• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Bad Guy Ty park/ ty lizards FL

Case Documents have been attached to this post
 

Attachments

  • case management plan.pdf
    149.3 KB · Views: 445
  • Recommendation of the General Magistrate.pdf
    104.8 KB · Views: 434
12/2/2017 PLAINTIFF'S STATEMENT OF FACTS, INDENTIFICATION OF FACTS IN DISPUTE AND ISSUES OF LAW TO BE DECIDED BY THE COURT

The dispute will hinge on if Ty abided by the terms of his raffle (as it has all along).
 

Attachments

  • 14-0-51-249.pdf
    102.6 KB · Views: 258
Did anyone else notice the typos and missing facts ...as in the ambiguous representation of the true and specific parameters of the raffle prizes and alternative prizes?
 
Well, if the court system works, once all the information is reviewed (a good thing she has all the screen shots) and the court clearly sees how even in his legal papers, Ty Park tried to hide the facts of his own terms for the raffle, and all of the head aches he created on purpose , on his personal page and here on fauna when he admits to withholding information with actual defamation of Mrs. Cutlers reputation on his facebook page, followed by threats, and complete stubbornness by refusing to send her the prize she is due.. and to top it all off, I remember reading ( before I was banned) how he laugh at Fauna at the fact it had no ill effect on his business because he is simply too good.. :) can't have it both way Ty, lying in legal papers, hiding actual facts to try and look good..
can't wait for that day when you come crumbling down.. you and your blind followers might believe yourselves, but the facts will always remain the facts.
simply put:
you are wrong, have been wrong the entire time.. delusional is one way to say it.
 
Warning: Cease with the derogatory name calling towards anyone, please. It is not welcome on this site.
 
The dispute will hinge on if Ty abided by the terms of his raffle (as it has all along).
Well, perhaps not this entire dispute. Aside from the terms of the raffle, there is the issue of defamation and damage.
Saying someone did not abide by the raffle terms, and saying that Parks was in error is one thing, and I believe he did not in fact follow the terms of the raffle.
However, even if that is true, some of what has been said in the thread has been taken by Parks as defaming his character, and that and the issues of damages arising out of such alleged defamation are separate findings.
I am only pointing out that there are several, separate, findings to be made on these issues. Jumping the first fence doesn't make one the winner of the race.
 
What about the defamation of her character that Ty has done to Michelle on FB?

That goes both ways IMO. Though I still feel that Ty's behavior here and on FB is what lead to his defamation of his character. But what was said about her in his FB group was outright sickening IMO.

Also, I am a little worried about some of the things said in this pdf, like:
2. On or around March 2016, Mr. Park conducted an online raffle to raise money for reptile and amphibian conservation. The online raffle offered the chance to win a blue albino tegu, with tickets selling for $100.00 each. Ms. Cutler purchased 4 tickets from Mr. Park.

The bolded part in the PDF just saus a chance to win an blue albino Tegu, it doesn't say "bread by him" which I think might be used as a loophole. I dunno. Am I being paranoid?
 
What about the defamation of her character that Ty has done to Michelle on FB?
What about it? You have to understand this is a legal proceeding. If Michelle wants to sue for defamation she can if she wishes consider doing so. But in THIS proceeding, the judge will make a finding based on any presented evidence of defamation of Parks because that is the issue presented in this particular action. The courtroom is not a playground where the opposing party can present a defense of 'well you said something about me too!'

I am simply saying here that this is a formal proceeding, there are formal rules, and it is not a snowball fight where one just picks up something and throws it at the other side.
 
What about it? You have to understand this is a legal proceeding. If Michelle wants to sue for defamation she can if she wishes consider doing so. But in THIS proceeding, the judge will make a finding based on any presented evidence of defamation of Parks because that is the issue presented in this particular action. The courtroom is not a playground where the opposing party can present a defense of 'well you said something about me too!'

I am simply saying here that this is a formal proceeding, there are formal rules, and it is not a snowball fight where one just picks up something and throws it at the other side.

Do you think that Park's post on here being extremely rude and dismissive along with claiming he was intentionally withholding information information from Michelle will be considered?

I've never really dealt with legal proceedings except for one time when I was like 16, so this kind of stuff is Greek to me.
 
I've never really dealt with legal proceedings except for one time when I was like 16, so this kind of stuff is Greek to me.
I have. People lie in pleadings every day, even if by omission rather than commission as Ty has done in the latest pleading. That's why there is the discovery process.
 
I suspect that Ty may have some difficulty proving any financial damages from any alleged defamation, especially with the quantity of his minions expressing their adoration of him despite his actions, as Michelle recounted the raffle events here on Fauna.
 
Also, I am a little worried about some of the things said in this pdf, like:
The bolded part in the PDF just saus a chance to win an blue albino Tegu, it doesn't say "bread by him" which I think might be used as a loophole. I dunno. Am I being paranoid?

No, you’re not being paranoid. Ty is skewing the facts of the raffle to better fit his actions. It’s up to Michelle’s side to correct that by presenting the actual raffle communications. And the judge has to not only see the discrepancy, but understand the significance.

On a very positive note, it is blatantly inconsistent to scream defamation of character has negatively impacted his position as the #1 breeder of quality tegus, while also saying a tegu from some unknown source would be of equal value and quality.
 
Did anyone else notice the typos and missing facts ...as in the ambiguous representation of the true and specific parameters of the raffle prizes and alternative prizes?

Yes, I noticed that also....I almost posted that it sure looks like he wrote it himself. There are some names at the bottom that look like lawyers. I'm not sure if those names are indicating that they wrote it?
 
Back
Top