• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Heika Sample ... Seller Beware

Chameleon Company

New member
Joined
Feb 6, 2002
Messages
2,825
Reaction score
9
Points
0
Age
71
Location
Babson Park, Florida
Many of you know me and the business I manage. Those who don’t can click on my website link to learn more. I breed and sell chameleons as a commercial venture. Heika Sample is a customer of mine residing in Oregon who bought six female panther chameleons from me in January 2007. She's the "Heika" that posts in many chameleon forums, one of which she also moderates. We've been unable to resolve some claims originating from her and brought to my attention on July 10th, 2007. As we attempted to resolve matters since, her undocumented claims have become untenable in a different forum discussing these issues, and her stance and actions irresponsible. I have made the decision to post the actions of parties here, in the BOI, as I have no desire to chase her from one obscure forum to another. Moving forward there will not only be a clear record of “Seller Beware” when dealing with this individual, but also an accounting of events and actions taken by parties in a public forum on this issue where input is invited.

Heika has made statements, and taken positions, that are irresponsible and without merit. I have asked her repeatedly to elaborate these charges and claims, as well as provide source data (i.e. vet reports, test results, names and contact info), and have met a brick wall in my efforts. This would include her being contacted by two different veterinarians at my urging requesting her cooperation..

First, a paste of Heika's last version of her complaint from a different forum, which I take issue with:
Heika Sample, The Chameleon Forums, 7-23-07
I have had some problems with "bone density", as one fine owner of your company seems to prefer calling it. Amazingly, although all of my panther and veiled chameleons are housed in identical fashion, the problems have been limited to.. well.. 6 animals. All 6 were purchased from the same company. You can guess which that might be.

When I contacted the company and originally asked if they were actually using ProZyme, I had no idea that my frank question would be met with such hostility. In getting to the root of the problem in 6 females that I am quite fond of, I have been accused of many things, and called a few names, the worst now blanked out by Brad (another forum). My hope was to find solutions and explanations for the health issues that I was seeing in a specific group of animals that I own. It seemed to me that the owners of the company simply didn't want to be blamed for the issues. I am more than willing to assess my own husbandry.. I do it daily, as any good keeper should. I am not sure even now if the responsibility lies with me. If it does, it seems coincidental that only 6 particular animals are affected by my husbandry faults.
I have many email communications voicing Heika's issues, anger, etc. But since the above was from a public forum, in a now deleted thread, I also felt it best represented, in her own words, what I needed to respond to. My response will first be the dates and timelines of events and communications, briefly summarized. Full supporting emails can be posted if and when necessary. All dates are 2007.

1) January 2007. Heika purchases 6 panther chameleons, receives them on Jan 30th. All a bit “cold on arrival but OK” (email confirm)

2) 2-02: Heika reports a slight URI in one animal, which she attributes to the cold. She feels she can treat it.

3) 2-05: Heika reports: "This female appears to be recovering nicely. With any luck, she will pull out of this without any problems at all. On another note… all of the chameleons appear to be doing very well. One of the Ambilobes out of Anubis Jr. just completed a shed. No stress colorations, they are eating, drinking, and look well.”
.
4) 2-23 Heika: "One female might be a male"; My reply "If so, I'll fix it. LMK", This is more than two weeks after my guarantee expired. I never heard more on it. (Since she now in July claims to have “six females” from me, I guess “he” was really a she all along) !

5) 6-16 (four and 1/2 months after purchase) Heika: One of the females is not doing well ... Not growing and eating poorly etc etc. Any suggestions ? I offer a list of 4-5 avenues to explore as possible causes.

6) 7-10 Heika is having trouble with a gravid female that she bred. She emails me, accuses us of a rumor that she heard we use growth enhancers that produce debilitating effects on our animals, and wants me to be "honest and forthcoming" . Claims the animal suffers from Metabolic Bone Disease (MBD), which the rumor says we cause in our animals by use of the growth hormone or growth-hormone-like substances, and this is now the reason for her female’s problems. (The “growth enhancer” claim is pure BS, btw, and was debunked in another forum. We use no such substances, and it is pure folly to think we would or could) She tells me now that the ill chameleon from 6-16 has died.

7) 7-10 My reply was professional. No such truth to the rumor. I discuss the situation. I ask her to call me, and Heika and I talk on the phone. It’s very civil.

8) 7-11 I volunteer 2 free Nosy Be females to Heika, as I check records and note a problem from another customer on an animal shipped in January, and reported to me then, where the customer (a veterinarian) felt it was not a serious situation. I had sent a replacement for free then (in February), and also let them keep the first animal. I enlist the help of close friend Dr. Ivan Alfonso, who is also our herd veterinarian, to look at Heika’s concerns. We spend considerable time communicating with Heika. Calcium deficiencies are always magnified by egg production, and as there are many causes of MBD and its symptoms, we request the bloodwork on the animal. Bloodwork is vital in an MBD diagnosis, and at the time of this writing, we do not know if any was ever done. More on MBD and “bone density” below. Heika refuses to send us anything, yet claims that it is our fault. Of note is that she had the animal for over 5 months, deemed it healthy to breed, and then ran into problems. Our guarantee is 5-days, not 5 months, FYI, but we have worked with many customers beyond our 5 day obligation.

9) 7-13 & 14 OK, according to Heika, the problem with this animal may not be MBD traced back to our "growth hormones". Its now filarial worms, as they cut the animal open to remove the eggs, and found it loaded with “filarial worms” in its gut. While not uncommon in WC animals, there is no known transmission of filarials specific to chameleons here in the U.S. They are not only almost exclusively host-species specific by type of filarial worm (two are known to affect chameleons), they are mosquito specific as well as the vector of transmission. It takes a specific species of mosquito depending on the type of filarial to transmit it between animals. Heartworms in dogs are a type of filarial worm. They are also not known to reside in the gut as described, or in the quantities described. This is an unheard of diagnosis in CBB animals, and would rate as the stuff of scientific case-studies and published articles that make careers. While it seems that everything about her description is wrong, and her vet does not know reptiles (her words), we obtain opinions from several other vets on our end about the possibilities (all say something not right), and ask Heika to put us in contact with her vet. We line up a Board Certified Clinical Pathologist to do the case study with available research funds if we can confirm all, as it would be that big of a deal. But the evidence trail has to be kept intact, fully documented, and be open to all scrutiny, lest someone just grab a filarial from a WC animal and say “here it is“. Heika refuses to pass on any info. Multiple refusals. No data or info period. Of big note here should be that Heika claimed in the forum that there were hundreds of the worms in the chameleon and that she has a jar full of them in the fridge. She refused to even provide pics of the worms. :shrug01:

Littered throughout as things progressed was an escalation of rudeness and childishness as others began posting in forums, and forum dynamics emerged. It was not so initially, and I raise it because Heika’s emails to me now say “I came to you for help and was treated rudely and insulted”. That is not only not supported by the actual dialogue and communications, but IMMHO, when it did occur in forum, Heika began it by insulting Dr. Alfonso when, in eventually refusing his help, she felt a need in referring to him as biased and a poor chameleon keeper. Of note is that Dr. Alfonso had helped Heika in times past (2006) with other medical issues regarding chameleons from other sources, and she had extended her gratitude in-forum to Dr. Alfonso at that time. In the end, another acquaintance did make a very uncalled for characterization, but by that time Heika had insulted everybody remotely related to me. I am also not sure what she expects when she belittles people in forums .... a "Yes Ma’am"? Throughout it all, I was never malicious, or insulting, IMMHO, and I also see it as immaterial to Heika and me and her animals and the issues here.

I have pleaded with Heika to cooperate with the medical information. I have told her that her inaccurate accusations needed redress, and she refused. I told her that I would post in an appropriate forum (here) that would generate a public record to contrast her irresponsible accusations.

There are many characterizations in emails, posts elsewhere (many deleted now but which we have full copies of) besides what I have posted above. Heika's characterizations about how she was treated are grossly inaccurate. Her characterizations of her actions are grossly generous. Her characterizations about how my company takes care of customers is not true. Heika, I can only work with what you tell me when you tell me. What I have are undocumented accusations five months unsupported.

Again, Heika's words from above, now in a better light:
1) When I contacted the company and originally asked if they were actually using ProZyme, I had no idea that my frank question would be met with such hostility.
The email exchange was not as described. It was a bit more than a "frank question". Heika played the blame game from the beginning, all based on an absurd rumor. It was not met with hostility, just facts and help.
2) In getting to the root of the problem in 6 females that I am quite fond of, I have been accused of many things, and called a few names.
Heika began with the accusations, insults in emails and forum, etc. I did not accuse her of anything, or call her any names. I can't speak for others who felt slighted by H. Heika, once you post in forums, you invite ridicule when you are the first to spread it. Your "getting to the root of the problem" self-description is hollow.
3) My hope was to find solutions and explanations for the health issues that I was seeing in a specific group of animals that I own. It seemed to me that the owners of the company simply didn't want to be blamed for the issues.
Nope, I don't think so. You don't tell me of a problem which you attribute to me until the sixth month that you have the animals. At that point, you have had serious issues with two, one of which you had deemed fit to breed, and then ran into problems. You are correct, we do not want to be blamed … we want the data. You refused .... BUT .. we offer two free animals no-strings-attached. Heika did not ask for any compensation, and does later decline, as her uncooperative stance becomes more absurd. How can we offer help, support, or anything you are supposedly asking for, if you don’t provide any information/facts that you claim to have ?
4) I have had some problems with "bone density", as one fine owner of your company seems to prefer calling it.
We almost want to make a poster out of this one. Here is the only diagnostic info Heika has referred to in any and all communications about what she decided was “MBD”
Heika, from a post in another forum
"X-rays also showed that her bone density was not good."
So we are to assume that it is wrong calling it "bone density" problems when:

1- Heika herself called it "bone density" in her very first post in her filarial worm thread in another forum; and
2- How else can we call it when the condition she claims (MBD) was diagnosed ONLY with X-rays? What does an X-ray determine? Bone Density !!!
5) Amazingly, although all of my panther and veiled chameleons are housed in identical fashion, the problems have been limited to.. well.. 6 animals. All 6 were purchased from the same company. You can guess which that might be.
Now you reference problems with six animals, after six months <sigh>, but never provided any evidence to support such a "coincidental" claim. You have described issues with only two chams, yet not substantiated a single claim. You have refused all cooperation. And for the two you have lost, I offered two free female Nosy Be replacements right up front, no evidence required. So, at this point, on your word, I am to believe that all your other chams that are not my pedigree are fine, and the ones I sent are not, now that you‘ve had them for six months. And the first 4-5 months of “all OK” is now to be of no consequence. In all sincerity, looking at your track record in this whole incident, could you please identify the basis of credibility on which I can give any of your claims merit. At 4 ½ months you tell us of one animal with problems. At 5 ½ months your gravid female’s demise is now our fault. Two days later its all six. Not a lick of supporting documentation. The only fact we have is that you are providing no facts.
6) I am more than willing to assess my own husbandry.. I do it daily, as any good keeper should. I am not sure even now if the responsibility lies with me. If it does, it seems coincidental that only 6 particular animals are affected by my husbandry faults.
Then let me explain. I have a covenant with you as a customer to abide by my guarantee, and all other rules of accurate representation and ethics as a seller, both overt and implied. You have the responsibility such that, whatever occurs with your animals, if I am to be “blamed” as you said we “were to blame“, you are obligated to report it to me promptly, and with as much data as anyone could reasonably expect. ESPECIALLY if there are medical issues that you claim have been “dormant” for many months. Do not ask for help, then refuse the help as it does not assist you in your goal of transferring blame based on assumptions. Help is about solutions, and it takes as much information as can be had to figure out what has happened, and what can then be done to help. Six months after the fact is an exceedingly difficult "blame" to substantiate, and yet you expect it to be embraced while you withhold all medical data. 3-4 weeks after you deemed it fit to breed, the animal is doing poorly with the pregnancy, and you now want to assign a six-month-old cause, and yet won’t provide even a sticky-note of documentation. Then we have a first-in-history claim of filarial worms in CBB chameleons in the U.S., and you tell us (email) that asking for documentation and contact info is to question the integrity of you and your vet. Even the most experienced chameleon breeder would be hard-pressed to find any causative agent that could be six-months latent. If you are going to cast the "blame" on the breeder after so much time has elapsed, then you need facts and data, and you need to share them.

I am not sure how easy you thought success would be with panther chameleons Heika. All my animals are not perfect. Despite all the info available, it is my opinion that failure remains the most common teacher. Everyone with any sustained success with chameleons has learned plenty from their certain failures. My history of taking responsibility for my mistakes, when I do not meet my obligations to my customer on the first try, is time-tested. As of now Heika, your history of taking responsibility is to blame others and run from your own accountability and obligations.

Heika, we have been confidantes in the past. There is no doubt you expend enormous effort in various chameleon forums. I made numerous requests of you to fix this via any number of easier and more constructive ways, and was told to pound sand. Next time you ask others for help, consider that you have an obligation to help them to help you.

Heika, your line that says it all :
I am not sure even now if the responsibility lies with me …
Of course not. How could it ? Nah. :rolleyes:

I can document all of the above, have all the emails and thread posts, etc. I would rather wait to see if anything is in dispute before I do, kind of as a Court Complaint. Otherwise, this thread will be as 50 posts long before the second true post.

To my many customers, as always I thank you for your patronage. To those where I have had problems to fix, I thank you for your helping me to do that when the situation arose.
 
**Ahemm, Jim, full names on posts or risk getting deleted....

Funny how sensitive people get when asked to provide documentation they say they have to support their wild accusations. I especially enjoyed the fact that she bred a female knowing it wasn’t 100% and then scratches her head when things go south for the animal. While I think I went overboard in my assessment of this situation and Heika on another forum and should have posted in a more toned down fashion, I still stand by the simple fact that this is a scenario of someone trying to shift blame for her own husbandry errors onto someone/something else. You see this all the time in Chameleons and the small pond big doggs the forums create. Seems Jim tried to properly remedy the situation. Yet he and the company I have an interest in are attacked for 5-6 pages on a public forum. And, this woman didn’t expect to get her feathers ruffled back after flailing around like a yahoo? Reminds me of a fantastic quote, “I think of a man; and take away reason and accountability.”.

Maybe Heika realized being a Chameleon breeder wasn’t in the cards for her but had a shot at being the person who exposed the good business practices ‘ol Jim and the Chameleon Company. You know, that bad guy who offers you new animals for the ones you killed 6 months after the transaction is completed. You swindler Jim!!

-Matt Jillson
 
I dont think ill be the only person to say this, but, you owe nothing, NOTHING to this person.

If you have a TOS that clearly states you expect any problems to be reported in 5 days time, then thats that, and there is no question otherwise.

Regardless if you help people past that point, after a weeks time ALOT of things can go wrong with a chameleon if they are not housed, or fed properly. I dont even keep them and i know that, and understand it enough to say it. They are sensitive animals, and personally, if she thought there were problems from the get go, why would she breed them only a few months later? *Shrugs* maybe its just me, but when you get a new animal in, i would say keep that thing in quarantine until you are SURE that it is healthy 100% before breeding.

I just think this is a person trying to get some extra out of nothing owed.
 
mattjillson said:
**Ahemm, Jim, full names on posts or risk getting deleted....

-Matt Jillson

He's good , it's listed on his user profile to the left of his post.
 
[SARCASM]It's quite obvious that you sold her WC animals that you loaded up with growth hormones. That explains the filarial infestation and the MDB/early demise.[/SARCASM]

Yeah, right...

Jim, I'd love for her to come here and :shootfoot .

Nothing like some good, old fashioned BOI meltdown entertainment.
 
Alicia,
Trust that I have no problem embracing your words. In fairness to Heika, she did not ask for replacements. Although she did initially accept my offer, she then declined it as it became all about "blame" to her. I think she fixated on "blame" too much, and once it got in another forum thread, she made some mistakes in escalating that as an issue. It was untenable at that point. But she did not, and does not, want replacements. Her actions have indicated that she wants to trumpet the "blame" garbage though.

As a footnote, the thread where she escalated things was one started by me addressing the rumor that others had fomented about the use of growth hormones here. No how, no way, so help me God. We use the sun, and are good at what we do. No gimmicks. But she hijacked the thread with the blame game. The thread didn't mention her or her name until she posted and decided to trash my company as you see in her words above (it was the last of sevreal posts). She was slanderous, unprofessional, etc. Too far over-the-top for me. That forum eventually deleted the thread.

Geez, here I am posting in the BOI again. Full circle I guess .. LOL !
 
Chameleon Company said:
Alicia,
Trust that I have no problem embracing your words. In fairness to Heika, she did not ask for replacements. Although she did initially accept my offer, she then declined it as it became all about "blame" to her. I think she fixated on "blame" too much, and once it got in another forum thread, she made some mistakes in escalating that as an issue. It was untenable at that point. But she did not, and does not, want replacements. Her actions have indicated that she wants to trumpet the "blame" garbage though.

As a footnote, the thread where she escalated things was one started by me addressing the rumor that others had fomented about the use of growth hormones here. No how, no way, so help me God. We use the sun, and are good at what we do. No gimmicks. But she hijacked the thread with the blame game. The thread didn't mention her or her name until she posted and decided to trash my company as you see in her words above (it was the last of sevreal posts). She was slanderous, unprofessional, etc. Too far over-the-top for me. That forum eventually deleted the thread.

Geez, here I am posting in the BOI again. Full circle I guess .. LOL !

Okay, the way it read, ( and it was long forgive me if i took it wrongly) it sounded as if she was angry, and complained because she wanted replacements. Though, i suppose if one is making wild accusations about animals being treated with growth hormones, or somethingorother, why would they want them in the first place. Forgive me on my ASSumption then.

I still think she sounds pretty crazy to be making statements like that though...
 
Jim O said:
Jim, I'd love for her to come here and :shootfoot .

Nothing like some good, old fashioned BOI meltdown entertainment.

Well, I do plan to come here and defend myself.

My version of events differs somewhat, as many of you can imagine.

I will post every email and forum correspondence, and recap every telephone conversation that I have that is pertinant to this situation. In the end, you will see that Jim is presenting a very scewed version of this saga.

Entertainment on the way.

Heika
 
Alicia,
I know it is a long read. I think Heika bought the chameleons with all the proper expections, that being that she either hadn't heard the rumor, or put no credence in it. It was only many months later, when she had problems with a gravid female (going by her communications to me) that she then felt the rumor had merit, and was therefore the cause of her problems. It also provided an easy answer for her problems if it was true, aka it was not due to a husbandry problem that so many hobbyists encounter. Well, the rumor is completely not true. It does not mean Heika's husbandry is "bad", anymore than that of others who do not have 100% success is bad. Its a tough thing to get used to, but my opinion is that the reality of it all is that half the time you don't see the problems coming, cannot definitively find a cause that you can change, etc. It is expensive and frustrating when it happens.

Heika, I'll have my popcorn ready in the microwave for your version. In fact, here's the first email exchange about the rumor, which Heika characterized as a "frank question", and my reply:

July 10th, from Heika

Hi Jim,

I need to address this with you, although I am very reluctant to. However, the health of my females seems to depend on it.

I heard rumors in January that you were using a substance that enhanced growth. I have a link to the product somewhere here. I also heard that this stuff increased growth at the expense of calcium uptake, and that some individuals developed MBD. I had already paid you for the females that I have now, and really thought that it was a bunch of nonsense.. I felt that your reputation and ethics would prevent you from selling animals who were part of this experiment without informing the recipients.

The young female that I emailed you about a while ago has now died. The necropsy revealed MBD as the cause. When I received the results, I panicked. I thought, holy shit, what have I done wrong?!? I have the right lights, the right supplements, the right everything.. why MBD? That was yesterday. Today, I took one of the nosy be females in because I suspected she was egg bound. She is.. and also has MBD. She is egg bound as a result of it. I drove home, collected chameleons, and drove back to the vet. I have a monstrous vet bill, but one thing is certain. Only the females that I received from you have MBD. The nosy be females are the worst off.. they were the oldest females I received from you. The younger ones have it to varying degrees. 2 other females and a male were also x-rayed that came from other sources, and they all proved to be healthy animals with no sign of MBD. They were kept in exactly the same conditions as the females I purchased from you, and were purchased at approximately the same time.

I am not asking for any compensation.. the money is spent, and I don’t want replacement animals. I can’t imagine that you don’t know about this issue, and I want to know how you are treating your affected animals. I need to know. I also need to know if your animals are showing genetic problems. Are you seeing poor hatch rates out of treated animals? Are the offspring strong? Please be forthcoming, I need to know everything about this stuff, because I need to make decisions based upon what you have to say.

I don’t want to go public with this.. no BOI, no nothing. I don’t want my breeding stock or my husbandry to be viewed as substandard. My success as a new breeder depends upon a good reputation, and I don’t want that smear on my name. I am sure that is your goal too. So, please, just answer my questions honestly so we can move on from this.

Thanks,

Heika

I will wait for Heika's responses to come to elaborate, but there are many unsubstantiated conclusions in her email, and that's being polite.

Here is the "honest answer" she requested, so "we can move on from this"........ small problem though ...... she didn't move on.

My response to Heika, Jul 10th
Heika,
I am sorry to hear of your results. However, you also went a long way with a few erroneous assumptions, to include asking me to answer questions "honestly", which is to imply that I would not under certain circumstances here or anywhere else.

Let me say three things as directly as I know how:

1) We use no growth enhancement substances what-so-ever. All natural, all the time. No gimmicks.

2) Anything less than Mother Nature is deficient husbandry. We all have "sub-standard husbandry" with mixed results, as only she is the "right stuff". Sometimes I get 100% hatch, for instance, and sometimes nothing, from sibling animals in otherwise identical conditions here.

3) Assumptions make an "ass of u and me".

As you know, MBD is a blanket term for what is the result of many different possibilities affecting calcium being where it needs to be, when it needs to be there, and in the proper amounts. One of the factors could very well be the genetics of a certain batch of chameleons. Whatever I shipped was in the full belief that the animals were fine and fit, and I have to go on the assumption that they appeared the same to you when you received them, for I have heard nothing otherwise. We retain no animals from 2 of every 3 clutches we produce. I have nothing from the winter Nosy Be's here, although I am now once again holding back more females from that locale for next year's production. Knowing all that I do, to include that there is still so much more that I and others do not know about chameleons, how can I put my finger on anything causative when there are so many possibilities, and all is so far removed from when they were in my care ? With the lingering accusation of a "substance", which would be to accuse me of terrible ethics, how can you believe me? I have different bloodlines here ranging as deep as 4-6 generations, depending on the specific bloodlines. There is little that I haven't seen regarding unexpected results. .

Heika, I hope you realize that optimum conditions vs. lesser conditions, or a situation where one person's husbandry conditions are significantly different from another's, might allow something to manifest in one place and not the other. If those sibling animals were predisposed to have a higher risk of calcium concerns, is it not possible that it would more likely manifest in one place, such as indoors under artificial light, and not be as likely to happen in real sunlight ? Or with different supplement regimens ? Is this not the basis of a definition for "stress", things being less than optimum ? I understand your frustrations, as I have killed more chameleons that most, if not all, homo sapiens But I also know full well where the risks are, and when I have taken them on, and must own them. What I have to be "forthcoming" about is the reality that working with chameleons is full of disappointments ...... to include dishonest and unscrupulous people, for sure. Dr. Ivan Alfonso is my very good friend and herd vet, and a part owner. I think we take enormous comfort in the integrity of each other. I have other intimates, with impeccable reputations, within the business who have been here often enough, and have known me for a long time, to help offset those that would spread false rumors about me. I have thousands of contented customers where there was never a problem or frustration with the animal I produced and sold. I am also far from perfect, and have had to fix plenty of problems along the way. I think my reputation there is unmatched.

I can’t imagine that you don’t know about this issue, and I want to know how you are treating your affected animals. I need to know. I also need to know if your animals are showing genetic problems. Are you seeing poor hatch rates out of treated animals? Are the offspring strong? Please be forthcoming, I need to know everything about this stuff, because I need to make decisions based upon what you have to say

You have lots of sentences ending in a "?", and some need far better definition as to what you are truly asking, lest I type all afternoon. Might be best if you call me. Up until 10 PM EST is fine. FYI, if I had relied on any gimmickry, I would have bred myself into oblivion long ago.

Jim Flaherty
 
In the beginning...

I purchased 6 females from Jim. There were the usual emails exchanged, prices discussed, money sent. Temperatures were very cold here at the time, and so shipping was delayed for a couple weeks. In the time between payment and the arrival of the chameleons, I first heard the rumors that Jim used ProZyme to artificially enhance the growth of his chameleons. I had already paid for the animals, and trusted Jim. I dismissed the rumors as just that.

The animals came. They were in fairly good shape. One of the females had a URI that later turned out to be something more. I discussed the URI with Jim, but never bothered to discuss the "something more", because I simply didn't see the point. I had no plans to return the female. She had some odd symptoms, and as time progressed, I made the decision that she would never be bred. She improved over time, and I still have her today. She still slobbers.. no URI, it is actually "bone density" problems. I like her, and she has been relegated pet status. But, once again, I never wanted her to be replaced. I couldn't see the point in discussing the illness with Jim.

Here are those early emails discussing that female. Unlike Jim's claim above, it didn't look like a slight URI.. it looked like a humdinger. Chameleons don't normally slobber.

From: Heika
To: 'The Chameleon Company'
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 2:17 PM
Subject: URI.. Nose be female
Hey Jim,
Just wanted to let you know I am treating one of the nose be females for a fairly advanced URI. I noticed yesterday when she was hanging from a branch slobbering.. today she was wheezing and popping. Other than that, the other five seem to be adjusting well.
Heika

Jim's reply:

From: The Chameleon Company [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 2:25 PM
To: Heika
Subject: Re: URI.. Nose be female
Hope that you caught it in time. While I didn't notice anything before sending them out, its possible that a cool-down in shipping aggravated something. Was it one of the larger Nosy Be's, or a smaller Ambilobe ? Thanks.
Jim Flaherty
The Chameleon Company, LLC
www.chameleoncompany.com

I responded:

From: Heika
To: 'The Chameleon Company'
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 2:36 PM
Subject: RE: URI.. Nose be female
This is one of the larger nose be females. She seems to be in good physical condition otherwise, so I hope that it was caught in time as well. That is my guess, that the cool shipping probably set it off. She is on baytril prescribed by my vet and will hopefully be fine.
Heika

I didn't hear from Jim for a while after that, but did email him about a young female that looked like it was coloring up into a male. She turned out to be just a colorful little female, as I later told Jim on the phone. He did offer to replace her if she turned out to be a male. Everything was pleasant, things were ok. I was alright with the 6 girls.

It was in these intervening months that a young female shipped from ChamCo slowed down in growth. Knowing these things happen sometimes, I kept a close eye on her. I asked for Jim's advice the first time she dropped in weight instead of gaining weight. Please note.. I asked for nothing but advice. You will see that is a common thread in all of my interactions with Jim. I wanted nothing from him but information.

From: Heika Sample
To: [email protected]
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 2:24 PM
Subject: Failure to thrive..

Hi Jim,

Hoping you can give me some suggestions with one of the little females I purchased from you a while back. This is one of the youngest ones, a female out of Anubis Jr. I will start with a little history on her care...

Initially, she was housed with her sister. For the first month and a half, they both grew at about the same rate. Then, suddenly, this little girl quit growing. She didn't lose weight and showed no signs of illness, but wasn't growing. I was concerned that her now-larger sister was eating up all the bugs, so I seperated her out into her own cage. Things continued on, and she made some small weight gains, but nothing major. I have weighed her every couple of weeks, and this time is the first time she has lost weight.

She still looks alright.. very small, but healthy in appearance. I am at a loss as to what to do for her. She looks like a four month old. All of the other chameleons that I purchased from you (actually, all of the other chameleons period) have grown and thrived. This little girl.. she just.. stays tiny. Now with the weight loss, my concern is that she will start to decline. My vet has wormed her twice now.. that isn't the problem. She is getting a good variety of food and supplements, and also gets dosed with a tiny amount of vit. A every two weeks. She is still spunky.. I expect to get bitten when I handle her, and she never fails to deliver. Have you seen this? If so, what have you done?

Thanks,

Heika

The other chameleons, with the exception of the Nosy be female mentioned above, were doing fine. Even the nosy be female had improved. I had no reason to suspect a problem.

Jim responded:

----- Original Message -----
From: The Chameleon Company
To: Heika Sample
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2007 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: Failure to thrive..
Heika,
Wish I had a clue. As for whether I have or haven't seen animals that slow down then get back with the flow of things, I have. But I've also seen ones that continued a decline. My first guess as to things reparable would have been parasites. But that's been addressed. My second tier guesses would be bacteria, coccidia or otherwise, but that's something that would require more lab work. If real sunshine is ever an option, it can work wonders as well. I hope she turns around.
Jim Flaherty
The Chameleon Company, LLC

I was already doing the things that Jim suggested, including putting the female outside every morning for a couple hours. Her death took me by surprise. She hadn't shown any real symptoms of illness. I asked my vet to take a look at her for me, and he told me she had MBD. In the meantime, the healthy nosy be female began exhibiting symptoms of being egg bound. It was after discovering through an x-ray that she also had MBD (or bone density issues! :rofl: ) that I began panicking. That was an expensive day at the vet, as I had several chameleons checked for problems. Considering the findings, that long-ago conversation about ProZyme flashed through my head again. I emailed Jim to ask him about it. Please note, I ask for nothing from him.

From: Heika
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 3:17 PM
Subject: Problems..
Hi Jim,
I need to address this with you, although I am very reluctant to. However, the health of my females seems to depend on it.
I heard rumors in January that you were using a substance that enhanced growth. I have a link to the product somewhere here. I also heard that this stuff increased growth at the expense of calcium uptake, and that some individuals developed MBD. I had already paid you for the females that I have now, and really thought that it was a bunch of nonsense.. I felt that your reputation and ethics would prevent you from selling animals who were part of this experiment without informing the recipients.
The young female that I emailed you about a while ago has now died. The necropsy revealed MBD as the cause. When I received the results, I panicked. I thought, holy shit, what have I done wrong?!? I have the right lights, the right supplements, the right everything.. why MBD? That was yesterday. Today, I took one of the nosy be females in because I suspected she was egg bound. She is.. and also has MBD. She is egg bound as a result of it. I drove home, collected chameleons, and drove back to the vet. I have a monstrous vet bill, but one thing is certain. Only the females that I received from you have MBD. The nosy be females are the worst off.. they were the oldest females I received from you. The younger ones have it to varying degrees. 2 other females and a male were also x-rayed that came from other sources, and they all proved to be healthy animals with no sign of MBD. They were kept in exactly the same conditions as the females I purchased from you, and were purchased at approximately the same time.
I am not asking for any compensation.. the money is spent, and I don’t want replacement animals. I can’t imagine that you don’t know about this issue, and I want to know how you are treating your affected animals. I need to know. I also need to know if your animals are showing genetic problems. Are you seeing poor hatch rates out of treated animals? Are the offspring strong? Please be forthcoming, I need to know everything about this stuff, because I need to make decisions based upon what you have to say.

I don’t want to go public with this.. no BOI, no nothing. I don’t want my breeding stock or my husbandry to be viewed as substandard. My success as a new breeder depends upon a good reputation, and I don’t want that smear on my name. I am sure that is your goal too. So, please, just answer my questions honestly so we can move on from this.
Thanks,
Heika

So much for not going public. Here we are on the BOI anyhow.

Continued..
 
OK ?

Heika,

Check your email dates. You didn't receive the animals until January 30th. :rolleyes:

Here is the email from you on 2-05-2007
Evening, Jim.

This female appears to be recovering nicely. With any luck, she will pull out of this without any problems at all.

On another note… all of the chameleons appear to be doing very well. One of the ambilobes out of Anubis Jr. just completed a shed. No stress colorations, they are eating, drinking, and look well. Madagascar is happening in the shop.. it is working out better than I expected! The shop was built on a hill, and about half of the back wall is cement retaining wall. It holds the humidity very well! I am spending way too much time out there.. I love just watching them…

Heika

I went by what I was told. Goodnight :thumbsup:
 
What i dont get, is, you guys seem to have wanted this to work out, and everything to be civil. Those emails definitely dont seem that negative.... at least, not in my eyes... and are just from a concerned owner to the breeder. Who wouldnt be upset when they have findings like these?

Why is it here on the boi exactly? why should this new breeder be avoided exactly?

For spreading rumors? im just curious as to whats exactly trying to be got at here... maybe im just too slow to get it too... you never know. and is probably more than likely the case....
BUT
why would this heika post false accusations unless had Proof that Growth hormones were used? i dont know why anyone would do that really.... craziness Especially if you are an up and coming breeder and all that. Whod risk their reputation over false information?

Other than that, *shrugs* im just trying to understand is all.
 
Mooing Tricycle said:
BUT
why would this heika post false accusations unless had Proof that Growth hormones were used? i dont know why anyone would do that really.... craziness Especially if you are an up and coming breeder and all that. Whod risk their reputation over false information?

I believe you have just stated Jim's reason for this thread quite nicely. Unsubstantiated statements on multiple forums.

On a side note, while I have known Jim to be somewhat stubborn and opinionated in numerous threads here on the BOI, he is definitely on the short list of folks in the industry whose word I would trust on it's face value alone.

I guess the point that nags at me the most is repeated offers of help from Jim that were categorically refused when proof and documentation were requested.

Based on the Emails presented so far, I would have to say that Jim at least attempted to go above and beyond his TOS.
 
Continuing on..

Jim responded, and I was somewhat reassured.

From: The Chameleon Company
To: Heika
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: Problems..
Heika,
I am sorry to hear of your results. However, you also went a long way with a few erroneous assumptions, to include asking me to answer questions "honestly", which is to imply that I would not under certain circumstances here or anywhere else.
Let me say three things as directly as I know how:
1) We use no growth enhancement substances what-so-ever. All natural, all the time. No gimmicks.
2) Anything less than Mother Nature is deficient husbandry. We all have "sub-standard husbandry" with mixed results, as only she is the "right stuff". Sometimes I get 100% hatch, for instance, and sometimes nothing, from sibling animals in otherwise identical conditions here.
3) Assumptions make an "ass of u and me".
As you know, MBD is a blanket term for what is the result of many different possibilities affecting calcium being where it needs to be, when it needs to be there, and in the proper amounts. One of the factors could very well be the genetics of a certain batch of chameleons. Whatever I shipped was in the full belief that the animals were fine and fit, and I have to go on the assumption that they appeared the same to you when you received them, for I have heard nothing otherwise. We retain no animals from 2 of every 3 clutches we produce. I have nothing from the winter Nosy Be's here, although I am now once again holding back more females from that locale for next year's production. Knowing all that I do, to include that there is still so much more that I and others do not know about chameleons, how can I put my finger on anything causative when there are so many possibilities, and all is so far removed from when they were in my care ? With the lingering accusation of a "substance", which would be to accuse me of terrible ethics, how can you believe me? I have different bloodlines here ranging as deep as 4-6 generations, depending on the specific bloodlines. There is little that I haven't seen regarding unexpected results. .
Heika, I hope you realize that optimum conditions vs. lesser conditions, or a situation where one person's husbandry conditions are significantly different from another's, might allow something to manifest in one place and not the other. If those sibling animals were predisposed to have a higher risk of calcium concerns, is it not possible that it would more likely manifest in one place, such as indoors under artificial light, and not be as likely to happen in real sunlight ? Or with different supplement regimens ? Is this not the basis of a definition for "stress", things being less than optimum ? I understand your frustrations, as I have killed more chameleons that most, if not all, homo sapiens But I also know full well where the risks are, and when I have taken them on, and must own them. What I have to be "forthcoming" about is the reality that working with chameleons is full of disappointments ...... to include dishonest and unscrupulous people, for sure. Dr. Ivan Alfonso is my very good friend and herd vet, and a part owner. I think we take enormous comfort in the integrity of each other. I have other intimates, with impeccable reputations, within the business who have been here often enough, and have known me for a long time, to help offset those that would spread false rumors about me. I have thousands of contented customers where there was never a problem or frustration with the animal I produced and sold. I am also far from perfect, and have had to fix plenty of problems along the way. I think my reputation there is unmatched.
I can’t imagine that you don’t know about this issue, and I want to know how you are treating your affected animals. I need to know. I also need to know if your animals are showing genetic problems. Are you seeing poor hatch rates out of treated animals? Are the offspring strong? Please be forthcoming, I need to know everything about this stuff, because I need to make decisions based upon what you have to say
You have lots of sentences ending in a "?", and some need far better definition as to what you are truly asking, lest I type all afternoon. Might be best if you call me. Up until 10 PM EST is fine. FYI, if I had relied on any gimmickry, I would have bred myself into oblivion long ago.
Jim Flaherty
863-438-9477
The Chameleon Company, LLC
www.chameleoncompany.com

I did call him at that point. I wanted to figure out a solution to the vexing problem with 6 particular animals. He promptly offered to replace the 2 nosy be females. It was a generous offer, but I did initially refuse. Only because he insisted, and because it seemed to make him feel better, did I accept. As you will see later, I refused the animals.

Now comes the long line of emails asking me to tell him who initially told me about the ProZyme. I told him on the phone that I would contact that person and relay his request. I did that. There are simply some things that I won't do.. as you will see below, I wouldn't give up the name of the person who initially told me. It really didn't matter at that point.. the rumor was so far spread in the chameleon community, that who started it was a mute point.

I am going to group the "give me a name" emails together, along with a few others, for the sake of brevity, and because I don't really have any comments on them.

From: Heika Sample
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 12:55 AM
Subject: Link to this stuff..

Hi Jim,

Here is the web page to the stuff that people are saying you are gutloading your crix with.

http://www.prozymestore.com/

Heika


From: The Chameleon Company
To: Heika Sample
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 4:07 AM
Subject: Re: Link to this stuff..
Heika,
Considering the gravity of the falsehoods, I need to know who said that I am using this stuff, which is a not true, and then who linked it to causing or contributing to health abnormalities, such as MBD. I will NEVER identify you as the source of that info, but I do need to go on the offense on this one.
Jim Flaherty
The Chameleon Company, LLC
www.chameleoncompany.com


From: The Chameleon Company
To: Heika Sample
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 4:57 AM
Subject: Re: Link to this stuff..
Heika,
All of this amazes me more with every click of my mouse. I have already found a half dozen different articles on the internet this AM regarding the positive role of pro-biotics in fighting MBD, in particular in improvement of all intestinal functions, to include helping to remedy those deficiencies in intestinal absorption which would be a causative agent of MBD. These are papers published by medical researchers, and not marketing come-ons. The below cat-and-paste is from one such cached study, but clearly shows how pro-biotics help to improve patients with IBD (inflammatory bowel disease caused by a number of other diseases), with IBD being a cause of MBD.
Metabolic bone disease (MBD) and muscle wasting (MW) are serious complications in adults suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The inflammatory process and corticosteroid treatment may lead to changes in the IGF-system associated with MBD and MW. AIM: To assess changes in the IGF-system and clinical and biochemical markers in ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: We studied 37 IBD patients with severe clinical exacerbation (20 with UC, 17 with CD) before and during high dose corticosteroid treatment and tapering (8-12 weeks). RESULTS: Total IGF-I was reduced in CD (36% p<0.01) and UC (41% p<0.001) before treatment and normalized completely. Free IGF-I baseline levels were unchanged compared to controls. In UC, free IGF-I levels increased significantly at week 1 and week 4 (p<0.01, respectively). In CD, no changes in free IGF-I levels were observed. IGFBP-2 baseline levels were increased by a factor 2.3 in UC and CD compared to controls (p<0.01 respectively) and normalized during treatment. IGFBP-3 was reduced by 38% (p<0.01) in CD and 32% (p<0.01) in UC with only partial normalization. Harvey-Bradshaw index, C - reactive protein and albumin normalized during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Significant changes in total and free IGF-I and IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-3 were demonstrated in CD and UC patients in exacerbation with only partial normalization during high dose corticosteroid treatment and tapering without differences between UC and CD. These changes may be part of MBD and MW in active IBD.</p> <p>PMID: 17126585 [PubMed - in process]</p> (Source: Growth Hormone and IGF Research) Growth Hormone and IGF Research Thu, 01 Feb 2007 05:00:00 +0100 614630 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?
Probiotics are living microorganisms that upon ingestion exert health benefits. The impact of probiotics on gut flora represents a new and interesting therapeutic approach in a number of diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. According to actual publications and guidelines of medical societies, the clinical relevance of probiotics can be described as follows: (a) In the case of ulcerative colitis, available data demonstrate benefits of probiotic therapy. (b) The available data regarding pouchitis are limited, but the therapeutic effect seems to be excellent. (c) In the case of Crohn's disease, the role of probiotics is not clearly defined, thus the results of new trials have to be awaited before probiotic therapy is recommended. (d) Further indications such as antibiotic-associated diarrhea, acute pancreatitis or irritable bowel syndrome have been reported recently. The results of these clinical trials have been encouraging, but they often included only a small number of patients and therefore a clear-cut assessment seems difficult at the moment
I was also unable to find anything ... zip ... nada ... even suggesting that the effect of pro-biotics was anything except as an aid to digestion. Nothing to suggest that it functioned with any effects similar to growth hormones, etc. Dr. Alfonso finds the whole thing ludicrous and extremely misinformed. If you can recall any internet discussions on the subject, it would help. Thanks.
Jim Flaherty
The Chameleon Company, LLC
www.chameleoncompany.com


From: The Chameleon Company
To: Heika Sample
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 6:19 AM
Subject: MBD in January
Heika,
I went back through my Inbox files for January, trying to get a feel for what went to whom where, and what feedback I had gotten. Small world, but I found a note from Susan Donaghue, as she had purchased some Nosy's, males and females in the Jan-Feb time frame. She noted that one of the females she received was showing some minimal MBD symptoms, but that she felt comfortable that she could deal with it, and asked for no compensation. Her observation came 1-2 days after receipt of her animals. To my knowledge, she was able to deal with it, as I heard no more about the animal. She also had a later shipment pending for February. At the time that she notified me of the initial MBD, I told her I would send her an extra female in February for free. I did include the extra female in February.
It is possible that one or more of her animals were from the same clutch as yours, which would reinforce the possibility that that group had some condition that pre-disposed it to a higher incidence of MBD. As I mentioned in the phone-con, we have seen genetically linked weaknesses and deficiencies before, to include some from WC animals or bloodlines. Some were gender specific, affecting only the males in a clutch, while others not. Such genetically linked problems are not common, and where we have been able to identify it in the past, we cull animals of give them away to regular customers, as while not good as breeders, they may make a nice pet for someone. I have never warmed-up to putting animals down.
I hope this helps. Thanks.
Jim Flaherty
The Chameleon Company, LLC
www.chameleoncompany.com


From: The Chameleon Company
To: Heika Sample
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 6:46 AM
Subject: Re: Link to this stuff..
Heika,
This was Ivan's reply to the link:
Jim, that product is ProZyme which is not even a probiotic. I remember mentioning on a chameleon forum about 4 years ago that I used a probiotic in a chameleon and recommended a client to use ProZyme for another animal. One person in the forums misunderstood me and used ProZyme with their chameleons which led to a great growth rate and better eating habits for the animal. ProZyme is a digestion helper in that it pre digests much of the carbs and fats by the time it hits the gut. Then, normal digestion breaks down even more carbs and fat and thus leads to much better absorption, therefore more nutrients available, therefore better growth and activity. If you have better growth but crappy husbandry practices, it indeed can lead to MBD but has nothing to do with growth hormones added.

Ronnie's product uses nothing of this sort. He uses regular probiotics like Lactobacillus and such which doesn't lead to increased rates. Furthermore, Ronnie's gutload has a incredibly accurate Ca:p ratio that should prevent any problems should they arise. Much more reason to believe that ignorant/jealous people are talking and they are getting others to listen.

In the end, even if we were using Pro-Zyme it could only be a good thing. But as it stands, we are not using the product anyway. I have used Pro-Zyme for many years on dogs, cats, birds and reptiles with absolutely no ill-effects.

Ivan
Jim Flaherty
The Chameleon Company, LLC
www.chameleoncompany.com

From: Heika Sample
To: The Chameleon Company
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 12:08 PM
Subject: RE: Link to this stuff..

Jim,

I first heard the rumor in January. The person who told me said that your use of this product was discussed on Susan James' forum. I have heard it many times since then from many sources. I am surprised you haven't heard the rumor before now; it is wide spread. Like I said initially, many of us dismissed it out of hand. The only reason I even brought it up to you was because of the problems I am having with the females I purchased from you. With one dead ambilobe, one dying nosy be, and 4 others that have varying stages of MBD, I felt it was an issue that needed to be discussed. While I am glad to hear that others also had problems with the nosy be clutch, I believe the responsibility falls back to me to reassess my husbandry practices. Something is working well with my other chameleons that isn't working well with the ones I purchased from you. Perhaps the transition from your greenhouse to artificial lighting is the cause. I am coming up with a new supplementation schedule for the remaining four females to see if I can knock this out.

I am not sure who you would talk to about this. Like I said, there have been rumors of it for months. I don't know what the preliminary source was. If you communicate well with Susan James, I would start with her forum to track it down.

Please, Jim, I want my name left out of any discussion or controversy surrounding this. I agree that it needs to be addressed. I think this rumor is affecting your business and reputation more than you realize.

Heika

From: The Chameleon Company
To: Heika Sample
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 9:15 AM
Subject: Re: Link to this stuff..
Heika,
Thanks for the info, and the Susan James link gives me a place to start. You will not be brought up in any way, but I hope you realize the highly vested interest I have in nipping this in the bud, or shall we say multiple blooms at this point. As for my not hearing about it, just goes to show you the nature of the people who participated in the rumor, as the usual custom is to notify the subject ! I will attempt to find her forums, but could you send a link ? Thanks.
Jim Flaherty
The Chameleon Company, LLC
www.chameleoncompany.com

From: Heika Sample
To: The Chameleon Company
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 12:23 PM
Subject: RE: Link to this stuff..

Hi Jim,

I should have told you about this months ago, but like I said, I gave very little weight to it initially. Lots of rumors, most of them are false. Plus, I hate controversy.

I apologize, I don't have a link to her forum. It is my understanding it is an invitation-only forum, and, well, I haven't been invited.. :) Might check with some of the AdCham members, I believe there are several who belong to both lists.

Heika

From: The Chameleon Company
To: Heika Sample
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2007 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: Link to this stuff..
I am putting feelers out, and exhausting my search engines, but since you didn't observe the actual posts, I need to know who told you about them. Again, you will not even be referred to, but I do need to get on this, as we both agree. Thanks.
Jim Flaherty
The Chameleon Company, LLC
www.chameleoncompany.com

From: The Chameleon Company
To: Heika Sample
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 8:20 AM
Subject: Re: Link to this stuff..
Heika,
Well, no one has contacted me regarding what you were told, or your request to them to get in touch. I also believe all that you said regarding what you were told. This is ugly for sure, but also not my doing. My pledge to you to not mention your name, or even drop a hint as to who you are, is solid. I also believe that you have given the entity that told you the information enough time to come forward. I have no intentions of contacting this person, but I do need to know who they are. Dr. Alfonso and I are intent on putting the topic in a thread, both to explain the lack of any scientific support for the notion that pro-biotics cause the harm mentioned, but also to then address the accusation of poor ethics here. I ask you to think back to your note, when you felt I was culpable of poor judgment and a lack of ethics which then caused distress with your chameleons. You were adamant that I be honest and forthcoming, and rightfully so as the allegation was serious. I do not care for any of this either, but the person that passed the info on to you bears accountability, even if just for me to know who it is that smiles at me from the front, and then may put the dagger in my back lest I turn it on them. We have all been fair in this. I now need you to be forthcoming, and tell me who passed on the info. Maybe you would rather call so as not to put anything further in writing. I realize this may be difficult, and ask only what you would expect were things reversed.
On a more fun note, I will share a morning experience that made me smile (sort of anyway). During my morning feeding in the greenhouse today, I found a hatchling chameleon walking across the top of a set of about 36 cages where we house and breed females. I then went to my hatchling cages, about 50 feet away, and counted every hatchling of late to see if any were missing. None were. So, it appears I have a phantom clutch buried somewhere, which has begun to hatch. That is the reason for the measured smile, as it means we missed a clutch. It has happened once before about 15 months ago. No luck so far, but it makes every trip into the greenhouse a chameleon field trip now ! Not quite herping in Madagascar, but it will do.
Hope all is well. Those Nosy's are growing well, and should be good to go in under four weeks.
Jim Flaherty
863-438-9477
The Chameleon Company, LLC
www.chameleoncompany.com

Now comes the first real conflict. I really had no idea what the issue was about filarial worms. I had never dealt with them, because I had never kept WC chameleons from Madagascar, with the exception of 4 brookesia that I still own. They don't appear to have any. To say that I was surprised by the reactions is an understatement.

From: Heika Sample
To: The Chameleon Company
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 12:07 PM
Subject: RE: Link to this stuff..

Hi Jim,

I am not going to tell you who first told me. If it is any consolation, the person who told me did not say it in a manner that was derogatory. It was presented in concern because I had just purchased several chameleons from you. This same person had recommended that I purchase chameleons from you in the first place. Since that time, I have heard rumors of it from every major chameleon keeper that I speak to regularly. Everyone eventually asks if I have seen health issues with the 6 chameleons that I purchased from you, curious if the rumors are true. Up until very recently, I felt that the chameleons were in good shape for the most part, and have said that.

I would LOVE to have a chameleon hunt, what a nice visual you give in your description of the baby chameleon. I am also glad to hear the nosy's are growing well.

I am about to leave for a reptile show, but I want you to take a look at chameleon forums. I posted early this morning about a chameleon that died from filarial worms. I did not mention a breeder's name, nor will I, but that is the nosy be female that we have discussed. I believe her sister with the weird medical problems also has them, but won't have confirmation on that until blood work is performed on Monday. I would really, really appreciate your input. I will have a clearer view of what is happening once all the blood work is done, and I will keep you informed about the progress, but I need some assistance. This is not a blame game, and even if the females did ship infected with microfilarials, I can completely understand how they would go undetected. It is a non-issue. The issue is making sure it doesn't spread to the rest of my chameleons and treating the infected ones.

Thanks,

Heika

Here is the thread, in its entirety, that I posted on my favorite chameleon forum. I needed information to deal with the issue, and to be honest, I was once again panicking for the safety and welfare of all of my animals. Please note, no names are presented here.

Heika 07-14-2007 04:59 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Filarial worms

I recently had a terrible experience with a beautiful nosy be female that has been in my care since February. She was purchased as a CB animal, and was around 6 months old when I received her. I don't believe in breeding chameleons young, and so I waited to breed her until just recently. The breeding was successful, and she began showing the typical signs of being gravid. When it came time to lay her eggs, it was obvious that something was wrong. I suspected she was egg bound, and took her to the vet. X-rays confirmed that she was gravid, and believing she was egg bound, my vet prescribed medication to induce labor. X-rays also showed that her bone density was not good. This was extremely concerning for me, because she had been kept under UVB lights, supplemented, and fed well gutloaded feeders for her entire time with me.

Despite the drug to induce labor, she didn't lay. The following morning, she was in very bad shape. I took her back to the vet. After some discussion, my vet and I agreed that removing the eggs and spaying her at the same time was the best option. If she survived, I planned to rehab the MBD and then rehome her to a pet home. My vet began the procedure.. cut into her abdomen.. and a worm popped out of the incision. To my horror and his, her abdomen was filled with filarial worms. There were somewhere around a hundred or more of these worms, all feasting on her organs and eggs. My vet did his best to remove them all, but she died within 10 minutes of being sewn back up.

At no time was a subcutaneous worm ever visible on this female. In addition, fecals performed were all clear of parasites. All animals that I purchase are given routine fecals to make sure they don't need to be medicated, but filarial worms in a CB animal was simply not considered to be a problem, and she wasn't checked for them. Neither were the other animals, also CB, that I acquired from the same source. At least nutrient robbing, organ destroying worms explains why she had MBD, but that is very small consolation.

I have some questions for the experts on this forum, because I am simply at a loss as to how to proceed. The animals came to me in my region's winter from a more tropical location. Mosquitoes are the common carrier of these worms, and up until the last two or three weeks, it hasn't been warm enough for them. I haven't seen any in my shop, and all of the chameleons live in screen caging that would prevent mosquitoes from entering the cages to spread the disease from one animal to another. Due to the MBD, it is believed that this female carried the worms for quite some time before being overcome by them while she was gravid. I have reason to believe that at least one other chameleon from the same source is also infected with the worms.

Now, the questions. For the experts.. what are the chances that the rest of my chameleons, both from the same source and ones that I acquired from other breeders, are infected? Should I perform blood tests on all of the chameleons, or just the ones that were shipped from this breeder? Can filarial worms be transferred sexually? What is the best method for treating them? My vet prescribed panacur, which has now been administered to every single animal in the shop, as a precautionary step. He feels that low doses of orally administered ivermectin would be more effective. In researching, I have read that ivermectin kills the microfilarials too quickly, and causes them to clog the bloodstream, etc. Would the best strategy be to perform blood tests and cull any animals that have been infected? Will panacur kill the microfilarials? Finally, what is the best strategy for collecting blood from a chameleon for blood smears?

I do realize that admitting to a dangerous, contagious and deadly infestation in some of my chameleons could be considered economic suicide if I ever plan to sell any of my chameleon's offspring. I am asking for assistance on a public forum because the wellbeing of my animals is my primary concern and I know that the knowledge I seek is here amongst our members, whether they will publicly admit to it or not. If someone does not feel comfortable posting a reply on the forum and has information that can assist my vet (who primarily treats mammals) and I in treating this, please feel free to email me privately at [email protected].

Thanks for any help!

Heika

Electric 07-14-2007 06:50 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

sorry about your loss...

imagine having something eating you from the inside...that's terrible, parasites/worms has to be the one thing that disgusts the most, almost like a phobia... the mental picture of a worm popping out of her abdomen gave me shivers/goosebumps

I'm interested to see the responses you will get...I get mosquitoe bites pretty frequently, can these worms be given to humans??

Chameleon Company 07-14-2007 10:50 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Heika,

I have emailed you on the side regarding this, and am seeking more info as well. There are several things that we know about filarials that make it difficult to connect some of the dots here. One of the more problematic ones is the means of transmission, the mosquito. As of now, I do not believe that there are mosquitoe species endemic to the U.S. that are known to transmit the filarials found in chameleons. Almost all filarials are specific about the mosquitoe intermediary. Even if there were, it would require that the mosquito bite an infected chameleon, buzz around for a few days if not more, and then find another chameleon to stick. I am meeting with a very knowledgeable vet tonight as a social call, and will ask him to post his thoughts later, but my initial conversatons with this entity also rule out transmission via any known contact other than blood suckers and needle sharing druggies. At this point in time, the most likely candidate would be a mis-diagnosis, and that the parasites are of a different type. It would be important to take those extra steps to be certain of the diagnosis considering the long odds involved.

As to the MBD situation, or more specifically lack of bone density, it is exactly what you would expect to see in a female that was gestating and not at top shape or with top husbandry. While the parasite findings would seem to be more than enough to have doomed this animal, it is also my experience based on volumes of feedback and other anecdotal evidence, that more than 50% of all breeding/egg-producing attempts with hobbyists fail, even with the best of intentions and perceived husbandry. That would include lights, supplementation, etc.

As to "admitting to an infestation ... economic suicide", I think that a bit too self-incriminating considering the current diagnosis. Filarials in chameleons are not known to transmit stateside, and other parasites are easily dealt with. Every breeder out there that deals with imports has dealt with filarial worms. Not as an animal-to-animal problem, but just as some of their imports have them, and some don't. Melleri are notorious for such, but I have seen it often enough in panthers. I have yet to see a WC animal not affected with other parasites, many of which do present animal-to-animal transmission possibilities. No importer can accurately claim that their imports are parasite free, or that because of a couple doses of panacur, etc, that their animals are parasite free. The most honest statement would be that they are "parasite managed".

Eric Adrignola 07-14-2007 12:40 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The only seller I knew that sold parasite-free imports was a guy in PA who actually did blood work, and treated for filiarials. Especially in Melleri. It was a pain, but he had the equipment, and patience. Certainly not a profitable enterprise, as he had to stop - wasn't' worth the time, though he was selling them for $200, and he bought them for $20 from importers. The work involved in testing and treating these things is a chore, especially when it comes to the subcutaneous ones - surgery is needed.


A friend of mine had lost a very long term captive melleri to these just a few months back. Fecals were clean, it was huge, healthy - then just "Dead". Filiarial worm chewed through a major artery. The vet said transmission via mosquitoes in the US would be impossible.

I am thinking that the female you got was an import. If it wasn't, I'm keeping ALL my animals indoors!

Chamgirl 07-14-2007 01:55 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When I took in a wild caught panther (given to me because he was at deaths door), he had filarial worms. They had to be surgically removed plus Ivermectin was used. I learnt then that there are always at least three worms minimum in an infested chameleon (mine had three). I am posting this to state that even though I had a panther with these worms, my other three chameleons didn't suffer themselves from this, i.e it didn't get transmitted to them despite them all living in the same room. Over a year later my panther chameleon is free from any problems.

Heika 07-14-2007 03:09 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It looks as though my vet needs to go back to the drawing board on what these things are. He was pretty certain, but if they can't be transmitted by mosquitoes in the US, and I can be as certain as I can be without having seen her hatch myself that she is CB, then they probably aren't filiaral worms. I will wait for the sample he sent in to come back before making any final decisions on how to proceed.

Thank you for all of your input, I welcome any additional comments. I have a container of these things in the fridge and will photo them in the morning to give people something to dwell over.

Parandrus 07-14-2007 06:10 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It would be very interesting to see what the worms really are. I have seen filarial worms get "lost" in the skin and the coelomic cavity but never feasting on organs and eggs. Filarial worms are basically bloodstream parasites and their ocurrence in other places is an abnormality and generally non-pathological. Was a direct blood smear performed to see if there was any microfilaria in there? I will be quite interested in knowing if these guys are filarial worms indeed as it would be a first for me so definitely keep us posted.

Diagnosing calcium definiciency by just an X-ray is not a good way. Decreased bone density is expected in animals that are producing. Doing bloodwork and determining the Ca:p ratio is more reliable in the presence of clinical signs but due to the pet being gravid, it is hard to say if she was calcium deficient before or if being gravid caused the calcium depletion.

Ivan

Chameleon Company 07-14-2007 06:15 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diagnosing clacium definiciency by just an X-ray is not a good way. Decreased bone density is expected in animals that are producing. Doing bloodwork and deterriming .....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Thou typeth in too much of a hurry, dear doktor ! Fortunately, its the only thing thou doth do in a hurry :D

Parandrus 07-14-2007 06:17 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank God for the edit button!

Chamgirl 07-15-2007 02:58 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Great to see you posting Ivan! I remember you helped me out a lot several years ago with a Fischer chameleon when I needed help (on another forum).

Eric Adrignola 07-15-2007 04:28 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As part of my training last fall, we went over the various native and nonnative species of mosquitoes. I'm wondering if any of these nonnative parasitic slimebags could be responsible for transmitting nonnative parasites. The tiger mosquito is pretty widespread, so I'm sure they'd have considered that one.

Could be a nonnative mosquito? But then again, it'd have to have other parasite ridden hosts to have the worms in the first place. Weird.

MWheelock 07-15-2007 05:59 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hey lady,

Just sent you a P.M.

Give me a call if you need.
Matthew

Heika 07-15-2007 06:09 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally Posted by MWheelock (Post 32616)
Hey lady,

Just sent you a P.M.

Give me a call if you need.
Matthew
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Thanks, Matthew! Your opinion as a vet and as an unbiased cham keeper is always so appreciated!

Heika

MWheelock 07-15-2007 06:19 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.vetclinpathjournal.org/VO...03_129-132.pdf

Hey,

Here is a website that discusses the possibility of filarids. Like I said before, it is possible though unlikely if she was CB.

The questions that I'd have for you is:

If this was a CB cham, was it raised in an enviroment, before or after with wild-caught chams?

Do you have any wild caught chams?

Will your vet teach you how to do a blood blood draw out of the ventral tail vein? If so, it is easy to see the microfilaria on a simple smear (blood drop on a slide with a coverslip). There are "wiggly things" ("wiggly things is the scienctific name:)) that can be easily identified under low magnifications. Since you have quite a few lizards now, it might be worth investing in a microscope and learning how to do some of the diagnostic tests.

Talk to you later,
Matthew

DraftDayz 07-20-2007 06:12 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...I get mosquitoe bites pretty frequently, can these worms be given to humans??
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Yep, although they usually dont do any harm. Parasites are usually very specific about their host. If a human gets a filarial worm here in the states, it usually ends up wandering the body looking for its "mating spot." The worm wanders in humans, however say if it normally infects ducks, it would home in on its preferred spot and wait for a signal from a mate. The wandering of these worms usually doesn't do much, if any, damage at all. These non-human specific species that sometimes infect man are called Dirofilaria conjunctivae.

Now thats not saying there aren't filarial worms for humans. Here are some disease filarial worms cause in humans:

Elephantiasis
Loa Loa
River Blindness

You could contract Elephantiasis here in the states for awhile, and there still may be evidence of it in the backwoods of the carolinas and Louisiana. But it was mostly eradicated in the last century here in the US.

Another filarial worm that is pretty common is Dirofilaria imitis which is the canine heartworm. I believe the CDC has documented half a dozen cases or so in humans since their inception.

Anyways, hope this helps ease your tensions, as well as give you some table talk in future. Just not the dinner table :D


I have to get ready for work now, so this will be continued as soon as I can manage.

Heika
 
Alicia,
After the initial goodwill, we ran into problems. She didn't want animals, she wanted someone to blame. I was very concerned about correcting the complete BS of the "rumor". I contacted many, and found that it had been fomented by others in the business who had professed to be a bit more professional. The rumor is a deliberate lie. Its false. Its 100% BS. It can be a cutthroat business, but my disappointments with those entities was still a lesson learned at my age. So, I started a thread in Chameleon Forums to get the truth out to chameleon people. This is after my emails with Heika, phone calls, two free chameleons for her, 6 months after being in her care, etc. The thread was about the truth of pro-biotics (like acidophilus) which are in many insect gutloads. It is the only probiotic we use, and we use it in far less amounts than found in the popular commercial gutloads. Any link people want to make to it being as a growth hormone is beyond ridiculous. That's another story. Heika starts posting in the thread with the same mantra all over again. This is after all the educated opinions that say pro-biotics as growth stimulents is just phooey. Here is just her first bit of BS there (I have enough to fill many posts) and you will get the idea:

7-22 Chameleon Forums
It seems to me that at the core of every rumor, there is a kernel of truth. Perhaps some of your 16 inch long 5 month old panther chameleons led to this speculation.

...... maybe that is crappy husbandry that could lead Prozyme to cause MBD

She fabricated the concept of a 16" five month old. I can do 10"-12" maybe in that time on a good day. Raised indoors under artificial light and lower temps, you might get 8-9" at best at 5 months. Its been so long since I was indoors. I have a quarter of a million dollar enterprise here. I use it. Just maybe it works? The rumor said we used Prozyme (a pro-enzyme, not a pro-biotic). It is safe as well, but we do not use it, and know of no one who does. That had already been explained in the thread by DVM's. As you can see, she had one goal, to continue to spread the lies, and then have us to blame for her problems. I have all the proof, but its not necessary. The thread went downhill as three folks got stupid, Heika being one.

I asked Heika to withdraw her false accusations. She did not. I told her that I did not want to have to post this in a place such as this, but would if she did not retract her false statements. She was given a better option than this, and refused.

And then where are any of the medical results ? She refused everything. The beginning post is accurate. 100% substantiated. Let people see all the evidence, and draw their conclusions. So far, none of my facts, claims, and characterizations have been refuted. They won't be.

Thanks John. Likewise.

Finally goodnight ...... :sleeping:
 
I realize that I am hardly playing on a level playing field here; Jim is a known entity at Fauna, I am not. However, I am certain that the readers of Fauna will bear with my work schedule while I present the entire controversy before coming to conclusions. There are two sides to every story. I am showing the whole thing.. the good, the bad, and the ugly. While Jim jumps around and presents snippets and pieces of emails and postings that certainly don't portray the whole truth, I am going to continue to ignore him.

Onward we go.

Please note in the filiaral post that I never mentioned a breeder's name. In fact, I quit responding to the thread completely because of the emails that were happening behind the scenes.

Jim emailed me after my initial request for information on the forum with this:

From: The Chameleon Company
To: Heika Sample
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2007 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: Link to this stuff..

Heika,
I have to confess some disappointment. When you were upset that I had somehow been responsible for problems afflicting your animals, causing you distress both emotional and financial, you were adamant that I be both "honest" and "forthcoming". Well ? I need to gain as much information as possible regarding this. You were able to come up with the link to the pro-enzyme quickly. Using your source, you should also be able to procure a cut-and-paste of the relevant forum thread, which would eliminate any further requirement that I had of sources.
As for micro-filarials, I have discussed this with Dr. Alfonso, but have not taken a look at the thread. First off, the likelihood of there being filarials or microfilarials in a CBB animal are so incredibly remote, that the diagnosis and all supporting documents would need to be examined and scrutinized in depth, to include the credentials of the vet. To the knowledge of all that I know, the microfilarials that infect chameleons are not known to have a U.S. found mosquito intermediary. While we have seen such parasites in WC animals, the likelihood of transmission is seemingly not possible in stateside animals. Secondly, we just do not have them in our collection, and the frequency of WC's coming into our collection is very small. I have not seen an imported animal with filarial worms in over two years, and even then, there is the problem with transmission. Even with those "CBB breeders" who are up to their necks in all things WC, would be hard-pressed to transfer the parasite short of a blood transfusion between animals. Could you forward me all the data from the vet, to include his or her certifications in pathology ? Thanks.
Jim Flaherty
The Chameleon Company, LLC
www.chameleoncompany.com

While I was somewhat offended by the request for my vet's credentials, I did reply on the forum that I would take pictures of the worms and post them for people's inspection. I also spoke at length on the phone with Jim again. I told him that I would share all of the data that I got from the vet with him. I planned to do that until I received the following email:

From: ivan alfonso [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2007 7:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Pardalis problems you are having.

Hi Heika:

The reason of my writing is because I want to explain and clarify some things to you in light of your recent comments and actions. Jim has kept me well informed of your conversations with him and I always offered my advice and information through him as I figured that was easier and better. However, in light of your recent posts/actions I have to address you personally to clarify some points.

1- Your first concern/complaint to Jim was that we were using a growth hormone to make our animals grow fast. The fear was put in your head by a rumor started in a chameleon forum and you even got the link to the "growth hormone" which turned out to be Pro-Zyme and was said to be a pro-biotic. I am not sure who started the rumor and if there was any intention other than jealousy but the fact of the matter is that we don't need to use any growth hormone as we have the 2 main factors that make chameleons grow, sun and nutrition, and we have them in plenty. We use pro-biotics only in the cricket gutload and I would like to see who in the world will certify that pro-biotics are a growth stimulant. Pro-biotics are encouraged in all branches of medicine to reduce the overgrowth of "bad" bacteria. But it just so happens that Pro-Zyme is NOT a pro-biotic but a digestive aid enzyme. What does that mean? Well, as you probably know, any living being wastes a percentage of what it eats. In dogs it is suspected that only 70% of the food digested is actually absorbed. Well pro-zyme aids in pre-digesting the food so that up to 90% can be absorbed and thus more nutrients are available for the animal. Does that mean a better growth rate? Yes, but not an uncontrolled one. Of course, all that would have been very clear by just reading the website that Pro-Zyme has for all to see. However, the person that started the rumor doesn't seem to be literate or just believes that others will believe the rumor blindly without researching on their own. All that said, we don't use Pro-Zyme on our chameleons even though I encourage using it to my clients for weaker, stunted animals regardless of species.

2- Your second complaint came tied with the first as it was that our "growth hormone"-supplemented animals were showing signs of MBD and egg binding because of that. Well, by now we got the growth hormone myth out of the way, so let's try to address the MBD thing. There are many factors that can cause any of the conditions grouped together as MBD such as lack of UVB, lack of proper hydration, lack of proper temps, lack of calcium, lack of Vit. D3, too much Phosphorus in the diet, and many others. The younger the animal, the easier it is to see signs of MBD as they are in a fast growing phase but none of the animals were showing problems when you got them, right? Did you notice any problems in the first 4 weeks since you got them? How about after 6-8 weeks? Jim said all was good with your animals until recently, when you started seeing problems. How can an animal have MBD for 6 months and not show signs of it until recently? If you got the animals in January and they appeared ok until the end of June or beginning of July, how can that be related to anything we did wrong? How can your Vet feel confident enough to diagnose MBD by an X-ray only? Does he know chameleons use a lot of calcium to produce a clutch of eggs? I have to think that the animals suffered from a deficiency on your end of the husbandry and, since you think everything is ok, your next step is to put the blame on us. Was bloodwork done on the animals before you bred them to check their Ca:p ratio? This is not a common practice but, if it was not done, how can you be sure that the chameleons didn't have enough calcium to produce eggs and lay them? If this condition was inherent to us, then I would have expected signs to be shown much sooner or, at the very least, the condition to be diagnosed properly.

3- The third time's the charm, some say, and it seems to apply here. This case of the worms is the most concerning of the three and certainly the one I am most interested. Why? Very simple, if they are indeed filarial worms, how in the world did they get in a captive born animal and how in such gigantic numbers? Not even wild caught animals have been found with such gigantic numbers when deceased, so how is it that it happened in a captive born animal? Obviously the general thought here would be that they are not filarial worms but some other type of worm. Still, it would be interesting to know what they are and if indeed they were the cause of death. But you promised to post pics and have not done it so far. I would love to see all these hundreds of worms that you mentioned to see if I can at least try to ID them partially. Needless to say a proper pathology/parasitology report will be needed and I hope your Vet knows where to send these samples for proper handling and ID. But the problem here is that you call/email Jim about this and despite his advise, you still take it to the forum to see if you find someone that sides with what you think is the right answer as you obviously don't believe Jim's explanation. Then, when I post in the same public forum you posted the problem, you post something that I must be stupid not to understand:

"Thanks, Matthew! Your opinion as a vet and as an unbiased cham keeper is always so appreciated!

Heika"

The sentence speaks for itself in that you heard something you liked from Dr. Wheelock and that you simply don't respect mine as a vet or a chameleon keeper because I am biased. If being biased is being friends with Jim, then so is Dr. Wheelock's opinion as you guys are at least common acquaintances from the forums for a while. Does that mean I don't respect Dr. Wheelock's opinions, whatever they might be? No, I respect his opinions but they would be as "biased" as mine. My interest in The Chameleon Company is not only a minor ownership one, but a friendship one with Jim and an educational one by being able to work with one of the largest collections of chameleons in the world. My own animals and bloodlines reside in the facility and I enjoy greatly being part of something special. I take my job seriously and definitely try to improve on everything everyday as there is no way to know it all. This is why I asked Jim to request from you any and all results from your Vet so I could look them over and see if I could lend a hand. You seem to think that I am here to try and defend Jim and "protect" him. There is nothing to protect as nothing was done wrong on our end. Proper procedures must be done to ensure that this situation gets diagnosed properly. My posts were not meant in any way to undermine your questions or credibility so I don't see why your post aims to do that to me. I remember you contacting me a long while back about a problem with a Quadricornis (I think). At that point I offered you my "biased" opinion and you didn't seem to mind then.

I truly feel you are in grief by all these sudden problems in an animal that was purchased from us but that grief could be blinding you into seeing things in an objective manner. This could have been worked quite differently if you would have brought your concerns in a less accusatory way as I have access to board certified pathologists, parasitologists and even internal medicine people that would have done all kind of work on your animals (alive or dead) for free. But you chose to take a different path and take all this to a public forum where now it is shaping to be "us vs. you and whoever is on your side".
If you decide to see things in an objective manner, research the possibilities and even accept some "biased" help, don't hesitate to ask because I would be very interested to find out how to get your animals in top shape regardless if you got them from us or not.

Ivan

At this point, my temper began to get the better of me. Jim and Ivan had become increasingly arrogant, up to and including insulting my long time friend and vet. I responded to them both:

From: Heika [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 5:46 AM
To: 'ivan alfonso'; '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Pardalis problems you are having.

Hello Ivan and Jim,

I have seen some of your responses to Jim, via forwards from Jim. For the purpose of communicating openly, I have included you both in this email. Since we are clarifying, let me give my perspective in this.

1. I was concerned when I discovered that only the group shipped to me from ChamCo showed signs of low bone density. Although I had dismissed the Prozyme rumors prior to even receiving the chameleons, I felt I had to ask if it was being used. If the answer had been yes, I could have possibly pinpointed the problem. The answer was no. Now, the rest of what you are saying really doesn’t even matter to me. I don’t care what the product is or what it does for dogs.. I only care if it was used on my chameleons, and if it was, did it lead to a problem with bone density? I don’t know who initially started the rumor or what their education level is, nor does it matter to me. The person who told me is a well educated, compassionate keeper.

2. I am not sure how growth hormone got mixed into this. It wasn’t from me. I am aware of the things that cause MBD. I work very hard to make sure that my animals are given the proper nutrition, lighting and supplements to prevent the problem. It seems that my efforts are acceptable in all except for a few of my chameleons, which coincidently came from ChamCo. Of course, invasive worms have played a part in that, I am sure. Yes, I did notice problems with one of the Nosy Be females right after arrival. She still suffers from the same mystery conditions she had when I received her, and will never be bred because of it. I contacted Jim two days after receiving the chameleons and made him aware of the problem. Despite veterinarian care, tests, etc., she still has issues, including low bone density. I also contacted him about the young female ambilobe that failed to thrive and later died.

“I have to think that the animals suffered from a deficiency on your end of the husbandry and, since you think everything is ok, your next step is to put the blame on us.”

This pisses me off. Do you really think that I don’t question my husbandry every day? How DARE you. I have placed NO blame on your door step, nor have I asked for anything of ChamCo beyond information. What kind of keeper do you think I am? I have to investigate every possibility in this, and part of that is asking Jim hard questions that I was able to avoid asking up until now. I know from reading Fauna that both of you are more than willing to spar with words, which is why I avoided this communication for as long as possible to begin with. I prefer to avoid it. I really prefer to avoid it. The bottom line is this… they are lizards. They are my passion and my joy, but in the end, they are lizards. As such, they are not worth ruining relationships over. Just to keep my communications with you both pure now and in the future, I respectfully decline ChamCo’s offer to replace the two Nosy Be females. That way, you will know that I have no other motivation behind my investigation into the cause of the deaths of two of the females that I purchased from ChamCo, and the illness of an additional one.

My vet is a good vet. He cares immensely, has great skills, and I have entrusted the care of my animals to him for over 15 years. I could not believe that his credentials were wanted so that they could be “scrutinized.” I think not. My vet is a good man who puts an amazing amount of energy into educating himself. I trust that he will get to the bottom of this. I owe NOTHING to ChamCo, especially not my vet’s credentials. Both of you have now managed to not only insult my husbandry skills, but the skills of my vet. I will have no more of this. I will take complete responsibility for the health issues of my chameleons if they are mine to take responsibility for. Until the final tests come in, I suggest you keep your comments in those regards to yourself. As it is, I can see absolutely no reason to share the findings with either of you. Your only interest up to this point has been in placing blame. Fine, place blame wherever you want. I simply want answers that will help me correct the issues that I find in the animals that I purchased from ChamCo. At this point, I am angry enough that my only concern with not sharing information with you would be for the animals in ChamCo’s care.

3. No pictures of the parasites will be posted online. I trust that the institution my vet sent a sample to will be able to ID them. I see no reason to open myself or my vet’s skills up to further ridicule. I actually posted on the forum BEFORE speaking to Jim, and the reason that I even emailed Jim about my post is because I wanted him to be informed. I also hoped that he would be able to answer some of the questions I asked on the forum. How dare I think that might happen. What questions were answered? Here are the questions I posed:

a. What are the chances that the rest of my chameleons, both from the same source and ones that I acquired from other breeders, are infected?
b. Should I perform blood tests on all of the chameleons, or just the ones that were shipped from this breeder?
c. Can filarial worms be transferred sexually?
d. What is the best method for treating them? My vet prescribed panacur, which has now been administered to every single animal in the shop, as a precautionary step. He feels that low doses of orally administered ivermectin would be more effective. In researching, I have read that ivermectin kills the microfilarials too quickly, and causes them to clog the bloodstream, etc.
e. Would the best strategy be to perform blood tests and cull any animals that have been infected?
f. Will panacur kill the microfilarials?
g. Finally, what is the best strategy for collecting blood from a chameleon for blood smears?

Neither of you answered a single one of the questions I asked. Not one! How helpful do you think I found your responses? In my opinion, your responses were strongly biased babble based upon the fact that you both knew I was referring to an animal that I purchased from ChamCo. Now, to answer your question about the blood smear, Ivan. Since I had just asked what the best strategy for collecting blood from a chameleon for a blood smear was, do you think that I have ever had one performed? In fact, do you think that maybe this line in my initial post may have given you that information? “…but filarial worms in a CB animal was simply not considered to be a problem, and she wasn't checked for them.”

I actually do respect your opinion as a vet and a keeper, but not in this matter. It is very clear to me from your posts, your emails included in Jim’s forwards, and in Jim’s posts, emails, and telephone conversations that the vested interest in this female as an animal that was sold to me by ChamCo will prevent you or Jim from answering in the most helpful manner. One of the main reasons that I purchased form ChamCo in the first place was because of that long ago assistance that you freely offered for an animal that I own. It was a panther chameleon, and he is still with me.

“This could have been worked quite differently if you would have brought your concerns in a less accusatory way as I have access to board certified pathologists, parasitologists and even internal medicine people that would have done all kind of work on your animals (alive or dead) for free. But you chose to take a different path and take all this to a public forum where now it is shaping to be "us vs. you and whoever is on your side".

Although I can almost feel the paranoia coming off of this statement, let me reassure you both that I am not gathering a “side” with which to go to war. I can also assure you that the accusation you see is also imagined, because I accused ChamCo of nothing. I have spoken to very few people about this matter, and only 2 of my closest chameleon friends know the company that the animals were purchased from. As you both know by now, I don’t believe in throwing people under the bus, so to speak. If I did, you would have the name of the person who first told me of the Prozyme rumor. I will not play the “let’s take sides” game. I am not interested in opinions about other breeders, although I have certainly been drenched in them over the past few days. I am not going to divulge the fact that the animals were purchased from ChamCo on a public forum. In fact, I am done with this issue. Neither of you have any further information that I need. If I had known that this would be the response to my request for assistance, I certainly would have never asked.

In all of this, my only concern has been for the health and well being of my animals, both the ones purchased from ChamCo and the ones purchased from elsewhere. I feel that our missions are somewhat different; I really am trying to get to the bottom of the problem. I am not sure what either of your goals are. It is about the animals, isn’t it?

With respect,

Heika

I still stand by my response. Here, things take a turn for the worse with Jim as well. Jim responds with this email:

From: The Chameleon Company [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 7:03 AM
To: Heika
Subject: Re: Pardalis problems you are having.

Heika,

Might I ask that your barbs at me be in response to your interactions with me ?

Maybe you need to take a step or two back, and a deep breath. Perhaps we have both heard things of late that we found a bit of the "blame game", and I don't know how you can not appreciate that I might have been on the receiving end of speculation by you that casts aspersions not only on my animals, but more significantly my ethics. In your own words, you described how a rumor had caused me harm. Now, with the filarial thread, while the breeder remains unnamed, the thread encourages speculation as to whom might be shipping WC's as CB's, with the most likely explanation being a mis-diagnosis of filarials ! To that end, you do owe me the results if filarials are still indicated. Why would you not send them if that were the case ? And if they are not filarials, do you not owe that to the thread ?

Heika, I have been completely honest and forthcoming. Prior to the filarial thread, I listened to your plight and offered you two animals so far beyond my warranty period that I doubt any other breeder would have done it. Then the filarial thread appears. Its one thing to seek info on filarials, but it is another altogether to say that they have been diagnosed in a CBB animal, especially when all indicators say that might be an erroneous diagnosis. You jumped the gun on that. Unfortunately, Dr, Wheelock only fueled the fire, and I am quite disappointed with his answer for not clarifying all "possibilities" better. I PM'd him immediately after his post, requesting clarification, that I hope to receive today. Too many posts there were half-cocked already, fueled by the kind of speculation that is often wrong but only tarnishes others, and I was going to wait on the facts, where others had not.

The filarial thread is not over, as we need to know whether the diagnosis is true.

What should be my take on your expanding the issue to include Fauna, where I might have 4 posts in the past six months. I have been on the receiving end of "the rumor", and now what would still loom as a likely misdiagnosis about filarials, and now its my (?) objectivity that is no good ?

I think that Dr. Alfonso's references to not hearing about problems from you regarding the animals condition prior is based on the nature of your current complaints about MBD and filarials. You had no prior complaint about either in the first six months that you had the animals, and whatever concerns you had before that were dismissed by you, not by me. I believe that a valid issue. I am also not sure what kind of a success you expected, particularly once you started breeding. I am going on the assumption that you believed everything to be fine with an animal that you had gotten from me for six months prior, and which you then bred, and now the wheels fell off.

More than any other thing you said Heika, this one might reflect the real problems here.

Neither of you answered a single one of the questions I asked. Not one! How helpful do you think I found your responses?

I think that my post was quite informative regarding your situation. There was also more to address than your situation, as the basis for some of your questions was in error. Again, the thread is not just about microfilarials, but the accusation that they were in a CBB animal. Like it or not, by innuendo and speculation, based on very suspect data at this point, you have cast doubt on me and my business. Even if you only told one person, or only one knew, will it not progress? Do we not have a perfect example already on the table ? Your email of this morning confirms my read on those speculations, to include the poor choice of putting the word "unbiased" in one of your characterizations. I have been completely honest, forthcoming, and generous with you and your situation. Now I read of Fauna, that "I owe you no results", and other references that make me want to cringe . While "you may have accused Chamco of nothing", you are now going to withhold the data that would confirm or deny the presence of filarials, the results of which are quite significant in their repercussions if the diagnosis is correct, and at this point of equal significant to me if they are not. I cannot see the dots of you bearing no obligation to redress the harmful speculation that you unleashed connecting them as you have. Could you show me the malice in my posts, emails, or recollections of phone conversations ? Do I need to show you yours ? I am exceedingly disappointed. I do expect the results to be posted in a timely manner. I hope that I do not have to ask for them in thread. If the diagnosis of filarials is confirmed, I will need much more documentation, as it may be the basis of a case study. Sorry, but "thems the ropes" in a situation like this. I hope you can understand the ramifications. Thank you.


Jim Flaherty
The Chameleon Company, LLC
www.chameleoncompany.com

Might want to start counting how many times that Jim says he is disappointed. It becomes kind of entertaining. After reading that I needed to take a step back, and that Jim expected me to post the results in a timely fashion, because "thems the ropes", I took a deep breath and responded with this:

From: Heika [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 8:39 AM
To: 'The Chameleon Company'
Subject: RE: Pardalis problems you are having.

At this point, Jim…

Considering the treatment I have received from both you and now Ivan, and the fact that I, not you, am bearing the financial and emotional burden of this, you could ask until you are blue in the face. If you feel that your animals may be infected with a new or old type of filiaral worms, I suggest you start testing them. You will receive no data from me.

Take it to wherever you want.. I owe you nothing. Take it to the thread. I will respond that, as discussed in our email correspondence, I will not share the data because of our interactions off the forum. Wonder what speculation that would bring on? Don’t tell me what I have to do and what I don’t have to do; you won’t win.

Heika

Now, please note that the Chameleon Company had not been mentioned in context to any of this on a public forum. I believed we both wished to avoid that. For me, I didn't want any speculations made over the health of my animals. I believe that Jim felt the same.

Note the change in Jim's tone in this next email:

From: The Chameleon Company [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 8:49 AM
To: Heika
Subject: Re: Pardalis problems you are having.

Heika,
I think that you now need to take several steps back. I again ask you to show me where you have been "ill-treated" by me. I will not argue or defend Ivan's words or actions, perceived slights, etc. He's a big boy, and I do not muzzle him any more than he would think about doing likewise to me. I believe that all my communications have been to the contrary. I also ask you where is the responsible action in not posting the results of a situation that has potentially enormous ramifications for one and all ? As to you being the only one to bear emotional and financial burden from this, how unrealistic is that assumption ? Please think through your actions here. You are better than this, or I would certainly like to think so.

Jim Flaherty
The Chameleon Company, LLC
www.chameleoncompany.com

By now, the condescending tone of the emails has really worn my last nerve. I was dealing with bone density issues, possibly invasive worms, etc. and Jim and Ivan wanted to swap blows. I wasn't going to be bullied.

From: Heika [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 9:17 AM
To: 'The Chameleon Company'
Subject: RE: Pardalis problems you are having.

Jim, I have been surprised and disappointed by the response I have received. First, I was grilled about the identity of a person that I stated right off the bat that I wouldn’t disclose. Then, my husbandry skills were questioned.. which actually isn’t all that offensive.. but then, my vet’s skills were also questioned, to the point where you requested his credentials so that they could be scrutinized. Finally, my motive was questioned. I really don’t CARE what the worm is, as long as I can base a care plan around it for my surviving chameleons. The only thing I need is a firm diagnosis and treatment plan. Case studies? If there is an opportunity for that here, I will turn it over to Matthew if my vet is not interested in it. He can share his findings with one and all if that is the route I take and if it is worth exploring. I see no reason or obligation on my part to share my data with you. I am sorry that you feel otherwise. I have limits to my tolerance, and they were met and exceeded by Ivan’s email and our previous correspondences. As you know, you are defined by the company that you keep. I will not continue communication with a company when one of the owners is completely offensive. I have absolutely nothing to gain from the interaction, and so I choose to end this little saga. I am very sorry to lose the high regard I once held for you both.

Good luck in your business.

Heika

I think it is time to start a new reply, this one is pretty full. Continued..
 
And then, the rest of the story.. or, at least, another section in the Jim and co. vs. Heika saga.

The emails continue. Jim says:

From: The Chameleon Company [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 10:04 AM
To: Heika
Subject: Re: Pardalis problems you are having.

Heika,
You still need to take that step back, or another one if you feel you took the first. Trust that your surprise with my concerns about getting to the root of the rumor as best I could were matched by an equal surprise here. I understand your stance, but take chagrin at your response, much less the need for you to make it an issue still. I put no contingencies on my sending you two animals. I promised you anonymity. My request of you is understandable by all the other notables that I have spoken to regarding this issue. It comes down to who foments gossip and who does not.

How can you not expect your husbandry to be questioned ? Were you not questioning the husbandry and ethics here ? How can anyone with experience, fielding a question from another about problems with their chameleons, not question the husbandry ? Can you show me where I was in any way offensive or accusatory ? Do you not see that you have both directly and indirectly questioned my ethics in several areas ? And who has perfect husbandry to begin with !!

I never questioned your "motives", did I ? I don't care about motives as I have no problem understanding your concerns. I have dealt with a few chameleon problems, do you not think ? Am I not in a position to appreciate exactly what you are going through regarding the health issues you have suffered ? How many times do you estimate that I have "been there, done that"?

Maybe in time you will see things differently. Maybe not. I have tried. You are in a place that I cannot reach.

Jim Flaherty
The Chameleon Company, LLC
www.chameleoncompany.com

Jim was right. I was completely done. I was not going to play anymore, and I had hoped my last email had communicated my desire to end the discussion. I didn't respond to his email. A short while later, another email arrived from Ivan. Note the change in tone in it, as well. Also, please note the offer of help that is extended after the fact.

From: ivan alfonso [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 4:00 PM
To: Heika
Subject: RE: Pardalis problems you are having.

Hi Heika:

I understand everything you want to get off your chest and how you think I am just banding with Jim because we have mutual interests. Yet you still want to throw a punch/jab with your last comment which reads:


" It is about the animals, isn’t it?"

All I can say about that sentence is "cute", but I will still humor you with a response to it. Plain and simple, it is more than about the animals, it is about the truth and education that comes with it. As much as you want to think that I want to blast your Vet or yourself, you couldn't be farther from the truth. My request for proof is not because I don't trust anything you say but rather because I want to see for myself with hard evidence much like cops do, human doctors do, lawyers do, etc. I wanted to see what were the findings since you mentioned to Jim your vet was running all these tests as I am very, very curious. If I was to say that an animal we got from someone has a severe problem, I want to have the hard proof to back it up NOT to bash them but rather to tell them "hey guys, you sold me an animal that a few weeks later showed these results. You might want to look into this and see". You know why I would like that? Because it makes us better in every aspect. If your animals were MBD from the start, Jim didn't mention it to me as he only said you mentioned a URI problem with 1 of them but no MBD. Jim mentioned that Dr. Donoghue got one with early MBD and thus he wanted to replace the females to you as an extended customer service. Did I think you were after free females? Heck no! I was surprised to see Jim go so above and beyond to give you replacement animals but I am not going to complain if he chooses to do so. As I told you before, I am nothing more than a very minor owner in ChamCo so my main interest is not financial.

You seem to have gotten all too defensive and, as such, it is easy to accuse me of being paranoid or anything else. The word to describe me is curious; very, very curious. I want to know how the diagnosis of MBD was reached? I want to know when was it reached? I want to know how many worms were there? I want to know what kind of worms were they? I want to know every possible way all your problems could have been solved? Why do I want to know so much? It is not to ridicule you or your Vet but to make me better and make ChamCo better. Can you realize that is the basis of any Veterinarian? Curiosity makes us want to learn more and in the process we realize how little we knew all along. That is why I wanted to know the facts, the proof, etc. All I wanted to know is how we can help you and help ourselves if we are, in any possible way, responsible. We can assume we are not because the animals are ok here but we could be wrong insome instances and people like you hold the key.

Now what exactly do you think gets accomplished by posting in a forum? Am I to believe that nobody has contacted you offlist to ask you about the breeder who sold you the animals? I have told Jim in numerous occasions to do as much health support as possible by keeping me informed and that I would offer as much help as I can. By the time Jim asked me a few questions I can answer them with the knowledge I have at this time (July 2007). Can that change tomorrow? Of course it can, but I need hard facts to learn from them and change my views and opinions. By you refusing to provide me with them, you are refusing to acknowledge that people can learn and help each other. The reason I offered a battery of specialists like I mentioned before is not to undermine your Vet but, since you mentioned he is not reptile oriented, then I simply wanted to help get to the bottom of this quickly and for the benefit of us both.

In any case, I can see you are extremely mad about this and probably will not understand my points. However, should you decide to cooperate and provide the evidence, reports, results, etc I can assure you that will not regret it as my sole interest in a quest for the truth and as happy and ending as possible.

Hope to still hear from you,
Ivan

After these posts, things calmed down for a few days. Then, on my favorite forum, a new post bringing up the whole ProZyme thing again. I must confess, I did exagerate about the 16" chameleon, but as you can see, Jim also made a 16" exageration. Here are all except for the last two posts on the thread, which has now been removed from the forum in question.

Chameleon Company 07-22-2007 07:58 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Digestive Aids or "Growth Hormones" ? A Rumor Debunked

Some recent feedback from customers brought to light some misconceptions about the use and effects of probiotics and proenzymes as supplements to chameleon food and insect gutload recipes. As background, a very simple definition of probiotics would be supplemental bacteria given to an animal to rebuild the normal flora found in the digestive tract that aid in the breakdown of food, and which can often be depleted by the use of antibiotics or other conditions. Proenzymes would not be bacteria, but rather supplemental enzymes, that aid in the earlier stages of the digestion of food. The misconceptions which I was made aware of had to do with rumors that these digestion aids also had effects similar to growth hormones in chameleons, and that we used them here at The Chameleon Company for that reason. I have requested another entity, who is more knowledgeable about the science of these items than I, to post here to better explain what these things are. Because I was able to get feedback on the misconceptions and rumors from several sources of late, indicating that the misinformation had more legs than I would have supposed, I wanted to focus my post more on that aspect of the conversation. Here are the common themes that were inherent to the versions as I was told:

1) That we use a probiotic and/or proenzyme in our cricket gutload.

2) That the impressive growth results that we have achieved with chameleons here is due primarily or in part by the use of probiotics and/or proenzymes.

3) That this product produces enhanced growth rates, beyond what would be considered "normal", much like a growth hormone would.

4) That this product causes a higher incidence of calcium/growth/bone abnormalities, and/or MBD symptoms.

5) That our ethics were therefore lacking regarding this gimmickry in growth.

I wanted to briefly present my factual experiences regarding the above claims and inaccuracies.

1) The cricket gut-load that we use here is our own concoction, but includes about 30% by mass the premium cricket gut-load as sold commercially by CricketFood.com, at this link: http://www.cricketfood.com/product_i...71beba66bc2941. Ronnie Buck, owner/proprietor, does include a minimal pro-biotic formula in that product. We add many other ingredients to it here, all common grocery store items which would not raise an eyebrow anywhere, and no additional digestive aids of any sort. We therefore use less probiotics than a hobbyist that uses the cricketfood product directly, and by my estimate, many hobbyists use this product. This is significant because its use elsewhere does not produce the suggested shortcomings.

2) We feel that the minimal probiotics in the formula are completely safe and beneficial. We have never noticed a variance in our growth rates with or without the probiotics, as we had achieved the same growth rates in the past prior to there being a trace of any probiotic in our gutload. All evidence suggests that while the benefits of probiotics may not be obviously visible, they do help to maintain stable digestive processes. We highly recommend the products available at CricketFood.com

3) If we even suspected that anything in our husbandry produced "abnormal" growth rates, we would not use it.

4) Not only do our observations indicate that there is no reason to believe that probiotics increase the incidence of growth abnormalities, but all observations and scientific literature support the opposite conclusion, that being that they work to minimize deficiencies which contribute to MBD and other digestive related shortfalls.

5) Our ethics are just fine.

We have often heard others remark, sometimes in awe, and sometimes as professional envy, as to "how fast your animals grow", or "how big they are for 3 month olds". Such conversational come-ons are often a source of mild humor to us, as our first reply then and now is "Compared to what?" As we are a greenhouse facility in Florida, the comparison becomes one of animals raised in an environment and growing-day that mimics Madagascar very closely vs. animals raised inside someone's house somewhere in the U.S. The most immediate and important difference is real sun vs. artificial light. While we take pride in doing many other things well, not all of which we publish, there is no substitute for the real sun, only poorer imitations that invite deficiencies. While our system, like any captive situation, will still come up short in its imitations of Mother Nature, and always have ways to be improved, it is our experience that the incidence of growth problems, to include MBD, is greater when animals are raised indoors under artificial lighting vs. when animals have access to real sunlight.

Do our animals grow "fast" ? Hmmmmm ... couldn't it be that what many are familiar with would be considered "slow" ?

Parandrus 07-22-2007 07:58 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jim asked me to post some extra input regarding this rumor that has been spreading in the hobby since at least January 2007. I have known Jim for many years and am the herd veterinarian at The Chameleon Company, LLC. I am hoping that any information provided here helps to not only dispel any misinformation about the Company, but also clarify some of this bad information that leaks into the hobby and is taken as true without some research being done.

As Jim stated already, pro-biotics and products like Pro-Zyme are mainly digestive aids. Pro-biotics have been used for quite some time in human and animal medicine in an effort to displace pathogenic bacteria and replace them with beneficial bacteria. In other cases, the pro-biotic simply keeps in check the population of normally occurring yet pathogenic bacteria. In doing so, the animals show better health by better maintaining proper digestion and other physiological functions. Products like Pro-Zyme are simply enzymes that help start the digestive process a bit early. By doing so, there are more nutrients ready to be absorbed in the intestine of the animal and thus better uptake of the food. In no way can these 2 products be considered even remotely similar to a growth hormone . Pro-biotics and Pro-Zyme could potentially help achieve a better growth in animals that show need for them, particularly in an animal with stress-related digestive disorders, but are designed to maintain and facilitate optimal digestive processes, not directly promote abnormal growth like a growth hormone would. I have yet to see a case where the use of pro-biotics and/or Pro-Zyme lead to calcium deficiency or bone deformities.

We all know chameleons in nature achieve better growth rates than the ones we get in captivity due to better exposure to sun and food. At The Chameleon Company they get plenty of sun, plenty of food, and plenty of water, and thus the chameleons are achieving a more natural growth rate which is one we are not used to seeing in the hobby. The market has been dominated for years with breeders following the same pattern of raising babies indoors under artificial light and scheduled feedings; then along comes The Chameleon Company and offers a different yet well known approach, producing very different results to what we have been used to. At this day and age we should know that different doesnt mean abnormal.

Scooter 07-22-2007 08:38 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As a very new chameleon keeper, I will refrain from specific comment, having not heard the "rumors" .....

However, as an owner who is interested in good care techniques, I will now seek information concerning digestive probotics and look for an outside cage to give my baby some time in the 'real' sun.

Thank you for bringing this topic to my attention.

Chameleon Company 07-22-2007 09:00 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scooter,

As you will likely read in many different husbandry pages, the real sun can work miracles when compared to whatever is the next option. I raised panthers indoors for years before going full blown with an outside greenhouse with all the right plastics etc., so its been a "been there, done that" thing for a long time. Many keepers are in northern climates where it may only be practical 3-5 months of the year to get an animal outside. Get wheels on the bottoms of your cages, take a few other precautions (predators, birds, ants, wind, redundant door closures, to name a few) and do not miss the opportunity.

As for the rumors, bad info on the internet, sniping amongst breeders chasing $, etc, let common sense be your first guide. Then get a second opinion. Then a third. Good luck.

jboysen15 07-22-2007 09:34 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

so what exactly is the probiotic you use?

pohchunyee 07-22-2007 09:35 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I never heard of all those rumours before. I guess thats the dark side of chameleon breeder around the states; spreading rumours, hating each other, claiming their chameleon are the top notch breed... yada ...yada... yada.:mad: BEWARE!!

Chameleon Company 07-22-2007 09:42 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What Ronnie uses in his premium gutload is acidophilus. Here's a Wikipedia for you:


Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Acidophilus is a general name for a group of probiotics, often added to milk or sold as a capsule, which contains one or more of the following bacteria which aid in digestion: -

Lactobacillus acidophilus (A)
Lactobacillus casei (C)
Lactobacillus bulgaricus (L)
Bifidobacterium bifidum (B)
Streptococcus thermophilus
Only L. acidophilus is the true acidophilus strain, but many producers (mainly in the US) use it as a more generic name for mixtures of bacteria, one of which is L. acidophilus.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I was sure glad they didn't find any in Chris Benoit's fridge, eh ! Its amazing the circles in which these rumors get mileage. :cool:

Chris Anderson 07-22-2007 09:49 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ivan,

You describe products like Prozyme as a digestive aid designed to increase nutrient absorption and thus achieve better growth. Obviously the product was not designed for use in reptiles and studies are probably nonexistent as to their use in chameleons, let alone metabolic effects so we can only speculate on their impact.

According to Prozyme's website, Prozyme is a combination of highly concentrated lipases, amylases, proteases and cellulases which increases the absorption of nutrients by up to 71% by increasing the breakdown of these compounds. Obviously we have no real idea about the relative absorption increase in chameleons but we can likely assume that there is some nutrient absorption increase compared to feeding regiments without any prozyme-like-product use.

You stated that you have yet to see a case where the use of prozyme has lead to calcium deficiency or bone deformities but it seems to me that the use of such a product without the alteration of one's calcium supplementation regiment would invite such deficiencies. What I mean to say is that if a chameleon is being fed a diet without the use of prozyme or a similar product and the absorption of minerals (calcium, etc.) and protein, lipid and carbohydrate derivatives is at its peak/optimum level/balance, by adding an enzyme cocktail, you're increasing the absorption of the nutrient derivatives but unless you somehow increase the input of minerals to compensate for the resultant increased growth, you've created a situation where calcium deficiency or bone density issues would seem to be increasingly likely.

As I said, we can only speculate with chameleons and the idea of maintaining and facilitating optimal digestive processes sounds great but does such facilitation of digestion not also create a possible need to alter the calcium availability of a theoretically already balanced diet, if not the alteration of calcium absorption potentials if already absorbing at its peak?

I can see that such a product has its uses for animals with digestive disorders but it seems to me that the theoretical use of such a product simply to increase growth would be potentially dangerous, especially in animals like chameleons for whom the product was not designed.

Chris

Chameleon Company 07-22-2007 09:52 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Poh,

I think that I would draw a significant distinction between claiming one's own bloodlines as top-notch, etc, vs. making false claims about the husbandry of others, effects of nutrition, etc, so as to malign someone else. I would hope that every breeder could claim ownership of their bloodlines as being top notch. I suspect ownership of the darker stuff will keep them as orphans though.

Heika 07-22-2007 09:53 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It seems to me that at the core of every rumor, there is a kernel of truth. Perhaps some of your 16 inch long 5 month old panther chameleons led to this speculation.

I received this recently from a source that will remain unnamed, discussing this very substance, imagine that!

Here is a direct quote of someone comfortably knowledgeable with the substance Prozyme:

"ProZyme is a digestion helper in that it pre digests much of the carbs and fats by the time it hits the gut. Then, normal digestion breaks down even more carbs and fat and thus leads to much better absorption, therefore more nutrients available, therefore better growth and activity. If you have better growth but crappy husbandry practices, it indeed can lead to MBD but has nothing to do with growth hormones added."


So, to the knowledgeable Chameleon Company owners Jim and Ivan.. what constitutes crappy husbandry? Is it when us Northerners keep our animals under artificial lighting? Or, maybe using Cricket Food's gutload uncut.. maybe that is crappy husbandry that could lead Prozyme to cause MBD? But really, it isn't MBD until it is diagnosed as MBD, because it could just be a lack of bone density.. right?

Maybe if you could share your gutload recipe and the exact plastic that you are using on your greenhouse, less experienced (or simply inferior) chameleon keepers could try to emulate your success. I have always been certain that a company that is comfortable with its practices would have nothing at all to hide, and would want to share their methods so that everyone keeping these precious reptile gems could be successful. After all, it is about the animals, right?

jboysen15 07-22-2007 09:59 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

JIm,

I would like a 2nd and third opinion from someone who does not have a financial interest involved.

Also, Jim, where is your 3rd opinion? You have your opinion and your business partner ivan alfonso!

Sure you say you have a vet opinion, but he is business partner of yours. It seems to me like there is a conflict of interest.

It is too bad that the chameleon world only gets the opinion of Ivan Alfonso.

I too raise chameleons, and believe it or not, in Central Florida, where I believe, mother nature shines the same sun at my house as it does yours. I also raise chameleons inside my house as well. In my experience, I have not seen any "visual"(and i repeat, VISUAL) benefits of in the first three months of life of keeping them outside with FLORIDA SUNSHINE. Now, I totally agree that real sunshine helps, but I think anyone would be hard pressed to find much VISUAL difference in panthers at three months of age which, besides your holdbacks, is the last time you see any of your chams because you sell them off of your chameleon "farm."

And you claim to have mini Madagascar in your backyard. Closest to the real thing. So how does a green house replicate Madagascar? Maybe next time I vist the importers I will ask them if they get the Wc's from their neighbors' greenhouses. How does gutloading with probiotics mimick Madagascar? Do probiotics grow on trees on NOSY BE?

As I look back, this is not the only time i have seen your company's ethics questioned.

Do you really think all these rumors are started by one person looking to take down your godly chameleon empire? Does everyone in the world have it out for Jim Flaherty and the chameleon company?

AMEN to heika...more to come......

Chameleon Company 07-22-2007 10:06 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chris,

I think that I can elaborate for myself as well as Dr Alfonso:


Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I can see that such a product (prozyme) has its uses for animals with digestive disorders but it seems to me that the theoretical use of such a product simply to increase growth would be potentially dangerous, especially in animals like chameleons for whom the product was not designed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


If you look at my post, I state that we do not use prozyme. We know of no one who does. Likewise, Dr. Alfonso's statements about no negative feedback regarding prozyme use is true. Perhaps we should have mentioned more clearly that the use of "Prozyme" was part of the original rumor .... heck, one of the posters in this thread even provided me the link to the product "Prozyme" that they had been told we used .... LOL ... and that is how it became included. Also, you refer to the "increased growth" effects. Can you show me the link to that being a result of the use of probiotics ? Pro-enzymes ? All data indicates that it only helps to maintain normal growth, and compensate for stress related deficiencies or actual diseases. We have no experience here to indicate otherwise. There are quite a few cricket gutloads on the market currently boasting the inclusion or probiotics from at least several different manufacturers, btw.

Chameleon Company 07-22-2007 10:18 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Heika and Josh,
16" long in five months Heika ! LOL !! What would that be Heika, a "kernal" of truth on a cob of mistruths ? Can you post the link .... or the tape measure ;) Josh, seems the barbecue must be hot and the beer cold again. I do thank you both for the demonstration as to how rumors might get traction. Very illuminating !

Chris Anderson 07-22-2007 10:23 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jim,

I don't believe I mentioned you or your company or you using the product a single time in my post. My post was as a discussion on the use of the product in general. I've heard the rumors as well and to be honest, my interest is more on the potential of anyone deciding prozyme's use is a good idea just to speed up growth so I wanted to voice those thoughts on the product publicly for everyone's consideration.

As far as referencing the increased growth effects of prozyme as you requested, I was replying to Ivan's own words and those on Prozyme's website:


Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally Posted by Parandrus (Post 33466)
Pro-biotics and Pro-Zyme could potentially help achieve a better growth in animals that show need for them...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


http://www.prozymeproducts.com/: "PROZYME. is proven to increase the absorption of vital nutrients, including essential fatty acids, by up to 71%. This increased absorption provides natural relief from the following difficulties...:

-Weight problems..."

Chris

jboysen15 07-22-2007 10:37 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jim, are you saying that Heika and myself started this "rumor?" Considering she lives across the USA and we have never spoken, that would be kinda....

Jim, Sunday is a day of rest, a day the good LORD set aside for us to spend with family, church, and our chameleons.

Are you insinuating something with the BBQ comment?

As we spoke on the phone, you said its not about color, its about size. And you gotta pay the bills....Those are YOUR words, though i'm sure you'll pass them off as rumor or heresay.

Well spank my ass and call me Sally, but ignorant ole me likes panthers for their color, not their size, otherwise, i'd have 50 mellers in the backyard eating my little yorkies for breakfast in the warm FLORIDA sunshine.

I have bought/traded/gotten as a gift, chameleons from just about every reputable(although not in your eyes, cuz they don't use florida sunshine) and not one , not one, you hear me? not one of them was half the size of the at the same age as the 3 month old grey beast i got from you.

As someone so experienced as yourself, "godly", as i think you refered to yourself in other posts, it seems a bit asinine, to think that your results are solely due to FLORIDA SUNSHINE, unless you are refering probiotics secretly as "florida sunshine"....wink wink!!!!!!!!!

I seriously have an issue with you even using your name and Mother Nature in the same sentence!

P.S. Maybe you should bottle up that Florida Sunshine and post an ad on kingsnake.
you can claim it as being the "RAREST OF RARE" and only available in 1 of 50 states!!!!

Heika 07-22-2007 10:57 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally Posted by Chameleon Company (Post 33485)
Heika and Josh,
16" long in five months Heika ! LOL !! What would that be Heika, a "kernal" of truth on a cob of mistruths ? Can you post the link .... or the tape measure ;) Josh, seems the barbecue must be hot and the beer cold again. I do thank you both for the demonstration as to how rumors might get traction. Very illuminating !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Wow, I felt a little deflection. Amazing how you managed that.. don't you want everyone to be better chameleon keepers?

Since I am sure that is your goal, because every ethical and serious breeder wants to educate the hobbyists who are ultimately their customers, how about answering these very specific questions...

1. What is the other 70% of your gutload?
2. What is your magic plastic?

Chameleon Company 07-22-2007 11:08 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chris,

You and I have communicated on this topic in emails prior to this thread, and I thank you for your candidness. But I do take issue with how some have chosen to approach the topic:

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've heard the rumors as well and to be honest, my interest is more on the potential of anyone deciding prozyme's use is a good idea just to speed up growth
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


What I believe we have said, and that all studies indicate, is that regardless of whether someone wants to use probiotics as a growth stimulant, or Prozyme as the rumor has suggested, that it does not have that effect. I also think that Dr. Alfonso correctly qualified his opinion by indicating that they could assist where there was a need. In that regard, all studies indicate and qualify that need as being a deficiency. Such noted examples are animals that have immune problems, been subjected to antibiotics recently, various diseases, and other stresses. Google it. Acidophilus is not a controlled substance, can be bought in the grocery store, and last I heard had nothing to do with Barry Bonds. Others have overlooked that hundreds of chameleon keepers in the U.S. use Ronnie's premium gutload, the source of any probiotics that we may use, and there are no reports of any abnormal growth attributed to it.

Josh, you are the gift that keeps giving. While your recollections of a phone conversation greatly contradict my recollections ... now that's a surprise :rolleyes:, I did learn long ago that if one makes the choice to argue with an eejit, all a passerby sees is two eejits arguing.

jboysen15 07-22-2007 11:14 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

see below!!!!!!!!!!

Chameleon Company 07-22-2007 11:16 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Heika !

We seem to have hit a nerve with you regarding this thread !

My website contains good info on gutloads, as do many other sites. As I stated, we use nothing unusual in the other 70%, but the greatest ingredients by mass would be orange juice, mixed leafy greens, such as collards, and bananas and some carrots !! My plastic was salvaged from what was left behind at Area 51 ;).

pohchunyee 07-22-2007 11:34 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well............ as far as i know, this thread will be deleted soon (just like previous "sensitive" thread) as if nothing happend. So guys, whats the point? Everyone is conversation slaughthering everybody?

( There is a old chinese saying: The Clam and the Stork are fighting, the Fisherman gain the upper hand in the end):D

so.........CHILL!!!!!

Brad 07-22-2007 11:44 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This thread has been closed temporarily.
It will be reopened within the hour.

...


Please try to keep personal attacks out of the forums.

Chris Anderson 07-23-2007 12:18 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jim,

My posts are coming from the angle of someone deciding to use prozyme outside of a digestive disorder treatment. Are you indicating that doing so would not result in increased growth rates somehow and that then any increased calcium need is unnecessary as a result?

Chris

Continued...
 
Heika, just a casual comment here from a casual observer. Your skin is way too thin! From what I can ascertain, Jim and his vet were simply trying to get to the root of the problem here. I see more insinuating comments, as well as derogatory comments on your behalf then I have seen from Jim.

My father has had issues with weight loss over the past few months. He physician could have simply said it was X but he ran tests and shared those tests with my fathers cardiologist. Turns out my father has an infection in the sac around his heart. Had dad's physician not shared that information then they would not have gotten to the root of the problem.

Point? The information you purport to have is of great concern obviously to the chameleon community. It will also help Jim get to the root of the problem, whether that problem is his or yours. Questioning your vets credentials is hardly insulting. Most vets are clueless when it comes to these animals so yes, a vets credentials should be questioned especially when his findings appear to be out of the norm.

I realize you are not motivated by financial issues otherwise you would have taken Jim up on the animals. To be blunt, I don't know what your motivations are but I know what they should have been. To help get to the bottom of this issue and see just where the problems started. Had you simply shared the results with Jim the two of you could have resolved this amicably. Now, you've gone and wasted a tremendous amount of time and have nothing to show for it.

Again, if you plan on lasting in this field you truly need to develop thicker skin as NOTHING I have read was deemed insulting by me. Not one iota other than a few of your forum posts.

Griz
 
Onward, onward..

Heika 07-23-2007 12:31 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally Posted by Chameleon Company (Post 33492)
We seem to have hit a nerve with you regarding this thread !

My website contains good info on gutloads, as do many other sites. As I stated, we use nothing unusual in the other 70%, but the greatest ingredients by mass would be orange juice, mixed leafy greens, such as collards, and bananas and some carrots !! My plastic was salvaged from what was left behind at Area 51 ;).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I wonder what that nerve could be.....?

But, regardless of the rhetoric, your response above (or lack thereof) seems to perfectly sum up Chameleon Company's stance. :D

Parandrus 07-23-2007 07:09 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Wow guys, once again this just takes a huge turn for the worse. Amazing how I can live so close to Jim, yet so far apart when it comes to things like this. It is 7:15 AM as I type this and running late to go to work but will do my best to say something to some of you and hopefully continue a civilized discussion later on if needed. If anyone feels to need to try staring bashing or personal attacks, please do so via PM and I will be happy to discuss it through there, otherwise, post away here for all to read.

First off, I never said we use or used Pro-Zyme in our animals. I have mentioned to clients that they can use it and I even mentioned in a forum years ago that Nutri-Bac is a good probiotic. At the time I mistook the name Nutri-Bac and said Pro-Bac which led the person to get Pro-Zyme for their chameleon. The response was that the chameleon was doing much better and no longer looking like a runt. SO maybe that was the start of the rumor years and years ago.

Chris, as I said intially, Pro-Zyme could potentially aid indirectly in growth in a weak and debilitated animal, but not directly influence growth like a growth hormone. Pro-Zyme has all kind of animals pictured on their lable, or they used to, and if you call them they will tell you it is safe for use on anything although the studies are only in mammals and birds. Many Vets use the product for birds and very few in reptiles. The ones I have talked to (a board certified Vet in Orlando and another Vet in Michigan) have not seen anything negative and some mildly positive changes in animals where it was used (birds and reptiles). As pointed by Heika and her source, if the product is used and bad husbandry is in place, it can lead to problems but so does excess calcium and vitamins that we use routinely in the hobby. The product is a digestive aid where needed. Once you see the animal looking better and getting back on track, it is common sense to adjust your husbandry for a healthier, growing animal. Let me know if this is good enough or not.

Heika, I can see where Jim's post and my follow-up can make you feel uncomfortable. Your source is quite correct in what he/she said but read above for an explanation to that. I told you before that I would love to help you in any way you allow me to and show you the results, proof, etc. that you might require. This thread was not done for you, so to speak, but rather based on the info that you and others were told and took to be true.

Josh, not sure what the purpose of your posts are. Last time you said your attacks on Jim were because you had too much to drink. Jim then referred you to my clinic where I thought you were a nice, level-headed person with good chameleon knowledge, and thus agreed that maybe your posts were the result of too much fun. Then this comes along and it seems as if you have some personal problems with Jim and now with me. If so, please PM me or call me and let me know the problems you have with me, since those are the ones I might be able to resolve or at least address.

I hope I didn't miss anyone but if I did, just PM or post here (respectfully please) and I will get to you tonight.

Regards,
Ivan

Chameleon Company 07-23-2007 07:13 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chris,

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My posts are coming from the angle of someone deciding to use prozyme outside of a digestive disorder treatment. Are you indicating that doing so would not result in increased growth rates somehow and that then any increased calcium need is unnecessary as a result?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I wish you luck in finding information regarding Prozyme. However, as indicated in all of the above posts, we do not, nor have we ever used the product Prozyme or any pro-enzyme. That would be the rumor.

What we do have experience with is the growth rates for chameleons raised in optimal growth environments. Again, for others who have struggled with it, its real sun, access to free-ranging quality bugs all the time, and lots of water as well as many other less obvious factors. It produces a much faster growth rate than animals raised under artificial light, with cup-fed or rationed food, and other shortcomings. As you can see, this is a difficult concept for some to grasp.

As to calcium and other nutrients, our experience is that it is best provided to our animals as a % of all that they consume, and not rationed or prescribed separately This is also how we believe that they get it in the wild. It stands to reason that if you are issuing calcium to your animals separate from their normal food, ie. not as a component of it, any animal that was growing faster would need to be provided a larger dose of calcium, just as it would likely be eating more food (note: an animal with intestinal parasites would have a reduced growth rate when compared to one without, food consumption otherwise being equal) . Since many digestive deficiencies will rob an animal of its ability to best use the nutrients it consumes, any product that improved that shortcoming could logically be said to improve growth from a decreased condition back to a more normal expectation for the husbandry parameters provided. If your animal was already growing at optimal levels for the husbandry provided, and had no digestive shortcomings, I can't see as a prozyme would have a growth deficiency to impact. Bottom line is that you never can say never until you try it, and see what happens. Again, we have no experience to lend regarding Prozyme or any pro-enzyme in chameleons, and as with anything chameleon, caution is advised.

As many posts have to by necessity speak to the larger audience, every chameleon keeper has assumed the role of being the new "Mother Nature taking over" for their critters. It was in balance when it was (or "were it") in the wild. The "new balance" is now for you to find, and it can be elusive.

Chris, you have my number and are always welcome to call to pick my brain better, and out of the presence of the sniping. :eek:

Heika 07-23-2007 09:58 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally Posted by Chameleon Company (Post 33522)
What we do have experience with is the growth rates for chameleons raised in optimal growth environments. Again, for others who have struggled with it, its real sun, access to free-ranging quality bugs all the time, and lots of water as well as many other less obvious factors. It produces a much faster growth rate than animals raised under artificial light, with cup-fed or rationed food, and other shortcomings. As you can see, this is a difficult concept for some to grasp.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I really don't think that anyone is having a difficult time grasping that concept. What most people want to know is the "as well as many other less obvious factors." Since ChamCo doesn't want to share that information, nuff said on that topic, huh? Seems to me that maybe ChamCo's animals just aren't suited to a life with people who, by necessity, need to keep them inside under artificial lighting, use cup feeders because they don't want bugs all over their living room, and a standard misting system because, well, the animals are kept inside. Course, these northern climates do force us into that position.

I suppose those of us who keep chameleons in these environs would do better purchasing animals from people who raise them up under artificial lighting in northern environments... kind of like buying plants from a local nursery rather than a far away one. Besides, I don't have access to Area 51 magic plastic.. and whatever else goes into that gutload.. :p

Chameleon Company 07-23-2007 10:27 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Heika,

I thank you for your level-headed approach ;)


Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I really don't think that anyone is having a difficult time grasping that concept. What most people want to know is the "as well as many other less obvious factors." Since ChamCo doesn't want to share that information, nuff said on that topic, huh? Seems to me that maybe ChamCo's animals just aren't suited to a life with people who, by necessity, need to keep them inside under artificial lighting, use cup feeders because they don't want bugs all over their living room, and a standard misting system because, well, the animals are kept inside. Course, these northern climates do force us into that position.

I suppose those of us who keep chameleons in these environs would do better purchasing animals from people who raise them up under artificial lighting in northern environments... kind of like buying plants from a local nursery rather than a far away one. Besides, I don't have access to Area 51 magic plastic.. and whatever else goes into that gutload..
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Continued..
 
We have websites, are published, respond to large quantities of emails and phone calls, and yet can't seem to make things as easy as some feel chameleon keeping should be. Hate to disappoint those that want a smoking gun to berate the results of others in chameleons, or a magic bullet to fix their own areas needing improvement, but there just isn't one ! Unquestionably, we agree that some folks are not well suited to be chameleon keepers. :D

I also want to thank you for the "your 16 inch long five month old panther chameleons ....." comment. I wanted to say "thanks, but nothing grows that fast here" ..... then my wife blushed looking over my shoulder, and I guess maybe there is one such critter here with even more impressive numbers. :cool:

pohchunyee 07-23-2007 10:40 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

this is getting way off topic!!!:eek:

Heika 07-23-2007 11:18 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally Posted by Chameleon Company (Post 33549)
I thank you for your level-headed approach ;)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Always a level head here.. :)



Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have websites, are published, respond to large quantities of emails and phone calls, and yet can't seem to make things as easy as some feel chameleon keeping should be. Hate to disappoint those that want a smoking gun to berate the results of others in chameleons, or a magic bullet to fix their own areas needing improvement, but there just isn't one ! Unquestionably, we agree that some folks are not well suited to be chameleon keepers. :D
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I think that many keepers are not looking for a smoking gun, so much as an explanation for health problems. Any good keeper (or company, for that matter) would of course be willing to take responsibility for any husbandry issues of their own making, and do their best to correct the problem. I agree, some people weren't meant to keep chameleons, same as some people simply aren't meant to be business owners. :eek:


Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I also want to thank you for the "your 16 inch long five month old panther chameleons ....." comment. I wanted to say "thanks, but nothing grows that fast here" ..... then my wife blushed looking over my shoulder, and I guess maybe there is one such critter here with even more impressive numbers. :cool:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


This is offensive. Children read this forum, Jim. What are you thinking? I have to question your judgement when you think that this kind of comment is appropriate. Do you think it puts you in a good light? Far from.

Chameleon Company 07-23-2007 11:46 AM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't know Poh. The topic was not only pro-biotics etc, but also the ugly side of rumors and gossip, and maybe the "sour grapes" and other similar motivations that foster such. On the upside, this thread generated an enormous number of hits in less than 18 hours. Obviously, the rumor was out there first, for many months. Now the truth is here to rebut it, as well as the additional word-of-mouth that will eventually cause more to hear an opposing view to whatever version of the nonsense they earlier heard.

FYI, we have hundreds of testimonials from people who have been enormously pleased with our product, and had tremendous success producing their own next generation of chameleons from our bloodlines. Many have had to do it indoors for most of the year, although we have plenty of Southern CA and South Florida customers too, who do avail themselves of the opportunity to get their animals outside more. We see our bloodlines for sale on KS every day. There are the inevitable failures as well, as it ain't as easy to do as some would like. My own estimate would be that 50% of all chameleon keepers fail rather miserably early on, and that may be generous on the success half.

Obviously, most would welcome more quality questions and quality posts, while a few still favor the personal attacks and other nonsense. You take the good with the bad.

Heika, some folks look sincerely for any and all answers. Others only certain answers. BTW, the light here is not only "good", but its the real McCoy. I hear it helps folks with a sense of humor too ! :cool:

Heika 07-23-2007 12:54 PM

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally Posted by Chameleon Company (Post 33553)
On the upside, this thread generated an enormous number of hits in less than 18 hours.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Yes, I am also very pleased with the amount of hits this thread is getting.. the more information a person has about the company they are considering dealing with, the better, of course. Don't you agree, Jim?


Quote:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are the inevitable failures as well, as it ain't as easy to do as some would like. My own estimate would be that 50% of all chameleon keepers fail rather miserably early on, and that may be generous on the success half.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Continued...
 
Back
Top