• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Beware of Jeane Best & Wendy Childs

Has it been pointed out that she sells as dragon lady 99212 on kingsnake? Unfortunately if someone does a search for Dragon lady 99212 will they find the information on Wendy?
 
romad119 said:
Well they must be ok, they have no negative trader ratings. A system only works if you use it. Just like with TSE, you only help them by not accuratley giving them a thumbs up or down.

Most people won't read through every post and will click on their profile to see an unblemished trading history.....

I would add to their trader rating, but am not a contributing member of this forum.

Also, I'm not saying all their deals were terrible... I'm just saying that there were many, many misunderstandings between us. I would still like to get them worked out if she would answer my emails.
 
Jeanne Best & Wendy Childs should be avoided!

I have had my own run-in with this pair regarding hybridizing Rankins Dragons with Beardeds to get "color" as well as some of their other questionable dealings and practices. Suffice it to say, they are to be avoided at all cost on any level!...MHO...this is not an unsubstantiated "slam"...have e-mail threads and documentation of my own as well as those of 2 reputable Rankins breeders to support my statements...very LONG story, so won't post any of the threads here...just thought I'd add to the list of growing warnings about these people...
 
ladywhipple02 said:
I would add to their trader rating, but am not a contributing member of this forum.

Also, I'm not saying all their deals were terrible... I'm just saying that there were many, many misunderstandings between us. I would still like to get them worked out if she would answer my emails.

The trader rating reflects individual deals. You wouldn’t be stating all their deals were bad. You would be just reflecting on your particular deal. It may save someone some headaches in the future.

After the flat out lies she told about your shipment, I admire your hopefulness in resolving the “misunderstandings”.
 
Otter_23 said:
Unfortunately if someone does a search for Dragon lady 99212 will they find the information on Wendy?

They will. If they use the search function.

dragonlady99212
dragonlady 99212
dragon lady 99212


No matter which way they search.
 
Online names...

The last coorespondence I had with the Best woman, she was listing these monikers:

DragonLady99212 - KingSnake.com
SpokaneLizardLady - ReptileAuctions.com
DragonLady509 - Ebay.com
DragonLady509 - GunBroker.com

My involvement with her was on reptileauctions.com...since Wendy got more involved, not sure how many names they are using...gotta say given what I went through with them, I find the GunBroker.com a bit scary! :uzi:
 
Ratings...

ladywhipple02 said:
I would add to their trader rating, but am not a contributing member of this forum.

Also, I'm not saying all their deals were terrible... I'm just saying that there were many, many misunderstandings between us. I would still like to get them worked out if she would answer my emails.

I think many people don't respond after a negative experience...
Here is the feedback I left and her response on reptileauctions.com--think it says a lot...this was just the beginning of my conflict with her and Wendy regarding what they are doing...went on for some time and the email threads are downright scary...

Spokanelizardlady Feb. 11, 2006 15:05:30 Sold animal as stated. Buyer now has a problem with what someone else other than breeder is claiming and instead of taking it up with us has choose to leave us neg feedback! Animal is as stated in auction. I held up my end of the deal and do not agree that this is a "hybrid" animal as YOU claim. I can PROVE it. Neg Feedback was unwaranted. BAD NEWBIE. Need to do reaseach BEFORE you purchase!
Feedback Edited

purchaseTrader Responded
Well Jeanne, I have evidence in your own words and photos that proves you are continuing to misrepresent these animals. They are NOT pure Rankins and you know it. A complaint with supporting facts regarding your listing tactics has been filed and is being investigated. You need to stand behind your chosen project and stop misrepresenting HYBRIDS as PURE stock! Yes, if I had done more research before buying, I would have passed...interesting you seem to be blaming this on me when you are the breeder!
 
Still threatening me...

MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Originating-IP: [70.57.167.59]
X-Originating-Email: [[email protected]]
X-Sender: [email protected]
Received: from bay0-omc2-s32.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.168]) by bay0-imc3-s31.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:19:11 -0700
Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.224.47]) by bay0-omc2-s32.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:19:02 -0700
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:19:02 -0700
Received: from 65.54.224.200 by by105fd.bay105.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:19:01 GMT
X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt2UqMZP8F89WH/kzoyj12XZOHUWsaVtjJs=
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jul 2006 09:19:02.0091 (UTC) FILETIME=[5CB769B0:01C6B482]
Return-Path: [email protected]

Here is an email that Jeane sent me this morning:
"Lynn, I got an email from Jim saying you wanted to speak to me. I have not heard a word from you since the below email saying you were refunding me. I emailed 2 more times then filed with Paypal. It was the appropriate thing to do, however I was aware they do not cover animals. My bank however says that what happened falls under "unfair business practices" and they suggest I charge back. I would request you refund me the agreed amount to my paypal account at [email protected] by tomm. If not then I will do the paperwork when I make my rounds doing errons tommorrow.

I have been extremely patient. You said you were refunding me 15 days ago.The gecko I am left with is a mALE by the way, not a female. Overall I am completely disatisfied and have gone backwards in vet bills now. To be left with an animal I had to buy another cage for to house solo and have no need for."

I did, indeed, as Jim of ChamCo to bespeak her for me because I haven't been able to get through to her. I emailed her twice trying to work things out. She wouldn't answer. I just wanted to make things right... but she's still threatening me (this email was sent from Jeane's account, but signed by Wendy, by the way). Also, there's a lot of stuff that doesn't make sense with this... The gecko that she says is male is clearly listed on her website as female. It's the gecko named MindEraser (and I can provide photo proof it's mine).

My question though... can she really go through the bank to do a charge back?
 
ladywhipple02 said:
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Originating-IP: [70.57.167.59]
X-Originating-Email: [[email protected]]
X-Sender: [email protected]
Received: from bay0-omc2-s32.bay0.hotmail.com ([65.54.246.168]) by bay0-imc3-s31.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:19:11 -0700
Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.224.47]) by bay0-omc2-s32.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:19:02 -0700
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 02:19:02 -0700
Received: from 65.54.224.200 by by105fd.bay105.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:19:01 GMT
X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt2UqMZP8F89WH/kzoyj12XZOHUWsaVtjJs=
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jul 2006 09:19:02.0091 (UTC) FILETIME=[5CB769B0:01C6B482]
Return-Path: [email protected]

Here is an email that Jeane sent me this morning:
"Lynn, I got an email from Jim saying you wanted to speak to me. I have not heard a word from you since the below email saying you were refunding me. I emailed 2 more times then filed with Paypal. It was the appropriate thing to do, however I was aware they do not cover animals. My bank however says that what happened falls under "unfair business practices" and they suggest I charge back. I would request you refund me the agreed amount to my paypal account at [email protected] by tomm. If not then I will do the paperwork when I make my rounds doing errons tommorrow.

I have been extremely patient. You said you were refunding me 15 days ago.The gecko I am left with is a mALE by the way, not a female. Overall I am completely disatisfied and have gone backwards in vet bills now. To be left with an animal I had to buy another cage for to house solo and have no need for."

I did, indeed, as Jim of ChamCo to bespeak her for me because I haven't been able to get through to her. I emailed her twice trying to work things out. She wouldn't answer. I just wanted to make things right... but she's still threatening me (this email was sent from Jeane's account, but signed by Wendy, by the way). Also, there's a lot of stuff that doesn't make sense with this... The gecko that she says is male is clearly listed on her website as female. It's the gecko named MindEraser (and I can provide photo proof it's mine).

My question though... can she really go through the bank to do a charge back?

My answer would be, don't give this piece of trash a penny. She can certainly attempt to initiate a chargeback but I think you have plenty of proof . She is a scammer and a nutjob.
 
ladywhipple02 said:
My question though... can she really go through the bank to do a charge back?

Yes....
To head her off, you can contact your bank and give them the documentation to support your position on the refund.

If you mailed the goods - you can also file a complaint with the division for Mail Fraud. https://www.usps.com/postalinspectors/fraud/MailFraudComplaint.htm

For Internet Crime:
http://www.ic3.gov/

For Fraud:
http://www.fraud.org/

Better Business Bureau:
http://www.bbb.org/complaint.asp

Federal Trade Commission:
https://rn.ftc.gov/pls/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01

~~~~~~~~~~
Morgana Calvert
 
Also, be sure and remind her that, in her own words in this thread, she stated that the geckos arrived in perfect condition and even provided the tracking number with her claim.....
 
Okay guys... I've done a lot of thinking about it, most of the day today, but also since this whole thing started. Today, I came to a conclusion that I'm sure many of you will disagree with: I paid Jeane and Wendy their money. I sent them the $75 that I told them I would send before they put the claim on me.

I did it because now no one, including them, can say that I haven't acted with complete professionalism in this matter. I never threatened them, even when they filed the claim, and though they threatened me many times with legal retribution. My emails were always courteous. I have done what I said I would do. I simply want this transaction to be done with... and now it is.

I would like to thank everyone for their support! You all have helped me towards my decisions and I appreciate that.
 
ladywhipple02 said:
Okay guys... I've done a lot of thinking about it, most of the day today, but also since this whole thing started. Today, I came to a conclusion that I'm sure many of you will disagree with: I paid Jeane and Wendy their money. I sent them the $75 that I told them I would send before they put the claim on me.

I did it because now no one, including them, can say that I haven't acted with complete professionalism in this matter. I never threatened them, even when they filed the claim, and though they threatened me many times with legal retribution. My emails were always courteous. I have done what I said I would do. I simply want this transaction to be done with... and now it is.

I would like to thank everyone for their support! You all have helped me towards my decisions and I appreciate that.

Somehow I don't think you have heard the last of them. They out will try to milk more money of you I am sure. Sorry you got involved with them at all!
 
Let them try, lol. There isn't much to milk!

In all seriousness, however, I know they will probably feel like they have won, and feel obligated to take advantage of that. But I have upheld my end of the agreement. There is absolutely nothing that says otherwise. If they want to fight for more, it will, indeed, be a fight.
 
ladywhipple02 said:
In all seriousness, however, I know they will probably feel like they have won, QUOTE]
Lynn, With all due respect.....They did win.....They threatened you, You caved...I have read this whole thing from the beginning and there was never any proof that any of what you sent to these career criminals "DIED" MHO is that they got 2 live animals and got you for $75, so in essence Wendy/Jeane have won. :bawling: :hot:
 
ladywhipple02 said:
Let them try, lol. There isn't much to milk!

In all seriousness, however, I know they will probably feel like they have won, and feel obligated to take advantage of that. But I have upheld my end of the agreement. There is absolutely nothing that says otherwise. If they want to fight for more, it will, indeed, be a fight.

Have they withdrawn the PayPal complaint???
 
lynn, you caved.

It is precisely because of people caving as you did that the nutjobs like wendy and jeane get away with as much as they do.

You totally blew it. You were robbed and then you paid for the pleasure.
 
I knew I was going to get this.

I didn't cave. I sent them an email telling them that I was going to send them the $75 before any of this happened. I'm upholding my end of the deal. I'm proving that when it comes right down to it, I'm a person who takes responsibility... even when they clearly do not.

I'm sorry you all feel this way... please don't think so little of me.
 
Wilomn said:
lynn, you caved.

It is precisely because of people caving as you did that the nutjobs like wendy and jeane get away with as much as they do.

You totally blew it. You were robbed and then you paid for the pleasure.

Maybe they feel like they got away with something with me. Let them. But the story has been told by more than one person and their reputation here---as well as in much of the reptile industry---is ruined. No one's going to be buying a gecko or a dragon from them for awhile.

They lied, I didn't. They threatened, I didn't.

I upheld my part of the bargain, even when they did not.
 
Back
Top