• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

ReptileRefuge-stealing photos and Care Sheets

Not anymore, since it seems to be an issue with me posting and distracting from the purpose of this thread.

That was set up 2 1/2 years ago and no where does anything appear on my posts.

Anyway, thanks for contributing and bringing out such important facts
 
CheriS said:
Not anymore, since it seems to be an issue with me posting and distracting from the purpose of this thread.

That was set up 2 1/2 years ago and no where does anything appear on my posts.

Anyway, thanks for contributing and bringing out such important facts

Not important to me. I could care less. In fact, I would have left it there if I were you. I just felt it should be pointed out since you made it seem in your post like there was no reference whatsoever to Reptile Rooms in your Faunna activities.

If was apparantly important enough to you to delete it though.
 
dwedeking said:
Maybe you can locate another reason for non-reptilerooms.com forums to get shut down.

I don't know. STEALING other peoples photos and care sheets seems a good enough reason to me. Even if there was no copyright notice on it.
Seems like it's "okay" to steal joe blows photos or care sheets, but I bet there would be a big stink if the photos taken were Bill Love's or excerpts from The Barkers care DVD's were copied on to a website.

As far as fair use, I think it is a stretch to even consider "fair use."
There is a difference between a teacher being able to photocopy portions of a book, and give credit, and then use them to teach (a common "fair use") and someone taking these documents, wholly (photos and care sheets) and using them on a website, even if someone tried to use the "teaching" argument. Unless the site is an actual bonafide non profit site, it is a "commercial" site.
Just my take on the situation
 
I don't know. STEALING other peoples photos and care sheets seems a good enough reason to me. Even if there was no copyright notice on it.
Seems like it's "okay" to steal joe blows photos or care sheets, but I bet there would be a big stink if the photos taken were Bill Love's or excerpts from The Barkers care DVD's were copied on to a website.

Wow. Since a large portion of the caresheets where taken from my website and a larger portion of the photos for those caresheets were off my website if anybody should be agro it would be me.

Except one thing. I don't really give a crap because I contact him, and he was more than willing to resolve the issue. As a matter of fact with all this political BS going on he took the caresheets off his website and request the members help him out with new caresheets. I volunteered all the photos and caresheets he wanted.

Here's the issue I have with the whole deal. He wasn't selling animals based on this information (no monetary value). He was more than willing to fix any issue. And the reptile hobby doesn't need all this political BS.
 
Whats Ironic is that if CheriS had not started this post, I would not have known about Reptile Refuge Forums. Now that I have checked it out, It seems like a nice site. I think I will look at it and post there in the future.
 
dwedeking said:
Except one thing. I don't really give a crap because I contact him, and he was more than willing to resolve the issue. As a matter of fact with all this political BS going on he took the caresheets off his website and request the members help him out with new caresheets. I volunteered all the photos and caresheets he wanted.

.

Some people take offense when their photos are stolen, and that is political BS?
Seems in this instance that the person was just "ignorant" to the "thievery", and is learning from his mistakes. good outcome. However, there were others who stated that he would apparently take down the offending info, just to go find something somewhere else and post it. I can't make you give a crap, but apparently some people do.

I was just posting my opinion, based on a lot of these posts, is that it seems to be no big deal. I disagree.
99% of the time the info and/or photos that are stolen, are used by ripoff artists to sell and misrepresent animals, granted that was not the case here, but I still don't see how that makes it political BS.
 
but I still don't see how that makes it political BS.

Stay in the reptile world enough and you'll be able to tell the difference. Look at the chameleon threads out there. All that does is make the general public scared to make a purchase. This hurts everyone that's doing this as a business.
 
reptilebreeder said:
based on a lot of these posts, is that it seems to be no big deal.

Nowhere in this thread did I see a post suggesting that its no big deal. I know I was debating the "Is it a civil or criminal offense" issue as well as what the chances were that anyone would file suit over something like this and if they did, what chance would they have of being awarded damages.

If anything I think this thread brought some copyright infringement topics to light. Mabe more people will think twice before they copy and use someone elses property. I know I learned alot just digging around on this topic.
 
Damn. I can either spend $500 with a lawyer to protect my caresheet or 30 seconds to send an email that will get the site owner to put a link on there that makes me $200...... Oh hell, let's have a pissing match. :D
 
Daniel said:
LMAO!! So if it's not in google it's not anywhere? Which week is this? I used to do SEO (search optimization work) for a living and there are many reason why a site isn't listed in Google.
Daniel, you said yourself on page 1
he said the photos he got off a google search and he was unsure of their orgins
and has told many others the same thing about the care sheets... he does not remember what sites he got them on... just through google. Jenn Harrell is the only one located on google for bearded dragons with that sheet.. and it was written by hers, used without permission and her legal notice/copyright removed.
Wow. Since a large portion of the caresheets where taken from my website and a larger portion of the photos for those caresheets were off my website if anybody should be agro it would be me.
Actually, 2 out of about approx 35 I saw were yours, you have an arrangement with them to use yours now or ones you will write for them....and have multiple links to your retail site for sale of the products you are recommending in the caresheets. That's fine for you, that's your choice, and you can profit off them, but the other approximate 28 do not have or want a business arrangement with them and do object to someone stealing their work and claiming it as their own.

You came into this because you were told they were using 2 of yours, you chose to use them to promote your own business. You have not see how they treated other reptile business owners. They lied and claimed they were written by them or their mods work from their experience. When called on it by those who really did own the sheets, they tried to blame others, said a "friends" experience was used to write them... even insulting the owners of the sites the caresheets were stolen from that they were garbage or wrong info...... That they were stealing and using!

Jim of HomeGrownHerps was insulted and even banned as "clogging up the forum" since he publicly said they were his and got the person who claimed he wrote it (or part) to admit he never even raised the species the care sheet was about and only added a few lines. Of course that thread is deleted now :)

You are or course welcome to your opinion and if other's conduct does not bother you, suits you and your needs, I wish you well. But I can guarantee you, if they came on anyone else's site including this one and spammed or stole photo/articles and claimed them as their own and then insulted the real owners. Rich would not put up with it and the issue would be thief and spamming, not that he had a forum! The fact I also have a site or help forum is not the reason I started this thread... hundreds have sites or probably several dozen forums... they are not mentioned on BOI...they are not stealing and spamming..... that's stretching the facts a bit and low to accuse me of that or justify what your business relationships is to them.

I dislike anyone that steals others work and I also can not condone and support them when they then slam or insult those people and ban them for trying to protect their work and try to hide it from others.. whether I have a site on not, that just disgusting and unethical.

Orphis,

I do not know about the leo sheet, the one I said I felt did violate copyright that your link was to, was the bearded dragons one and I do understand what you are saying about copied from someone else who copied it and removed the name/copyright.... but that was not the case with the bearded dragons page. He states he got it off google, the only one on google like that is Jenn Harrells.

Its all easily avoided if someone request to use someone else's work and when I have been asked, usually I agree to it, with credit where it came from.
 
CheriS said:
Orphis,

I do not know about the leo sheet, the one I said I felt did violate copyright that your link was to, was the bearded dragons one and I do understand what you are saying about copied from someone else who copied it and removed the name/copyright.... but that was not the case with the bearded dragons page. He states he got it off google, the only one on google like that is Jenn Harrells.

Its all easily avoided if someone request to use someone else's work and when I have been asked, usually I agree to it, with credit where it came from.


Cherpi: Maybe you are using Google Mars to do your search. When I type "Leopard Gecko Care Sheet" using Google (Earth) the fourth or fifth link listed is the link I was refering to. Its Homegrowns care sheet but NOT homegrowns site! Here it is again. I linked to it from Google (Earth).

http://www.reptileforums.com/care_sheets/lizards/leopard_gecko.htm

Once again I ask you. If Reptile Refuge copied that care sheet from the site I Googled it from. NOT homegrowns. Where does what he did rise to a criminal copyright infringement offense?
 
Ophis

Please read the last two paragraphs I posted......why are you asking me about leo's? I have no idea of the what if's, I am not an attorney and never said anything about them. Your the only one talking about leo's... I said bearded dragons, back on page 6 and above.. seems I have wasted a lot of time trying to explain that. So have fun whatever your trying to accomplish
 
I think were comparing Geckos and Dragons here. I have always refered to the Leopard Gecko care sheet that was in question. Axe brought up the care sheet in post #21 of this thread. We can debate the Beardie thing further if you want, but I would hate to see you waste anymore time on this subject. If you think he commited a criminal offense, I would turn him in to the authority having jurisdiction immediatly! as Axe said, ITS A FEDERAL OFFENSE!
 
Hello, everyone. I am the one who posted the caresheets on the Reptile Refuge forums. I found out about this thread this morning, and have just now been getting around to chiming in. There are a lot of posts in here that I'd like to defend myself against, but that'd take me all night, and quite frankly, I don't have the time nor desire. So, I'll reply to a few newer posts, and provide other information that will undoubtedly answer any questions in the previous posts.


"That's fine for you, that's your choice, and you can profit off them, but the other approximate 28 do not have or want a business arrangement with them and do object to someone stealing their work and claiming it as their own."
Woah, woah. I NEVER said I wrote ANY of those caresheets. In fact, with the exception of a few, every one of them had links back to the creators website. So, tell me, how do you figure I was calling them my own? As for making a business arrangement with dwedeking, there is none that I'm aware of. The link at the bottom of my forums was put there by me, with no instruction from him. I did that because I've always liked his website, and he's one hell of a guy, which is more than I can say for you.

"You have not see how they treated other reptile business owners. They lied and claimed they were written by them or their mods work from their experience. When called on it by those who really did own the sheets, they tried to blame others, said a "friends" experience was used to write them..."
"Jim of HomeGrownHerps was insulted and even banned as "clogging up the forum" since he publicly said they were his and got the person who claimed he wrote it (or part) to admit he never even raised the species the care sheet was about and only added a few lines. Of course that thread is deleted now"

Wrong. reptiletrader is who you're talking about, I'm sure. He was asked several times to post a link to his website which supposedly contained this caresheet. I got sick of the arguing and simply deleted the thread and banned him. Why? How was I to know that he wasn't simply someone else trying to destroy the reputation of our forums? He sure wasn't interested in proving it was his work. If he's so protective over it, why not at least prove it? Moldypotato told me that he wrote that caresheet. I posted it and didn't think twice about it. Additionally, "clogging up the forum" was never an issue, nor was it mentioned. We have more than plenty of space on that website, and unlimited bandwidth. I simply got sick of the arguing.




There seems to be a lot of speculation going on in this thread. I've read the entire thing several times to assure that I've not misread, or misunderstood anything. When I copied the caresheets, I honestly didn't know that it was against the law. I posted them, not to claim them as my own work, or to make money with the information, but to give the information to people who needed or wanted it. Sure, ignorance of the law is no excuse, however, it wasn't intentional, and I think that should stand for something.

When I was first confronted with the issue, I wasn't mad, or upset in any way. The creator of the caresheet sent me a private message requesting the deletion of that thread, and I did so. As I did with every other caresheet who's creator wanted them removed. Eventually, I removed all that I did not have direct permission to use. I did not argue about that. I just did it and went on. I did not simply delete them and go find another one from another site, like you seem to think I did. Hense, speculation.

Some people messaged me and told me that they don't mind the caresheet being up, but they'd like a little more than a simple link back to their website for credit. So, I edited the post and put what they told me to put there. All was well. You see, there's a LOT better ways to go about this other than using this thread to basically bash us and give the impression that we're some kind of thief in the night. It was a frickin' genuine mistake. Surely you've made mistakes before.

Since this has begun, several people have sent me private messages on my forum with url's to their websites which contain images and caresheets, and told me that I can use any of them that I want, as long as I credit the owner. Very nice of them, and I appreciate it very much. They realize that this has been blown way out of proportion.

I was nothing but nice to everyone who sent me a message about this, regardless of the fact that some of them were in no way nice to me. Most people simply sent me a message telling me what they want done, and I did it. They said thanks, and that was that.

I am sorry that I've gotten this many people into an uproar about this, and I assure you, that was not even remotely my intention. I'm just trying to have a forum like all of the other forums out there. I am not trying to break any laws, or piss anyone off. This issue has already lost 2 of my moderators and several of my regular posters, who I'm sure were fed wrong information.

I'm not the cloaked thief you guys are making me out to be. I made a mistake, and corrected it in a very timely manner. I've even made some new friends out of the deal. And I'm always looking for new friends. So, flame me if you will, but that's what happened, and I'll be more than happy to give you any other information you may want.
 
Wired:

Since you decided to post here. Lets discuss the Beardie sheet CheriS refers to. You said you were ignorant of the law regarding what you did. Where did you copy the Brardie sheet from. If you got it from the authors website was the copyright link in big red letters at the top of the page not there at the time? If it was, how do you reconsile this with your claim of ignorance?
 
Back
Top