CplUry
New member
Apologies, I'm not accustomed to internet forums. I think it best that communication be left to email then.
Please don't misunderstand this as any argument toward anyone, (I don't engage in internet fights) I only wish to explain the rationale behind this proposal.
It would be imprudent and counter-intuitive to seize the reptiles without Beando's agreement and the agreement of the victims. Hence, the initial proposal. As I said before, prosecution WILL require EACH victim, who desires compensation of any kind, would HAVE to be present at each and every court appearance. Those who are present are heard, those who are not are stricken from the list of victims and must fend for themselves in civil litigation. It is far from unheard of to have a defense attorney continue to another date, knowing that the victim has a finite number of days/hours in the Commonwealth, resulting in the dismissal of charges. There is absolutely nothing that I do that is not above-board. I defend the Constitution first and above all. In addition, I will act only in the manner in which the victim requests. Knowing the court system, having investigated and testified at countless narcotic, sexual assault and crimes-against-society cases, I am painfully aware of the parameters of my job and the limitations set upon me as an Agent of the Government. I have extensive training in a state in which very few other Police Academy certifications are accepted. Again, I am happy to act in any capacity in which the victim(s) wish me to act. Unfortunately, I have to advise the victim that there are limitations and, sometimes, the actions taken are less than the victim wishes, but better than letting the offender walk.
There is absolutely nothing that I do that is not above-board. I defend the Constitution first and above all. In addition, I will act only in the manner in which the victim requests.
Lucille,
If I'm reading Cpl Ury correctly, Derek Beando has agreed to turn geckos over to him