• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

KelliH and others Banned? Why?

Status
Not open for further replies.
shrap said:
I can understand Rich's feelings about people bashing him and his site, none of us would like it if we were in his shoes. I mean if my next door neighbor bad mouthes me I sure aint invited him into my home and welcoming him with open arms.

I still do not understand the decision on Jeanne though. She didn't say anything bad about Rich or the site. Just that she didn't like Lucille. Jeanne was not a mod here so she was not under any type of obligation. That part just don't make sense to me.


Yeah, I guess I probably shouldn't have banned her, but the damage is done. And honestly I don't feel bad about it at all. Matter of fact I probably should have banned others for the same reason. I just don't WANT those sorts of people HERE. I've worked too damned hard on this site to make it into something to have those destructive personalities eat away at it from within.

Honestly, was I supposed to read that animosity laced thread and just shrug it off, keep those people as moderators here, and welcome them lovingly back into the arms of everyone here? Get real.......

If people hold such animosity towards myself, this site, and any moderators here, then hit the road. I do not want them using this site to further their own ambitions and goals. I do not wish to assist them in any way with the facilities I offer here and with my other sites. Yes you certainly are free to post your true feelings but if you do so in such a way that it is obvious that those words WILL get back to the targets, well then you may have consequences to bear up under. If that concept is difficult to understand, I believe there are medications available that help your cognitive capabilities somewhat.

Those people were posting on a publicly viewable forum so either they maliciously desired for this info to reach the targets over here or they were just too damned stupid to understand that concept. Either way, I really don't want them here. If those are the kind of people Kelly wishes to surround herself with, then I guess the feathers on that bird are not what she portrayed here at all. You ARE known by the company you keep. If it so happens that the majority of the leopard gecko community here feels the same way and desires to be those same birds of a feather, then more power to them. That is their choice to make.
 
WebSlave said:
Yeah, I guess I probably shouldn't have banned her, but the damage is done.

Agreed.

WebSlave said:
Honestly, was I supposed to read that animosity laced thread and just shrug it off, keep those people as moderators here, and welcome them lovingly back into the arms of everyone here?

Nope. I already said twice that I can completely understand how you feel about what was said in that thread and can't blame you for your feelings on the matter in the slightest.

My only quandary was Jeanne and you cleared that up for me as honestly as you could. Thank you.
 
BTW, Kelli, who was there for you when you had the loss of your son? Was it not the same people you and these others now slam, and these same people collected funds to help, did they not? Oh, yes we will not forget that part. Just something to ponder.

IMO, the loss of respect goes a long way, does it not? I just could not/will not let you walk away without the whole truth out there for everyone to see.

Some of these people that are now being slammed/ back stabbed are the same people that gave freely from their hearts to help Kelli when she needed it. Now look at the thanks that is now being returned.

As far as I am concerned, that is a great way to show your appreciation.
 
Thanks Sharp for the negitive Karma points. But It was the exact same people that helped her.
 
BalloonzForU said:
What the :censored: happend to FREEDOM OF SPEECH?
What’s hard to understand here?

While I agree that the fundamental right to free speech is not to be trampled with and everyone has a right to express themselves, Nothing of the sort is happening here. You don’t always have that privilege without consequences. For instance, if I have an employer that I disagree with vehemently, I would not voice my concerns opening and publicly without expecting to be standing in the unemployment line.

To be honest, I started reading this forum due to Kelli’s posts. I truly enjoy them. I’m not completely surprised by the turn of events here. It’s time to part ways and I think all involved would agree on that.

I wouldn’t want Kelli to be miserable on a site she doesn’t respect. I wouldn’t want Rich to rely on a moderator who shows such a dislike for him publicly.

The moderators are supposed to represent this site in a positive light. The situation wouldn’t be tolerated by anyone in any aspect of live.

Take any example student to a teacher, employee/employer, child/parent, and moderator/ site administrator. Would any of them truly expect to call the other a “b*tch” and more publicly and not expect consequences?

I don’t think anyone truly expects Rich to have a moderator that dislikes him. I don't think Kelli really wants to post on a site she no longer cares for.

I believe the best possible outcome here is to let those who are miserable post elsewhere. The rest enjoy the site.
 
No problem at all Bobby. It was way out of line bringing Hayden into this.
 
shrap said:
No problem at all Bobby. It was way out of line bringing Hayden into this.

That is a matter of opinion, I will agree to disagree. You do not IMO, stab people in the back that help you. Bottom line!!
 
WebSlave said:
If that concept is difficult to understand, I believe there are medications available that help your cognitive capabilities somewhat.
Sorry Rich, but at this time medicine still isn't able to offer a cure for "stupid."* :rofl: ;)











(* Author's footnote: It should be noted that the above attempt at humor and levity was not in any way an attempt to call any particular person, on this forum or not, "stupid." If you have somehow managed to take offence to the said statement, then please take a moment for personal reflection as to why it might be that you are so easily offended...and then find a qualified therapist who can help you find your own special little "happy place.")

(A footnote to the footnote: Yeah...I know that I'm a dork. You don't need to tell me.)


 
Thanks to my 'coach' Jeremy. LOL


Oh yea Marcia you too. :toiletcla

Simple fact is I just learned to write better. :) Doesnt take a genious to figure out when people are taking offense that was never intended, you are doing something wrong.
 
Its sad, when I first heard that Kelli and Marcia and Jeanne along with Mr.Sage were banned I was rather disappointed. But however, after reading the thread, I was a little shocked to see me in there. I can't say Rich didnt have a reason, he absolutely did.
 
I think the banning was unwarranted. So your feelings are hurt, big deal. They didn't try and damage the site, and were nothing but professional while on this site. How many employees do you think go out after work with a few buddies, and bash their employers. Doesn't mean they get the boot, for talking crap outside of work. It's how you act while here that should count for how they are treated.
Also, they didnt try damaging Fauna. They were telling people fauna sucks, dont go there blah blah, they stated personal opinions. This would be the same thing as if I posted on a forum "man, this cashier at McDonalds really pissed me off. What a rude little a-hole", well would I get banned from McDonalds because I didn't like someone? I think not.
I think Rich overreacted. While I agree what they said wasn't in the best taste, banning them wasn't the appropriate solution.
 
Wanting to make your own forum and all is fine, Im just so disappointed that there people who seemed so mature and good took the low road.


Did anyone else find it funny that the forum members there got their panties in a bunch that some sneaky person went behind their backs? Hypocrites.
 
Southwick Herps said:
I think the banning was unwarranted. So your feelings are hurt, big deal. They didn't try and damage the site, and were nothing but professional while on this site. How many employees do you think go out after work with a few buddies, and bash their employers. Doesn't mean they get the boot, for talking crap outside of work. It's how you act while here that should count for how they are treated.
Also, they didnt try damaging Fauna. They were telling people fauna sucks, dont go there blah blah, they stated personal opinions. This would be the same thing as if I posted on a forum "man, this cashier at McDonalds really pissed me off. What a rude little a-hole", well would I get banned from McDonalds because I didn't like someone? I think not.
I think Rich overreacted. While I agree what they said wasn't in the best taste, banning them wasn't the appropriate solution.

You are forgetting who owns the playground. Tell you what, if one of my employee's spoke to me like this you had better believe they would have gotten the boot. To say otherwise is simply ignorant.

Griz
 
BalloonzForU said:
Agreed again. No one said anything damaging other than their personal feelings. What the :censored: happend to FREEDOM OF SPEECH?

Ignorance, nothing but ignorance. But then again, what do you expect from someone who just posted this?

standard


I say good riddance!

Griz
 
BalloonzForU said:
Agreed again. No one said anything damaging other than their personal feelings. What the :censored: happend to FREEDOM OF SPEECH?

Ignorance, nothing but ignorance. But then again, what do you expect from someone who just posted this?



I say good riddance!

Griz
picture.JPG
 
Griz said:
Ignorance, nothing but ignorance. But then again, what do you expect from someone who just posted this?



I say good riddance!

Griz
picture.JPG
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: That is too funny.......
 
Ya know what I think? yeah well ya'll get to hear it anyway! Those guys had a right to say how they felt. AND, Rich had a right to do what he did, upon finding out about it. and... Maybe its all for the best to get these feelings out in the open and not have people who don't like or respect each other, pretending they do.

The thing that creeps me out is the person who went from that forum that was apparently informally "invite only" and so was apparently invited by those members, to Rich's ear over here to tattle on them. Betrayal of trust. I'd love to know who did it, tho I'm sure I never will. I do have my suspicions tho.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top