crazycorn
Walking the line...
ENOUGH name calling, it will detract from this thread and its meaning ultimately taking it to HELL, plus I can't stand name calling.
You might get a quicker response from an e-mail David.crazycorn said:I have PM'ed NERD about question and I hope to see the answer publicly as that is for what I asked. Sadly I doubt I will get the answer.......
Turn them off. LOL.crazycorn said:LOL I think my email is getting enough of a work out with the topic reply notices.
Condoning it or not?FreakOfNature66 said:Personly I think that its their choice to do that.
I wouldnt buy one and I dont agree with it but I dont think that makes their snakes worth anyless and I dont think anyone has the right to tell them what to do. I mean for christ sakes look what all the hot keepers already have to deal with. Hot or not its their choice. Isnt useing someones pictures without permission against the law? I dont really know just curious your not saying its your but still. No Offense Please. Just my thoughts.
Condoning it or not? A second post against the thread starter and not against the proper people.Jim O said:David, Do you want to give us some context on these photos?
And yes, they are copyright and since you copied them without permission that is a no-no.
Condoning it or not? So what if they are rescues? That has nothing to do with the fact that "NERD supports voids and plays with them". It's right there in living color.reptilemama said:Don't quote me, because I'm not 100% sure, but I think I heard/read that all of NERD's void are/were rescues.
Condoning it or not? Parading venomous animals out within a few feet of the public, void or not, is "supporting voids and playing with them."Dennis Hultman said:Yes, I second that. Context please!
So far you have stated you’re a picture thief. Now prove your statement that they support Voids and the context of the pictures you have stolen.
Thanks in advance.
Condoning it or not? What's with all the context to form an opinion crap? Not one single person asked the dude who decided to wear his rattlesnake as a bracelet what kind of context he did it in.lucille said:David: We all have our opinions on voids. Myself, I am against them. HOWEVER, you reprinted pix that were removed from a site without permission, and admit to it; that is not a good thing to do. Further, we have no context to form an opinion. Even the folks who are anti void will by and large find a place in their heart to accept one in a rescue circumstance.
Condoning it or not?Cat_72 said:Perhaps if YOU do not even know the context in which they were originally posted, it wasn't such a good idea to post them here and add your own thoughts to them......which COULD be far from the truth.
I have strong feelings against voids myself, but I don't think I would have made a post like this without knowing for CERTAIN what those pictures were all about.
Condoning it or not?shrap said:Don't you think it is up to YOU to prove your claims? You come on here and accuse people of very specific things but have no proof of those things, only assumptions, and then tell other people to go and find out for themselves whether you assumptions and accusations are true?
In the future you should really try to get the details and facts BEFORE you accuse people of things.
Condoning it or not?Rebel Dragons said:David, did it ever cross your mind to contact NERD and perhaps ask them if the pictures in question are theirs? And then maybe ask for an explanation of what everyone is seeing in those pictures?
I think that would have been a better first step. Then once you received your answer you would have been able to make a post here with context and facts to back up your statements. Your opinions would have been received better too.
Barely condemning it. It is this post, #44 and Page 9 before anyone decides not to condone freehandling hots. David's accusations were 100% right. Where's David's apology? NERD DID PLAY WITH HOTS. It's right there.Jim O said:David, the bashing you are taking is your own doing. I am not happy with what I see in the pictures either but the plain fact is you can't make accusations without a factual basis.
What do you call someone who takes something that belongs to someone else without permission?
I know the context. It has been made clear to me. And my opinion, if not made forcefully enough to satisfy some of you could not be clearer. I am very disturbed by those photos. Kevin should know better or should have known better. I hope that he reads this and heeds this.JuliusSqueezer said:To answer your question of context however late it may be...again...Yes it was a NERD event held at NERD by NERD featuring NERD Owner and employees. Now where do you stand? Do you think NERD represented these animals to the public in a way that sheds a good light on reptile keeping as a whole or even any part of it?
Well Mr. Rhodes Scholar, they vary from state to state and last time I checked "New England" was not a state.bcfos said:Does anyone know the venomous laws in New England? Reason being if it is a permit required they would have to have one being a cobra even if it is a void is still classified as a cobra and would be a permit required snake.
That's good because I haven't. But if you can find where I have, show me. I'm not holding my breath. Wake me up when it's over...Bthacker said:This thread really isn't about Jim back peddling.