Chameleon Company
New member
Starting a thread here which began in the sticky (purple-pink) Rich put at the top of the BOI about a specific customer who took him for some money, Luis Torres. Starting it here, as suggested by Rich, just to collect some ideas. Rich has indicated he is open to possibilities, although maybe not anytime soon. I will cut and paste my suggestion and Rich's reply there, and I thank Rich here for his time and sincere reply. My idea is that someday the BOI might have a big link at the top of the BOI, in spotlights and everything else, saying "Here's the Bad Guys". It may not be able to say that, and therefore the title of my thread starter "Vendor's with issues in the BOI". It would be the "Quick Reference", rather than use of the "Search" function, which many do not use for whatever reason. For example, someone such as Ray's Reptilia could be listed as "having issues". His various incarnations could be listed as well, all in bold. Then links to his different threads. It could be alphabetized by best known name. There are pros and cons, with three big "pros" in my book:
1) Label it as tactfully as possible, but it would become the "Bad Guy" list of the reptile world. God bless him, but right now Dennis Hultman seems to be the one who injects the numerous "bad guy" links into a thread when someone starts what they think is the first "bad guy" post about such as Ray's Reptilia, etc. Others do it as well, but with all, in a few days, they are buried again.
2) It would generate more satisfaction for those who want to see bad guys outed. While not banning folks from advertising here (see current Scott Torres thread), it would help to address those frustrations among members. Right now bad guys enjoy seeing their latest bad-guy thread sink. For repeat offenders, that will no longer be of any comfort.
3) I believe that dedicated members here would willingly volunteer administrative efforts. As mentioned in my paste, the BOI would now be the vetting ground which would feed onto that list. Again, this "ultimate list" would be for the repeat "big-time" offenders.
All this is just thinking-out-loud, kicking around ideas, etc. Here are the pastes, which include more thoughts, and again I thank Rich for his response to me there.
I suggest an administrative committee of ten. If Rich would ever do this, and I am still around and active here, I would be inclined to purchase a higher-level membership, perhaps $100, to help cover programming costs, if I were invited as one of the ten. Rich need not invite me, but I offer it as a suggestion of how it could be made to work. Rich could pick those to whom he would extend the $50-100 invitation. I don't have the time to be the main organizer, and am not volunteering, but I bet we have a few well respected members here who would do it. This person would solicit votes via PM from the committee to place offenders on the list. The standards need to be high, such that people have to have made a sincere effort to be bad to make the list, such as in the KS "three complaint" rule, as an example. If they resolve them, they then can be removed from the list. Candidates who currently might qualify, besides Ray, would be such as TSE, Bobby Pruett, CRE, and others. Others here are far more familiar with the historical list than I.
I don't think this will happen anytime soon, if at all. Its just to kick around suggestions. Thanks for reading this far.
1) Label it as tactfully as possible, but it would become the "Bad Guy" list of the reptile world. God bless him, but right now Dennis Hultman seems to be the one who injects the numerous "bad guy" links into a thread when someone starts what they think is the first "bad guy" post about such as Ray's Reptilia, etc. Others do it as well, but with all, in a few days, they are buried again.
2) It would generate more satisfaction for those who want to see bad guys outed. While not banning folks from advertising here (see current Scott Torres thread), it would help to address those frustrations among members. Right now bad guys enjoy seeing their latest bad-guy thread sink. For repeat offenders, that will no longer be of any comfort.
3) I believe that dedicated members here would willingly volunteer administrative efforts. As mentioned in my paste, the BOI would now be the vetting ground which would feed onto that list. Again, this "ultimate list" would be for the repeat "big-time" offenders.
All this is just thinking-out-loud, kicking around ideas, etc. Here are the pastes, which include more thoughts, and again I thank Rich for his response to me there.
Jim F. writes:
Rich,
No doubt Luis is a bad guy in your mind, and likely 99% of the readers here believe you and the evidence. What got my attention is that you decided to post this particular personal "bad guy" experience to the top of Fauna, as a sticky. I concur. Its your site, and this guy owes you.
Just want to plant an idea. You often see frustrations voiced about the ability of known "bad guys" to advertise in Fauna, as with your recent post in the Scott Sanchez thread. Even for such known bad guys, noob's have to come here, do a search (hoping they have the name correct), or maybe see a revoked GGC, which will only exist as a warning marker if one was first awarded. There is no quick reference anywhere. While it has its pro's and con's, maybe just look at the "pro's" of a "Fauna Bad Guy" list right at the top of the BOI ? What you have done here with Luis, only bigger. On it would be folks voted on by a voluntary panel of esteemed Fauna members (you pick .... maybe 10, where a vote of 7 would be required). Like KS, people would get there by having 2-3 unresolved issues of significance, where a scam or theft would be apparent to this jury. Folks could get removed by clearing those issues. The forum for debate would be the BOI of course. I think that many members (and potential members) would seeing a true "bad guy" list, as voted by proven good guys. Under each person so voted would be links to the BOI threads that qualified them as "bad". Or instead of "bad guys", call it "Vendors with issues in the BOI", with all other qualifiers still required. It would become very popular, as many here would want to see the accomplishment of ID'ing bad guys being "up in lights". I think you could find 10 good people here to be your jury who would willingly participate.
The downside ? Legal of course. You could maintain veto control, but it also wouldn't be difficult to run without legal dangers so long as you had a good vetting process. There are certain names that would be a lock to be on the list, and any legal claim by them could be laughed at, as it isn't going to happen any more than Luis is going to have his attorney mail you something. Just food-for-thought, but it would put more meat on the bones here, just as elevating this thread did for you, and become a very popular list.
Rich's reply:
Sorry Jim, but no, I am not going to do that. At least not in the foreseeable future. That suggestion, if implemented, would still put me or whoever was designated to manage it, in the position of a JUDGE, which I have stated time and time again I am not willing to do. In the case of THIS thread, I have direct experience with Luis Torres and feel confident that my evidence and knowledge of the case warrants my being a judge for THIS case and MY labelling him as a "bad guy". I cannot do the same for anything else anyone else states that I do not have this same direct experience and knowledge of.
Further, please do not clutter up THIS thread nor others with suggestions of how to run this site or any forum on it. Although I do appreciate feedback and construction suggestions, there is a Feedback Forum designed for such things, and I would prefer that this thread cluttering that has become a growing problem begin to diminish appreciably.
Since I am under no increased legal risk by editing or deleting posts within a thread I have started, such "cluttering" will be edited out or the posts completely deleted as necessary in order to keep THIS one on topic.
I suggest an administrative committee of ten. If Rich would ever do this, and I am still around and active here, I would be inclined to purchase a higher-level membership, perhaps $100, to help cover programming costs, if I were invited as one of the ten. Rich need not invite me, but I offer it as a suggestion of how it could be made to work. Rich could pick those to whom he would extend the $50-100 invitation. I don't have the time to be the main organizer, and am not volunteering, but I bet we have a few well respected members here who would do it. This person would solicit votes via PM from the committee to place offenders on the list. The standards need to be high, such that people have to have made a sincere effort to be bad to make the list, such as in the KS "three complaint" rule, as an example. If they resolve them, they then can be removed from the list. Candidates who currently might qualify, besides Ray, would be such as TSE, Bobby Pruett, CRE, and others. Others here are far more familiar with the historical list than I.
I don't think this will happen anytime soon, if at all. Its just to kick around suggestions. Thanks for reading this far.
