I have read both threads ....... phewwww !
Griz writes (in the other thread):
They say that character is who you are when nobody is looking.
This is in the context that those participating in the other thread thought it was blocked from public view. It is one of the most poignant and accurate statements I have read lately. Well put Bob!
Wendy, you write this, from earlier in this thread:
I got pulled as a mod but not banned, I mentioned 4 people that are members here that I do not always like, none of them mods just regluar posters. If Id of said it here in HELL it would have been fine so I don't see why I can't say it other places.
You also mentioned me as a "friend" with whom you had major differences. We have traded views on the phone, in threads, etc, and not always in agreement. One thing I would expect of a "friend" would be to keep the negative gossip and feelings out of a public forum, while a "non-friend" would be under no such expectation, but maybe that's just me.
Here's the rub. Wendy, you seem to create a class distinction, between "mods" and "just regular posters", as if criticizing the lower class should be more acceptable than the upper class. While I don't agree with the concept of HELL, the mods forum where they bash members, etc, lets just use your own characterization. If mods are "special", and deserving of more respect,
then I would say that it is a fair implication by your own words that more is expected of them, and how they conduct themselves relative to us common folks. That is where you fell short, although I do not think you should have lost your mod status, just been warned, as I also think respect should not be a 2-tiered system. I also think HELL is a bit of a double-standard quandary for that reason, as well as the mod-forum if it is used as a place to bash us common folks.
While Rich and I have had our disagreements, I have no problem with his rationale. It both amazes and amuses me that people think that "free-speech" carries some guarantee of no-accountability for what is said !