You two got into a pissing match and both, may(or may not) have been rude to each other.
Ah, no. I was told I would be met at a specific place at a specific time and this did not happen. That is not a pissing match.
kmurphy said:
There was no scam, deceit, poor quality animals ect. Actually there is no reason to stay away from either one of you, regardless of who wins this argument.
Again, I was told I would be met at a specific place at a specific time and this did not happen, I was deceived.
Wilomn said:
dandy, it's nice to see your mind reading abilities have returned full force, as well as your ability to say one thing and do another, something you are known for.
I recall a time, in the not so distant past, when YOU were constantly telling the Faithful Fauna Readers exactly what Rich was thinking, interpreting for the masses, unasked for of course, the edicts from on High, as it were....except that you were not ...... shall we say CORRECT and just leave it there?
I have no idea what you are speaking of yet I’m sure I’m not alone. Though, if I was attempting to give advice and I was incorrect and was corrected then I fail to see how that makes me an ass. You have been corrected many times, does that mean you are a bigger ass than I?
Wilomn said:
While I do find some pleasure in this, it's just a side bonus, not something I seek out; heck you make an ass of yourself often with NO assistance from me so I generally just read and chuckle, or guffaw as the situation warrants.
To the point. I have defended both neil "the liar" gubitz and sal "the theif" tornambene when they were wronged. Forgot that didja? Convenient, as is much of what you forget.
It appears the mind reading abilities you claim I have seem to be contagious. You claim to know what I am thinking. Can you guess what I’m thinking now oh hypocritical one?
Wilomn said:
You see, unlike you and some of yours, I do NOT decide who is right and wrong based solely on who they are. I actually look at the situation and THEN decide if I wish to participate in the eventual outcome of that situation.
Come on wes, you are so full of crap your breath stinks. I’ve had friends of yours PM me inquiring as to why you have such a hard on for me. Kind of odd how your reply was only minutes after aaron’s. So you are saying that I was wrong to sit and wait and aaron was correct to make me wait. Seems you have been backing persons known to be deceitful and devious as of late.
Wilomn said:
I do what I think is right and/or necessary by the circumstances involved not by who is involved. You should try it, it's not easy, but it is rewarding; not to anyone but me, but unlike some (you) I am not out for praise or attention.
I do and have done so unlike you and some of yours. Forgot that didja? Convenient, as is much of what you forget.
Wilomn said:
You wanted your boo boos kissed and it didn't happen. Again.
Gee, again wes’ mind boggling mind reading powers astound us all.
Serafim said:
From my point of view with no money or animals being lost in this transaction
it should just be chalked up as poor communication on both sides.. Continuing this thread makes both parties look bad and really doesn't need to be on the BOI just my opinion...
regards Serafim
Again, I was told I would be met at a specific place at a specific time and this did not happen. How could that be misconstrued as communicating poorly?
Bill Stonegate said:
Hello??? From a business standpoint, if someone keeps you waiting for more than 10 minutes, you got a genuine reason to be ticked off. If you call that person, and they act flip, when they should be explaining GENUINE REASONS why they were late, and you get the runaround, tell them you can't wait any longer, and go home.
There was not any reason given as to why he did not leave until 11:00 am (the time in which he agrees to meet me at). When he called me at 9:30, he told me he was going to be leaving in half hour.
Wilomn said:
There is one thing about dandy that many may not know.
He has in the past said one thing in private and quite the opposite thing in public which brings anything he says in public into question.
Please provide your proof o' libelous one. Make it quick though because you are going back on ignore and you can play with yourself. Though there is one thing about wes that many DO know. He has in the past made false statements and accusations without any means of proof.
Wilomn said:
Sure, the kid should have been on time and it was not cool to tell dandy that he was almost there when he was just leaving BUT I can easily see dandy starting the pissing/wording match. Easily. How many of you would wait an hour and a half just to be "sure" that if the kid showed up you could throw down with him?
Gee, which is it wes, I'm say things and don't have any intention to back them up or I'm sitting around waiting to back them up and it's wrong? Then again wes, maybe you should read what has been written and see what an ass you are making of yourself.