Ken Harbart
New member
Hit reply too soon...such is life.
Anyways, the ad clearly stated that the Pender Co. animal was an '01.
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">There have been several complaints filed about similar instances in regard to your "business".</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
Where? Bear in mind that I already know yuor FBI story from the other thread is nothing more than a lie.
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I have let no fewer than 1 dozen other businesses know about your fraudulent activities. You truly are a moron.</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
Now, now Brett... it's not nice to refer to others as being a moron when you yourself are acting like one. Then again, I guess that would make you the qualified expert on morons.
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">PS..the term "slander" does not apply to true warnings about illegal activities.....duh.</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
Yep, John's right... another legal beagle wannabe. As it stands, the preponderance of evidence does indicate this to be libel. The ad and emails show that the snake was represented as an '01, which is contrary to Brett's claims. He has also blatently lied regarding the FBI.
However, for Shannon to be entitled to a legal claim, he'd have to show some sort of damage resulting from this fiasco. That would be difficult, considering that Brett's claims & lies are more amusing than damaging.
Anyways, the ad clearly stated that the Pender Co. animal was an '01.
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">There have been several complaints filed about similar instances in regard to your "business".</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
Where? Bear in mind that I already know yuor FBI story from the other thread is nothing more than a lie.
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">I have let no fewer than 1 dozen other businesses know about your fraudulent activities. You truly are a moron.</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
Now, now Brett... it's not nice to refer to others as being a moron when you yourself are acting like one. Then again, I guess that would make you the qualified expert on morons.
</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote </td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">PS..the term "slander" does not apply to true warnings about illegal activities.....duh.</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
Yep, John's right... another legal beagle wannabe. As it stands, the preponderance of evidence does indicate this to be libel. The ad and emails show that the snake was represented as an '01, which is contrary to Brett's claims. He has also blatently lied regarding the FBI.
However, for Shannon to be entitled to a legal claim, he'd have to show some sort of damage resulting from this fiasco. That would be difficult, considering that Brett's claims & lies are more amusing than damaging.