Chameleon Company
New member
Stephanie,
It doesn't have to be a "major" problem to post here. Good Guy posts are anything but a problem, and they are frequent ! But if it is an accusation which is negative in nature, in this case "false advertising", it is of enormous help to have evidence that a group of your peers could easily look at and conclude likewise. Without any further proof at this point, all we have seems to be one person's word against another. I admit that the reply to your email inquiry does not lend itself to Scott, as he provides no explanation to you of what would seem to be confusion over the price (ie.: "please note that there is a $50 shipping charge also mentioned in the ad", etc), and I would say to him as seller, that it is the "wrong answer" regardless of what the original version of the ad said. As I said earlier, an accusation in the BOI can expect to be challenged by the accused and some readers. There is no set level for the "seriousness of the charge", although some complaints are petty regardless of the facts. What is prudent is to be able to have made the effort to accumulate relevent evidence to support the allegation, and then to post it here. The current allegation would be more serious than the thread starter in my eyes, that being that an altered version of the original ad is being presented as the original. If true, it goes from being a typo or poor choice of ad presentation to a lack of integrity, maybe worse.
It doesn't have to be a "major" problem to post here. Good Guy posts are anything but a problem, and they are frequent ! But if it is an accusation which is negative in nature, in this case "false advertising", it is of enormous help to have evidence that a group of your peers could easily look at and conclude likewise. Without any further proof at this point, all we have seems to be one person's word against another. I admit that the reply to your email inquiry does not lend itself to Scott, as he provides no explanation to you of what would seem to be confusion over the price (ie.: "please note that there is a $50 shipping charge also mentioned in the ad", etc), and I would say to him as seller, that it is the "wrong answer" regardless of what the original version of the ad said. As I said earlier, an accusation in the BOI can expect to be challenged by the accused and some readers. There is no set level for the "seriousness of the charge", although some complaints are petty regardless of the facts. What is prudent is to be able to have made the effort to accumulate relevent evidence to support the allegation, and then to post it here. The current allegation would be more serious than the thread starter in my eyes, that being that an altered version of the original ad is being presented as the original. If true, it goes from being a typo or poor choice of ad presentation to a lack of integrity, maybe worse.