For those of you who seem to think that I have some kind of a personal problem with Dean, that simply isn't true. I was accused earlier in this thread by Reagan about assuming, and for those of you who are saying I have a personal problem with Dean, you are doing that as well.
The fact is, I want the truth. If I make a mistake, and I'm proven wrong, then what I set out to do was accomplished, and the truth was presented in one form or another. How this thread makes me look is not a concern of mine. Chris did not deserve what has taken place here, and it's been shown, that from start until now, this whole transaction has been full of lies. Those lies have come from Dean, and Reagan. Read these next two quotes carefully. You will see that they contradict themselves.
He no longer has an I-Phone, the only reason Utta was able to reach him on his phone is because I told him he had until the end of February to get the phone out of my name. He will more than likely be losing his business phone number, as we can't figure out a way to allow him to port it without me being stuck with the ETF.
I took Dean's cell phone where he no longer has a smart phone. He has an inexpensive phone(I paid $15 for a cheap gophone to replace his iphone) that I only pay an additional 9.99 a month for, no need for me to pay for a data plan. I am wanting to take that line and give it to my youngest son when I go home for spring break.
In the top post you say that you took Dean's phone away. You talk about early termination fees also. You also say that you told Dean to get the phone out of your name, but he can't do that, you have to do that, because you claim that the contract is in your name. So it isn't possible for him to get the phone out of your name.
In the bottom post you say he has a cheap phone, but that cheap phone still has the same number as the I-phone had.
If you have ever had a cell phone contract, then you would know, that you can't just up and stop paying for a data plan, you are under contract. Not only that, but you claim you went and bought another phone. You would of had to pay to switch the I-phone phone number over to the cheap phone, while still having to pay for the data plan, because you are under contract. So you say "no need for me to pay for a data plan." That is a lie. Not only would you still be paying for a data plan, but you would also be paying the additional 9.99 a month, plus taxes for the new cheap phone. Which means, you now have a numberless I-phone, or it has a new number that you are paying the data plan on, because you are under contract, and in addition to that, you added another 9.99 plus tax to your plan. You talk about the early termination fees in the top post, but yet you are willing to pay for these other additional fees.
If you did all of these things, they would have told you, to just sign over the number to him right then and there, it would have been cheaper for you. In both cases you would have had to pay for a new number, but you would of walked away with the I-phone with new number, and Dean would have walked out with his same number under his own name. No contract would have been broken.
Until the divorce is final and the business is completely out of my name it does concern me.
I already posted to show that your name is not associated with the business. So, now on to the divorce.
I posted your marriage license to show a few things. One of those was to show some of the things that are found on county web sites in their public records. I have been through Cleveland County Public Records, and there is nothing in there about you filing for a divorce. Marriage licenses, and divorces are public record. I have found another court case where Dean was involved, but nothing about a divorce. I have not posted the other court case about Dean in this thread.
So, maybe you are, or maybe you aren't getting a divorce. But regardless of that, here is something that I believe.
I believe that when women make a claim about hardships, and so on, people are more symathetic, then if a man posted the same thing. So, by you making post's here, and not Dean, it raises the level of sympathy, and some people will try to be a little more lenient, and show more mercy, and by doing so, they will be more defensive of your situation. Regardless of whether the truth is even known.
In this case, had Dean come on here and said the same things you did, after seeing the evidence against him, people would have jumped all over him, and said he's just making excuses, which is one of the things Chris has gotten plenty of. Dean is not posting here, because you are posting for him. There is no reason Dean can't post here. I'm not saying that Dean should post here, I'm just saying that there is no reason why he can't.
Dean has made a step in the right direction by sending Chris some money. If his current rate of payment continues, Chris will have been paid off in five years. Not quite what he had in mind, but it's better then not getting any money at all. I hope he continues to pay Chris, and eventually pays his entire debt.
I am looking forward to the day that I come here, and give Dean a big apology, and I will be happy to do so, when Chris is paid in full.
