• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Dan Felice - Good Guy

Jeff...

Well it would seem that you've left on the note that would insinuate that my statements here are fictitious. That does bother me after all the time I spent posting for your benefit. Much like you insinuated that I selectively entertained questions, I must reciprocate. You have done exactly that. Perhaps you could be so kind as to lend closier to this dilemma by answering Anaconda's question as well as the ones I submitted in a previous post. ..

"Perhaps you could answer a few questions yourself. How many e-mails have you and Dan exchanged on this matter? When was the last one? What was his side of the story to you. What was his excuse for not defending himself here? What was his response to your questions to him about selling my brother one of the offspring as crosses? What was his response to you with regard to "Project Bluebook"? If you haven't exchanged e-mails regarding this matter and asked him these questions, why not? He has had visitors from the Indigo forum in 02. Why hasn't he solicited them to testify that they saw Texas Indigos at his house. Why would I make up such an elaborate story about this isolated (hopefully) incident"?

Also why do you suppose Dan has not refuted any of the charges brought forth in this thread? Perhaps the stories he has been submitting to everyone through private e-mail are just too outlandish. As Anaconda asked, where are those offspring now? Lastly, after reading all of these posts, is it in fact your contention that I am making this all up?

Regards...
 
Jeff Nichols..................

You seemed to have left in a huff, apparently miffed at the questions asked of you. I don't see why it's that difficult for you to say who has those snakes now. Also, the fact that you are, apparently, unwilling to answer that question gives rise to the suspicion that you have something to hide. Why would you/your wife get rid of those snakes within only 9 weeks, after all the hoopla made over them in that KS post to the Indigo forum on October 3, 2003? Something does not "add up" here, and your apparent reluctance to comment any further only adds to the mystery. What's the deal Jeff?


Albert Applebaum
 
Jeff said, and I quote, "Ummm, never said we kept them, just said we'd observed them and did scale counts. I was just asking if CK had witnessed the mating that he alleges to have occurred. FWIW the scale counts did not support CK's contention. However, in his defense, I don't know what a cross might count out as".

That certaintly led me to believe he got rid of them. Why get rid of them if he was secure in his mind that these are pure? Quite the conundrum. But what I find even more provocative is this post by Jeff...

Actually, this is not a "campaign".

I really don't know why I waste time with it. I've seen the animals, I've scale counted the animals. I'm done. Enough.

Regards,
Jeff Nichols

Why is it that after all of the evidence I (and my brother) submitted, which was a far cry from being adequate enough in Jeff's mind according to his posts to support my stance on this matter, why is it that "seeing" the animals and having "counted the scales" is suddenly sufficient enough for him to lay this to rest when prior to that post he would only accept my witnessing the animals copulate?

Regards,
 
"However, in his defense, I don't know what a cross might count out as".


"I've scale counted the animals. Enough, I'm done".

Hmmm, interesting Jeff.
 
chris kennard & rob aka 'applebaum', 200+ NEGATIVE posts straight and counting.....]

this will be my 1rst and last post ever concerning this subject. [#1] no drymarchon were EVER crossed at ANY time! kennard just 'thinks' there were and 18 months later for reasons KNOWN only to him has decided to 'come clean' and save the drymarchon community despite the fact that he loathes everyone and anything in the indigo forum. or ANY forum for that matter. he is banned on a continual daily basis from posting anywhere in KS for his complete lack of respect and decorum w/ regards to other members. you have all seen him in his different disguises/name changes whether you recognized him or not. he NEVER stops! [#2] rob, who hides behind the names 'applebaum & anaconda al' has NEVER even owned a snake and wouldn't know a garter snake from a garden hose.......chris saw the actual copulation here in my home huh rob? well, that must have been QUITE a trick as the adults were never here in the first place yip-yope!! i only hatched the eggs. but never mind the truth, you just keep parroting whatever 'cunnard' tells you to. these 2 guys have now posted OVER 200 times straight negatively here in fauna on TWO guys ONLY. myself and fred albury. i believe the words 'fanatic obsession' would come into play nicely here. those numbers are simply not possible by regular people but apparently it's the norm for the 'dynamic duo'. the numbers speak for themselves. in the thread bearing my name, they are responsible for fully 88% of the posts there even though they know ABSOLUTELY nothing about anything and it never involved them in the least!!! how and why is that possible? it's NOT! these are 2 very unhappy individuals that go around [talking to themselves in the thread] and looking to create TROUBLE nonstop. [#3] the LEGITIMATE animals in question were sold a looong time ago, were honestly represented and the book has long since been closed. this is apparently not good enough for frick & frack however. ????????? why? who the hell knows? they have their own agenda and motives apparently, relentlessly [and idiotically] pursuing a topic that they had/have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with EVER in the first place.......now you 2 boys run along and knock yourselves out some more. i [and others] are enjoying watching your 'rant & chant' show. i know YOU TWO think you are 'owed' facts but YOU ARE OWED NOTHING!! get it? i know you both as major mouth-offs/trouble seekers for some time [20+ years in 'cunnards' case] and that is PRECISELY why you were never told anything in the beginning. YOU CANNOT BE TRUSTED! people warned me about you years ago to present and now i see that they were right all long. THIS IS NOT NORMAL BEHAVIOUR. it's not even close...... so run along girls and carry your tales like 2 little snitches. you both disgust me!! the case is closed. except by you 2, who know absolutely the least. you guys are pathetic and have become laugh stocks. life---you oughta try getting one! oh, and Merry Christmas...... very sincerely, dan felice
 
ok i dont know anything about any of you however, is this a bad guy thread? or inquirey? it really seems to be in the wrong place or needs to go attached to whatever post you are refering to..... i dont know what more to say
 
LMAO!!! This is great...

Why didn't you add this where it belongs Dannio? Hopefully the forum bosses will move this to the thread that has already been addressing this issue. In any case, let's break it down, shall we?

"this will be my 1rst and last post ever concerning this subject."

Of course it will. Once again you refuse to refute even one statement made in the other thread which is exactly why you started a new one, lol.

"[#1] no drymarchon were EVER crossed at ANY time! kennard just 'thinks' there were and 18 months later for reasons KNOWN only to him has decided to 'come clean' and save the drymarchon community despite the fact that he loathes everyone and anything in the indigo forum."

"You're lying. I know it and you know it. Perhaps you could elaborate on why I "think" (lol) there were.This is all spelled out in the thread about you which you have managed to avoid like the plague. Care to explain why you were a no-show while your buddies once again stuck up for you. How I feel about the Indigo patrons is irrelevant here, but I will go on record to say that I certainly don't loath them as you would have everyone believe. With the acception of Fred Albury, I have never pursued anyone who didn't attack me first. The only reason I pursued Fred was because of you Dan. Remember? We'll discuss that shortly.


"he is banned on a continual daily basis from posting anywhere in KS for his complete lack of respect and decorum w/ regards to other members. you have all seen him in his different disguises/name changes whether you recognized him or not. he NEVER stops!"

Let me remind you that this is not a popularity contest, your attempt at character assassination doesn't hurt my credibility. You often mistake credibility for popularity. Truth is, I have a clean slate, you don't. And you're right. When it comes to the truth, I "never stop".

"[#2] rob, who hides behind the names 'applebaum & anaconda al' has NEVER even owned a snake and wouldn't know a garter snake from a garden hose."

LOL! Yet another diversionary topic. Let's stick to the issue here, you crossing Drys and misrepresenting them.

"chris saw the actual copulation here in my home huh rob? well, that must have been QUITE a trick as the adults were never here in the first place yip-yope!! i only hatched the eggs."

Is that the story you've been telling everyone, lol? Hmmm. Why did TexIndigo Gal say in a post on KS that they were from "Dan Felice's" stock? But let's pretend for a moment that your not lying (lol), that still doesn't explain where the crosses went and why you voiced such concern to me that Steve might find out that the animals you sold him were in fact crosses. And where are the unaccounted for crosses Dan? But I digress, this is one hell of a fish story you got goin' on here pal!

"these 2 guys have now posted OVER 200 times straight negatively here in fauna on TWO guys ONLY. myself and fred albury."

I'm sooo glad YOU brought this up. First of all, YOU are the reason both of us even know about these forums. Let me remind you that YOU started the campaign to "get" Fred Albury. Before I even got my computer you constantly bitched and moaned about your hatred for him and his posts, and just like you've demonstrated here for two years now, you solicited someone else (Antibury) to do your bidding! You orchestrated it all and now you have the audacity to come on here and act JUST LIKE HIM, LOL! How many times did you call me and say"Fred just posted, go get him"? How many times did you feed me with ammo such as information about Fred that you collected from Doug Taylor? Much like Fred, it seems your MO is to sit back and watch while others take your heat. But again I digress. The fact that we have only pursued you and Fred Albury speaks volumes and I'm glad you brought it up. If we were here for the "sport", surely you would see us in every other thread here attacking people. Not the case.

"i believe the words 'fanatic obsession' would come into play nicely here. those numbers are simply not possible by regular people but apparently it's the norm for the 'dynamic duo'. the numbers speak for themselves. in the thread bearing my name, they are responsible for fully 88% of the posts there even though they know ABSOLUTELY nothing about anything and it never involved them in the least!!! how and why is that possible? it's NOT! these are 2 very unhappy individuals that go around [talking to themselves in the thread] and looking to create TROUBLE nonstop."

You can translate the threads to fit your agenda all you want, it won't help you. Chances are, had you or Fred made any attempt to refute the charges brought against you, these threads would be much shorter. Let me also remind you that I did not start the two threads you are making reference to. The "trouble" you refer to was "created" by you. Let's stay focused Dannio.

"[#3] the LEGITIMATE animals in question were sold a looong time ago, were honestly represented and the book has long since been closed. this is apparently not good enough for frick & frack however. ????????? why? who the hell knows? they have their own agenda and motives apparently, relentlessly [and idiotically] pursuing a topic that they had/have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with EVER in the first place.......now you 2 boys run along and knock yourselves out some more. i [and others] are enjoying watching your 'rant & chant' show."

Legitimate, LOL! Huh-whu? What "legitimate animals in question" are you referring to if you claim to have hatched the Texans for someone else? This gets to the heart of the matter. And what were those "legitimate animals (lol) "honestly represented" as? Who got them? This would truly close the book on this matter and lay ALL of this to rest while making us look foolish. Why would you not post this information??? My only "agenda" here is to bring to truth to light. Yours, once again, is to resort to character assassination while completely avoiding answers or closure to this matter.

"i know YOU TWO think you are 'owed' facts but YOU ARE OWED NOTHING!! get it? i know you both as major mouth-offs/trouble seekers for some time [20+ years in 'cunnards' case] and that is PRECISELY why you were never told anything in the beginning. "

But I was told ALOT from the beginning by YOU! Is it your contention that 20+ years ago, people who were mutual friends warned you that I was a trouble maker and that's why you became such a close buddy and then cooked up some ludicrous scheme "in the beginning" to make me think you were breeding crosses, lol? Come on Dan, you can do better than that. As far as owing us facts...not so. Why would I seek "facts" from someone that has none?

"YOU CANNOT BE TRUSTED!"

By who, you, or are you speaking for the masses? I can be trusted to tell the truth unlike you, and that's the issue here. Again, you confuse popularity with credibility. And again I remind you, I have a clean slate pal. YOU DON'T! I never sold an animal as something it wasn't.

" people warned me about you years ago to present and now i see that they were right all long"

Really! Name those people and please relay what they said. And why would you befriend someone you were "warned about" ,lol?

" THIS IS NOT NORMAL BEHAVIOUR. it's not even close...... so run along girls and carry your tales like 2 little snitches. you both disgust me!!

Take a good look at yourself before calling us girls Dannio. You've hidden behind anyone and everyone you could pursuade to do your bidding, including me. You let Dean, Oldherper, Jeff etc. defend your lies while you sit back and do NOTHING. I am happy to "disgust" a dishonest person like yourself.

"the case is closed. "

Hmmm, let's see. You come on here and start a new thread to avoid the charges in the original thread, once again completely avoid any attempt to refute anything in it, do nothing more than assault our character while lending nothing substantial and say "case closed"? LMAO!!! I don't think so.

"except by you 2, who know absolutely the least. "

Quite the contrary! It is your victims (buyers) who know the least.

"you guys are pathetic and have become laugh stocks. life---you oughta try getting one! oh, and Merry Christmas...... very sincerely, dan felice"

Your "opinions" are niether here nor there. I have a life, and I'm sure my Christmas will be a pleasant (and honest) one. "Very sincerely"? That will be a first, lol.

All in all, your post speaks for itself pally. Why don't you go back to the original thread and answer the questions? Here's a few...let's start with the questions above...

1) What "legitimate animals in question" are you referring to if you claim to have hatched the Texans for someone else? This gets to the heart of the matter. And what were those "legitimate animals (lol) "honestly represented" as? Who got them? This would truly close the book on this matter and lay ALL of this to rest while making us look foolish. Why would you not post this information???

2) Why did you sell my brother one of those offspring representing it as a Uni/Eastern cross?

3) What did "Project Bluebook" refer to and why did you readily adopt that name yourself with regard to the offspring in question?

4) Why have you never once said emphatically that YOU did not cross those snakes?

5)Who did you "supposedly" hatch the alleged "real" Texas Indigo eggs for? How many eggs were there in that supposed clutch and who got the offspring. Surely this would lay this mess to rest.


6) Why did you say ""this will be my 1rst and last post ever concerning this subject." Is it because you knew your post would come under fire and you knew you wouldn't be able to "honestly" refute anything in our posts? Once again you have managed to assault my character while adding nothing of creedence to substantiate your claim that you are not lying.

My apologies for the long post people, but it's amazing that Dan even showed up here and I wanted to give him a chance to respond to these issues and lend closure to this mess right away.

Lastly... YOU'RE LYING DAN. FESS UP! NEXT!!!
 
In case anyone is wondering, Dan has decided to disregard the tos and start his own little threadypoo on this topic to avoid the facts presented here. Hopefully the mods will move it here? In any case, here's your big chance Dannio! Answer those questions and PROVE ME WRONG!
 
Sorry Bruce, I know how confusing this seems. Check out the thread entitled "Dan Felice, good guy". It will explain everything.
 
One question I missed Dannio...

you said...

""[#3] the LEGITIMATE animals in question were sold a looong time ago, were honestly represented and the book has long since been closed."


Are you refering to the supposed "Texans" that you incubated for someone else and are those the ones that TexIndigo Gal was the recipient of that she claims are from "Dan Felice's" stock or are you refering to snakes YOU personally bred and sold? Certainly you represented your own line of Texas Indigos to someone (Steve and Bobby) if they are being referred to as "Dan Felice's" stock. That would mean that you would have to have had your own Texas Indigos in 02. So are you saying that the "Texas indigos" that TexIndigo Gal recieved from "Dan Felice's" stock are the same one's you hatched for someone else??? Did you sell them to Steve Fuller and Bobby Lee as YOUR stock or did you tell them you were hatching them for someone else? And please don't solicit anyone else to answer these questions for you. YOU ANSWER THEM!
 
One last thing....

before someone else comes along to ruin your day, lol. You said...

""so run along girls".

Hey Dan. Who's acting like a "girl" here (no offense ladies of the forum, just making a point)? Like you've always done in the past, you hide just like Fred and let others speak for you while offering nothing yourself! For years you've had a habit of soliciting other people to be your "muscle" on the forums because you are too much of a coward to speak your own mind. Are you still angry that I declined when you practically begged me to go after that guy you hate on the "racer" forum at KS? Did it ever occur to you that I got tired of being under fire by YOUR pals in the KS forums who were unaware that I was representing YOUR thoughts? You are a sneaky little weakling and you should be ashamed of yourself. Next time you want to attack someone with these types of insults (girl), make sure you reminisce about your own past and think twice before posting. Otherwise, fasten your seatbelt wiseass! NEXT!!!
 
In Dan's new thread (which hopefully will appear here soon enough) he states...

"chris saw the actual copulation here in my home huh rob? well, that must have been QUITE a trick as the adults were never here in the first place yip-yope!! i only hatched the eggs."

So finally he admits to having no Texans at his house (I already knew this). Or would you like to edit that statement Dan? I never said I saw Texans copulating at Dan's house. I said he never had Texans there. The "adults" I was refering to are the Eastern Indigo and the "calico" Unicolor Cribo. Be careful Dannio. You don't want to mix your stories up. Focus!
 
Well HELLO Dannio!

It's a shame that your little thread was just moved to where it belongs! I guess your "complete lack of respect and decorum w/regards to other members" worked against you here.

I see that you've FINALLY mustered up the courage (after 45 posts) to speak on your own behalf. But, truthfully, after reading your comical "defense", I think that you were better off saying absolutely nothing.

First of all, let's take Chris Kennard and myself out of the picture, for a second. Chris's brother Joe Kennard posted a clear-cut example of how YOU HAVE CROSSED AN INDIGO SNAKE WITH SOME OTHER TYPE OF SNAKE, and you had nothing to say about it. You didn't contest what Joe had to say, and you didn't call him a liar. Why is that Dannio? I guess you have at least a little common sense?

If found it highly amusing the way you made the GENERAL statement that "no drymarchon were EVER crossed at ANY time!" An emphatic and absolute statement, indeed. But BY WHO Dannio? You certainly sound appalled, as though you were falsely accused of something, but why is it that you didn't say "I NEVER crossed any drymarchon........" ?????? Afraid to really "stick your neck out", are ya Dannio? Covering your a$$, are ya?

You'd love for this whole issue to be based on the simple question of whether or not "chris saw the actual copulation here in my home huh rob?" , wouldn't ya Dannio? Unfortunately for you, I'm the guy who chastized Jeff Nichols for trying to make that the issue, so you look pretty silly pretending that you thought that that's my reason for knowing that you are guilty as charged here. I have a much better, and much simpler reason for knowing that you are in the habit of crossing Indigos. Being a close friend of Chris Kennard's, I knew the details of "Project Blue Book" long before this thread ever came to life. I happen to know Chris like a book, and, although he may be a "pain in the a$$ at times", HE IS NOT A LIAR, and he certainly had no motive to lie to me about how Dan Felice secretly crossed Indigos. You assume that, because Chris might not be "popular" in your pathetic little circle on the KS Indigo forum, that he has no credibility here. Bad judgement Dannio!

You rant about how I can't possibly have any credibility here because of a string of "negative posts". I've only posted once, prior to this thread, and that was in regards to what a scoundrel Fred Albury is. Please excuse me Dannio if you thought I was "negative" in that thread. I was disgusted by the way Fred treated three differnt people, as shown in his emails to them. (If you have something positive to say about Fred, by all means, please do so now????????) For your information Dannio, some people actually do talk about scoundrels in a negative way. Why does that bother you? The best part about you bringing up Fred Albury, as though both of you are victims, is the ironic FACT that I wouldn't be here on this forum right now if it wasn't for you recruiting Chris Kennard, who, in turn, recruited myself, solely for the purpose of voicing your negative opinions about Fred Albury. You didn't have the balls to bash Fred yourself! Your email that Chris posted above says it best when you tell Chris that "his services" are no longer required. At the time you said that, Fred had already been exposed as a scoundrel and was no longer in competiton with you over Dean Alessandria's attention. (Brown nose!) At least do Fred a favor and don't pretend you give a crap about him.

You say that I "NEVER even owned a snake and wouldn't know a garter snake from a garden hose". Well I beg to differ little man! I probably caught, and kept, more garter snakes, by the age 8, than you have in your life. It's true, today I have Red Eared Slider Turtles and African Clawed Frogs, but even that dirty little secret doesn't prevent me from knowing your dirty little secret. Fess up Dannio, the truth will set you free! And, by the way, you shouldn't be mad at Chris Kennard for saying that you crossed Indigos, you should be mad at the "BIG MOUTH" who told him in the first place. Is this what you meant in your "YOU CANNOT BE TRUSTED" comment? You should be very angry with yourself over this whole mess Dannio!

Thanks your the Christmas greeting and Happy Holidays to you! What coal mine will Santa be tapping to fill your stocking this year?

Albert "Rob" Applebaum

PS What was the girlie name you were hiding behind recently on KS to bash Chris Kennard ? Was it "Tash 234" or "Alice 657" or something else? It was funny to see how fast you hit the forum abuse button to have it deleted the second Chris exposed you. You are not in any position to talk trash about anonynymity on the web!
 
PS Dan.........

As for your claim that I do nothing but "parrot" whatever Chris Kennard wants me to say, guess again. Unlike you, Chris has no problem speaking for himself, and neither do I. You on the other hand (for 45 posts) used Jeff Nichols to "parrot" whatever it was that you wanted to say, and he/you didn't make a very good case.

And, in case you hadn't noticed, I had nothing disparaging to say about you until you opened your big mouth about me. I was content to play a limited role and question the guys that you were hiding behind until you crossed (no pun intended) the line. When you live in a "glass house" be careful who you "throw rocks" at.

Albert "Rob" Applebaum
 
"[20+ years in 'cunnards' case] and that is PRECISELY why you were never told anything in the beginning.

""yeah stupid, there was a fib told......to you about 2 years ago".


Pick a card, any card. So which is it Dan? I was never told anything? Or I was told a fib? These are two completely different stories. Come on Dan. Let's debate! You didn't mind mouthing off on KS when you knew you could have my posts erased with a snap of your (or your spokesperson Oldherper"s) finger. Here you have to face the music. What on earth could possibly be stopping you from sharing the name of the person who you supposedly hatched Texas Indigos for, how many offspring were produced and who got them? Also why did TexIndigo Gal claim that the "supposed" Texans she got were from "Dan Felice's stock"? Are you willing to publically announce that you did in fact owned your own adult Texas Indigos in 02 that you bred? You could easily end this right now by answering those simple questions.

Happy Holidays!
 
On page four I posted the first of the only two posts submitted by Dan in the thirty-five post thread at KS where I asked some of the same questions I asked here. The following is the second post...



RE: p.s. & VERY LAST WORD EVER......

[ Logout ] [ User Prefs ] [ Search Forums ] [ Back to Main Page ]
[ Back to Indigo Forum ] [ Reply To This Message ]



Posted by: dan felice at Tue Dec 9 12:51:01 2003 [ Report Abuse ] [ Email
Message ]

no cunnard, i don't know what you mean. i haven't a clue......you are beyond
hope at this point. i feel very, very sorry for you. LAST WORD SMOOTH: you were
never in the loop. EVER! you only have yourself to blame for that. for Christ's
sake, leslie warned me about your 'mentalness' the day she introduced us in '85
in john's grill. i don't know where your living but it's not in the present and
your knowledge of reptiles and their husbandry is sketchy at best. the next
snake you breed will be your first......for one example. you HIGHLY OVERVALUE
your own opinions that more often than not are unsubstantiated. in other words,
you deal in a fantasy world......a longtime habit of yours. i'm not dealing w/
it any longer......i have bigger problems to deal with. YOU ARE MAKING A FOOL
OUT OF YOURSELF YET AGAIN!!!!!! even the people in the pit forum [your alleged
forte] avoid you like the plague. what about that dn't you understand?......
btw, thanks OH, but please don't waste your time anymore on this buffon. i'm not
ever, ever again......


That opening statement sound kind of familiar Dannio, lol. In any case, I figured since Danny boy had this kicked off of KS before I had a chance to respond (just like the first post I submiited on page four?) that perhaps I would do so here. Thanks again Fauna for all of the opportunities that KS robbed me of to defend myself and respond to these accusations! So, without further ado...


"no cunnard, i don't know what you mean. i haven't a clue......you are beyond
hope at this point. i feel very, very sorry for you. LAST WORD SMOOTH: you were
never in the loop. you only have yourself to blame for that."

Why would I EVER want to be part of a "loop" that condones your actions? I'm happy to blame myself for disassociating myself with fraudulant behavior.

"for Christ's
sake, leslie warned me about your 'mentalness' the day she introduced us in '85
in john's grill."

LOL, this is precious! Who is this "Leslie" you refer to and was she there when you produced the snakes in question? Also since you hold "Leslie's" opinion of me in such high regard, you must be better friend's than we were. Therefore why not have her come on here and explain all of this mess you've created and explain how she knows anything about me and while she's at it, explain this alleged "warning", lol?

"your knowledge of reptiles and their husbandry is sketchy at best. the next
snake you breed will be your first......for one example."

That wouldn't explain why there exists an article in the Philadelphia Herpetological Society Bulletin archives that I wrote about a specific breeding that took place as a result of my "husbandry skills", lol. That happened long before you knew what a "husbandry skill" was, lol. What are your other "examples"?

"HIGHLY OVERVALUE
your own opinions that more often than not are unsubstantiated. in other words,
you deal in a fantasy world......a longtime habit of yours. i'm not dealing w/
it any longer."

Wrong! I don't highly overvalue "opinions". I do however "overvalue" the truth as the weight of the word "value" exists in your world. If those opinions are unsubstantiated, then why haven't you taken the opportunities you've been given to prove me wrong???

" YOU ARE MAKING A FOOL
OUT OF YOURSELF YET AGAIN!!!!!!"

How so?

"even the people in the pit forum [your alleged
forte] avoid you like the plague. what about that dn't you understand?...... "

Not the one's with integrity Dannio. The ones who avoid me do so for a reason. The same reason you are. What about that don't YOU understand?

"thanks OH, but please don't waste your time anymore on this buffon. i'm not
ever, ever again......"

Yeah, thanks Oldherper, lol! Great job! Hey Dan, what's a "buffon?

NEXT!
 
It looks like this case is closed.............

Dan felice has apparently "taken the fifth" in order to dodge some simple questions that might clear this matter up. "Mum is the word"! You are, no doubt, a "behind the scenes" kind of guy Dannio, and I wonder if you've run out of "parrots" to present your side of the story. What's the reason for being so secretive? Did you end up having to buy those snakes back from Jeff Nichols because they he realized that they were tainted? Why doesn't he speak on your behalf anymore? Is he pissed off at you? Why so secretive Dannio? Why are the "powers that be" on the KS Indigo forum not rising up to vouch for you here? Do they have nothing to support the comical "Dan Felice - Good Guy" assertion made here? What's the deal Dannio? Your silence only makes you look bad.

Albert "Rob" Applebaum
 
Back
Top