spawn
mossy frogs are the hardiest frogs
Steve, did you ever find out anymore? How does this work liability wise?
hhmoore said:From what I have heard, Reptster hopes to offer shipping via UPS in the not too distant future - can you confirm that, David?
It certainly wouldn't surprise me - UPS has been demonstrating that their rulebook bends for the almighty dollar for years... Their written policy states no snakes, and they usually flat out refuse to take them when properly labeled...but many of the higher volume sellers use them exclusively. With FedEx positioned to get a greater share of our business, UPS was bound to come on board.
DavidYoung said:If you would contact me personally on the UPS issue. I am not ready to release the facts on that just yet. We have a huge suprise in store though.....
As far as liability goes it is exactly as I stated. You are shipping through FedEx and its the same terms as if you were shipping verified through FedEx. Jim misunderstood what I was saying when I stated that you cannot use your FedEx account number through Reptster as FedEx has no way to process your account through a third party. Which means your FedEx sales rep would not have anything to do with your Reptster FedEx shipping. However if your package is having issues and you need customer service you can call FedEx or me. I have demonstrated on a few occasions I will customer service the package but you can call FedEx @ 1800-go-fedex and give your tracking number just as well.
Thanks,
David Young
727-686-5456
[email protected]
homegrownherps said:I did not misunderstand you.... My problem with using Reptster is that I didn't like the idea of having to deal with anyone else but my FedEx rep if a problem should occur during shipping.
That is what you told me when you talked to me at the show.
Its hard enough dealing with the FedEx rep ..... having to go thru a 3rd party would just make it worse.
Actually, Steph, it IS a legal issue. Regardless of company policy, lizard or snake - by law, if there is a living thing inside the box, it has to be accurately labeled as such (think Lacey Act). All the people that are "flying under the radar" or just plain lying about the contents are in violation. Gary's point is that this (Reptster) offers an easily usable alternative...letting people actually declare the contents of the package they are shipping.TripleMoonsExotic said:Keep in mind, it's not a legal issue at all, it's a policy issue per courier company. It's not illegal to ship nonvenomous snakes through these companies.
I still see issues coming up with this since these people using Repster don't really have to be certified...They just have to watch a video (in reality, how can you prove someone actually watched the thing?). At least with the certification process you have to show that you ship correctly to get the waiver.
hhmoore said:Actually, Steph, it IS a legal issue. Regardless of company policy, lizard or snake - by law, if there is a living thing inside the box, it has to be accurately labeled as such (think Lacey Act). All the people that are "flying under the radar" or just plain lying about the contents are in violation. Gary's point is that this (Reptster) offers an easily usable alternative...letting people actually declare the contents of the package they are shipping.
On that note, IS Reptster making that requirement known? What about auditing packages for compliance?
DavidYoung said:We do require that every package complies with local, state and federal laws. When we have been asked we have responded that you must put the Latin name of the animal on the package to comply with the Lacey act. We cannot monitor every package nor are we responsible for how they are shipped. Just as FedEx cannot monitor this. We are creating a shipping FAQ and would appreciate any contributions the community has to offer.
Thanks,
David Young
hhmoore said:Actually, Steph, it IS a legal issue. Regardless of company policy, lizard or snake - by law, if there is a living thing inside the box, it has to be accurately labeled as such (think Lacey Act). All the people that are "flying under the radar" or just plain lying about the contents are in violation. Gary's point is that this (Reptster) offers an easily usable alternative...letting people actually declare the contents of the package they are shipping.
DavidYoung said:When we have been asked we have responded that you must put the Latin name of the animal on the package to comply with the Lacey act.
TripleMoonsExotic said:I was under the impression that that Lacey act required both the Latin Name and the Common Name?
TripleMoonsExotic said:I was under the impression that that Lacey act required both the Latin Name and the Common Name?
3372(d) False labeling offenses
It is unlawful for any person to make or submit any false record, account, or label for, or any false
identification of, any fish, wildlife, or plant which has been, or is intended to be—
(1) imported, exported, transported, sold, purchased, or received from any foreign country; or
(2) transported in interstate or foreign commerce.
http://www.fws.gov/le/pdffiles/Lacey.pdf3376(a)(2) The Secretaries of the Interior and Commerce shall jointly promulgate specific regulations to
implement the provisions of section 3372 (b) of this title for the marking and labeling of containers or
packages containing fish or wildlife. These regulations shall be in accordance with existing commercial
practices.