be attempting to come up with excuses that would get David off the hook. At this point, it is his responsibility to fix this issue. Not anyone else's.
 
Bill Stonegate said:
Of course not. Sheeze... Don't you get it? He clearly agreed to pay SOMETHING for the services he received, and when it was time to settle up, he skulked away. How much he owes is for Mr. Young and the Kordeks to work out, but the fact that he refuses to communicate says it all.

You might want to step away from the keyboard, and, as Shrap suggested, read this thread from post 1. :bandhead0
Click to expand...


Yes - no one argues that he agreed to pay something -- but if the contract amount was $250 and that is what he agreed to pay then her insistence on being paid $750 is a breach of contract - if she breaches the contract what is his obligation? I don't get why nobody thinks that is relevant? Would you pay someone 3 times what agreed on for services partially rendered?
 
ToshaMc said:
Yes - no one argues that he agreed to pay something -- but if the contract amount was $250 and that is what he agreed to pay then her insistence on being paid $750 is a breach of contract - if she breaches the contract what is his obligation? I don't get why nobody thinks that is relevant? Would you pay someone 3 times what agreed on for services partially rendered?
Click to expand...


WHY would he say "payment sent" then?
 
If he has a legitimate reason for not paying a cent, then he is more than welcome to present his argument to the BOI with proof.

Kelly has done that exact thing, and has dealt with her own share of personal attacks. She has withstood the whole thing and remained very professional. She has not uttered a single untruth and has not stretched the truth in any way. So far her story has remained consistent from day one. She has backed up everything she has said with evidence.

David, on the other hand, has provided no evidence to back up his claims. He falsified e-mails. He's lied multiple times.

On one last note, anyone enjoy the fact that DJslurp first started posting defending David, and NOW it comes out that he/she works for reptster?
 
ToshaMc said:
If you have a contract with me for this service at this amount and midway through I realize I haven't charged you enough are you obligated to pay my new price because I screwed up?
Click to expand...

Did he post his side of this anywhere here with 'proof' of the amount?

I was waiting after his first post to read the emails and I haven't seen them yet.
 
ToshaMc said:
Yes - no one argues that he agreed to pay something -- but if the contract amount was $250 and that is what he agreed to pay then her insistence on being paid $750 is a breach of contract - if she breaches the contract what is his obligation? I don't get why nobody thinks that is relevant? Would you pay someone 3 times what agreed on for services partially rendered?
Click to expand...

Where is there any evidence that she breached her contract? Show me! David, show us!

Until he can at least back up his argument with some sort of evidence, stop assuming that Kelly's a bad guy in this. What if this? What if that? It's totally inane and pointless.

Here's a hypothetical: Let's say someone dies after being hit by a drunk driver. Let's say the trial starts and the driver refuses to testify. Are you going to still sit there and say, "well, what if it wasn't really his fault? What if the person that was hit was actually forcing him to drive, so it's really her fault?" It's just plain idiotic.
 
ToshaMc said:
Yes - no one argues that he agreed to pay something -- but if the contract amount was $250 and that is what he agreed to pay then her insistence on being paid $750 is a breach of contract - if she breaches the contract what is his obligation? I don't get why nobody thinks that is relevant? Would you pay someone 3 times what agreed on for services partially rendered?
Click to expand...

OK, I can see see this is going nowhere fast.:rolleyes:

If the contract was truly for $250 (unknown, but let's say it was), then any responsible business person would have simply stated that he/she believed the agreement was for $250, paid the $250, and let the chips fall where they may. He has run away and paid nothing. You really should read the entire thread.
 
jayefbe said:
Where is there any evidence that she breached her contract? Show me! David, show us!

Until he can at least back up his argument with some sort of evidence, stop assuming that Kelly's a bad guy in this. What if this? What if that? It's totally inane and pointless.

Here's a hypothetical: Let's say someone dies after being hit by a drunk driver. Let's say the trial starts and the driver refuses to testify. Are you going to still sit there and say, "well, what if it wasn't really his fault? What if the person that was hit was actually forcing him to drive, so it's really her fault?" It's just plain idiotic.
Click to expand...


I'm not making her out to be the bad guy. I'm not saying David is right. He can't prove their agreement was $250 any more than she can prove it was $750 - because their "contract" was verbal, their negotiations were verbal and they apparently didn't communicate very well. Which was the point I started 100 responses ago - in order to prove a breach of contract you need to be able to provide proof of said contract and there isn't any. They could be equally guilty of screwing up the deal - I don't know, you don't know - if you do show me.
 
ToshaMc said:
I'm not making her out to be the bad guy. I'm not saying David is right. He can't prove their agreement was $250 any more than she can prove it was $750 - because their "contract" was verbal, their negotiations were verbal and they apparently didn't communicate very well. Which was the point I started 100 responses ago - in order to prove a breach of contract you need to be able to provide proof of said contract and there isn't any. They could be equally guilty of screwing up the deal - I don't know, you don't know - if you do show me.
Click to expand...


You are confusing two issues, Tosha. One issue is whether or not there is a contract. There is no question but there is a contract here. He promised money "payment sent" she promised services, at least some of which she performed.

The second issue is the amount of the consideration. That issue is not settled. But it would take David to settle it, and he has skulked out.

A third, intertwined issue is emerging. The first two issues are between David and Kelly. The third issue has to do with the general readershio here, and how David's avoidance of the issues will affect his business.
 
Ok, Tosha, have you read the thread, from the very beginning?

I have. I first read the thread when Kelly first posted. I, at the time, hoped that it was a simple misunderstanding. I was planning on using reptster and have had packages sent to me using reptster. I did not want to see the company go under.

All of the e-mails that Kelly originally posted originally stated $750 where the XXX's are. Feel free to ask Kelly to forward the original e-mails to you, I know that she would be more than happy to as she has made that offer numerous times. David, on the other hand, has stated that he has received many paypal payment requests. That was a lie. He stated that he had e-mails that Kelly was hiding. Also a lie. He then produced another "e-mail" to Kelly stating his issue with the payment, this is another fake e-mail.

If there was genuinely a problem with the cost agreed than David could have brought that up with Kelly MONTHS ago. If he had, I am positive that this thread would not be on here right now.

David is a liar. Nothing he has claimed has turned out to be true. Kelly, as all evidence shows, is not a liar.

Tosha, you are saying that Kelly is a liar.

Now, go back to post 1, read the posts that Kelly has made. Read the posts that David has made. Do that and then post what you think.
 
Back
Top