John,
I think the only part of your post that I was actually disagreeing with was this one line:
If people are getting into this as an investment, they need to play the stock market, buy CD's (not the music ones lol), get into real estate, whatever.
It's just that ball morphs shold be viewed as an investment, and a legitimate one. The reality is VERY few people pay a couple thousand dollars for a snake just to have it. Nearly all of them intend to breed it and hope to at least make a little profit from it.
I breed other species of snakes, some at a distinct loss financially, just because I enjoy doing it. I have to view the balls as investments though. If they weren't I still wouldn't have any morphs and would just have waited until they were all priced in what I would consider to be the nice pet range.
Grant,
To be honest, your comments are somewhat naive. I'll address a few of your points to explain.
Firstly keeping prices high to protect investment sounds suspiciously like price fixing.
You have to understand price fixing. If all the top breeders of ball morphs, no need to name them most know who they are, got together and decided they were all going to charge X dollars for a given morph, that's price fixing. That's not what we are talking about here. In fact with any but the most rare morphs it can't even be done because there are too many other people breeding them.
If supply increases faster than demand, prices will fall, and as more hobbyists produce more morphs we are seeing an increase in the number of 'rare' morphs.
This is true, but this thread has nothing at all to do with supply and demand, it is about one breeder (MKR) intentionally cutting his prices to almost 50% of normal market value. Until this week, normal market value for a Mojave was around $1500. Being a free market as you stated, the consumers really determine the value of a given morph by what they are willing to pay. Breeders then price their animals in the range of that amount give or take a few percent, in order to sell their animals for what is considered top dollar at the time. Extra supply didn't cause these mojaves to be sold for $800, neither did decreased demand.
Secondly there seems to be a prevailing attitude that some people are only into ball pythons to make money, and that these people are 'bad' for the rest of us, and for the hobby. On the other hand those people who complain about the money makers are crying because their investments are falling in value. Are you hobbyists or are you breeding ball pythons to make money? The term 'investment' suggests the latter.
Everyone working with ball python morphs is in it for the money to some degree despite the "I do it for the love of the animals" crowd. As I stated earlier, no one pays anywhere from $2k to $20K for a single snake with no desire or intention of breeding it to make a little money.
If you only did it for the love of the animals as a hobbyist, you'd be completely satisfied with a group of normal balls and breed them to sell for $30 each. It's all the same, except for the price tag on what you produce.
Besides, there's nothing wrong with making some money doing what you enjoy. There's a section of the hobby that tries to make you feel dirty or greedy for making money off them. Ironically that's the same section that cannot afford to pay 2 grand for a snake to begin with.
Being a hobbyist and investing in ball pythons are in no way mutually exclusive. By definition, anyone who does not breed snakes as their primary income is a hobbyist.
It might be upsetting to find out that had you waited a year to buy a Mohave morph you could have saved yourself $500,
That's greatly oversimplifying what has happened to create this thread. Everyone expects what they buy this season to be selling for less next year. A $500 decrease in price is nothing in many cases, with codoms it's often 50%.
Here however, mojaves sold for $3k last season and this one breeder sells them for $800 this year. Taking the 50% decrease that the market dictated and cutting it nearly in half again, artificially and unnecessarily driving the price down.
It's a matter of respect for your fellow breeders as well as prior customers. If the market will support $1500 for an animal, there's no need to undercut to that degree.