• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Dan Felice - Good Guy

LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Wes Pollock, in his zest to protect the herp community from a guy who has never ripped anyone off, just created his own "Bad-Guy" thread on Chris Kennard!

At least it appears as though the massive waste that Wes brings to any thread that he intrudes will be limited to that thread for the time being.

Bye Bye Wes!
 
Oh al/elenor/rob or whatever your name is today, I NEVER said he was a bad guy. I merely questioned his morals.

But if you think he's a bad guy then, surely he MUST be. So be it and thank you very much.

Oh and by the way this is not a bad guy thread about your pal kennard or even you al/elenor/rob, it's about felice. Try to remember that.

Wes Pollock
 
A poem by Wes Pollock...................

Roses are red
Violets are blue
I'm schizophrenic
And so am I




Wes, I'm done addressing your mindless, infantile gibberish. Good luck in your quest to expose Chris Kennard as a "Bad Guy"!
 
Lee McMurtry................

You are the guy who started this thread as a result of a deal you made with Dan Felice. You said that one of the four snakes that he sold you died and that felice talked about replacing that snake.

Has he "walked the talk" and sent you another snake or money since your post?

Even though you obviously felt that your deal with Felice warrented a "Good Guy" thread about Felice, has your opinion changed at all after reading this entire thread?
 
I too found it odd that Lee waited (four weeks after recieving the snakes from Dan) until one died before posting a "good guy" post on Felice. Dan has had plenty of time to replace the snake, which in light of this thread I'm sure he was speedy to do the right thing. Funny how Lee hasn't followed up on this.
 
Also, how about an update on the remaining snakes Lee?

Are the seventy-five percent of the snakes that Dan sent you that survived doing well?
 
The Final Word

I've been reading this thread intermittently, but not posting because most (all) of it seemed unrelated to the subject at hand. There seem to be several people (or a couple with assorted handles) determined to keep this thread going, though it has long since degenerated. I'm reluctant to encourage this any further, but feel compelled to due to Mr.(?) Kennard (again) questioning my role in posting.
In the interim, and despite assist feeding, the second unicolor died. After waiting several weeks to be sure that there wasn't a problem in my snake room, Dan sent me a replacement pair at a very reasonable cost - they are feeding well and thriving. As far as I am concerned as a customer, Dan has been everything that I could ask for in a seller - excellent communication before, during, and after the deal, nice animals, and a willingness to work through solutions to problems.
I'm still waiting for someone to post that THEY PERSONALLY were wronged/misled/cheated/mistreated by Dan.
Chris, Al - I would suggest that you've made your points and stated your case - its all there in black and white for someone to read and to weigh your arguments against others. Shakespeare once wrote (something like) "Methinks he doth protest too much." Why do you care so deeply about whether Dan hybridized his snakes? As I've said before, if he did it, and misrepresented the offspring, that's wrong; but it seems to me that there are a million other people in this hobby/business perpetrating far sleazier crimes against reptiles and customers that you could crusade against if you were really outraged about the behavior and not the man.
This will be my last post on the matter. I continue to be happy with the outcome of my dealing with Dan Felice. If you have further questions about my integrity, please ask them in a separate post, and I will respond. I encourage you to use the free time you gain by walking away from this for something productive (read the BOI for an extensive list of reptile cheats/scammers/thieves that you can go after next).

-Lee McMurtry
 
Mr. McMurtry...

The final word? For you...perhaps. I feel that as long as Dan continues to put on this facade as though nothing has happened and continues to "pretend" that he has done nothing wrong as he is doing right now on KS while ignoring this thread, people will continue to fall victim to his deceptions, thus the need for this thread to exist until Dan supplies some form of closure. If he continues to ignore this thread in the hopes that those he solicits will discredit my charges without refuting anything, then it is up to me to defend my charges since I am continually put under scrutiny. You would do the same as would anyone here whether they admit it or not. Dan wants people to think I'm lying. I want people to know the truth. That being said, permit me to answer your thoughts, civily of course.

"I've been reading this thread intermittently, but not posting because most (all) of it seemed unrelated to the subject at hand".

I disagree with both the reason you haven't been posting and the relation of the subject at hand. Given Dan's habit of soliciting people to do his bidding, it seems funny that just when things got heated on KS about those crosses, you waited eight weeks, until one of the four snakes Dan sent you died, to post a good guy post before even getting a replacement. Forgive me if I'm the only one who sees something fishy about that.

"There seem to be several people (or a couple with assorted handles) determined to keep this thread going, though it has long since degenerated".

See my opening statement.

"I'm reluctant to encourage this any further, but feel compelled to due to Mr.(?) Kennard (again) questioning my role in posting".

Please, call me Chris. And don't think for a second that I don't appreciate your taking the time to entertain our curiosity. And please don't mistake my disagreeing with you for dislike. Not so.

"In the interim, and despite assist feeding, the second unicolor died".

Now this would be a much more reasonable explanation for your reluctance to post throughout this threads existance. So it's fair to say that half of the snakes that Dan sent you died.
 
Oops...

Hit submit reply too fast. Allow me to continue.

"After waiting several weeks to be sure that there wasn't a problem in my snake room, Dan sent me a replacement pair at a very reasonable cost - they are feeding well and thriving".

Hmmm, I'm suprised that he made you pay at all. That doesnt sound like a fair deal to me, but that's just my opinion and I suppose only relevant if you shared that opinion, which you obviously don't. Personally, I would have GIVEN you the replacement animals. Just good business ethics. But Dan is about the almighty dollar.

" As far as I am concerned as a customer, Dan has been everything that I could ask for in a seller - excellent communication before, during, and after the deal, nice animals, and a willingness to work through solutions to problems".

I wonder had this thread existed, would he have served you the same way? Doubt it.

"I'm still waiting for someone to post that THEY PERSONALLY were wronged/misled/cheated/mistreated by Dan".

Now that is a VERY interesting statement! After reading this thread, if you are not convinced that Dan "wronged, misled, cheated or mistreated anyone, than you are a perfect example of why it is important that this thread continue in an effort to find closure to any confusion people may have about whether or not this guy can be trusted. Either you are genuinely not convinced that Dan did this, or you are in fact posting on Dan's behalf. Of course that is my opinion, but I'm sure I'm not alone here.

"Chris, Al - I would suggest that you've made your points and stated your case - its all there in black and white for someone to read and to weigh your arguments against others".

I beg to differ. Apparently, it wasn't enough for you to form an opinion ("I'm still waiting for someone to post that THEY PERSONALLY were wronged/misled/cheated/mistreated by Dan").

"Shakespeare once wrote (something like) "Methinks he doth protest too much."

Perhaps you should save ridiculousness that for the next person who is misled or wronged.

"Why do you care so deeply about whether Dan hybridized his snakes"?

I never said I cared that he hybridized those snakes. Please try to stay focused. This is about him misrepresenting them to make a buck. If that doesn't concern you, than you must not regard this board as a useful tool.

"As I've said before, if he did it, and misrepresented the offspring, that's wrong; but it seems to me that there are a million other people in this hobby/business perpetrating far sleazier crimes against reptiles and customers that you could crusade against if you were really outraged about the behavior and not the man".

I see your point Lee. As long as people are doing worse things than what Dan did, then why should I bother going after a guy who I KNOW did what Dan did when I could go after people who I know nothing of? You can't be serious Lee.

"This will be my last post on the matter. I continue to be happy with the outcome of my dealing with Dan Felice. If you have further questions about my integrity, please ask them in a separate post, and I will respond. I encourage you to use the free time you gain by walking away from this for something productive (read the BOI for an extensive list of reptile cheats/scammers/thieves that you can go after next)".

Thank you for posting. As far as your comment about walking away from this for something productive, that pretty much solidifies my perception of your agenda. Maybe you don't think it's important that your new found buddy be exposed for his wrongdoing, but I do. As far as your cheap shot about seeing who I "can go after next", take a good look at all of the threads here. I don't "scout" for people to "go after". You'll find Wes, Wendy and Gila sticking their noses in alot more posts than myself without provocation (including this one). I don't crave that kind of attention. I am here because I know for a fact that Dan did what I said he did...period. I have read quite a few "bad guy" posts on this site and did not entertain them. Why? Glad you asked. Because I had no reason to. You do the math pal.
 
One last thing Lee...

If you don't mind. In the interest of future prospective buyers of Dan's who will be using this board to make a decision, is it your contention, after reading this thread, that Dan is a "good guy" and that people should not hesitate to buy from him?

"excellent communication before, during, and after the deal,..."

Was there no discussion about this thread throughout your communications? Surely Dan would have asked that you follow up with a "job well done" post. What was his excuse to you regarding the existence of negativity in his supposed "good guy" thtread? Since he won't speak up himself, perhaps you could help to lend closure to this mess. Thanks in advance.
 
One More Time, For Chris

Again against my better judgement...
Chris - I re-read the entire thread - all 170 posts to date. Of those posts 105 were from you or Rob Dunleavy, and doesn't include posts that Rob submitted under an alias that were removed by moderators. Now, many of those posts were your responses to people posting about you (28 posts), and I can see why you would want to defend yourself, but I do think that I can safely say that these were, for the most part, off topic. The thread, entitled "Dan Felice - Good Guy" was about my experience with Dan - other topics are, by definition, off topic. And lest you feel singled out, I felt that ALL of those posts back and forth between you and Jeff, Chris R, Wendy, Wes etc. were off topic, which is why I quit reading the thread.
Rob - I failed to find a way in which you contributed to the thread except to say, in essence "I believe what Chris has told me". Do you have any first hand knowledge of Dan and previous dealings to support the things that you allege? And why post under different names?
For both Chris and Rob - you may not like what Wes had to say, but he has a point. Especially in a forum like this, how you say things can be as important as what you say. The personal issues back and forth, the cross posting, posting under aliases - it all undermines your credibility, even if your message carries the truth. You clearly want people to believe you, to the extent of posting repeatedly about the issue, so let your actions support your words, not detract from them.
As far as the truth goes, I have no idea what the truth is in the matter of Dan and the hybrid cribos. I've heard your version, I've heard Dan's version, and there's been a lot of extraneous supposition along the way. The opportunity to PROVE that Dan hybridized the snakes and knowingly misrepresented them is probably long gone - it would require DNA testing of the parents and babies, and proof that the snakes being tested were in fact the snakes alleged to be involved. Until then, its your word against his, and people can interpret his silence as they wish.
The things that I do know to be true are that Dan treated me well, and that I'm happy with our interaction. For the record, Dan offered to replace the cribo that died for free (I pay shipping) PRIOR to this thread being started - and was, in fact, the impetus for the thread. I asked him to wait, because I was concerned about the other snake, which did in fact go on to die. Don't know why the snakes died - they were in the same room and similar rack environment as my other 50+ snakes, but they did. I've been a reptile hobbyist for more than 10 years, and this isn't the first time that I've had baby snakes just not do well - it happens - not often, but it does. When that happened, I asked Dan to honor the offer of a replacement, and offered to pay for another snake to pair them up, which he accepted - at a cost below what I've seen these snakes go for. Now Chris - I have a question for you. You said in one of your posts that had you been the seller, you would have replaced both snakes for free. Really? Eight and twelve weeks after I received them? If so, you have more generous terms than any seller I have seen on Fauna, KS, or individual websites. What do you produce, and do you have a website or ads containing your terms of service?
Let's for a moment stipulate that Chris is right. Dan Felice DID knowingly misrepresent hybrid cribos as Texans. Now what? Should I return my snakes and ask for a refund? Badmouth Dan on an internet forum? Picket his house with a sign? As I've said before, what goes around tends to come around - I'm not sure that I need to be the Karma Police on this one.
Both Chris and Rob have insinuated that Dan and I are somehow in collusion, or that he has put me up to posting my experience. I've spoken to Dan once on the phone prior to the sale, and several times by e-mail before, during, and after. Obviously we discussed this thread in the wake of everything, but he has never asked that I post (or not post, for that matter) about him, and honestly probably wishes I never had. Since I KNOW that Chris and Rob have jumped to conclusions about me, you can see how I might suspect they've jumped to conclusions elsewhere as well.
As for another buyer asking me about Dan, I would tell him honestly that Dan treated me well despite not all going smoothly. I would also tell him that there have been third party allegations of misleading buyers on the internet stemming from one incident a couple of years ago, but that to the best of my knowledge none of those buyers has actually surfaced.
Chris - I think you've made your point about what you believe to be true about Dan. Please restrain yourself from making assumptions about me. They detract from your credibility on other issues. I look forward to having civilized discussions on other topics elsewhere on the board.

-Lee McMurtry
 
Holy slippery snake scales batman, a short, succint and lucid post in this thread.

Is that allowed?

Well said Lee.

If those babies you got ever breed to eachother would not that have REAL good chances of producing some unusual babies if what kennard postulates is true? If they produced anything that did not appear to be pure Texan then it would lend credance to what he has said felice did.

It will be interesting to see just what comes out of them. Please let us know when and if you breed them together.

Wes Pollock
 
WELL SAID LEE!!!!!!!!

I couldn't have said it better myself. Thanks for your great post!

Take care!

Billy Fraser
 
Mr. Mcmurtry...

I would just like to entertain a few points you made in the interest of not boring you too much.

"The thread, entitled "Dan Felice - Good Guy" was about my experience with Dan - other topics are, by definition, off topic".

We'll have to agree to disagree on this one Lee. The fact that your thread turned into a "bad guy" thread doesn't make it off topic. The absence of my submissions to this thread would lead people to believe Dan honestly represents all of his animals. That's simply not true and people have a right to know.

"I felt that ALL of those posts back and forth between you and Jeff, Chris R, Wendy, Wes etc. were off topic, which is why I quit reading the thread".

Fair enough. I would agree that SOME of those posts were unnecessary. But would you not defend yourself against the venom brought here by a few of those you mentioned?

"you may not like what Wes had to say, but he has a point. Especially in a forum like this, how you say things can be as important as what you say".

You're right. I don't like what Wes has to say. It's funny how you guys accuse me of being like Wes and portray him as an innocent here. He is the most obnoxious and condescending troublemaker here. Of course that's just my opinion and doesn't sit well with the "regulars" here who can't see through his facade. No biggie.

"The personal issues back and forth, the cross posting, posting under aliases - it all undermines your credibility, even if your message carries the truth".

You guys just love throwing that "credibility" thing in my face as if I have none, lol. I beg to differ and the e-mails I've been getting suggest otherwise. You'd be suprised who the minority really is here. It isn't me.

"Now Chris - I have a question for you. You said in one of your posts that had you been the seller, you would have replaced both snakes for free. Really? Eight and twelve weeks after I received them"?

Really!

"I've heard your version, I've heard Dan's version,..."

I didn't know Dan had a version!!! What is it Lee! Let's put this to rest right now! Let's see if his "version" to you matches his versions to everyone or anyone else! Of course he doesn't want anyone to post his version to them because he knows he'll get caught in the lie. What say you Lee? What is Dan's story?

"Chris - I think you've made your point about what you believe to be true about Dan".

I don't "believe" anything to be true. I "KNOW" it to be true.

"They detract from your credibility on other issues. I look forward to having civilized discussions on other topics elsewhere on the board".

Fair enough guy! I know that since the appearance of certain people here that I have become abrasive and callous. My apologies. But I stand by my convictions.
 
Wes...

"If those babies you got ever breed to eachother would not that have REAL good chances of producing some unusual babies if what kennard postulates is true? If they produced anything that did not appear to be pure Texan then it would lend credance to what he has said felice did.

It will be interesting to see just what comes out of them. Please let us know when and if you breed them together".

Wes Pollock

This is a testament to your lack of concern for facts or knowledge and your agenda here. Perhaps you should go back to the beginning of this thread and read Lee's first post where he says he got "Cribos" from Dan, not Texans. Nice try though. But I digress. It wouldn't matter what the offspring from those crosses look like. They will still be the product of crosses...period!
 
"It is true. Dan bred his "calico" Unicolor Cribo to an Eastern Indigo and sold them as Texas Indigos."

I guess I really shouldn't have taken you at your word, eh kennard. The above quote is from you.

I have it right in my signiture line that I may not be very smart and occsionally, not all the time like some here, I prove it.

The plain and simple is that if felice sold them as PURE anything and they start throwing out mutts your contentions will be proven.

This, as you obviously missed, was what I meant to convey.
 
I am curious..I actually gritted my teeth and managed to wade through this entire thread again earlier this evening.

Please let me preface this by saying I know none of the principals in this discussion in the slightest and have no strong opinions either way.

My question, after digesting this entire discourse is, are their any supporting statements or direct eveidence anywhere here that support the allegations made by Mr. Kennard? I am certainly not discounting his statements out of hand at all. This is not an attack on his credibility. I just have failed to find a second individual anywhere in this thread with first hand direct knowledge of this supposed situation with Mr. Felice.

I find it odd that in 36 pages of posts and over a two month time period no one else has stepped forward.

Please don't interpret this question as an attack or an invitation to attack, I just find it odd
 
Wes...

""It is true. Dan bred his "calico" Unicolor Cribo to an Eastern Indigo and sold them as Texas Indigos."

That's what I said alright. What does that have to do with the fact that you just stuck your foot in your mouth because, once again, you stuck your nose where it doesn't belong without knowing relevant facts of the post in question.

"I guess I really shouldn't have taken you at your word, eh kennard. The above quote is from you".

I don't think anyone cares at this point whether or not you are or aren't taking my word for anything. I certainly could care less. But doesn't that sort of contradict your statements...

"Even though I do agree with you guys on this one as well as the albury one you seem to miss that time and time again. How can such clever guys as you and kennard keep missing that? Something got your dander up?

felice has dug himself a pretty deep hole here".

Wouldn't that be construed as "taking my word for it", lol?

"I have it right in my signiture line that I may not be very smart and occsionally, not all the time like some here, I prove it".

Was that a gift, lol? Normally I would take that ammo and run with it. Nah. Too easy. Thanks anyway!

"The plain and simple is that if felice sold them as PURE anything and they start throwing out mutts your contentions will be proven".

I think anyone with common sense knows I'm telling the truth, but okay. Have it your way. Who's got the offspring Wes??? How will anyone know?

"This, as you obviously missed, was what I meant to convey".

If that is so, than the true meaning of your post wasn't there for me to "miss" Wes. But good enough. I get the picture now.
 
Back
Top