• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Beware of Jeane Best & Wendy Childs

Kevin, you are mistaken. You also are not in possession of the PM's between Lynn and I. For future reference Kevin, it is for the seller to request whatever proof they feel is offered, or feel should be offered, from a buyer with a claim. If the seller has questions, the seller should ask them. Is this rocket science? If you are telling me it is my position as neither the seller nor the buyer to make one or the other do such, you are a bit out of touch with the mechanics of a deal. I made recommendations in private to both parties. Some were taken. Some not. I would question your impartiality if it mattered to me Kevin. It does not. BTW, all I took as "fact" about claims that were made is that they were claims.

The "rocket science" of this thread Jim, is why you would put yourself in the middle of this transaction and act as the scammer's mouthpiece when they are unwilling to come here and present their own defense. From your posts it appears you do represent the seller. If you don't like the moniker stop getting in the middle. And for the record, I am completely impartial, unless you call thinking Wendy and Jeanne are no good lying scum as holding some prejudice towards them. I have never met either of the participants and Lynn just came into this thread. So my experience with them is just what I've read here, unlike yourself. If you made "recommendations" to both parties then you should have recommended the Lynn ask to see the vet report. I stand by the statement that an impartial party would have.
 
Well, I have to say, that gecko is most assuradly a male. Wendy (if you are reading), can you post the vet report that states that the other has coccidia?
 
Kevin, my position throughout has been about what a customer should expect from a seller. I speak for myself with regard to all those expectations, and all opinions are mine. You choose more of these pathetic assumptions about me, and the conclusion that I draw is that you think that I should be standing with you calling people "no good lying scum", etc, and commiserating with Lynn as the chargeback went through? I thank you <cough> for the continuing example. OBTW, Lynn gets it. You don't.

Tim in St. Louis. You did receive a PM about your concerns. Put simply, people who too often find themselves knee-deep in excrement need to find a better compass by which they navigate, and choose their footfalls with a bit more caution. ;)
 
Gecko_Den said:
I would have believed her without the pictures, after all the male reproductive organs are her area of expertise....... :rolleyes:

Burn!!! Nice one Sam! :)
 
I am wondering WHY so much has to be done privately. I am wondering WHY jimbo is soooooooooooooooooooooooooooo very involved in this. I am wondering WHY he has so much to say to so many that he wants SECRET.

I much prefer to have things in the open where there is less chance for error of omission or collusion, such as we have seen here from day one with jimbo and his whores.

When so much has to be done in private one can't help but think there is some reason to keep it in the dark

I wonder what that reason is.
 
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Wes ! I guess you wish it were legal for you to sit at your neighbor's mailbox and open their mail as well !

As you know, or better put, as you have demonstrated, the confidentiality of a PM is only as good as the honor of the recipient :rofl: Weren't you also the one about a week ago wondering why everything is Jim Jim Jim ! :rofl: Wes, you are the true gift that keeps giving, and I thank you :IThankYou
 
jimbo, the simple fact you missed with your pm is this.

You never bothered to find out if I wanted to play your game. You sent me something and asked that I keep it private. I never aquiessed, never said I would.

YOU ASSumed.

Had you asked first, things may have been different. There are many things I know that I have never said word one about because I said I wouldn't.

My honour is not in question here, not by anyone who matters.

Yours however, has been SEVERELY questioned.

Way to go not answering the questions too. You and your whores are good at that.
 
While I do agree that the BOI is a good tool, Sometimes handling things in a private correspondence seems to work rather well also.Some times doing mediator through Pm's gets better results then watching page upon page of pissing contests,through Pm's cooler heads prevail and things come to a quicker resolution. Ok now everybody take a step back and think.....The BOI gets things done...Right ?.....Jim through his Pm's accomplished the same things did he not ???? So what is the big deal how this was handled ? It got done didn't it ??
 
Jim, the reason this thread is more about you than most, is because you're speaking for the seller in her absence. You believe yourself to be middle of the road on this but every one of your posts have a Best/Childs slant. You're clearly not posting here asking for Wendy to produce vet reports or asking about the inconsistencies in her statements and emails. That wouldn't even be a negative post in regards to her. If she has them, being her advocate, your advice would be post it on the BOI and shut those a$$holes up. But you're leaving that up to the seller to do. Well, Jim, the BOI has never worked that way before. It's only by the constant pressure from the community, friend and foe alike, that scammers have to produce or shut up. (Well Wendy has already shut up- personally that is).
 
It got done didn't it ??

What got done Bill? Lynn gave Wendy what she wanted. (By the way I agree with Sammy. Two thumbs up from me for doing what she felt was right.)
Wendy has left a bunch of unanswered questions that aren't going away just because Lynn capitulated to her demands. I can't see how anyone can be satisfied with the results here, and that includes the Childs/Best duo.
 
kmurphy said:
What got done Bill? Lynn gave Wendy what she wanted. (By the way I agree with Sammy. Two thumbs up from me for doing what she felt was right.)
What got done was Lynn did the right thing..She gave Wendy what she felt was owed..Yes a big thumbs up.
Wendy has left a bunch of unanswered questions that aren't going away just because Lynn capitulated to her demands. I can't see how anyone can be satisfied with the results here, and that includes the Childs/Best duo.
Kevin, With all due respect. It doesn't matter how many times Wendy/Jeane posted nobody would be satisfied with the results.Yes there are alot of unanswered questions and they will go on unanswered that is life and all the ranting and raving will never change that, :rolleyes: People will always form their on opinions on whether or not they will do business with them. I for one won't .....only because they deal in thing that have legs. :raspberry
 
It doesn't matter how many times Wendy/Jeane posted nobody would be satisfied with the results.Yes there are alot of unanswered questions and they will go on unanswered that is life and all the ranting and raving will never change that,

Unfortunately this may be true Bill but I, for one, would offer Wendy my sincerest apologies if that vet report showed up.
 
Kevin,

I try to refrain from insults, although I do have my moments of tossing them when well deserved. Here's what you say:
Jim, the reason this thread is more about you than most, is because you're speaking for the seller in her absence. You believe yourself to be middle of the road on this but every one of your posts have a Best/Childs slant. You're clearly not posting here asking for Wendy to produce vet reports or asking about the inconsistencies in her statements and emails.

Now Kevin, are you always dumb as a stump, or just now? I guess since only 90% of the people here are calling Wendy and Jeane whores, asking questions only of them, that I have erred in not making it 95% ? Maybe you lost sight of the fact that the vet reports were offered to the seller, and she declined them? :slamit: <cough>

Wes, posterboy, thank you <cough>. :bluegrab:
 
Hey, Jim... as a matter of clarification:Neither Wendy nor Jeane has once offered to show me a vet report. Jeane did offer to send the dead gecko to WSU to have a necropsy performed, and told me it would cost an extra $48 for the necropsy and $18 for overnight shipping. At the time, I chose not to do this because all my other geckos were tested and healthy.

I went through the emails and looked. Just wanted that known to everyone.
 
Jim you're right I assume to much. For example is assumed you to be an intelligent man, but now I admit that I may have been hasty in that assumption, my apologies Jim, it won't happen again. It always amazes me that people can't debate issues without interjecting derogatory adjectives that have no bearing on the poiint they are trying to make. It only serves to be inflammatory and shows someone that has a lack of conviction in their stance.

Jim this happens to a BOI thread, here for the public to see, and more than me on the BOI are asking for the reports. It makes little difference whether Lynn is asking for it. If Wendy is satisfied with the way this has turned out, when it would be so simple to put it to bed, then so be it. I have never called them whores, or insulted you till now, so I don't know where you're coming from with that part of your post.
 
Kevin,
My reference to the name calling was not meant as an accusation that you had done it. Only that I had not. But I do take exception with those fixated on a view that my questions have to be in lock-step with theirs, and frankly laugh at it. Many have asked for the report, except the one person to whom it mattered. I have made some attempts to get the report in the thread, but the jury is still out on that. It requires the permission of the vet, who looked at a few pages of this thread, and was quite aghast at the conduct observed here ...... imagine that ! The vet does not want her name accessable to posters here. Now that's the BOI I know ! I have contacted an intermediary in the hopes of satisfying the feeding frenzy.

By your own admission Kevin, if a vet report is produced, you owe an apology. Maybe if you didn't rush to put your foot in your mouth, you wouldn't be in that position ?

Lynn, I can only speak for myself, but if you were aware that a vet had concluded coccidia and other parasites, and did not ask for a report, then that would constitute declining your assumed right to see it. A necropsy was specifically offered to you, as the cost was included in the offer. If you had a communication where you asked for a vet report, and were told "No", then there might be merit with your not having it being the fault of another.

All you chest thumpers, and especially you Wes, you pusillanimous pipsqueak. Wendy was a porn star. She was by her own admission a prostitute as well. I do not have a whore at present, although back in my military days I was often in countries where such was legal. Hmmmmmmmm. But many of you, and especially you Wes, keep referring to the "whores Jeane and Wendy" etc. You are a class act Wes ... a real piece of ...... class.
 
Wtf??????????

Oh my god!! Is any of this really necessary?? Pornography, name calling, insults, and plain old nastiness towards each other....Is that what the BOI has come to?? A thumping ground full of those trying to one up each other??

Gentlemen, please try to take a step back and look at the evidence that is presented. Based on what has been said here, I would never do business with these two woman!! Sorry, but I don't purchase animals that are shipped thru the post office, no matter who the seller is.

We would all like to held by a higher standard to other enthusiast, yes?? Then lead by example and step away from the key boards unless there is something more intelligent to add.....
 
By your own admission Kevin, if a vet report is produced, you owe an apology. Maybe if you didn't rush to put your foot in your mouth, you wouldn't be in that position ?

Jim, if you're saying in your last post that you've, spoken to, or been in contact with, Wendy's vet. Maybe even seen the report and verified that the gecko was sick as described, and that it was Lynn's gecko, as verified by the date of examination, then I'll apologize right now and happily.
 
I haven’t referred to either of them, as “whores” and I believe suggesting that 90% of participants responding here have, is an extreme fabrication. It is however evident that Wendy is in her second or third career of screwing people.

In this latest incident, It’s a fact that before she posted on this forum saying she received perfect animals from Lynn, she had already sent an email that the animals were thin and was yet again trying to extort animals/funds from yet another person. What really gets me is the pettiness for the request of three or four more dollars for PayPal fees.
 
Back
Top