TripleMoonsExotic
New member
Rich already owns a BOI only site (BoardOfInquiry.com). He has also stated he has no plans to sell it at this point. The choices were close it all down or members step up and provide monetary support to back it up.
Rich already owns a BOI only site (BoardOfInquiry.com). He has also stated he has no plans to sell it at this point. The choices were close it all down or members step up and provide monetary support to back it up.
Too bad you couldn't put one of those little thermometers on the site. Like the ones that libraries use, when they are doing a fund raiser. As they get closer and closer to their $$ goal, it gets filled in. It doesn't have to have any numbers on it, if that was something you are worried about. It would give us something to shoot for, a goal anyway?!?! Right now, we are just shooting into the dark and/or we have to keep buggin you for numbers and you have enough headaches, as is.
Just a thought,
Wayne
The thing is, a very large portion of the membership seems to be unaware that this is taking place...or simply doesn't care.
What purpose would such an indicator serve, other than to allow those of us that do care to breathe a sigh of relief if the magic number is reached. Some people are going to contribute. Some may sit and watch, thinking that if the goal is not reached they will jump in before the close...but more likely will somehow forget to take that step. Some will probably watch, rooting for the demise of the BOI.
Why promote a bare minimum mentality? The BOI is a great tool. What's wrong with people supporting it because they use it...without regard for whether some arbitrary number is reached? And really, what Rich has been talking about is a minimum number. Would it be bad to have 30 more people contribute...or 300? The more the better, IMO. Unfortunately, as things have been outlined, it doesn't sound like after the fact support will help keep the BOI open once it shifts to contributor access only. I understand Rich's logic - after all, he's got his life to consider, and he HAS tried the paid access thing before.
It would probably be a violation of the site TOS. Namely the part about spamming and you would ban me!
Or would you? 
But that does bring up a good idea. How about a mass email for the users of the forum, outlining the story and what's going on/will be done. Since there are so many who are saying they had no idea, and so many more never come to any section of the site where things like this are posted, is it worth a shot?
A mass PM would avoid that issue. That said, I hate getting those things.
Actually I don't believe this system has the capability of a mass PM. Even if it did, most people have their user cp set to send them an email notice upon receipt of a PM, so I would STILL get flooded with those bounce back emails.
Chances are you'd have much less bounced back e-mails too.didnt Allen belcher want to buy this site he offered in a thread![]()
Just my two cents but if you only allow paying members to post on the BOI -- you are thereby requiring people to pay if they want to defend themselves. If they choose not to then they get slammed by the paying members. Sorry just doesn't seem impartial.