KNOBTAIL
LORD OF THE FLIES
TOM, you may be 100% correct about your
assesment of Neil. I have never posted any thread in defense of Neils action. People may interpet it that way, but nevertheless, I cannot provide any information about a complaint that someone else makes on this site unless I have 1st hand information.
I can also appreciate your frustrations about Neils perpetual ability to screw in a lightbulb backwards, and I have never posted any threads in his behalf on that as well.
You may also be correct about the age difference cosidering that I am reaching 60 and I may have a different perspective on things in general. I may be also willing to accept what one may consider humerous may not be to someone else.
Mr Eaton and I have come to a mutual understanding. Their is no doubt that his threads to me were quite different and more intuned with an intellengent response to my complaints. I appreciated that and we have moved on. Personally, i can understand his frustrations as yours, but their is a way to express them and then their is a way not to express them.
I guess my argument is that we have to put ourselves (me included) into a more professional dialogue when dealing on the internet. I dont entertain complaints about Neil or anyone else unless I have something to contribute that I know about or experienced with the person in question. It is my opinion that , if you want to express an opinion that is based on what other people have written about thats fine with me because it is just that an opinion, certainly not first hand facts!
But lets be civil about it. If you stop and think about it, the only response someone could have provided to Mr. Eatons early posts, would have been more caustic then his. That would have evolved into a flame war, personal attacks, etc. In the end it would have been deleted by the webmaster. Thats the only conclusion I could see.
You can provide an argument and explain your reasons and gain the greatest amount of respect by being a gentleman about it. I believe Mr. Eaton is a gentleman, I also believed when he calmed down he could have expressed himself even more forceful had it been handled a bit differently. This has nothing to do with Neil, but it does have something to do with credibility in any format that requires a dialogue. I am putting this to rest. Thanks for your imput and I really appreciated everything you have said. JERRY
assesment of Neil. I have never posted any thread in defense of Neils action. People may interpet it that way, but nevertheless, I cannot provide any information about a complaint that someone else makes on this site unless I have 1st hand information.
I can also appreciate your frustrations about Neils perpetual ability to screw in a lightbulb backwards, and I have never posted any threads in his behalf on that as well.
You may also be correct about the age difference cosidering that I am reaching 60 and I may have a different perspective on things in general. I may be also willing to accept what one may consider humerous may not be to someone else.
Mr Eaton and I have come to a mutual understanding. Their is no doubt that his threads to me were quite different and more intuned with an intellengent response to my complaints. I appreciated that and we have moved on. Personally, i can understand his frustrations as yours, but their is a way to express them and then their is a way not to express them.
I guess my argument is that we have to put ourselves (me included) into a more professional dialogue when dealing on the internet. I dont entertain complaints about Neil or anyone else unless I have something to contribute that I know about or experienced with the person in question. It is my opinion that , if you want to express an opinion that is based on what other people have written about thats fine with me because it is just that an opinion, certainly not first hand facts!
But lets be civil about it. If you stop and think about it, the only response someone could have provided to Mr. Eatons early posts, would have been more caustic then his. That would have evolved into a flame war, personal attacks, etc. In the end it would have been deleted by the webmaster. Thats the only conclusion I could see.
You can provide an argument and explain your reasons and gain the greatest amount of respect by being a gentleman about it. I believe Mr. Eaton is a gentleman, I also believed when he calmed down he could have expressed himself even more forceful had it been handled a bit differently. This has nothing to do with Neil, but it does have something to do with credibility in any format that requires a dialogue. I am putting this to rest. Thanks for your imput and I really appreciated everything you have said. JERRY