puppytoes72
New member
i didnt re-hash anything.i simply answered someone's question about why we didnt trust vickie.can you answer my question now?
you are right sherri! dennis,you would rather defend someone that only gives a crap about the money and turn around an attack a girl for making a decision to rehome some beardies so she can take off time from work to take care of her son?? you are lower than low.whiskersmom said:Your little jabs are ineffectual and childish. If you think you can run some people away from this topic, you are SADLY mistaken. You do not corner the market on this subject nor do you get to decide who participates in it.
For you to say one person wasn't able to feed their dragons was low, very low and just shows your caliber.
We will stay and post our opinions for as long as humanely possible.
I bet as a child you didn't play fairly.
screw you dennisDennis Hultman said:
No, what I find hard to understand is that you and Michele have pressed so hard that they respond about this mutation that when they do the only question you could muster up after their responses is if Vicki was lying about how many silkies she received or rehashing the inbreeding question that has been answered on three threads now.Which brings us right back to why the other thread was closed.
That is where this was one is heading too.
puppytoes72 said:you are right sherri! dennis,you would rather defend someone that only gives a crap about the money and turn around an attack a girl for making a decision to rehome some beardies so she can take off time from work to take care of her son?? you are lower than low.screw you dennis
how does that have anything to do with the issue at hand? whiskersmom said:So what you are saying is only breeders are allowed to have concerns whether this practice should be done? And who was it that couldn't feed their dragons six months ago? What does any of that have to do with this thread?
And by the way, buddy, all concerns are legitimate, no matter what your lord and highness thinks.
walker75 said:Honestly, did you think Alessandro and Vickie could come here and talk about the silks like some people talk about underwear and no one would question the ethics of inbreeding? Get real. Of course we're going to bring up inbreeding...it took place.
6 months ago I asked some real good questions of the Dachiu's!! They never answered nor tried to answer. The reason I asked was to give the Dachiu's and others a reason to say what the future holds. What is apparent is that they will kept secret anything they feel they can and must till the time is right then QHAM it hits the internet. How are people suppose to react??? Dachiu does amongst other breeders have a well publicise name.
I and others look towards them to lead and give answers to things that they do know about such as Andeo. I am sure they have had mass die offs and have purged them or tried to from there colony and they are not alone in this action..
People looks towards the so call major breeders as if all everything they do is correct and justified. It has been proven they are wrong,
Many good hearted and well intended people have been devastated by this Virus, at the same time many will not come forward on their own.
I really do wish the Dachiu's would participate in the research that Cali Dragons and Valley Dragons have taken up on their web sites .
If Dachiu would show the lead in trying to help us the reptile community to future our knowledge on the Adenovirus and also the Silkback Dragon I am sure many many more people would come forward. we would beable to get some answers
Honestly, did you think Alessandro and Vickie could come here and talk about the silks like some people talk about underwear and no one would question the ethics of inbreeding? Get real. Of course we're going to bring up inbreeding...it took place.
Dennis Hultman said:
Your wrong Tere. I would never state such a thing to you. How could you even think that I was speaking of you.
Originally Posted by puppytoes72
EVERYTHING.its unnatural and wrong to inbreed for a "project" and the almighty dollar
Saladragon said:Because I'm not stupid, Dennis. There's nobody else on this thread that knowingly had financial problems last year...or six months ago, whatever.
It really doesn't matter anymore, Dennis. None of this even matters anymore. I'll just slink back to my dying dragons now. Thanks for the fun.
plz help,my new bd wont eat
i just got my 1st bd and it wont eat,i researched everything b4 i bought it so i think its environment is ok.i tried putting crickets in his home and i also tried feeding him in a seperate tank.its been 24 hours.any suggestions??
Dennis Hultman said:The post I was referring to
It was cheap, immature shoot back. After being called unethical in the other thread. I have never had my ethics questioned here before in regards to the treatment of my animals or myself, business and I'm still a little miffed about it.
I'm still amazed that you would assume I was talking about you.
walker75 said:And this is the point. Nowhere in all of the reptile industry is responsible line breeding a "question" to prove a morph. Every single ad in the snake forum. Every morph had to be proved to sell it as such.
__________________
Key word Responsable this is what all this is about !!!
Being responsiveable and having trust in what you are buying as a customer from a supposed Reptable Breeder.. !!!
That what they say is true and they are and have been responsiveable and honest
I also understand linebreeding and all BUT what I can not understand is the continued evasiveness and the direct bullcrap. Really
Dennis Hultman said:Yes, I understand what you are stating. But the argument that I have been making is from a general standpoint. Sherri and Michele are not making that direct argument about Vicki either. They have consistently stated all is wrong with the way any morph is proven out. I'm debating the point of line-breeding not who is doing it.
and btw....you dont have to be a genetics expert to know that breeding close relatives is INBREEDING Dennis Hultman said:I was merely making a point in regards to both Sherri and Michele experience in regards to their charge of inbreeding to create a morph when they simple don't have the facts. The comment I made was about Michele lacking the knowledge or shall I say being a newbie only six months ago and now she is stating what breeders do to prove out their morphs is wrong. The person has a total lack of knowledge when it comes to genetics.
Most every single morph project had to be lined-breed to be proven.
I'm really surprised that you would think I was addressing you.
whiskersmom said:That is not what I've been trying to say....have you not seen this so called Bearded Dragon??? IT DOESN'T HAVE SCALES!!!! That would be like someone "line breeding" you and your sister so that your children can be born without skin. When have I ever brought up snakes or geckos? If I have, it was in a general statement. But I will definitely go on record stating that I believe that it's against the laws of nature for relatives to procreate. Period. Now if that makes me a person who doesn't belong in this thread, oh well, sucks to be you....you'll just have to ignore me.
While it is true, I'm not a geneticist or a biologist but neither are any of you. Just because you have been breeding in this manner doesn't mean it is ok or ethical.
I may not have the experience in line breeding but I do have basic intelligence and you insinuating that I or Michele have nothing to bring to the table is wrong. You just don't like what we have to say. And Dennis, I have spoken to breeders that have said that this isn't how they would conduct business. Not every breeder believes in line breeding.....they're just a little smarter then me in coming here.