With all this "kiss and make-up" talk, there is still an angle of this that I hope is not lost on the "can't we all just get along" crowd. A while back, the greater Fauna community was asked to contribute to someone in a time of terrible personal loss and financial need. It responded well. That a couple of individuals may have tarnished what they touched of it is not reflective of the much greater body of good that came of it, by the greater body of Fauna membership. Some feelings were hurt of late, again involving a misunderstanding it would seem, but even if not a misunderstanding, still entailing the communications of couple of specific entities at best. What is the response, besides going with their own site which many of us have no problem with? One of the first actions is to open, post in, and encourage a thread in the new site so that members of the Fauna community can be bashed, and get a flame war going. And if they thought it to have been hidden, only to then realize its open to the world, then delete it, and show some class. No such wisdom. I do not think that those who described it earlier as a "knife in the back" were far off the mark. The Fauna community deserves better, especially from Kelli. The only thing unfortunate about her being banned is that she cannot respond here, but I am for the ban being allowed to stand.