Chameleon Company
New member
I do see a distinction .....
Albeit an irrelevent one with regard to the topic of the thread. But with regard to Chuck's bringing up the pot-smoking habits of another poster who was critical of him, DZoo posted the following:
Albeit an irrelevent one with regard to the topic of the thread. But with regard to Chuck's bringing up the pot-smoking habits of another poster who was critical of him, DZoo posted the following:
I think we all agree that the defining concept is legality vs. illegality, and the consequent respect for the law. As a Libertarian leaning person, I am in the camp that believe marijuana is not a good vice, but that it should be completely legal. That is also a conversation for elsewhere. Back to point, I do not think it helped Chuck to make the point, and was a net loss for his standing in this thread. While I have stated that I think the right thing to do was to issue a prompt refund, I also don't see failure to do so as being large on the radar screen. Can not Cindy initiate a complaint with PayPal? Not to diminish Chuck's obligation, but in terms of actual loss, misrepresentation, or theft, this thread is more about ethics, character, and etiquette ........ and maybe the "pot calling the kettle black".As far as someone posting who is an admited pot smoker? I just don't see how that is relevant in any way except to try to distract readers from the matter at hand. Caffeine and Nicotine addicts will be the next target I guess, so if you drink coffee or smoke cigarettes your opinion is no good either- watch out!!!!!
