• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Info In response to Natalie Beacom

Aaron-
Let me start by saying that I did not reply to the initial thread, but read every page. I did NOT read every page of this thread because I don't need to.

This thing you are calling a "bandwagon" and an "attack" has nothing to do with the sometimes-wolf=pack-mentality that can be found here. I admit that I have seen cases of jumping on the injured lamb, but THIS is NOT one of those cases.

Your wife claimed to be 501c. That is a lie. When caught in that lie, she "proved" herself with more and more lies.

Your wife claims to run a "rescue" center, yet has animals posted on a variety of forums FOR SALE. That means market value for animals. It doesn't matter if she paid for them, because it plainly says on her site that these exact same animals were ADOPTED. Yet the advertisements clearly show market value prices. It doesn't matter what the intentions are. What matters is the contradtiction. "Adopted" and "Sold" are two different things. A person "selling" animals has no business posting them as "adopted" on a rescue website in an effort to give her center legitimacy. It may not be illegal, but it is still ethically wrong.

Your wife, or the creator of her website acting on her behalf copied and pasted the Code of Ethics from another site. THE CODE OF ETHICS!!! I mean...come on...even YOU have to see the freakin' irony of that. Of all things to be unethical about it's your CODE OF ETHICS!?!?!?

On top of that, she PLAINLY and BLATANTLY states that there are "no reputable rescue centers" in your county. The copy and pasting was from a RECOGNIZED and RESPECTED rescue center IN YOUR COUNTY!!

Oh the irony. Surely you can see how ridiculous that situation is.:shootfoot

And to top it all off...when she was confronted with these accusations, instead of standing up and saying, "You're right. I'm sorry. I have changed these issues", she not only continued to lie and belittle the intelligent people of this site, but she(or you...doesn't matter) and her friends used racial slurs, threats of physical violence, more lies, and childish playground tactics as a matter of "defense".

Now...I agree with you that the name calling, brow bashing, parenting insults, threats, harrassment and phonecalls is uncalled for. So are the lies, the threats, and the racial slurs from your side. On this, I'm quite sure most of us could agree.

But the bottom line is really quite simple. Regardless of the legality of the rescue website and your wife's other for sale ads across the internet, it is morally wrong to present yourself as a legitimate non-profit rescue when you are NOT a legitimate, non-profit, rescue center.

It is ethically wrong to sell an animal at fair market value, and claim it was "adopted out" on the website for your FAKE rescue center.

It is morally wrong to house animals in innappropriate enclosures as a means of "rescue"(referance the large lizards in the ferret cages, and the now-dead crocodilian in the much-too-small aquarium).

It morally AND ethically wrong to resort to bigotry, racism, and threats of physical violence in response to VALID accusations of these wrongdoings.

That really is the bottom line. Everything else in this topic AND the other one is simply the icing on the cake.

Your reactions in this topic have shown the same lack of comprehension of the moral and ethical situations at hand as Natalie's did in the other topic, not to mention the potential legal aspects of attempting to commit capital fraud by claiming 501c status without actual HAVING 501c status. And whether you like it or not...there are screenshots, archives, and caches of the pages showing that claim on her website. That is attempted fraud, and the IRS DOES care about it...they like to get their money, and they don't like people lying about being tax exempt and donations being tax deductible.

Sure...the phonecalls and harrassment need to stop....

So does the lying, the cheating, the plagarism, and the CONTINUED attempt to present herself as a legitimate rescue on OTHER SITES across the interweb. Yes, Aaron...your wife is STILL going around to other websites and presenting herself as a legitimate rescue. Yes, Aaron...your wife is STILL trying to garner support for herself and her "rescue" operations by claiming things which are not true on other websites, as well as her own.

Until those situations are succinctly and permanently rectified by her admission of guilt, the removal of the "rescue" website, and her immediate ceasing of all referances to herself as a "rescue center"...I seriously doubt that they will. You see...it's always been a small world. But with the internet, it gets vastly smaller. And whatever you type on the internet never really goes away, no matter how many times you pres "ctrl/alt/delete"...
 
Before you go waving a Level 9 flag, you might want to do a search to see why that whole thing got started.

Chuck saved you the trouble of searching...
(you've been soooo helpful lately, Chuck!!)
 
Now...I agree with you that the name calling, brow bashing, parenting insults, threats, harrassment and phonecalls is uncalled for. So are the lies, the threats, and the racial slurs from your side. On this, I'm quite sure most of us could agree.

I believe there is a necessary evil in some cases. I don't believe it is right to provocate everyone in every instance, but certainly it worked out just swell in this case, didn't it?
 
I believe there is a necessary evil in some cases. I don't believe it is right to provocate everyone in every instance, but certainly it worked out just swell in this case, didn't it?

I disagree. I do not believe that "The ends justify the means". In order to maintain the highest level of integrity of your own character, why stoop to the lowest common denominator?

I think Deborah Broadus is the PERFECT example of this in the other topic. In a situation where one could have EASILY justified and even applauded her losing her temper and returning insults, she conducted herself in a manner that upheld her own level of integrity, and showed a level of class that isn't often found in society. Even when she made the claim herself that she had lost her temper...it never showed. She always held her head high, and responded with class and self-respect. She made her point VERY clear...but she did it with class.

I don't believe in lowering myself to a standard that does not fit my personal character, and I won't do it, regardless of any justifiable reasoning. That's not to say that anyone else is not welcome to respond in any manner they see fit. It is merely my personal opinion.

That's also not to say that I don't agree with you 100% on the intent of your words in both topics, because I absolutely do. Everyone has their own way of "rousting the rubbish" as it were, and yours does work...I just choose to use a different tactic.

You asked...;)
 
And honestly the main person its coming from is the only person that's Local...so as stated if it does continue i will do what i have to. And just to clear it up. That 1 person hasn't even replied to this thread. It just needs to stop

EXCUSE me? I haven't made any calls to your house. Don't you DARE start accusing me of e-mails and phone calls. If we're playing it like that, then post EVIDENCE IMMEDIATELY.

NOW I'm pissed off.
 
Keep in mind, Mr. and Mrs. Beacom, that I WILL take all steps necessary to trace your call history and PROVE that I have NEVER made a call to your house.

I can also PROVE that there has not been any e-mails sent from me since Natalie contacted me through craigslist weeks ago.

I received a blank e-mail from Natalie about 2 days ago, which I found rather fishy.
 
EXCUSE me? I haven't made any calls to your house. Don't you DARE start accusing me of e-mails and phone calls. If we're playing it like that, then post EVIDENCE IMMEDIATELY.

NOW I'm pissed off.



Did i say it was you? not once did i ever single anyone out....you must be feeling gulity....go ahead do what you can to trace the calls...well see you at the swmo herp meeting tomorrow night then you can tell us how pissed you are in front of everyone
 
bill your making a case to make yourself no better than me or my wife... i hope you understand that..



also go ahead contact hp...i never said i was a system admin for them...and even if i were they would love to hear someone say im a racist to them...because they would just laugh it off and take the next call...enjoy
 
yep..looks like someones never heard of photoshop..

Are you seriously going to suggest that you photoshop'd your son into that photo?

Why didn't you photoshop your wife sitting on the car hood? Didnt know how to create a crater in the hood?

Like I said earlier folks.....this is just going to get funnier and funnier.
 
I didn't want to say anything, cause this isn't about me and I don't want to make it about me by jumping in. I said what I needed to say and as far as I am concerned, those people no longer exist for me (who were they by the way?:shrug01:), but I also don't want anyone thinking that Chuck doesn't have a lot of class.

He is very classy in what he does and very effective at playing the "bad cop" in Good cop - Bad cop.
 
I didn't want to say anything, cause this isn't about me and I don't want to make it about me by jumping in. I said what I needed to say and as far as I am concerned, those people no longer exist for me (who were they by the way?:shrug01:), but I also don't want anyone thinking that Chuck doesn't have a lot of class.

He is very classy in what he does and very effective at playing the "bad cop" in Good cop - Bad cop.

Thank you Deb. :)
 
Back
Top