Case Documents have been attached to this post
12/2/2017 PLAINTIFF'S STATEMENT OF FACTS, INDENTIFICATION OF FACTS IN DISPUTE AND ISSUES OF LAW TO BE DECIDED BY THE COURT
The dispute will hinge on if Ty abided by the terms of his raffle (as it has all along).
Well, perhaps not this entire dispute. Aside from the terms of the raffle, there is the issue of defamation and damage.The dispute will hinge on if Ty abided by the terms of his raffle (as it has all along).
2. On or around March 2016, Mr. Park conducted an online raffle to raise money for reptile and amphibian conservation. The online raffle offered the chance to win a blue albino tegu, with tickets selling for $100.00 each. Ms. Cutler purchased 4 tickets from Mr. Park.
What about it? You have to understand this is a legal proceeding. If Michelle wants to sue for defamation she can if she wishes consider doing so. But in THIS proceeding, the judge will make a finding based on any presented evidence of defamation of Parks because that is the issue presented in this particular action. The courtroom is not a playground where the opposing party can present a defense of 'well you said something about me too!'What about the defamation of her character that Ty has done to Michelle on FB?
What about it? You have to understand this is a legal proceeding. If Michelle wants to sue for defamation she can if she wishes consider doing so. But in THIS proceeding, the judge will make a finding based on any presented evidence of defamation of Parks because that is the issue presented in this particular action. The courtroom is not a playground where the opposing party can present a defense of 'well you said something about me too!'
I am simply saying here that this is a formal proceeding, there are formal rules, and it is not a snowball fight where one just picks up something and throws it at the other side.
I have. People lie in pleadings every day, even if by omission rather than commission as Ty has done in the latest pleading. That's why there is the discovery process.I've never really dealt with legal proceedings except for one time when I was like 16, so this kind of stuff is Greek to me.
I have. People lie in pleadings every day, even if by omission rather than commission as Ty has done in the latest pleading. That's why there is the discovery process.
Also, I am a little worried about some of the things said in this pdf, like:
The bolded part in the PDF just saus a chance to win an blue albino Tegu, it doesn't say "bread by him" which I think might be used as a loophole. I dunno. Am I being paranoid?
Did anyone else notice the typos and missing facts ...as in the ambiguous representation of the true and specific parameters of the raffle prizes and alternative prizes?