Codominant - an allele that causes the homozygous form to look different than wild type and the heterozygous form to have traits of both. (All three look different from each other.)
Dominant - an allele that causes the homozygous form and the heterozygous form to look the same as each other, but different than wild type.
I think this should say: Any pastel carrier that isn't a super pastel is het-for-super pastel not het for pastel.Therefore, any pastel carrier that isn't a super pastel is het-for-pastel![]()
anyone have a chart like for what to breed to make different types of morphs? liek what a lesser and lesser would make or lesserx mojave things of that nature. i am new to this morph stuff and although i have a few carpet pythons i have no ball pythons but im looking to getting into them i would just liek to know what the basic charts making different types of morphs or make good pairings.
Got ya!Playball, you'll have to forgive them on the pastel...it was the first codom BP morph that was "discovered". When two pastels were bred and the homozygous form stood out, they called it a super. That term stuck, and has been used in other morphs and even other species to describe the homozygous form of dom/codom traits (even if it isn't used in the name)
Those are great links, thanksTheHerpinator said:I found a couple. Pretty interesting stuff.
http://www.ballpython.ca/what_get/dominant.html
http://bryanbrownreptiles.com/genetics
This is what I was getting at! It is not het for pastel, its het for super pastel. So advertising a snake as het for pastel is not correct.I think this should say: Any pastel carrier that isn't a super pastel is het-for-super pastel not het for pastel.
Just like a mojave is het for lucy or a yellow belly is het for ivory
I'll agree that selling a snake as het for pastel isn't quite correct...This is what I was getting at! It is not het for pastel, its het for super pastel. So advertising a snake as het for pastel is not correct.![]()