brian , david and chris all well respected guys in my book .
Dude, I've SEEN it happen in court. Maybe not this particular incident but you said "And a judge would never allow compensation for the hypothetical loss of not producing the desired results". Workmens Comp is a prime example of this or the tons of cases I've seen where a company is sues because someone held them back from producing income over an amount of time.
I'm not picking a side on this case. Just saying, it has happened before and not all judges are the same. If a judge is the final determining factor, and he/she feels someone lost potential profit, it could rule in the plaintiffs favor.

Really? Even if I were to stipulate that half the sperm and half the eggs contained the hypo gene, which I am not save for the sake of discussion, that does not for 1 hot second mean that eggs are fertilized by half this and half that. Do the normal sperm shut down if the first 10 eggs are penetrated by normals, leaving 10 more eggs for hypo sperm only? Hey, I guess that is a cool band name...Drew and the Hypo Sperms...too bad I can't sing or play an instrument.Het x het: Each parent contributes a hypo gene to half its babies and a normal gene to the other half.
IF
BHB Reptiles provided a GENETIC PAPERWORK GUARANTEE on this animal they should ABSOLUTELY honor it if in fact the snake proves to NOT be a heterozygous animal.
.lol I only have two things to say 1. Ive never delt with the op or Brian so Im not on anyones side, but the Spider "het ghost" should have been bred to some visual ghosts before this thread was started. Four het females just isnt enough to come to the conclusion that he doesnt carry the gene. 2. If and when the spider doesnt prove out, then the person that is in ownership of the animal should be compensated by Brian. The previous owners where already compensated by selling the animal. 
See? Everyone one wins and the horses did not die in vain.
There's a lot of talk about policy holding up in court. You've gotta be kidding me.
I'm an appliance sales man. If I advertise a refrigerator I don't write policy guaranteeing that it's a fridge or your money back. It's obvious. If I sell you what we believe is a refrigerator, and it turns out to be a washing machine guess what, I either owe you a refrigerator or a refund.
Now if I advertise a possible heterozygous refrigerator, and when you put groceries in it and it washes them rather than keeping them cool then you are S.O.L since you bought a possible het.
This isn't the case here though. What I see is a HUGE name breeder ignoring a situation simply because he doesn't feel that a single problem will rip his reputation apart, and he's probably right but either way it's sad that this hobby is nothing more than a money making industry for some.
i had the same from Brian when a deal went wrong,he said he would make it right and then does nothing.$3500 down.
Please post any and all pertinent information to your transaction with Brian if that is the case.