• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Rich Zuchowski aka Webslave Ethical or not ???

Status
Not open for further replies.
Rich ill wait about 10 Min's before posting then i have to go back in the house and take in that movie with my son let me know if ya wanna sneak preview ?
 
I can see the implosion of Fauna on the horizon.

Not a destiny I wish to see for such a great site as this.
 
I don't watch prime time TV. I also do not use profanity myself. Are you man enough to not use it?
 
Alan, I'll be blunt. You're nothing more than a shamelessly self-centered individual with no class or integrity.

First you incessantly complained about getting warned for whoring your cages in various BOI threads that had nothing to do with you. Your complaining was rather amusing, because like a three year old that got caught with his hands in the cookie jar, you denied any wrongdoing. This despite the blatency of your actions. It was explained to you time and again that BOI threads were not your personal classified section. You chose to ignore that, and you were dealt the consequences.

Then, you claimed to have some damaging info that simply did not exist and tried to extort money from Jeff Barringer for it. Jeff knew you for your true character and turned you away. That must have really gotten under your skin, as you did not get the attention, or the money, that you were demanding.

Fast forward to today, and you tragically seem to think that you are someone of consequence and want to try once again to throw someone under the bus in order to make yourself somehow seem relevant. Sorry, Allen, you showed your true lack of integrity and emotional development some time ago.

Go ahead and watch tv with your son. Perhaps he can teach you something about maturing while the two of you are at it.
 
time to post it ...

well As promised ....

Screenshot_2.jpg


Screenshot_3.jpg


Screenshot_4.jpg


Screenshot_5.jpg


Screenshot_6.jpg


Screenshot_7.jpg


Screenshot_8.jpg


Screenshot_9.jpg


Screenshot_10.jpg



Rich How would me posting this here ruin you or fauna ? as i told you think your "facilitator" for these being posted ...
 
just so you know ill check this out in the morning or maybe later tonight , and Ken ya can make jabs at me , but ill tell you right fucking now ... leave my son out of this mean while absorb that and NO nothing has been edited any way shape or form
 
Ok....... :rolleyes: So what was your point in posting that??? What were you trying to prove???
 
read the title of the thread ... see ya later i done for the night , after all isnt the BOI for making / asking & providing people with information before dealing with them ???

there is a novel idea ...
 
Alan,

I see nothing nefarious in what you have posted. I don't see where Rich said he was out to get or ruin KS with his actions. What I do see is Rich using the purchase of Kingsnakes.com to get a good laugh out of it and pissing off Jeff B. to no end. Basically a tit-for-tat thing. Jeff pissed off Rich so Rich runs out and does something to piss off Jeff. Kinda of like what is going on with this thread and many others recently.

Now you have also made statements that Rich "lost" the lawsuit. I also seem to remember you claiming you have evidence to prove this. Please post this information as I believe we would all like to see what you are claiming to have. (If it was not you, I apologize in advance for the error.)
 
Want another novel idea, how about posting those screen shots so the posts can be read in order. They are chronologically out of date.
 
Congrats Alan, you proved exactly nothing and showed nothing that was not already public knowledge. In your pathetic attempt to sling mud, you once again show only that you are delusional. Kingsnakes.com was bought to get under Jeff's skin at that time. Hey there Captain Obvious, that was stated publicly even before you came across this "secret." Little hint Alan- it's only a secret if the everybody and their brother doesn't already know.

Once again, your vain attempts at self-promotion at someone else's expense has only hurt yourself. Par for the course with you, Alan.

As I said previously, you really need to be getting some lessons on maturity and emotional development from your son. That isn't a jab at your son, Alan. Quite the contrary- I'm stating that even lacking a mentally stable father figure, his intellectual maturity most likely supercedes yours by leaps and bounds. He could probably provide you with some solid mentoring. In short, in case you were too obtuse to grasp it, it was a commentary on the sad state of affairs that is you.

Also, Alan, I feel compelled to correct a key bit of misinformation that you tossed out there. When you approached Jeff, trying to sell this oh-so incriminating evidence and were turned away, there was no talk of settlement. The matter was still pending, and talk of Rich and Jeff putting that behind them didn't come until approximately one to two months later. At the time you tried selling your dud of a bombshell, both parties were still litigating, as shown by court documents.

Finally, Alan, since you are prone to misinformation for the sake of self promotion, let me correct your assertion that Rich lost the case, or whatever the fib of the month is. The verifiable fact of the matter is that the case was dismissed with prejudice on 12 Oct 2004 by the Honorable Lee Yeakel, U.S. District Court Judge. I believe that you stated that Rich, Jeff, or whomever couldn't divulge this info- it's public info, Alan, and is available for those who know where to look. Heck, I'll even save you the time, trouble, and money (after all, that $0.08 per page fee can be a real deal breaker)... it's posted as an attachment to this reply.
 

Attachments

  • show_case_doc.pdf
    27.5 KB · Views: 122
Alan, obviously you wish you had something that could destroy both me and this site. And I guess you have been harboring your "bombshell" all this time thinking about the sweet taste of revenge that would be yours when you posted it. Well I feel the best response to you at this point is....


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
 
Rich,
I believe this thread, and others inspired by Alan today, show the need to not only trust yourself once again with the ability to ban people for cause, but also to find as many ways as possible to compress as many links to the causative posts as possible. Every time someone views any post by Alan anywhere in this site, they should see that he has had serious issues here, and then click onto the most impugning of them.

Alan,
Like a consortium of the regulars here, I have had to the chance to read all of the meandering posts by you and topics dealing with you in Fauna in the last 24 hours. While I respect the opinions of many others as written about you, I need only your own words, and choices made by you, to form a very accurate opinion of you. Put another way, we could take every thread you have participated in, delete every post except yours, and form a consistently clear and accurate impression of you. Wake up dude. 35 years old, eh ? Hate burning my bridges before a sale, but it seems my chameleons will never be in your cages. What a complete horse's ass.
 
Thanks for posting that Ken. Pacer is a wonderful tool. That right there shows both parties agreed to have the case dismissed, no relief (damages) was granted, and it can never be filed again. For those that may not know or are wondering, any case that is dismissed with predjudice can never be brought/filed again.
 
JungleHabitats said:
Ok well lets start this off by asking if people think Rich Z AKA Webslave is a fair even ethical man that does no wrong and doesnt underhand people for donations , paying to view things then setting the rules back ( when the vague rules cant be found much less upheld evenly to all members )


So let me ask you this In the Kingsnake Vs Fauna classifieds lawsuit was rich Z responsible for his loosing the lawsuit to Jeff B for using the website name "kingsnakes.com to draw traffic from jeffs site as a redirect to faunaclassifieds.com ....??

Did Rich Z mislead people by inflating the member base of this website to then draw in new mmbers having them pay him for services and then change the services over 1/2 a dozen times along the way ??

Does rich Z use peoples personal PM's and other items against them when they disagree with him or may have some unflattering comments to be made ? does Rich Z shelter loosewheel from any subjective comments like a 5yr old ???


Ill be back a little later with some VERY VERY JUICY information ...


Please post this information as I believe we would all like to see what you are claiming to have. (If it was not you, I apologize in advance for the error.)

Don't apologize!
Yeah, he said. Like he said to a few people that emailed and private messaged me earlier in the year when his name came up in lights.


Hey Allen,
As for the rest of your quotes

That last time I checked The Ferret doesn’t own this site and it doesn’t matter what he suggested after the fact.

It wasn’t Rich that suggested anything about sidetracking traffic from KS with the infamous “S.”

Ritchie not Rich mentions something about keeping it a secret. Rich says NO he didn’t do anything wrong.
Doesn’t that show a lack of intent on Rich’s part to do anything wrong?

Rich said he wouldn’t keep it a secret or transfer it to another person.

I thought you had a smoking gun.
 
Wait, is this an inquiry, bad guy or good guy post? i'm confused!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top