• In case most of you have not noticed, I made changes to the donation amounts as well as the durations for all of the paid membership levels. Things are winding down here, and this seems to be the most prudent way to deal with the "end of life" period of this site.

    Contributor level members - $10 per 30 days
    Sponsors - Eliminated
    Benefactor level members - $25 per 30 days
    Endowment level members - $50 per 30 days

    Account Upgrades Page
  • Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

Money Talks and Michael Jackson Walks

Jim O

Careful with that axe...
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
5,097
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
in your mind
Once again the system worked...and proved that there are different systems of justice for the rich and famous (OJ Simpson, Robert Blake, and now Wacko Jacko).
 
And not that I have any sympathy but you have to think that Tom Snedden is all done.
 
Sickening. Not guilty on all counts. Some of the counts only had testimony of the mother (question character and motive), but many of the other crimes seemed to have many more additional witness and more credible evidence. Goes to show what celebrity will do for you. Some jurors said
Jurors remained guarded about details of their 30 hours of deliberations over seven days but offered some insight during a news conference, saying they were irritated by the testimony of the accuser's mother, who at one point snapped her fingers at them
and one said
''I disliked it intensely when she snapped her fingers at us,'' said one juror, a woman. She said she thought to herself, ''Don't snap your fingers at me, lady.'' The jurors were not identified.
makes that juror sound like arrogance, not evidence was the motivation for her vote.
On a side note, that other mother who was a witness and said she specifically gave Michael permission to sleep in the same bed with her son, should have been charged with child neglect or abuse, to give a grown man permission to sleep with your child is the most asinine thing I ever heard of.
 
Jim O said:
And not that I have any sympathy but you have to think that Tom Snedden is all done.

He has said even before this trial that he would not be running for another term and would be retiring.
 
DAND said:
Thomas Mesereau Jr., Jackson's chief lawyer is now the first male over the age of 16 to get Jackson off. :rolleyes:
Likely the first human of either gender. :p
 
I can't BELIEVE that there are actually grown men and women who sat outside that courthouse through the whole thing....holding "vigils" for Wacko Jackoff....some even GAVE UP THEIR JOBS to be there to support the sick SOB!!!
They, obviously, are nearly as disturbed as Jacko himself.

And....I can't even comprehend the idea that this so-called man is left raising his own kids....those poor children are doomed to be warped. :hot:
 
DAND said:
And what's up with all the idiots waiting outside the court house waving to the cameras? :bandhead0 What a bunch of losers!
Does the expression "they need to get a life" apply? LOL.
 
Thomas Mesereau Jr., Jackson's chief lawyer is now the first male over the age of 16 to get Jackson off.


LMFAO.....How true.

I still can't believe they let that sick bastard off on every count. What a crock..........
 
What's irritating it that this man (?) has PROVEN that he is irresponsible with children. Surely, you remember the famous shot of him dangling his own child off of a balcony. The fact that he keeps getting off (no pun intended) just intensifies the belief that fame and fortune can buy your freedom.

:hot: :uzi: :angry: :AR15firin :detonate: :2gunsfiri :bandhead0
 
the words i would use to describe this entire situation and how i feel would get me banned from this site forever... so i will simply say i disagree with the final decision
 
But who is sicker? The mother who was bascally pimping her little boy out to Michael Jackson or Michael Jackson himself? It seems to me that she was getting compensation at first, then when that stopped she got mad and took legal action.

When are THEY going to care about the poor boy involved? I haven't heard anything about his mental state or his welfare. If I was in the center of this garbage but totally ignored I think I'd be a basket case.
 
Shelly,

You are absoltely correct. The mother ought to be in prison for child endangerment. And whether the abuse happened or not, the child is now convinced that it did (probably with good reason) and will forever bear those scars.
 
Back
Top