I was just making an observation as a person who likes to read the BOI, on occasion. I read this entire thread and I can see that Vinny, seems to be a caring person.
I sometimes think that in our business, it's more about doing what is right by our customers, then about our "TOS" agreements. In my opinion, I think a TOS is a guarantee to our customers that we stand behind the animals that we sell. Not a "we stand behind our animals, as long as it's inside the terms of our TOS and is something goes wrong, outside of that time, then is sorry about your luck" agreement! Granted, there are times when we need to put our foot down, but is this one of them?
Yes, Vinny did offer a replacement snake to Kathy. But, can you blame Kathy for not taking that offer, considering that she had 2 (two) problems with the snake that she received? Would you have taken the replacement, considering? I certainly wouldn't have! And, I don't get the impression that Kathy is looking for a hand out. All I think she is trying to do, is become semi whole in this situation. She did pay $400 for something and what does she have to show for it? That's not including the Veterinary costs associated with that animal, that she only had for five or six weeks.
To me, sometimes, it's more about doing what is morally right, then what is outlined in a TOS agreement! Especially, when there is a possibility that the problem could have existed prior to selling the animal. But hey, that is JMO!
Wayne