DaveyFig
New member
One of the things that I have been thinking about for a bit, and pondered over a cup of coffee and some aquarium gazing, is the comments about a breeder being held responsible regardless of how many times the animal changes hands. While it can be said (and was) that genetics don't change(If it was a het, it always is a het.), we also have to take into consideration that our knowledge of the genetics does change. As soon as one person proves that the animal is not a het. the liability stops there. Whoever files the initial claim, or if there is no claim, the last person to own the animal should be compensated. The het did not prove for Cliff, but David had eggs, or at least gravid females. If David had held onto the male until he proved it, he wouldn't be in a position to owe Cliff anything. Also, a waiting period equivalent to a proper quarantine at Cliff's place would certainly have given David time to hatch the eggs and see that none were hypos as well.
