Valley Dragons
New member
Denisebme said:What drives me crazy here is that you really can't have it both ways. The tests are either great, or they are meaningless, they can't be both.
The huge problem with the research as done of the University of Florida is that they aren't publishing any statistical data on the animals that they test, and as far as I know, no one is, which is always going to leave a question as to how much stock you can place in the research.
For a lot of us, this isn't a "potential" problem. We've heard from breeders who have had die offs and from people caring for sick dragons, and that first hand information is enough for us to make a decision.
What drives ME crazy is that IT HAS TO BE BOTH WAYS to make an effective argument! I think it is great if people want to test, but without knowing what those tests MEAN, then what is the point? You CAN'T know what the tests mean, unless you know the health status of the animal that tested positive! I agree 100% that more statistics need to be published.
Jamie