kmurphy
New member
Kevin, you are mistaken. You also are not in possession of the PM's between Lynn and I. For future reference Kevin, it is for the seller to request whatever proof they feel is offered, or feel should be offered, from a buyer with a claim. If the seller has questions, the seller should ask them. Is this rocket science? If you are telling me it is my position as neither the seller nor the buyer to make one or the other do such, you are a bit out of touch with the mechanics of a deal. I made recommendations in private to both parties. Some were taken. Some not. I would question your impartiality if it mattered to me Kevin. It does not. BTW, all I took as "fact" about claims that were made is that they were claims.
The "rocket science" of this thread Jim, is why you would put yourself in the middle of this transaction and act as the scammer's mouthpiece when they are unwilling to come here and present their own defense. From your posts it appears you do represent the seller. If you don't like the moniker stop getting in the middle. And for the record, I am completely impartial, unless you call thinking Wendy and Jeanne are no good lying scum as holding some prejudice towards them. I have never met either of the participants and Lynn just came into this thread. So my experience with them is just what I've read here, unlike yourself. If you made "recommendations" to both parties then you should have recommended the Lynn ask to see the vet report. I stand by the statement that an impartial party would have.


<cough>