Best I can tell, Paul's use of the word "rape" in the title did not fall under the "acceptable titles" for a post. Yet now (10:45 p.m. 5/30/03), sitting here on just the first page of the BOI are 7 other postings that do not fit those rules either and they are not being edited
Rape is down right libelous. You are accusing someone of a criminal offense punishable by Jail time.
What other words do you see? the BOI has not been moving much lately. So I checked out the first two pages.
Inquiry , bad guy, possible dishonest seller, good guy, great guy, beware, good service, I'm not happy, fishy.
looking = inquiring = inquiry
question=inquiring=inquiry
buyer beware = bad guy
fishy= poss bad guy
i'm not happy = deal went bad (bad guy)
anyone have a problem with him? = inquiry
anyone know = inquiry
what is my point?
The rules are being bent and we know it. We understand. We are reasonable. But there comes a point when enough is enough. There comes a point when someone will cross a line in the sand. If you feel your rights are violated.......go to a site that will delete anything remotely negative.
We do not need someone posting on here about someone else getting raped and opening up possible libel. How would you like it if someone posted on a tittle that you RAPED them.
My point. Ken is doing his job. We do not single out anyone. If we did we would be put back in our place immediately.
Second point. Rules can be bent a little. But there is a "snapping" point where the rules can no longer bend and crosses over into breaking land.
And if you feel your rights were violated. Take it over to web wars and forum foibles.
Now back to Micheal Featherweight. He keeps complaining on bobclark forums that he can't sign on. Tell the guy to click on the link in his e-mail. Tell him it might help him to read a little.