• In case most of you have not noticed, I made changes to the donation amounts as well as the durations for all of the paid membership levels. Things are winding down here, and this seems to be the most prudent way to deal with the "end of life" period of this site.

    Contributor level members - $10 per 30 days
    Sponsors - Eliminated
    Benefactor level members - $25 per 30 days
    Endowment level members - $50 per 30 days

    Account Upgrades Page
  • Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

Dan Felice...EXTORTION..LIES ...HARRASSMENT and BIG THANK YOU TO THE PA. POLICE !!!!

Justin you really need to post those emails here or find out just what you can post as proof. Seems some agree with your statements here after reading the emails and someone else is casting what apears to be some doubt. Randy
 
I do have a question for all....

Since it is unlikely they will actually charge him with anything, should I go ahead and post the emails, or should I not post them just to make a privacy statement. Honestly Dan is getting his just rewards here for his actions...maybe it is time to publish the emails for all to see.
I didn't intend on it becomming an issue like this..maybe it is time to stop this before anyones feelings get hurt or someone says something they will regret.
What do you think???
 
Justin,

You do what you think is right and for your own reasons. That is always the best choice.
 
Hubris lucille, hubris. We've had that conversation before but it seems you've forgotten it.

It is NOT your place to contact ANY law enforecment agency about anyone else, ESPECIALLY if you have been asked to keep silent about certain things.

I too suspect that you have been swayed by dan, despite the evidence.

Ponder this as well: Justin is RIGHT HERE, talking and dealing with ALL the flack, much brought on by you lucille, and all the while dan is missing, as is ever his way when things get hot for him.

Methinks someone's gotten too big for her britches and jumped the gun here.

Justin SAID he would post them when HE talked to the detective yet that was NOT good enough for you lucille. What EXACTLY do YOU have to do with this? Is dan your FRIEND? Are you making this a personal thing? If you are trying to show no bias you are failing miserably.

Let JUSTIN handle this the way HE wants to. He is NOT a bad guy whereas felice is questionable at best.

Whatever you do Justin, make sure you do what YOU want to do, don't be pressured into anything by ANYONE here.

YOU I would give the benefit of the doubt. I suspect I am NOT alone in this.

Unless dan decides to post here I can't see any reason for anyone else to post unless and until Justin posts the emails.

Whatcha say dannyboy? Got some info for us?
 
Thank you, Wes!!! My emotions and thoughts have been in a funk today and I just do not have the words, but if I did they would have been very similar to yours.
 
What a FLIPPIN JOKE!!!!

I am embarrased to say I almost felt for:>Puke<: Lucille until I read where she had contacted the detectives on the case......UNREAL!!!! I don't think I need to say anymore.....but I will.

Justin.....If you don't post those e-mails I am sure someone else will. Might as well be you......I commend you on being super nice in your posts. I don't think I would be that nice.

bthacker
 
What am I? Chopped liver? How come nobody is asking me about the emails. I read the emails. I would love to publish them. I can't wait for you all to see them.
 
bluerosy said:
What am I? Chopped liver? How come nobody is asking me about the emails. I read the emails. I would love to publish them. I can't wait for you all to see them.
Click to expand...

Well.....good job on not sticking your nose to far in where it doesn't belong!!

If Justin wants the e-mails published let him do it on his own timing by himself. I don't see the other party in question here to defend himself, so there should be no reason but to believe both Rainer and Justin on this without even seeing the e-mails.

Man.... I still can't believe how retarded talking to the detectives without Justin's OK was........Duh.

bthacker
 
I was talking about the emails where Dan threatened me about a seperate incident.

I would not publish Justins emails w/o his permission. Besides I posted before to Justin that he should not post the emails due to peer pressure. He should do what law enforcement asked him to do so they can conclude their investigation.
 
Thanks for the clarification.....I guess it was needed.

Would it be proper to post your e-mails from Dan to yourself on Justin's thread? If it is about the same fella would it be okay? I am just asking....not sure of the etiquette. I am sure it is an interesting read.

bthacker
 
bluerosy said:
I was talking about the emails where Dan threatened me about a seperate incident.
Click to expand...
whoops, I too thought you were talking about Justin's e-mails. I read your previous post, I thought he just complained, and you sent him some more snakes, must have missed the part about the actual threatening e-mails. Were they originally posted in your other thread? (haven't had time to recheck that one as Dan has enough of his own threads, I had to catch up on.) In my opinion only, they would be relevant here, as they go to Dan's character. Supplemental "evidence" from another party.
 
Would it be proper to post your e-mails from Dan to yourself on Justin's thread? If it is about the same fella would it be okay? I am just asking....not sure of the etiquette. I am sure it is an interesting read.
Click to expand...

In my opinion it is appropriate as it refers to the same individual being discussed on this thread. It will help better show the character of this person. If he opens another thread on the same person he will probably get warnings points.

Thanks
 
I agree with Dan G.
The emails between Rainer and Dan Felice are definitely relevant to the conversation and should be posted...

I also feel that if Justin decides to post his emails...that is his business...and I encourage him to do so...but all the people that received the emails from Justin directly should keep them to themselves...it was explicitly stated that that was part of the agreement for receiving them in the first place...

I think that Dan Felice's silence is speaking volumes about the truth of the matter...and the depth of his character (which obviously isn't deep enough to get your shoes wet)...
 
Justin, just because the matter is closed between you and Dan according to the police dept., it doesnt mean that the state will not decide to bring charges against him. They dont need you and certainly have enough evidence to proceed without you. But....they sure dont want you releasing information that may give him time to prepare and have the upper hand for the worst which may be yet to come. If you do inquire about releasing the emails I would ask the the investigating officer if this matter has reached the level of review that would include the county prosecutor. If so, let it be and let them do thier jobs.

I want to again thank you for the forward of the emails. As I stated to you, the information you share with me in confidence will never be posted.
 
Alias47 said:
The emails between Rainer and Dan Felice are definitely relevant to the conversation and should be posted...

I also feel that if Justin decides to post his emails...that is his business...and I encourage him to do so...but all the people that received the emails from Justin directly should keep them to themselves...it was explicitly stated that that was part of the agreement for receiving them in the first place...

I think that Dan Felice's silence is speaking volumes about the truth of the matter...and the depth of his character (which obviously isn't deep enough to get your shoes wet)...
Click to expand...
I agree.
 
critical bill said:
they sure dont want you releasing information that may give him time to prepare and have the upper hand for the worst which may be yet to come.
Click to expand...
Chuck,

I think Dan probably has copies of the e-mails. And there is a process called "discovery" wherein the prosecution has to turn over all evidence that they plan to use at a trial. So I doubt that there is much of an issue in that regard. Further, as Webslave pointed out, sharing the information with you and with other people who are not Justin's legal counsel has already voilated any privacy under which said information was to be maintained. It is still Justin's decision to post or not, but "privilege" and "privacy" went out the window when the information was first shared.

Lastly, while the state may have enough to proceed without Justin, they would have a hard time making a case without his participation. If the "complainant" is not present at a trial to confirm that yes, he actually received these threats, what jury would convict in a case like this? If I was the lawyer I could raise all kinds of "reasonable doubt".
 
Bthacker said:
Man.... I still can't believe how retarded talking to the detectives without Justin's OK was........Duh.
Click to expand...

I questioned that one myself. She wouldnt confirm or deny the contents of the email when asked to do so, but felt it ok to contact the investigating officer and vowed to redirect law enforcement to this thread.

That makes me believe in some small way that she just possibly believed this was a hoax. If so....then what was her motive to obtaining the email? To come to Dans defense. And why? Because it completely out of his character. Perhaps her motivation was fueled by the shame of learning that she keeps poor company and isnt a very good judge of character at all.
 
Well I will post his emails.

Its a.m. and I am running out for the day. I have to dig up his emails and will post them when I return tonight. I should make something clear when I said he made threatening emails I meant he threatened to ruin my repution and not physical violence like he did in Justins emails. Otherwise his style and modus operandum are the same.
 
Jim O said:
Lastly, while the state may have enough to proceed without Justin, they would have a hard time making a case without his participation. If the "complainant" is not present at a trial to confirm that yes, he actually received these threats, what jury would convict in a case like this? If I was the lawyer I could raise all kinds of "reasonable doubt".
Click to expand...

Jim, they do not need Justin to proceed against Dan on the offense of impersonating a police officer. Everything else could be dropped if Justin decided not to press charges and the state would still have enough to move forward.

If you were Dan's lawyer you could easily argue the threats, harrassment, intimidation, and extortion charges if they were to be brought against him. You would never raise any reasonable doubt that Dan didnt identify himself as a police officer multiple times while doing so. That is a seperate issue and no doubt would be a seperate charge.
 
critical bill said:
I questioned that one myself. She wouldnt confirm or deny the contents of the email when asked to do so, but felt it ok to contact the investigating officer and vowed to redirect law enforcement to this thread.

That makes me believe in some small way that she just possibly believed this was a hoax. If so....then what was her motive to obtaining the email? To come to Dans defense. And why? Because it completely out of his character. Perhaps her motivation was fueled by the shame of learning that she keeps poor company and isnt a very good judge of character at all.
Click to expand...

I think you hit the nail on the head with this one. How sneaky if true, huh?
 
Back
Top