• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Good Guy Johns Stranahan/ JasBalls

deborahbroadus said:
The connection between little Sunshine and Johnny is explained in this email.
Click to expand...

Just an update to the person that decided to take it upon himself to write to my job and inform them that I am on the computer during work hours AAAALLLLL the time... :ack2:

You just are really lacking in common sense, aren't you? AND...you told on yourself not me. Being online all the time during work hours does not mean that I am online on a work computer but I did use it to screen shot the email you referred to..but...how would you know I was online all the time....UNLESS YOU WERE TOO??! :rolleyes: They have YOUR email address now. :rofl:

You just told on yourself.:shootfoot Do you really think that I would be so stupid as to not research OUR regulations before doing anything? :reddevil:

BTW: Yahoo, itself, is not a forbidden site...but some ADs are. The forbidden parts of a website are clearly marked, but it does not mean that the WHOLE website is forbidden. If it were forbidden, I, and no other employee, would be able to access it, that is how absolute our security is. I can be on the Fauna website, and I can post. There are some restrictions, but since you are so smmaaaart, I am sure your sneaky self will figure it out.

You are just the kind of person that I would NEVER do business with. Sneaky, low-down stalkerish, nasty little turd.

Now take your racist behind some place and stop trying to hide behind big words like "fraud" "tax-payers" expense..etc... when you obviously have NO CLUE what you are talking about......:rolleyes: .....and it shows.
 
deborahbroadus said:
Just an update to the person that decided to take it upon himself to write to my job and inform them that I am on the computer during work hours AAAALLLLL the time... :ack2:
Click to expand...

Someone contacted your employer, and told on you? What a joke. It's sounds like someone has a 6 year old mentality. Not to mention they have to be a big loser.

For those of you, who have your run ins with John, don't let him get to you. If you let him get to you, you are letting him win his childish games. There is a reason he gets banned from most of the sites out there. He obviously has some mental issues he needs to work out. If you ignore him, and don't let him bother you, he will stop, because he gets his jollies off knowing that you are getting mad. I don't know why anyone would want to do businees with a guy like that.
 
brd7666 said:
Someone contacted your employer, and told on you? What a joke. It's sounds like someone has a 6 year old mentality. Not to mention they have to be a big loser.

For those of you, who have your run ins with John, don't let him get to you. If you let him get to you, you are letting him win his childish games. There is a reason he gets banned from most of the sites out there. He obviously has some mental issues he needs to work out. If you ignore him, and don't let him bother you, he will stop, because he gets his jollies off knowing that you are getting mad. I don't know why anyone would want to do businees with a guy like that.
Click to expand...

They THOUGHT they were "telling" on me. :dgrin: Someone that takes what happens off a forum in order to stalk someone in their personal life clearly has serious mental issues.

But this isn't the first time that it's happened, so forum Wack Jobs with mental issues are clearly nothing new to me..... BUT I have erased where I work, so I can sort of cut this kind of behavior at the root..it does sort of waste tax payers' money when I have to spend time proving to my boss exactly what happened and pulling up the proof.:rolleyes:
 
Just out of curiosity, when this issue was raised, were you informed of the name of the complainant...or the email address. Was there something specific that relates this to a thread about John Stranahan? (Since you directed a subsequent comment toward Joe, it rather seemed like you were accusing him...which begs the question of why it would be posted in this thread, instead of one about him)
 
hhmoore said:
Just out of curiosity, when this issue was raised, were you informed of the name of the complainant...or the email address. Was there something specific that relates this to a thread about John Stranahan? (Since you directed a subsequent comment toward Joe, it rather seemed like you were accusing him...which begs the question of why it would be posted in this thread, instead of one about him)
Click to expand...

Harald, it's in THIS thread, because it was from this thread that their so-called "evidence" came from.

***My aside to Joe had nothing to do with the topic.
 
Thank you for the clarification - I figured there was a reason, it just wasn't clear (to me)
 
Back
Top