you are missing the point, yet again..
By placing that snake in with the others for an hour, 2 hours, 2 weeks 2 months, you exposed them to whatever that snake had.
Granted, the exposure level would be lessened.
Let's face it..You've backtracked on your story so many times it's impossible to tell the truth anymore.
I tend to go with what was ORIGINALLY stated.
And I can't "clear" someone, meaning Dean, who has sold other people sick snakes, most around the same time that I received the BCL... So IF the BCL had IBD, then what about those other people's snakes? including a breeder of blood pythons... Are you going to bring those ppl into this as well?
This is ludicrous...Your character is in question, PERIOD.
I'm not expecting you to CLEAR him of ALL wrong doing, especially not pertaining to dealings you had no part in...Be realistic. You are acting insanely childish to insinuate that's the expectation, here.
What people EXPECT is that you come here with FACTS, stand by what you claim elsewhere, and be HONEST and forthcoming.
You have hidden the fact from many buyers of your snakes that you have had a snake in your collection turn up with IBD on a necropsy, PERIOD. This information was stumbled upon while trying to find THIS thread. It's out there for public record, because YOU put it there.
A simple follow up clearing the air on an accusation YOU MADE regarding necropsy findings indicating the presence of IBD would have been appropriate, and ethical... Instead you have allowed the accusation to stand and you seem to expect everyone to believe your "sudden change of confidence" in your vet, now when you are under scrutiny and your collection's health is being questioned.