• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Joe Haggard aka joepythons ALL BAD

Suncoast Herpetological said:
That's one impressive vocabulary Joe and his two buddies have in that old thread. All four letter words but an amazing quantity and variety
I think there were actually three buddies but the one post was deleted as the account was created after the suspension. What a piece of work.

Hey Joe. Are you still sticking to the story that they were all different people?
 
Maybe different people.... but all posting from the same residence.
 
truth

Jim O said:
I think there were actually three buddies but the one post was deleted as the account was created after the suspension. What a piece of work.

Hey Joe. Are you still sticking to the story that they were all different people?
Jim,the users in that old thread were myself(joepythons),Eric Knock(bige61614) and Meshyangel is Eric's girlfriend.Bob Woodard has spoken to both Eric and Andrea.Why is it so hard for people to see for themselves the truth on that old thread? The KID killed the snake and got upset that i would not replace it period! As usual certain people here try to make something out of nothing.Why don't you people turn your wasted time slamming people for no reason and go after people like Chris Johnson or Big daddy reptiles?
 
internet

shrap said:
Maybe different people.... but all posting from the same residence.
Sammy,when everything was being said on that thread i was at my home and Eric and Andrea were about a half hour away at there home.We both had Family Video internet service and someone posted that something like a dynamic IP used by companies make it seem like everyone is on the same connection.The comments about this IP info is somewhere in the middle of that thread.
 
Jim O I believe he said it was Me Myself and I :)

John it was interesting and the number of times he used the same word yet as you said most if not all the good four letter one!!

Griz,,, Bob I was wondering how long it would take you to pipe up as I remember that mess and just how much you like ol Joe.

For those that didn't go look Bob wasn't trying to sell guns or well anything else Joe claimed. Randy
 
you

ravensgait said:
Jim O I believe he said it was Me Myself and I :)

John it was interesting and the number of times he used the same word yet as you said most if not all the good four letter one!!

Griz,,, Bob I was wondering how long it would take you to pipe up as I remember that mess and just how much you like ol Joe.

For those that didn't go look Bob wasn't trying to sell guns or well anything else Joe claimed. Randy
Randy,its people like you that make fauna a negative site to visit.You don't know jack but in every thread you have something to say and majority of the time you make no SENSE! I never said Bob was selling guns. He was attempting to TRADE guns! Everything was peacefull here and i peacefully replied to Sammy and then you post your trash.I am done with this thread.
 
joepythons said:
Sammy,when everything was being said on that thread i was at my home and Eric and Andrea were about a half hour away at there home.We both had Family Video internet service and someone posted that something like a dynamic IP used by companies make it seem like everyone is on the same connection.The comments about this IP info is somewhere in the middle of that thread.

I know nothing about Family Video as an ISP, but I am familiar with some smaller ISPs. Once you leave their network then all users appear to have the same IP addy to the rest of the world. So what you say is very possible, even if it is rare now a days. I have no reason to believe you are lying about it.
 
shrap said:
I know nothing about Family Video as an ISP, but I am familiar with some smaller ISPs. Once you leave their network then all users appear to have the same IP addy to the rest of the world. So what you say is very possible, even if it is rare now a days. I have no reason to believe you are lying about it.
Well, being as how truth is something of a stranger to joey, being as how he has lied about a few other things, used different IDs, just plain not been forthcoming, and granted it is within the realm of possibility that he is, this once, for a change, telling the truth, I'm not sure he's deserving of the benefit of the doubt.

That's only because he's abused that trust a few times previously, so I suppose.....nope, just can't see giving it to him this time. I'll go along with it being possible, but it's not going to change one iota of my opinion about joey.
 
Wes,

I completely understand where you are coming from. And this one particular aspect does not change the big picture for me either. But for me personally I cant call any person a liar in good conscience without having the proof to back up what I am saying.

And in this one particular case he could be telling the truth and I have nothing to show otherwise. All the posts made about it in that other thread were consistent with how it would be if they are telling the truth. That is all I have to go on, anything else would be pure speculation. And there aint even enough of that, in THIS particular case to call him a liar over it.
 
It's a fine line Sammy. I'm not calling him a liar, I'm just not saying he's telling the truth becuase he does have a history of lying.

Now if HE can prove that they were using different computers, are different people, that the ISPs matching exactly is a mere coincidence, then I'm all for saying, "my mistake" on this one. Short of HIM proving it though, I'm not willing to say he's NOT lying about it.

We're this ( ) close to saying the same thing.

Too bad you're such a liar joey. Here is a prime example where your history is working against you.
 
Well if you look at that thread all of them typed pretty much the same and sure knew the same cuss words lol ... But who can say.. Randy
 
Wes,

Lol.... Yeah I think we both are this ( ) close to saying the same thing. I aint calling him a liar, but I also aint saying he is telling the truth. I am just saying there is insufficient evidence to come to a conclusion. At least about this one particular aspect.
 
And in this one particular case he could be telling the truth and I have nothing to show otherwise. All the posts made about it in that other thread were consistent with how it would be if they are telling the truth.

Sammy, question; With a dynamic ISP, smaller company etc., is it impossible for two computers to post at the same time? From what I understand, in the other thread, this never occurred. I can see where they may have to wait in cue to post from the ISP server but the time difference should be minimal.
 
truth

Sammy & Wes,if you have read that whole thread then you would see that someone explained the whole ISP deal.I no longer speak to either Eric or Andrea,allthough Bob Woodard has spoken to them both.He knows i am telling the truth about Eric and Andrea but he does not like telling the truth when it concerns me.He would rather tell lies one after the other because i upset him some time back.I know i said i was done with this thread but i thought you both deserved a response.You both may barely believe me and thats your choice.I will still Thank You both.
 
internet

kmurphy said:
Sammy, question; With a dynamic ISP, smaller company etc., is it impossible for two computers to post at the same time? From what I understand, in the other thread, this never occurred. I can see where they may have to wait in cue to post from the ISP server but the time difference should be minimal.
Kevin,i am not sure whom family video actually went thru for our internet service but i will say everything i ever posted while using the service had a pony express action when posting anything.It made dial-up look like the speed of light :rofl: .There were several times both Eric and myself were both on line at the same time yet our posts were sent numerous minutes apart.
 
kmurphy said:
Sammy, question; With a dynamic ISP, smaller company etc., is it impossible for two computers to post at the same time? From what I understand, in the other thread, this never occurred. I can see where they may have to wait in cue to post from the ISP server but the time difference should be minimal.

With Network Address Translation or (NAT) you could literally have thousands of computers connecting to the Internet at the same time. The connections are managed - not by your local computer but by an edge router or in some cases a firewall.

Dynamic IPs are a different animal. All of the computers on "Family Video" need to have an IP address - the most efficient way to do this is with Dymaic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP). Assuming that "Family Video" is indeed using NAT (or a proxy) the addresses that the computers in each subscriber's home receives are private - seen only within the "Family Video" network. Once traffic leaves the "Family Video" network (bound for the Internet) that traffic is associated with "Family Video's" public IP address.
 
thanks

Scott Ashton said:
With Network Address Translation or (NAT) you could literally have thousands of computers connecting to the Internet at the same time. The connections are managed - not by your local computer but by an edge router or in some cases a firewall.

Dynamic IPs are a different animal. All of the computers on "Family Video" need to have an IP address - the most efficient way to do this is with Dymaic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP). Assuming that "Family Video" is indeed using NAT (or a proxy) the addresses that the computers in each subscriber's home receives are private - seen only within the "Family Video" network. Once traffic leaves the "Family Video" network (bound for the Internet) that traffic is associated with "Family Video's" public IP address.
Scott,thank you for explaining this here as i am sure people do not have the time to read that other thread to find this info.
 
Back
Top