• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Dan Scolaro bad guy.

I just read through a few reports and it is know the proof is lacking. But none of the professionals in the study of IBD are ruling it out either. :shrug01:
 
Randal

What is also interesting about the article is, thats mites are thought to be the vector for IBD but there has been no proof to support it. hmmm.
Click to expand...

Mites as a vector of transmission has been speculated for years. Glad you finally discovered that. That it is contagious was shown long ago. To disregard mites as a possible vector would be to invite disaster, just as to avoid all other possible vectors until "proven" would also be to invite disaster. Hmmmm.
 
Yo Dano!

19,475 views.

Almost 1000 more views since my last total view count just a few hours ago.

Over 12,000 new view in total since the report of IBD was posted. You managed to find just a single stray interested in 2 of your boas. A teenager at that no less. Tim was his name, wasn't it? Ha!

So hows business Dano?
 
Chameleon Company said:
Mites as a vector of transmission has been speculated for years. Glad you finally discovered that. That it is contagious was shown long ago. To disregard mites as a possible vector would be to invite disaster, just as to avoid all other possible vectors until "proven" would also be to invite disaster. Hmmmm.
Click to expand...

ROTFLMAO. :rofl: :rofl:
 
Jim,
I agree wholeheartilty with you. I was just saying what the paper stated.
I have always suspected mites "could" transmit IBD. There have been many papers over the last 15 years or so that have surmised that.

Randal
 
Jim,
Also, the link that Jennifer provided on IBD, was an eye-opener for me, as I never thought Pit-Vipers contracted IBD. As a breeder of venomous snakes for 35 years or so, I was always concerned about having a paromyxovirus contaminating my collection, so that was a great educational experience for me. i.e. Jennifer's "link"

Randal
 
Something is fraud here folks.

I just got off the horn with a fellow who knows a ton about IBD.

He said if the snake in question had IBD, then it is impossible for that other bagged snake to not be showing with it by now. He also said that if that snake was bagged with Al's snakes (and it was), then the odds are that Al's snakes would be dead by now by IBD.

What the hell is going on here? That snake I shipped then cannot be the one that was examined to have IBD.

Is anyone going to PROVE that the report was on a snake that I shipped had IBD are we all going to speculate it was?

1. We are talking about 3 snakes that were bagged with this other snake and NONE of the other 3 snakes have shown any disease or problems.

2. Secondly, none of any snakes ever showed any problems here.

3. Thirdly, those snakes came from a breeder who screens for IBD.

Can someone call that lab and find out if that snake is the snake we are talking about. This all sounds like a fraud to me and I am not convinced the snake I sent was the snake in that report.

Dan
 
And I am going to add right now:

I WAS TOLD THIS BUYER HAD ISSUES WITH IBD BEFORE AND I WAS WARNED HARD TO NOT SHIP ANYTHING TO HIM BECAUSE HE WOULD CLAIM SOME DISEASES LATER.

THIS IS FRAUD.

MY SNAKE WAS PERFECT.

BULL CRAP GOING ON HERE.

DAN
 
Dan Scolaro said:
I just got off the horn with a fellow who knows a ton about IBD.

He said if the snake in question had IBD, then it is impossible for that other bagged snake to not be showing with it by now. He also said that if that snake was bagged with Al's snakes (and it was), then the odds are that Al's snakes would be dead by now by IBD.
Click to expand...

Dan - This is NOT allowed on the Board of Inquiry. You can not give someone elses information without listing their full name.
 
Dan read over the thread starting at page 40 slowly all the bsing going on has been from you. Also If I get the pic of the one from the lab how are you going to know what snake it was. You already stated you didn't know what one it was when you posted you pics. It going to be impossible to prove cause you never photo id the snake. Also stop posting third person crap cause it is getting old.
 
His name is Fred Dulin. He has the IQ of 160 and is like a book.

Regardless, someone explain how this so called virus has not showed in the other 3 snakes if it was a virus on the other snake?

If there is no proof that it was my snake snake that was examined, this is a fraud.

Dan
 
Craig: I am not going to do anything? The fact that the other snakes have not shown with the virus should be a miracle to the researchers and they can act on it. They have the contact information for the snake keepers, so they can have at it with their work. But the fact remains, that anyone and everyone I spoke to said it was impossible for those other three snakes to go this long and not show the virus. Bring on an expert that will claim otherwise of bring me a certified document from the lab including photos of the snake that examined or else this is all huff for nothing.

Dan


Dan read over the thread starting at page 40 slowly all the bsing going on has been from you. Also If I get the pic of the one from the lab how are you going to know what snake it was. You already stated you didn't know what one it was when you posted you pics. It going to be impossible to prove cause you never photo id the snake. Also stop posting third person crap cause it is getting old.
 
Boa Constrictors can be CARRIERS of IBD.

Your friend, obviously does not know that much about IBD if he can say that " yes those snakes would 100% be dead or showing signs of it"

Youre So full of crap. Youre done. Shoo fly!
 
Dan Scolaro said:
Regardless, someone explain how this so called virus has not showed in the other 3 snakes if it was a virus on the other snake?
Click to expand...

I would love to: Snakes can be carriers without showing symptoms. Any snake can die from it while another snake that has been in close contact can be completely fine.

If there is no proof that it was my snake snake that was examined, this is a fraud.
Click to expand...

No, it's not. It's your failure to provide reasonable business records. Please tell me, why do you think someone would go through THAT much work to ruin your "incredible" reputation?
 
Dan Scolaro said:
Something is fraud here folks.

I just got off the horn with a fellow who knows a ton about IBD.

He said
Click to expand...

Oh please, here we go again with this BS.

This is just another third party anonymous quote as we have seen you make throughout this thread Danielle. It is BS. Name your source or just STFU and go away already.
 
Wrong on the identification stuff Craig.

I had 2.2 of them and Al has 1.1 so I can get photos of AL's tomorrow and eliminate them from the pack and narrow it down to the other 1.1.

Dan
 
Back
Top