• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

JENNIFER HARRISON GOOD GAL!!!

Chandler Reptiles said:
Sorry all part of being a proper ass clown I suppose...

If you are going to be something, be your best at it. I am damn proud of you!!
 
Many things she has said conflict with what she has been saying in defense of selling those babies. She's also been shown to be incorrect in her dates of when the last time animals have left her home, which btw are after the infected animal joined her collection. So there are two balls out there that can very well be carriers. Has she notified the person(s) she adopted them out to?

How would you like to find out some time down the line that you bought an animal that was linked to Jen after all your animals became sick and died? You would feel just like Jen did when she found out that the virus came from Wyatt. The tables have turned and Jen was going to possibly spread the virus on to others. She cannot say with a clear conscience that her animals are 100% clean, just because they were treated. Treatment doesn't mean they are clean just because they are not showing symptoms.

We've still not seen any proof as to what virus it is that killed off most of her collection and neither has she as she has said already. She has stated that she has requested the information and is getting the runaround, so how can she say for sure what it is?
 
shrap said:
This mentality is everything that is wrong with this place. The status quo.

The girl (jen) has actually done nothing wrong, but since she didnt do everything exactly like a few members here would have liked, you all are going to throw her under the bus and try to make her into a monster. You all suck. You all are the true monsters. Big giant ass clown monsters.

Arguabally, she showed an intention to do something that is pretty easily qualified as "wrong"

By "wrong" I mean "dangerous in a technical sense" rather than morally or ethically reprehensible, as she was acting in line with what she believed to be a safe course. That belief was an acknowledged error in judgement on her part.

Just trying to clarify here though; are you saying that nobody should have spoken up to point out that her animals are potentially asymptomatic carriers of an unknown disease causing agent that she recently had a problem with and massive die-off as a result of? Or are you saying that nobody should have told her to stop advertising and rescing the sales? Or are you merely saying, as I strongly suspect but am uncertain of, that you don't think she should be villified for her mistake?
 
Seamus Haley said:
Or are you merely saying, as I strongly suspect but am uncertain of, that you don't think she should be villified for her mistake?

Bingo!! We have a winner!
 
shrap said:
This mentality is everything that is wrong with this place. The status quo.

The girl (jen) has actually done nothing wrong, but since she didnt do everything exactly like a few members here would have liked, you all are going to throw her under the bus and try to make her into a monster. You all suck. You all are the true monsters. Big giant ass clown monsters.


Am i doing it? nope. But i would not be expected to be treated nicely and happily and all freakin sugar coated because of mistakes that i now have to fix that might actually cause MORE problems.

Nope. ill take it like an adult, and understand the reason people are upset, and do my best to fix it. So dont say "You people" cause i havent said anything here that says shes some horrible monster. :rolleyes: Youre kinda doing the same thing youre telling people not to do. Youre making others out to be some evil monsters, when hell... maybe you know, thats not their intent? Maybe it is, but you know freakin what... It certainly isnt mine. People are concerned. and have every damn right to be.
 
You know, I used to condemn those who have had this virus in their collection and said nothing about it....at this point, after Jen's honesty and the way she's being treated for it, I'm starting to understand why they did what they did.

Not that I agree with it, but I understand it. Somehow, I don't see anything that Jen could do would be good enough for some of you people, 5 years from now you'll still find a reason to crucify her, even with as hard as she has tried to keep everything public knowledge, and spent money she doesn't have to try to research it. For the good of ALL of us in this crazy ass hobby. She could have kept it all under wraps, waited til the die-off stopped, and then continued business as usual...but she didn't, she's tried to educate all of us about what is happening.

Did she make a mistake trusting the word of a vet when he told her that it was safe to sell animals? Perhaps. But this witch hunt is just freakin pathetic.
 
Cat_72 said:
You know, I used to condemn those who have had this virus in their collection and said nothing about it....at this point, after Jen's honesty and the way she's being treated for it, I'm starting to understand why they did what they did.

Not that I agree with it, but I understand it. Somehow, I don't see anything that Jen could do would be good enough for some of you people, 5 years from now you'll still find a reason to crucify her, even with as hard as she has tried to keep everything public knowledge, and spent money she doesn't have to try to research it. For the good of ALL of us in this crazy ass hobby. She could have kept it all under wraps, waited til the die-off stopped, and then continued business as usual...but she didn't, she's tried to educate all of us about what is happening.

Did she make a mistake trusting the word of a vet when he told her that it was safe to sell animals? Perhaps. But this witch hunt is just freakin pathetic.

You are correct Cat, IMO many here are trolls that want to attack someone regardless of what is right. Some want to attack others because they do not agree with their opinion, somehow they become a bad guy. That is something I find very funny, Jen is a good girl bottom line. Too bad I lost much of the respect for many of the trolls here, regardless of how educated they think they are, when it is said and done they prove to anyone that has half a brain that they know nothing. They run around and try to act like gods, and act like their opinion is the only one that matters. Well I have news, I have an opinion too, and that is mine.
 
Mooing Tricycle said:
Am i doing it? nope. But i would not be expected to be treated nicely and happily and all freakin sugar coated because of mistakes that i now have to fix that might actually cause MORE problems.

Nope. ill take it like an adult, and understand the reason people are upset, and do my best to fix it. So dont say "You people" cause i havent said anything here that says shes some horrible monster. :rolleyes: Youre kinda doing the same thing youre telling people not to do. Youre making others out to be some evil monsters, when hell... maybe you know, thats not their intent? Maybe it is, but you know freakin what... It certainly isnt mine. People are concerned. and have every damn right to be.

Sorry for making it look like I was lumping you in there Moo. I didnt mean for it to. I know you have been very understanding in the matter.

Respect and understanding is all I expect to be treated with, not sugar coating. These ass clowns have not even began to approach this with any kind of respect or understanding. They simply wanted to belittle Jen for not handling things exactly the way they thought it should have been handled. I am not saying Jen did everything right, I am just saying she did not do anything with malicious intent. Something these ass clowns just cant seem to differentiate.

But as far as me doing the same thing.... hardly. I am calling them out for being the witch hunting ass clowns that they are.
 
shrap said:
Sorry for making it look like I was lumping you in there Moo. I didnt mean for it to. I know you have been very understanding in the matter.

Respect and understanding is all I expect to be treated with, not sugar coating. These ass clowns have not even began to approach this with any kind of respect or understanding. They simply wanted to belittle Jen for not handling things exactly the way they thought it should have been handled. I am not saying Jen did everything right, I am just saying she did not do anything with malicious intent. Something these ass clowns just cant seem to differentiate.

But as far as me doing the same thing.... hardly. I am calling them out for being the witch hunting ass clowns that they are.


Ill admit. i was fairly angry reading that, and really thinking i was being added to that group, when i really try to see both sides of things as best i can, so i got a little offended.

Sorry for getting in there with the attitude... I could have just asked if i was being lumped in there.

The reason i say that you were doing the same thing ( i meant Making people out to be Monsters), in a way, was because People Like Felicia and such, are not bad people or evil witch hunters( im saying felicia, because you commented immediately after she posted... so yeah.. ionno.. maybe you didnt mean her, and then that there would be my fault for reading it that way completely), from what i see, they are upset, and are reacting because of worry for their own and others collections, which... personally i think is a fairly legit reaction, i acted the same way with that dan scolaro thread and one or two of the adeno virus threads ( so thats why i say that people should be held accountable for the things they do and act accordingly. If youre in this hobby for even a couple years, you quickly learn what to do and what not to do if you keep lots of animals, or at least... you should know.)

In defense, they too are just pointing out inaccuracies or things theyre seeing wrong. to be honest, i see it too, but ill at least leave room for an explanation... If Jen can explain them ( if she is willing, id hope so, cant expect her to of course) that would be great. Maybe those snakes adopted out are in single snake homes? All that there needs to be, for THAT information, is just some clarification... Do the people know if they did come in contact with the sick snakes, and what they should look out for? But as for the monster thing, i personally feel some ( not all, im sure some are just complete jerks) arent those kind of people. theyre just upset and worried.

I See your point that it would seem that shes being made out to be doing these things on purpose by some, but i dont really think that is their true intentions ( maybe it is, im not them, but i really am trying to understand both stances!). And i definitely dont think Jen is just out there doing it because she just dosnt CARE. I think, ( im sorry i cant explain THIER own actions, but just my view of them) that they are really just reacting based on what their own actions might be, as i have.

I dont know. i should probably go to bed or something. I just know that, i personally, do hold people to higher standards, i mean, heck. if I have to do things a certain way, and be careful and such, i would expect the same of others as well. Sure, that probably wont happen, but im certainly going to strive for it. I dont really think that its a bad thing to strive for.

Just as you would appreciate people being a bit more understanding of things ( and me too!),others would appreciate some dilligence in the way others care for their animals regarding diseases and sales and such when it comes down to something like this.

*shrug*
 
She almost made a mistake. I can understand bringing this stuff up, without that she might have shipped those animals, good on those who noticed and acted on the info.. But there is the sound of a lynch mob here and there shouldn't be.

I agree with you Cat, anyone reading this will think twice before making their problem public and we all may end up paying for that. I see nothing wrong with posting the info but some act like they have Chris Johnson in their sights and She ain't Chris not by a long long shot. Randy
 
Thank you Randy!! Excellent post! Wish I could give you karma my bother!
 
Well Sammy add me to the ass clown group because I did not think she should sell any animals. Am I happy she isn't? Yes. I was hoping she would see there was a risk doing it either by potentially passing on the virus or by looking like she didn't care about others collections. I don't think anything I wrote was malicious. If me stating my feelings about her selling animals this soon in public and in PM to her is a witch hunt, then give me a torch.
 
Steve, there is a big difference between saying you don't think she should be selling animals (which I myself said as well) and acting as if she's an evil, malicious person only out to destroy others collections with her lies and greed.
 
Cat_72 said:
Steve, there is a big difference between saying you don't think she should be selling animals (which I myself said as well) and acting as if she's an evil, malicious person only out to destroy others collections with her lies and greed.

I could not agree more Cat, seems like some jumped the gun on this. Jen is a good girl, and never once have I ever seen her do anything here that was evil or malicious as some here have been so quick to run with. I know for a fact without any doubt that she is in the hobby for the love of the animals. Never has she ever acted like a scumbag out to grab the cash.

Jen posted about her loss to help others, it is just way too sad that some seen it as an open door to attack her.
 
Cat_72 said:
Steve, there is a big difference between saying you don't think she should be selling animals (which I myself said as well) and acting as if she's an evil, malicious person only out to destroy others collections with her lies and greed.

Thank you Cat!! You have ALWAYS rocked, woman!
 
Whatever

When I first saw Jen advertising the Mojo for sale I did not respond. I waited, and gave some thought about posting. Since I know many consider Jen to be a "good gal," and I am always being called a troll for seeing things differently than the majority of the community, I figured I would let somebody else address it. Steve(SPJ) later sent Jen a PM and posted it in her ad. Great!
Then Jen posted some BS response in the classified ad about her vet team(with Elliot Jacobson being the best of the 3,) all clearing the offspring, and not holding it against anyone who doesn't want to purchase from her. Many of her post's are at the very best, inaccurate. Maybe even....Lies.
The fact is that no ethical person who cares about animals(their own, or others) more than money would be buying/selling animals so soon after having a deadly disease go through their collection. Even when confronted about this "bad choice" by another well respected member(SPJ,) Jen was not getting it. It wasn't until this thread was bumped and a bunch of :censored: clowns got involved that she chose to do the right thing.
 
Um.....did you happen to read the email from a vet besides Dr. Jacobsen that DID clear them for sale? I'm guessing not, since you seemed to think that it was a major revelation that the vaccine she was using was for "the bird flu". :rolleyes:

Half of the issues going on here are caused by people misreading, not reading at all, or spouting their halfwitted interpretation of what they think they might have read, and others running with it.
 
Cat_72 said:
You know, I used to condemn those who have had this virus in their collection and said nothing about it....at this point, after Jen's honesty and the way she's being treated for it, I'm starting to understand why they did what they did.

Not that I agree with it, but I understand it. Somehow, I don't see anything that Jen could do would be good enough for some of you people, 5 years from now you'll still find a reason to crucify her, even with as hard as she has tried to keep everything public knowledge, and spent money she doesn't have to try to research it. For the good of ALL of us in this crazy ass hobby. She could have kept it all under wraps, waited til the die-off stopped, and then continued business as usual...but she didn't, she's tried to educate all of us about what is happening.

Did she make a mistake trusting the word of a vet when he told her that it was safe to sell animals? Perhaps. But this witch hunt is just freakin pathetic.

Thank you -- finally someone who actually gets what I have been trying to tell people. This is why it has been stressing every last nerve I have, making me cry constantly every day, causing me to lose sleep and feel so anxious that I throw up -- I am being attacked relentlessly and accused of lying when I have not done so -- people are just not reading what I am saying or are getting it all screwed up. I easily could have hidden this virus, taken my losses, and then sold off what I have left to recoup some money. BUT I DIDN'T -- I have been trying extremely hard to make sure this info gets spread far and wide amongst members of our community so it doesn't happen again, and so that people realize how important proper quarantine is. I have spent thousands of dollars (the course of which put my marriage in a hurricane and almost ended it) to get answers and tests and information to give to our community to benefit every single person that keeps these animals that we all love. Did I make a mistake in trusting the word of 2 experienced herp vets in that my babies would be OK? Maybe. I had no reason to dispute their advice. And in selling them, I had no intent to harm anyone and had no thought that my vets could be wrong. But I rethought my decision after being confronted and decided not to do let them go and not take the risk. Yet I am still being crucified almost daily -- why?

Cat_72 said:
Um.....did you happen to read the email from a vet besides Dr. Jacobsen that DID clear them for sale? I'm guessing not, since you seemed to think that it was a major revelation that the vaccine she was using was for "the bird flu". :rolleyes:

Half of the issues going on here are caused by people misreading, not reading at all, or spouting their halfwitted interpretation of what they think they might have read, and others running with it.

Exactly what I have repeatedly been trying to get across.

I would also like to know -- what animals are people referring to when they say I adopted 2 out?
 
It is possible for snakes with OPMV to have multiple diseases as it destroys their immune system (which is why they almost always die of pneumonia -- which mine did). You can read this in many of the links I have provided to articles/forums on this virus, as well as the e-mail from Dr. Jacobsen months ago that I posted below. The limited evidence that Elliot has found leaning toward a new virus only suggests that there may be something else on top of it. As previously stated, his test results being negative for OPMV are null and void because the animals used for samples may very well not have had sufficient time to develop an immune response as they were not infected for very long before being euthanized (therefore every test done would indeed be negative as it is antibodies that they look for). We are doing new titres on the remaining snakes to confirm or disprove this.

I never stated that it was specifically Dr. Jacobsen that cleared my offspring to be healthy. I said that my vets had told me so -- and indeed it was Dr. Gordon and Dr. Brodnik, who are the other two involved vets in this case. Yes, I have never been contacted directly by Dr. Jacobsen other than the e-mail he sent me way back when this all began before he was ever actually on the case. He was supposed to have been in contact with Dr. Gordon this whole time, which is why when Mark told me where everything was at thus far and that the offspring would be just fine, I took it that he was basing it off what he had learned from Elliot thus far and could be relied upon. Then when Jason Brodnik backed up what Dr. Gordon said, I felt assured that all was true. That is why I decided it would be OK to sell the offspring. It was the people harassing me that ASSUMED it was Dr. Jacobsen that had been telling me this information -- only because I included him when listing the vets that are working on my case, which is entirely true.

My decision to retract my sales had nothing to do with "getting caught with my pants down", as I wasn't doing anything malicious or trying to "sneak" anything by, as Jas and Tosha want to believe in their deluded realities. I based my decision to sell them off what I was told by two professionals -- and the only reason I changed my mind was because I was forced to rethink the issue with good cause, and decided to err on the side of caution.

Dr. Jacobsen's e-mail to Tosha cannot be completely considered accurate as he was making statements based off of lop-sided rumors and lies that were told to him by Tosha herself. She had told him I had sold snakes from my collection -- not true. She had told him I was attributing statements to him, which I had not -- so again, not true. He also specifically told her that the info shared was not to be shared with anyone else -- which she blatantly violated. This is the response I recieved from him today:


Re: Virus info...and sharing private medical information...‏
From: Elliott Jacobson ([email protected])
You may not know this sender.Mark as safe|Mark as unsafe
Sent: Sun 5/04/08 10:03 AM
To: [email protected]

Jennifer: I provided some information to an individual who sent an e-mail to methat contained inaccurate information pertaining to recommendations that I supposedly made to you regarding ophidian paramyxovirus (OPMV) in yoursnakes. For instance, I did not recommend that you use the avian Colombovac vaccine. [This was before he ever recieved our samples -- the e-mail is pasted below] The avian viruses are so different than the reptile viruses that I doubt it would have any value even if your snakes had OPMV. If you have a hard scientific paper showing the efficacy of this vaccine for protecting snakes against OPMV, please send it to me. I believe all of the studies done are poorly documented. Plus there was no firm evidence that your snakes had OPMV. I mentioned to you that there were other viruses to consider. After speaking with you, the feeling I had was that your mind was made up and you had an approach you were going to follow. I received samples from Dr. Kincaid and reported my findings back to her. We did PCR for both paramyxovirus and reovirus on samples of lung from 3 snakes that were sent to me. The paramyxovirus PCR was negative. We were able to get an amplification product using our reovirus primer. However, we needed to have this product sequenced to make sure it was reovirus. At that point I notified Dr. Kincaid that we may have identified a virus but further sequencing was needed to verify what we had. I asked that she not share this information until we the sequencing results were completed. The results indicated that we amplified some other sequence that was essentially "garbage". We use"garbage" for any product that gets amplified that is a false positive. In my first review of the electron microscopic images I obtained on tissues from one of your snakes, I thought there might be an orthomyxovirus in the lung. But I was not sure so also I asked Dr.Kincaid not to share this information at that time. I sent images (3 weeks ago) to colleagues at CDC in Atlanta and they had a different opinion about the virus. They believe it is a rhabdovirus. This appears to be the same virus we identified in lung of a ball python in an epizootic in Texas. We are now trying to sequence this virus to determine its identity. This is not simple and straightforward. It may take us months to make a specific identification. I asked Dr. Kincaid to share this information with Dr. Gordon. I assume she did. If not, than I apologize for not sending the information directly to Dr. Gordon. Dr.Gordon should be the one providing the information to you.

I asked the person who sent me the e-mail to consider the information that I provided as privileged information and not be sent to anyone else. I simply wanted to correct the inaccurate statements in his e-mail that were attributed to me. It was a mistake on my part to think thatthis would be followed. So I also apologize for that.

In summary, we have no evidence that your snakes (or at least the samples sent to me) are infected with OPMV. However, we have evidence for a virus that is compatible with members of the family Rhabdoviridae. Our focus is to make a more specific identification of this virus. This could take months. Using Colombovac vaccine is unwarranted. Even if your snakes had paramyxovirus, it is questionable whether such a vaccine would have any value. Antibodies in snakes to OPMV develop 4-8 weeks following exposure (initial infection), not following first signs of clinical disease. Often signs of clinical disease are seen around 3 weeks following exposure. [Thus putting them within the 8 or more weeks it can take to develop antibodies -- and thus the negative test result] Further testing for exposure to OPMV is up to you since at this time there is no evidence at this time that your snakes are infected with this virus.

Any further communication to me about additional testing of your snakesshould be through Dr. Gordon. Any findings will be communicated directlyto Dr. Gordon and Dr. Kincaid (if she sends me any more material from your snakes) and no one else. I wish you the best of luck with your animals.

Elliott Jacobson
Professor of Zoological Medicine

Just so you have both sides, this is the e-mail I had sent to him that prompted the above response:

Virus info...and sharing private medical information...‏
From: Jennifer Harrison ([email protected])
Sent: Sun 5/04/08 2:14 AM
To: [email protected]

Dr. Jacobsen -- My first question that I have to ask, is why you're responding to random strangers and giving them information from my client medical records and the research being done on my animals, without my permission? Then on top of that, this information gets posted on a public forum for hundreds, if not thousands of viewers to see and interpret in various ways (incorrect ones)? Secondly, why are you telling this information to strangers but yet I have not even been contacted by you or given this information by you in either phone form, e-mail form, written mail form, or via any kind of medical reports forwarded to Dr. Gordon to give to me? Dr. Gordon asked me if I'd even recieved a bill from you, to which I responded that I had not, and he found that very odd. Then when I go to read these e-mails posted publicly, they get removed because you requested them to be withheld -- so that not even the person involved (ME) can become more aware of what is going on? I don't understand how you could feel that this was ethically correct or professional.

You have had the samples Dr. Gordon took since January -- yet despite how much we have pressed to get any kind of info from you, you refuse to respond or give us any indication as to what we're dealing with. The only information we get is from a single e-mail sent to the Marshfield Clinic, in which you specifically asked to have hidden from Dr. Gordon and myself...which makes no sense and in my opinion. I don't understand why all the secrecy and refusal to give us your findings. These are MY animals, MY pets that have been dying...MY thousands of dollars in losses and MY thousands of dollars in veterinary bills -- yet Dr. Gordon and I don't hear a word from you or your lab, because you are specifically hiding it from us. In what I said online about my remaining animals being safe to breed and their offspring not having inherited it, that info came from Dr. Gordon and Dr. Jason Brodnik of Colorado -- the third victim from the seller that sent me the original infected animal. I had no reason not to trust what two veterinarians experienced with reptiles were telling me. I have since rescinded my decision to sell my offspring from the 2 accidental clutches I got (2 females went on to ovulate in January despite having only been bred 1-2 times each back in September/October, before this all began). Not a single animal has left my posession since September of last year, far before the original infected animal was ever recieved and this ordeal began.

Back in the beginning when I first contacted you, you advised against using the vaccine. That was before you knew anything about what was going on and before you had ever recieved any samples from Dr. Gordon. Since then, you had not been giving us any kind of info, so we did our own research -- and since OPMV fit the symptoms like a puzzle piece, and the vaccine Colombovac was proven to stop it (and even cure some ill ones -- which makes no scientific sense but nonetheless is true) in MULTIPLE cases in Europe , Dr. Gordon and I made our own decision to import it from a vet in Germany that had experienced this success first hand, and use it in the manner which was discussed in those UK cases. And low and behold -- IT WORKED. I have not had a single new animal fall ill since they were all vaccinated -- and the last two ill ones I had left magically got better, despite every single other treatment failing. All of my animals have been healthy and feeding for months now -- none are symptomatic or otherwise having problems. The two previously ill ones do have a slight dry wheeze once in a great while when upset or stressed, but Dr. Gordon attributes this to lung scarring from all the hemorraging they endured. Despite the e-mail you sent to the Marshfield Clinic discussing the negative result from the OPMV test you did, I still firmly believe that this is what I am dealing with. Mainly because the vaccine worked exactly as it was proven to in other cases, but also because your research on the virus and other articles on it state that antibodies can take up to 8 weeks to develop -- therefore your negative test result is most likely null and void, considering that the 2 females we euthanized for samples had only been sick for 3 weeks. They very well may not have developed any kind of immune system response in that short period of time. My other main reason for firmly believing that this is indeed OPMV, is that the seller's third victim, Dr. Brodnik, had two titres test positive for OPMV in both the carrier animal that he recieved, as well as the mate that it affected (both are now dead). What are the odds that the seller is selling snakes with two separate viruses, both with identical symptoms, timelines, cultures (right down to the secondary Pseudomonas Aeruginosa pneumonia infection), and deaths?

I strongly suggest that we draw blood from the 2 previously sick females and run titres on both -- they were sick for many weeks, and it has been months since they got better. If OPMV is present, they will definitely have antibodies left. I also suggest we draw blood from each of my remaining healthy snakes that never got sick to check for exposure.

I am really upset by the fact that you chose to violate patient confidentiality and share info regarding my pets' medical records with a stranger -- but even more upset by the fact that you hadn't even shared it with me or my veterinarian first. I need you to tell me what you have found so far, what your thoughts are, why it is taking so long, and how we can retest things to get a difinitive answer.


~* Jen *~

This is the one and only contact I have ever recieved from Elliot until now, before we were able to send him anything. Since then, he was only in rare contact with Dr. Gordon and his office.

Re: Ophidian Paramyxovirus infection‏
From: Elliott Jacobson ([email protected])
You may not know this sender.Mark as safe|Mark as unsafe
Sent: Mon 11/19/08 6:54 AM
To: [email protected]

There are several viral infections in snakes that overlap with paramyxovirus infection. Your outbreak may be caused by this virus or it may not. The snake paramyxovirus is distinct from any other paramyxovirus based on sequencing. I know that some in Europe have used the vaccine for pigeon paramyxovirus in snakes. I do not believe that there are any adequately controlled studies to show that it is efficacious. If your veterinarian wants to know what samples to collect and how to collect them, he/she can contact me.

Good luck,

EJ Elliott Jacobson,
DVM, PhD, DACZM
Professor of Zoological Medicine
Bldg 2015, SW 16th Ave.
SACS, Box 100126
College of Veterinary Medicine
University of Florida
Gainesville, Fl 32610

Because of our limited contact with him, Dr. Gordon and I began doing our own research. Based on his findings through his own library, as well as things I printed and brought to him and also communication with a vet in Germany that had experienced this virus first hand, we decided to go ahead and try the vaccine anyway as we really had nothing to lose. Dr. Gordon is not just a stand-by cat and dog vet hanging on Dr. Jacobsen's every word. He has his own years of experience with reptiles and does a LOT of research on exotics on his own, for both his private practice and his work with the UW. It was under his guidance that we chose the path that we did, and I had no logical reason to dispute anything he advised me.

For whoever it was that said "I am refusing to do what is obviously necessary" or something along those lines -- you would too if you were in my shoes and facing the deaths of the very animals you busted your ass to earn and love with a passion that is only superceded by your daughter and your husband. I cannot in good conscience destroy these living, breathing, otherwise-healthy creatures unless I am given undeniable evidence that that is my only choice. Until then, I have no reason to kill them -- I am going to hold out for hope that they can be kept alive and that I can continue with the one and only hobby that I love. If it comes back that they need to be destroyed -- then I will either make that decision, or decide to keep them all as pets and end my business. For now, I will continue working with what I have privately and give things a few years to get confirmed results (whatever they may be), and make my decision after that point.

What I have left are as follows: My 2 beloved pets (Spoon and Lucky, striped male and normal female), my adult male clown (Hollywood), my adult male spider (Dash), a breedable sub-adult male genetic stripe that has been here on breeding loan for the entire ordeal, unfortunately arriving last fall right before this all came down and due to safety reasons, couldn't be returned yet (Jack). Yes, his owner is a friend of mine that has been kept very up to date on everything and is aware of what the potential outcome may be. We have our own contract that will be followed if anything happens to Jack. The other remaining animals are a project female that I raised up from a tiny 50-gram CH baby (Leilani -- she is one of the ones that would be hardest to say goodbye to), and an adult CBB yellow stripe female that is another project and unreplaceable as she was the only survivor of her clutch (Misty). Those 7 animals are the vaccinated "Lucky 7" that I had segregated away in a different room back in October and they all avoided becoming ill. Then I also have 2 adult females (Angel and Tarzan) that became ill, somehow managed to ovulate and lay fertile eggs, and upon vaccination returned to normal health. They are feeding and thriving and have been for months. Those 9 total are all that is left from my original collection. There are also my 2 baby butter motley cornsnakes and my 3 rainbow boas, but this virus appears to be only a ball python strain and as such they all remained unaffected. I did vaccinate them anyway, just in case. In a separate quarantine room (my bedroom), I have the following new additions (based on being told by the 2 vets that I am past the infectious period): An adult striped female, 1.1 adult co-dom genetic reduced patterns from Ian G., and 9 kingsnakes (1.1 baby blue-eyed blondes, 1.1 baby Carlsbad stripes, 0.1 baby coastal stripe, 1.0 baby hypo coastal stripe, 1.0 adult desert wide stripe, 0.1 adult albino stripe, and 0.1 adult Mexican black king). If I have to destroy everything, I will not be starting over. I will never be able to replace the animals that I have. I don't have any friends that can keep snakes for me. They either already have snakes of their own, or are deathly afraid of them and would never keep any in their house, or are not allowed to keep animals in their residence.
 
Back
Top