Well, since you want to keep trying to deflect the attention back to me, I have no qualms with jumping back in to point out more examples of your dishonesty and general propensity for saying whatever comes to mind, truth be damned. Your lack of capacity to understand that your motives and actions are transparent, and that no one seems to be buying the drivel you're selling, definitely isn't doing you any favors.
Figuratively speaking, you're laying in the mud, beaten and bloody. I suppose that reaching up out of the muck, to weakly kick me in the shin, would be satisfying to someone in your position. Your flailing is even more humorous for the fact that you don't seem to realize how pitifully obvious it is. Happen to be related to the Byers family..?
As has become clearer as this thread progressed, you give yourself entirely too much credit. You think you've hurt my feelings? While I'm sure that that was your intent; much like what you hoped to accomplish with your smear campaign, you've fallen woefully short of the mark. It's increasingly clear that when you're in a position where you can't righteously refute what's been said about you, you choose to attack. You've actually done all in your power to corroborate my initial opinion of you and your cohorts.
Again, just because you say it, it's not suddenly a fact. I suspect that the more you post, the more obvious this idea becomes, to those uninvolved potential customers/sellers who are reading your words:
Since Dan doesn't have the need to whine about the deal that got away, or manufacture retaliatory nonsense, he has nothing to gain from any of this. His only satisfaction is in pointing out someone for whom honesty is a foreign language, and ingrity an alien concept. I'm sure I'm wasting my time here, as the idea of objectivity is just as alien to you.
However, since you made the above-quoted statement, allow me to point out how it's yet another example of your habit of creating self-serving fictions. As of right now, you have 50 posts in this thread, whereas I have 10. Since we can't all be mathletes, I'll work it out for you. 50>10. They're not close. They don't even "seem" to be close. Much like your comically hypocritical signature implies, the devil is often in even the smallest of details.
He was? I can't seem to find it anywhere. I've received no infractions for my posts in this thread. How about you? How about pointing out where I was cited for being "out of line". Surely, it's not just another rambling from a chronically dishonest person, like the following screenshot.
Out of your 51 posts, only one of them is NOT within this thread. Back to that math thing... 1 =/= "lots". Unless you have another account with a fake name, which really wouldn't surprise me, the screenshot shows how you don't let truth get in the way of weaving your little fairy tales. You've already made it abundantly clear that you're willing to say and do whatever you need to, to try to get your way. So, by all means, keep posting.