• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Top Shelf Exotics (Inquiry)

I have been taunting Chris by email on a daily basis, and have gotten no response in the last week. He must have lawyered up, because he is too vain to think of keeping his mouth shut on his own. does anybody know how "someone" could get a home and cell phone number for "Tiny Johnson"?
 
Robert,

You would be doing yourself and any other plaintiffs a big favor by leaving Chris alone, stop emailing him, or do not attempt to make any contact that would undermine whatever course of action your attorney may take.

You are not doing anyone any favors by harrasing him with emails at this point! Your time will come, but for the moment let your attorney take the lead.
 
"I have been taunting Chris by email on a daily basis"


Be careful...
Do to my run in with Dan Felice I learned a bit about harrassment over the internet...collecting a debt is one thing but if you are continually vulgar , rude and harrassing and he has asked you to refrain from such language no matter if your collecting a debt you can wind up in some serious trouble. I know he deserves it BUT...you must behave in lawful manner otherwise your just lowering yourself to his level.
 
KNOBTAIL said:
You would be doing yourself and any other plaintiffs a big favor by leaving Chris alone, stop emailing him, or do not attempt to make any contact that would undermine whatever course of action your attorney may take.

You are not doing anyone any favors by harrasing him with emails at this point! Your time will come, but for the moment let your attorney take the lead.
I'm no lawyer, but I think you've hit the nail on the head here, Jerry!
:smash:
 
Just for the record, I am getting a number of emails from people claiming they have issues with Chris Johnson and wish to post their story on the BOI. I am sorry but I do not make exceptions for the requirement to be a paid member in order to post here. That stipulation was put into place to try to curb the rampant abuse taking place on this forum and I do not intend to relax that rule for any reason.

If you feel the need to post your story here, then just like everyone else posting in this forum you will have to become a paid member to help verify your identity. You can do so on this page: http://www.faunaclassifieds.com/forums/subscriptions.php?

It only costs $10 per year, which I believe is not an insurmountable hurdle to anyone.

I am sorry, but my belief is that this change was for the better, and I am sticking to that opinion.
 
tejasranger said:
I have been taunting Chris by email on a daily basis, and have gotten no response in the last week. He must have lawyered up, because he is too vain to think of keeping his mouth shut on his own. does anybody know how "someone" could get a home and cell phone number for "Tiny Johnson"?

I absolutely agree that it is inneffective or worse to do this.
Plus, I believe what everyone wants is their money; getting an attorney and getting your money is all there is left to do. At the beginning of the thread, it was justifiable to express outrage and hurt at what has happened. And after this thread reverberates through the reptile world, I am sure that Chris will not be putting people on the bottom of his customer service line for a long time, I can't imagine that he will have many customers after responding as he has.

Take the high road and win; but do not taunt.
 
Who was that who was compiling a list of people that haven't received anything? This thread has grown SO LARGE !!
 
repfriend said:
Who was that who was compiling a list of people that haven't received anything? This thread has grown SO LARGE !!


Derek Jones of V/R has the list of us who are empty handed. I still very strongly believe that there are many, many more out there who haven't gotten "on the list"......but there's a whole lot of money involved with just us.
 
tejasranger said:
I have been taunting Chris by email on a daily basis, and have gotten no response in the last week. He must have lawyered up, because he is too vain to think of keeping his mouth shut on his own. does anybody know how "someone" could get a home and cell phone number for "Tiny Johnson"?

I would be more inclined to think he got tired of the emails and simply blocked them.

And I have to agree with other sentiments posted here.....taunting him with daily emails is not only pointless, it could cause more harm than good.
 
With regards to Robert's emails. While I agree that the emails could possibly get him in hot water, they in no way affect anyone else's claims against Chris. Afterall Robert is one individual that got scammed and at this time there is no class action entity of which he is acting as spokes person for. ( I know he is collecting money.) So I say have at it, if it makes his day a little better. I agree with Justin though, be careful what you put in an email.
 
One Last Time

I am getting a little tired of people telling me how I should act and react, in regards to my communications with Chris. He is a liar and a thief, and deserving of no ones courtesy or respect. Let's put my process up against everyone else's. I get him to communicate, with posts here as well as emails. You don't. I got him to ship snakes to me (granted really sick ones with dubious pedigree's). You didn't. If I hadn't stepped up to the plate and faced this bully on the BOI instead of sitting back on my hands and hoping Chris would do the right thing, this thread wouldn't even exist. You didn't. We don't live in a perfect world and sometimes you have to get down in the trenches to make sure people like Chris don't flourish. So this will be my last post here as I don't want to disturb anyone else's sensibilities, with my confrontational style of dealing with liars and thieves. Somebody let me know where I should send the Fraud Fund money, and I will send it with a full accounting, because I don't want to be the topic of another thread. I will deal with Chris in my own way in my own time. Good luck with getting anything out of Chris by wishing him a speedy recovery from his FAKE illness. Because "we all want him to get well". NOT ME I couldn't care less, I just hope that whatever kills him is agonizingly painful, and gets him before he has a chance to procreate. One less Scumbag we have to deal with in the future. :ack2:

PS Someone posted He would eat a plate of liver if Chris didn't make everything right, I'm waiting, would you like onions with that.
 
Robert, why would you want to

put yourself in an uncompromising positon to allow Chris's attorney (if and when he gets one) to send you a cease and desist letter. You cannot do whatever you think is justifiable just because you received some sick snakes from Chris. Their are remedies for dealing with Chris, and one of them is not getting into the trenches , lowering yourself to his status, and trying to have a mud war. Chris will no longer contact you. and the fact that you received some sick animals which may be brought back to some health, does not negate the fact that others received nothing, and are not acting as you are............

Their is nothing to achieve by what you are attemting to accomplish other than bad faith . People are looking for your support in concentrating all the energies in one direction. That would be justice, and it will come.

Do yourself a favor, weigh the options before you decide to do something that you may regret. You will have ample time to scream after Chris is finished, financially, legally, and possibly criminally.
 
Bob........no one is against you here, we're all just trying to get to the same end, and I agree we all have different methods of reaching that goal. I think what we're all suggesting is simply that sending him emails that could very well be deemed "harrassment" and give HIM ammunition against YOU isn't going to help you out...nor will it do you any good if he's blocked your address totally. NO ONE is saying that you should back off out of pity or sympathy for Chris, because obviously that point has come and gone.

We DO appreciate what you've done here, Bob. And we need to stick together on this, I'm sure it would make some people more than happy to see us bickering amongst ourselves, and taking the whole focus away from the REAL PROBLEM.
 
Hey Bob, you should stay here! Everyone here who is honest appreciates what you had the guts to start. On the BOI everyone will give their opinions, that is what it's about, some will agree with you and some will not but you should not take it personally. Chris would LOVE to see the resolve of this effort, and the size of this group diminish in any way.
 
I us to be a collection agent here in the state of Texas , and one thing you want to watch out is suites for harrassement. If you give him enough ammunition he can easily make that 1500-1600 whatever he owes you dissapear and you'll end up oweing him far more. Wouldn't that be ironic if you end up paying off his debt!!! Not to mention legal problems and Texas will roast you dearly for harrassment in collecting a debt. Wether he frauded you or not it does not give you the right to break the law. I would lay off ( if you havn't shot yourself in the foot already).

Below is a except for the Fair Debt Collection Act

§ 806. Harassment or abuse [15 USC 1692d]

A debt collector may not engage in any conduct the natural consequence of which is to harass, oppress, or abuse any person in connection with the collection of a debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section:

(1) The use or threat of use of violence or other criminal means to harm the physical person, reputation, or property of any person.

(2) The use of obscene or profane language or language the natural consequence of which is to abuse the hearer or reader.

(3) The publication of a list of consumers who allegedly refuse to pay debts, except to a consumer reporting agency or to persons meeting the requirements of section 603(f) or 604(3)1 of this Act.

(4) The advertisement for sale of any debt to coerce payment of the debt.

(5) Causing a telephone to ring or engaging any person in telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously with intent to annoy, abuse, or harass any person at the called number.

(6) Except as provided in section 804, the placement of telephone calls without meaningful disclosure of the caller's identity.

§ 813. Civil liability [15 USC 1692k]

(a) Except as otherwise provided by this section, any debt collector who fails to comply with any provision of this title with respect to any person is liable to such person in an amount equal to the sum of --

(1) any actual damage sustained by such person as a result of such failure;

(2) (A) in the case of any action by an individual, such additional damages as the court may allow, but not exceeding $1,000; or

(B) in the case of a class action, (i) such amount for each named plaintiff as could be recovered under subparagraph (A), and (ii) such amount as the court may allow for all other class members, without regard to a minimum individual recovery, not to exceed the lesser of $500,000 or 1 per centum of the net worth of the debt collector; and

(3) in the case of any successful action to enforce the foregoing liability, the costs of the action, together with a reasonable attorney's fee as determined by the court. On a finding by the court that an action under this section was brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment, the court may award to the defendant attorney's fees reasonable in relation to the work expended and costs.

(b) In determining the amount of liability in any action under subsection (a), the court shall consider, among other relevant factors --

(1) in any individual action under subsection (a)(2)(A), the frequency and persistence of noncompliance by the debt collector, the nature of such noncompliance, and the extent to which such noncompliance was intentional; or

(2) in any class action under subsection (a)(2)(B), the frequency and persistence of noncompliance by the debt collector, the nature of such noncompliance, the resources of the debt collector, the number of persons adversely affected, and the extent to which the debt collector's noncompliance was intentional.

(c) A debt collector may not be held liable in any action brought under this title if the debt collector shows by a preponderance of evidence that the violation was not intentional and resulted from a bona fide error notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably adapted to avoid any such error.

(d) An action to enforce any liability created by this title may be brought in any appropriate United States district court without regard to the amount in controversy, or in any other court of competent jurisdiction, within one year from the date on which the violation occurs.

(e) No provision of this section imposing any liability shall apply to any act done or omitted in good faith in conformity with any advisory opinion of the Commission, notwithstanding that after such act or omission has occurred, such opinion is amended, rescinded, or determined by judicial or other authority to be invalid for any reason.
 
Casey Hulse said:
Hey Bob, you should stay here! Everyone here who is honest appreciates what you had the guts to start. On the BOI everyone will give their opinions, that is what it's about, some will agree with you and some will not but you should not take it personally. Chris would LOVE to see the resolve of this effort, and the size of this group diminish in any way.

I totally agree. This whole thread has been a group effort with some proposing one way to deal with this situation, and others volunteering thoughts about different ways to achieve the same goal.
Minor disagreements or proposals to do things a different way are just opinions and contributions: you can listen to what folks say and decide which opinions fit your situation best.
The vast majority of people on this thread have the same goal: retrieving lost funds and seeing justice done.
 
Robert, I have a funny feeling

that the frustration that you are dealing with is due to the fact that things are not moving as fast as you would like them to be.

If you have been in touch with an attorney, then for sure you realize that this will take time, allot of it! Be patient, and allow cool heads to prevail.
 
Bill leverton just wanted to let you know that at least 4 of us have already filled with the FBI internet crimes division. Has anyone gotten anything other than a case # from the FBI.
 
Back
Top