come to conclusions?
"This snake died of natural causes and was
subequently fed to this kingsnake.
If you have any questions about anything you
see on this website contact us before you
come to any conclusions.
Ray"
If i may add to my previous post, the fact that someone may have purposefully fed a live healthy snake to another is rather disturbing. However, just as disturbing to me is the fact that I would never trust the health of an animal that died of natural causes as a feeder animal to ANY of my pets. yes, accidents happen, and I've known several people have had a king escape and eat another snake.
However, most of them don't take pictures of it and put them on their websites because on their part, it is considered a mistake or a failure of their responsibility for the saftey and health of their animals. I feel a responsible owner would not glorify their mistakes, or endanger the health of their livestock by introducting any contagion via prey or otherwise. If the snake had signs of being previosly frozen, perhaps i could forgive what appears to be a risky situation, as some snakes will insist on eating specific prey, be it live rodents versus F/T or cold-blooded vs. warm-blooded prey. If the snake eating the corn was known to only accept reptilian prey, perhaps. I have never seen any information about a king who would not accept more reasonable prey.
In my experience, it is rare for reptiles to die of natural causes in captivity, and even when they do die of old age, most people bury them in their backyard, or even more responsibly dispose of the bodies with an experienced person on the offhand possibility that said corpse could be a carrier of some debilitating or heaven forbid, fatal disease to other animals.
I have never read or seen any responsible and trustworthy breeder of any kind of animal encourage exposure to a very likely health hazard in the way that this image shows.
You can argue that it is natural for snakes to eat one another, but we are keeping them in cages and treating them as pets, which is not in any way natural to a snake. Our responsibility to these animals is to protect them from "natural" dangers since they are very limited in what is natural to them when they are living in captivity.
So if that is coming to a conclusions, then I do apoligise. Otherwise, I can come to no other conclusion that there are animals at risk that should not be at risk, and I have a very hard time respecting such irresponsible behavior.