• Responding to email notices you receive.
    **************************************************
    In short, DON'T! Email notices are to ONLY alert you of a reply to your private message or your ad on this site. Replying to the email just wastes your time as it goes NOWHERE, and probably pisses off the person you thought you replied to when they think you just ignored them. So instead of complaining to me about your messages not being replied to from this site via email, please READ that email notice that plainly states what you need to do in order to reply to who you are trying to converse with.

  • IMPORTANT! PLEASE READ!! About the Google Adsense ads being displayed

    =====================
    Posted 08/15/2025
    =====================


    Yeah, I know. They are a pain in the butt. But they pay the bills to keep my server running. Just a fact of life, I am afraid.

    Want to get rid of them? Simple. Just become a Contributor level member or above and they will be gone. -> Please click HERE."

    Is that too much for me to ask of you to keep this site running? Well, sorry about that. I too wish I could get everything for free. But alas.....

    =====================
    Addendum: 01/10/2026
    =====================


    Google Adsense ad revenue for December, 2025 was just $30 over the cost of the lease for the server running this site. So, in effect, the money providing the incentive for me to continue running this site is coming SOLELY from the paid memberships and sponsorships here. Which honestly ain't much....

Bad Guy Kimberly Lucas Gorgeousgecko.com con artist!!

AltitudeExotics

New member
Joined
Aug 2, 2010
Messages
228
Reaction score
12
Points
0
Location
Denver.CO USA
On july 15th Kimberly Lucas posted ab ad on kingsnake.com for a "male moolglow crested gecko" Now before i go any further, i know the controversy about if moonglows really exist and i fully know the risks of buying a claimed "moonlgow". But i have seen true moonlgows in person, and i own, while not a moonglow, a WHITE based harley girl, who i was hoping to find a moonglow male for. So of course upon seeing her ad, i jumped on the opportunity. I emailed Kimberly requesting more pictures, specifically asking how dark his color gets. I received pictures of a PURE WHITE gecko, and was told he gets no darker than that. Now normally i would still be very skeptical without seeing the gecko in person, but seeing as this one was being offered by a fairly large and well known breeder, i decided to go for it. I sent the payment of $450 dollars, and a week later received my gecko. Now when he arrived, he was nothing close to white, fairly dark tan in fact. But i knew he was very stressed from the move, and decided to give him a few days to settle in and see how he changed. Well 2 weeks later and i've had him quarantined, haven't bothered him, and observed him many times a day, every day and he never got anything close to a white color. On july 29th i emailed Kimberly telling her i was not pleased because the gecko i purchased was not in any way a "moonglow" I will post the lengthy email conversation, but in summary, she refused me a refund, or to do hardly anything for me after deceiving me so badly. She offered me a $150 credit towards a future gecko, which in my eyes is a pathetic offer after what she did.

Here are a few pics i took of the gecko received from Kimberly. i took these pictures about 20 min ago, and he is not even fully fired up.


IMG_2188.jpg


IMG_2187.jpg


Does this look to anyone here like a gecko that could ever be called a "moonglow"?

In her emails she told me-
"I never used the words "pure white". I used the term "moonglow". Which by all standards... it is."
If i am in the wrong and anyone see's the gecko pictured as a moonglow by all standards, please tell me. But I see the gecko i received as not being moonglow in not one single standard of the term.

She also told me i was threatening her, to which she was referring to me stating that i wanted to settle this matter between us, so as not to bring outside parties into it. (I.E. the B.O.I.)

She suggested i learn something about crested geckos before purchasing anymore. But in my eyes, Kimberly is either a con artist and a liar, and deliberately sold me a gecko as a "moonglow" in order to jump the price up. Or if she thinks this is a moonglow, she is completely ignorant about gecko morphs and has no business selling them.

I offered to ship the gecko back to her at my own expense to get a refund and she refused.

i even said i would accept a refund of $150, which is one third of what i paid, and she refused. The pictures i received from her were obviously overexposed or otherwise altered to make the gecko appear white, as i have had him a month and a half and he has never been anything close to white.

i even sent her pictures of this gecko, next to my WHITE gecko, to show her how not white he was. Despite the lighting in the room washing out alot of his color he was obviously not white at all.

Our email conversation follows, reading from bottom to top.



Brian,

The reasoning behind my no-gecko return policy is that I can't insure the health of the gecko once it has been exposed to an unknown environment. The health of my colony comes first always!
I have nothing to gain from deceiving anyone into purchasing a gecko with what you seem to believe is altered photos.

I am not some 25 year old hobbyist who is trying to make a quick buck on some geckos. I have been in this business for a long time and I know what I am talking about.

You need to take some responsibility for this transaction and realize we are dealing with live animals. That gecko looked like those photos in my company and what ever stress is causing him to look different in your household I have no control over.

When you accuse me me of lying and false advertising you better have a leg to stand on.
You were not the only person to inquire about the purchase of that gecko and for me even to offer you a credit under the circumstances is a loss on this end.

I'm sorry you feel wronged but at this point I don't feel any further communication is necessary unless you plan on manning up and apologizing for your accusations.

Take Care,

Kimberly Lucas
Gorgeous Gecko
817-657-8588
http://www.gorgeousgecko.com


--- On Fri, 7/30/10, brian butler <[email protected]> wrote:


From: brian butler <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: male moonglow
To: [email protected]
Date: Friday, July 30, 2010, 3:41 PM

I don't understand how you think getting the same gecko back and giving me the same money back is a con? i gain nothing from that. i have no problem paying to ship him back. i understand i had seen all the pictures you sent me of him, but he doesn't look anything like that. If you knew you were misleading whoever bought him or not is a moot point. i'm not trying to gain anything here. i'm not trying to make you lose anything. i have no desire to screw you over i'm not that kind of person

----------
Sent from my Verizon Wireless mobile phone

------Original Message------
From: <[email protected]>
To: "brian butler" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, Jul 30, 8:26 PM +0000
Subject: Re: male moonglow

I offered you a credit toward gecko purchase of $150 in accordance with my no cash refund policy in an attempt to make you happy and you decided to press forward with the claim. Not exactly sure what your real goal is other than to complain and harass me into discounting a gecko you knew full well what it looked like before you purchased it.
Who's conning who?

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: "brian butler" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:27:13
To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "brian butler" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: male moonglow

It saddens me greatly that there are ppl in the world willing to cheat mislead ppl for there own gain. I only wish one day that mind set will be purged from this world. I will pray for you as god will judge you. Should you feel the light of christ on you and wish to make amends, please let me know. I would have no problem sending him back if you wish for a refund. God bless

----------
Sent from my Verizon Wireless mobile phone

------Original Message------
From: Gorgeous Gecko <[email protected]>
To: "brian butler" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Jul 29, 8:27 PM -0700
Subject: Re: male moonglow

Did you read the Terms of Service before purchase?


REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE/POLICY
If an animal arrives in bad shape or DOA, we will require proof, in the form of the deceased, injured, or sick animal being shipped back to us. We may be able to accept digital pictures as a substitute, but we will decide this on a case by case basis. Once we determine that you have a valid claim, we will work with you to find a suitable replacement animal. We do not ever under any circumstances give money back. The buyer is responsible for any and all shipping charges associated with the replacements. Our main goal is to make every transaction a pleasant experience, if any problems arise, please be assured that we will make it right! Our reputation is very important to us and we have built and maintained our good name by providing great animals and products as well as the very best in customer service. In the unlikely event that there is a problem with any items or animals, we ask that you keep the details of the problems private. You must first contact
us and allow us the time (up to 2 weeks) to review your claim, and figure out a suitable arrangement to replace your products or animals. Posting details of the transaction, problem, or claim, on any public forum or web site is a direct violation of this policy and will result in the immediate and unconditional void of our guarantee.




Kimberly Lucas
Gorgeous Gecko
817-657-8588
http://www.gorgeousgecko.com

--- On Thu, 7/29/10, brian butler <[email protected]> wrote:


From: brian butler <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: male moonglow
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, July 29, 2010, 8:18 PM


I don't understand how me being civilized and trying to resolve this between us is a threat. i'm very sorry if it came across that way. and no you never used the exact phrase pure white but with your pics and use of the term moonglow represented him that way. i'm sorry you don't see where i'm coming from.

----------
Sent from my Verizon Wireless mobile phone

------Original Message------
From: Gorgeous Gecko <[email protected]>
To: "brian butler" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Jul 29, 6:12 PM -0700
Subject: Re: male moonglow

I don't know why you are accusing me of being deceitful.
That is clearly not the case.


Kimberly Lucas
Gorgeous Gecko
817-657-8588
http://www.gorgeousgecko.com

--- On Thu, 7/29/10, brian butler <[email protected]> wrote:


From: brian butler <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: male moonglow
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, July 29, 2010, 8:06 PM


I was very pleasant when i first contacted you. i never threatened you. i wouldn't know how to threaten you if i wanted to. i don't understand why your acting like i'm trying to blackmail you or something

----------
Sent from my Verizon Wireless mobile phone

------Original Message------
From: Gorgeous Gecko <[email protected]>
To: "brian butler" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Jul 29, 5:38 PM -0700
Subject: Re: male moonglow






First of all I never used the words "pure white". I used the term "moonglow". Which by all standards... it is.

Second, you received un-altered pictures (several) and decided to purchase the gecko.

It is very cut and dry. There is no misrepresentation on my part. I have no idea why you think you have grounds to threaten me.

I suggest you learn more about crested geckos before purchasing anymore.
I also suggest you read the Terms of Service before purchasing a gecko.(as stated in the ad) I would have been more accommodating if you had not threatened me from the start.

Kimberly Lucas
Gorgeous Gecko
817-657-8588
http://www.gorgeousgecko.com

--- On Thu, 7/29/10, brian butler <[email protected]> wrote:


From: brian butler <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: male moonglow
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, July 29, 2010, 7:21 PM


So you see no problem with the fact you represented that you had a pure white moonglow gecko for sale. that i paid a very considerable amount of money for a white male gecko. and i recieved a gecko that is never anything close to white? moonglow may be a subjective term but no matter where you go one thing is agreed upon universally. moonglow means white. i was hoping you would want to do the right thing and make this right, but i can see thats not going to happen and i will have to find other means to correct this.

----------
Sent from my Verizon Wireless mobile phone

------Original Message------
From: Gorgeous Gecko <[email protected]>
To: "brian butler" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Jul 29, 12:59 PM -0700
Subject: Re: male moonglow






Brian,

What I was looking for in the photo was to see if he photographed similar enough to the photos that I had sent you. The photo on the black background showed his color similar enough to the ones I sent you. I too have moss green females with white heads and white dorsal flame. (She also has a few dalmatian spots.) Not sure if I would call her a "moonglow". Which brings us to this...
Moonglow is a relative term created by the hobbyist. There are no all "white" crested geckos as of yet. That would be called an albino. There are geckos that have washed out color and look extremely pale for the most part and I guess this is where this term hails from.

That being said.... I take very good and accurate pictures of my geckos. I have an expensive camera and I know how to use it. I did not alter or overexpose any of the photos sent to you. I purposely held the geckos at many angles so you could see all of his coloring and have the perspective of the color against my skin. You were given several current pictures of the gecko and chose to buy him. I have no control over nature and how his body has reacted to the stress of shipping and his new environment.

I am not trying to come across as harsh regarding this inquiry but I do feel I have been completely open and honest in this transaction. I am a little taken back by the accusations in this matter because I truly do value my customers and and take great pride in what I do. However, I am not going to take a loss on a transaction that was very clear and honest on my part. I did not deceive you in any way. You received a healthy adult male crested gecko that looks like the photos I sent you.
In conclusion, I do not feel any compensation is warranted in this instance.
I was considering giving you a credit to use towards future purchases but after re-evaluating the facts I decided there really is no justification for it.

Best regards,

Kimberly Lucas
Gorgeous Gecko
817-657-8588
http://www.gorgeousgecko.com

--- On Thu, 7/29/10, brian butler <[email protected]> wrote:


From: brian butler <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: male moonglow
To: "Gorgeous Gecko" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, July 29, 2010, 1:24 PM





here is a side by side comparison of my female and the male. As you can see my female has some patterning, but her base color is paper white and never changes. His color, while pretty light, looks very tan and dirty next to her.







From: Gorgeous Gecko <[email protected]>
To: brian butler <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, July 29, 2010 7:22:04 AM
Subject: Re: male moonglow






I would be interested seeing a picture of your female next to him and see exactly what you are talking about.




Kimberly Lucas
Gorgeous Gecko
817-657-8588
http://www.gorgeousgecko.com/

--- On Thu, 7/29/10, brian butler <[email protected]> wrote:


From: brian butler <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: male moonglow
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, July 29, 2010, 8:16 AM


Oh i wouldn't be asking for even half of what i paid seeing as he is nice and full grown just enough to make the final price better reflect what a gecko like him should cost somewhere to the are of 150

----------
Sent from my Verizon Wireless mobile phone

------Original Message------
From: Gorgeous Gecko <[email protected]>
To: "brian butler" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Jul 29, 6:13 AM -0700
Subject: Re: male moonglow

I'm curiuos what you think you should receive as compensation?



Kimberly Lucas
Gorgeous Gecko
817-657-8588
http://www.gorgeousgecko.com

--- On Thu, 7/29/10, brian butler <[email protected]> wrote:


From: brian butler <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: male moonglow
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, July 29, 2010, 7:55 AM


And they were very nice pictures you got but unfortunately its not ter accurate to the gecko in real life. its a common problem in the crested community. i do like him though and in the interest of keeping outside judgement out of this i would be willing to accept a small partial refund in compensation.

----------
Sent from my Verizon Wireless mobile phone

------Original Message------
From: <[email protected]>
To: "brian butler" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Jul 29, 12:41 PM +0000
Subject: Re: male moonglow

The photos were not overexposed or altered in any way. I purposely took the pictures with my hand in it to give it some perspective.

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: "brian butler" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:36:30
To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "brian butler" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: male moonglow

Well despite the obviously overexposed pictures you sent for one a moonglow is white and this gecko is not white even when fired down

----------
Sent from my Verizon Wireless mobile phone

------Original Message------
From: <[email protected]>
To: "brian butler" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, Jul 29, 12:34 PM +0000
Subject: Re: male moonglow

Brian,
I'm not sure exactly what you mean by that but I sent you several updated pictures of the gecko before purchase and you did not seem to think so then. What is it about the gecko makes you feel like you were deceived?
Kim
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: "brian butler" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:27:30
To: <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "brian butler" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: male moonglow

So this is a pretty nice gecko you sent me but i believe there was a mistake made i ordered a male moonglow and this is in no sense of the word a moonglow



Should i also post the pictures i received from her, to show how misrepresented he truly was?
 
no problem, this is the gecko i was told i would receive

This gecko, (if he really looked like this) would qualify as a moonglow in my book

The gecko i now own, looks nothing like this at any point ever fired up or down

IMG_1494.jpg


IMG_1488.jpg


IMG_1487.jpg



These are the pictures i was sent when she said he doesn't get any darker.
 
Sorry if I missed it but you could post where she said that "he never gets darker"?

I would consider that a major misreprensentation of the animal judging from the photos.
 
Post your e-mails when you first inquired about the animal. Everything up to your e-mail with the initial complaint.
 
Hey Brian can you take some pictures of the gecko in the exact same poses as in Kim's pictures......I want to verify that it is the same gecko.
 
I have purchased several crested geckos from Kimberly over the last few years. Separate purchases with a couple geckos each time.
She has always shown accurate photos for the animals I have purchased. I have never been disappointed in the quality of the geckos, the color,ect...was always as pictured.
Kim has always been great to deal with. She ships her animals with care,takes good care of them and in my opinion is a top notch breeder.

As a side note, I received a gecko from a member on another forum who saw my photos after I received the gecko and could not believe how dark she was, she had never seen the gecko that dark, ever.....

Also, I had a gecko (recently sold) that fired up to a neon orange, two times! Two times only in two years. I had photos of him like this, but did not use them when going to sell him as I felt it did not happen often enough to be fair in using them for a sale.
 
>From: Gorgeous Gecko <[email protected]>
>To: brian butler <[email protected]>
>Sent: Thu, July 15, 2010 5:39:26 PM
>Subject: Re: male moonglow
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi Brian,
>I tried to get him "fired up" but he really stays pretty much this color. Here
>are some more pictures. I tried to get his underside too.
>
>Thank you for your payment!
>I will be contacting you soon to arrange shipment.
>
>Kim Lucas
>817-657-8588


There is the email of her telling me he doesn't get darker i can take pictures of him in the same position later today, but based on what i can tell it is the same gecko, her pics were just altered. I was told he is 2-3 years old (see email below) and he weighs 44 grams as of yesterday.

>From: Gorgeous Gecko <[email protected]>
>To: "brian butler" <[email protected]>
>Date: Mon, Jul 19, 5:52 AM -0700
>Subject: Re: male moonglow
>
>Hi Brian,
>I purchased him from Jenny Pope. I don't have any lineage on him, sorry. He
>weighs around 41 grams and I'm guessing around 2-3 years old.
>I hope that helps.
>Thanks, Kim
 
AltitudeExotics;1055937 I was told he is 2-3 years old (see email below) and he weighs 44 grams as of yesterday. [/QUOTE said:
Ok, it is an adult and therefore not changing colors as it matures.

What are you seeing in the pictures that lead you to believe they are altered?

I am not a photoshop expert so if someone could comment on how they can produce a white gecko without disrupting the gecko's pattern or skin texture that would be great.

BTW, stick any crestie outside in the sun when it is 85 degrees with low humidity and watch how fast it lightens up. :NoNo:
 
Actually, what is bothering me is that the gecko in Kim's pics is nowhere near 40+ grams.....I have met Kim at a show and she is a petite woman......even if her hands were the size of my gorilla paws that gecko would not be 40+ grams. I am now getting the idea the pics are not altered but they are of the gecko at a much younger and smaller age.
 
For reference, here is the exif data of one of the photos she originally sent him, including original date of the photo. The data on all of them was the same and the below information is all from just one of the images. From what I can see, no photo editing took place.

EXIF IFD0

* Camera Make {0x010F} = Canon
* Camera Model {0x0110} = Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTi
* Picture Orientation {0x0112} = undefined (0)
* X-Resolution {0x011A} = 72/1 ===> 72
* X/Y-Resolution Unit {0x0128} = inch (2)
* Y-Resolution {0x011B} = 72/1 ===> 72
* Software / Firmware Version {0x0131} = Picasa 3.0
* Last Modified Date/Time {0x0132} = 2010:07:15 06:29:44
* Y/Cb/Cr Positioning (Subsampling) {0x0213} = co-sited / datum point (2)

EXIF Sub IFD

* Exposure Time (1 / Shutter Speed) {0x829A} = 1/125 second ===> 0.008 second
* Lens F-Number / F-Stop {0x829D} = 56/10 ===> ƒ/5.6
* Exposure Program {0x8822} = manual control (1)
* ISO Speed Ratings {0x8827} = 1600
* EXIF Version {0x9000} = 0221
* Original Date/Time {0x9003} = 2010:07:15 06:29:44
* Digitization Date/Time {0x9004} = 2010:07:15 06:29:44

* Components Configuration {0x9101} = 0x01,0x02,0x03,0x00 / YCbCr
* Shutter Speed Value (APEX) {0x9201} = 456510/65536
Shutter Speed (Exposure Time) = 1/125 second
* Aperture Value (APEX) {0x9202} = 325770/65536
Aperture = ƒ/5.6
* Exposure Bias (EV) {0x9204} = 0/3 ===> 0
* Metering Mode {0x9207} = pattern / multi-segment (5)
* Flash {0x9209} = Flash fired, compulsory flash mode, red-eye reduction mode
* Focal Length {0x920A} = 27/1 mm ===> 27 mm
User Comment Character Code = not defined
* FlashPix Version {0xA000} = 0100
* Colour Space {0xA001} = 65535
* Image Width {0xA002} = 640 pixels
* Image Height {0xA003} = 436 pixels
* Focal Plane X-Resolution {0xA20E} = 3888000/877 ===> 4433.3
* Focal Plane Y-Resolution {0xA20F} = 2592000/582 ===> 4453.61
* Focal Plane X/Y-Resolution Unit {0xA210} = inch (2)
* Custom Rendered {0xA401} = normal process (0)
* Exposure Mode {0xA402} = manual exposure (1)
* White Balance {0xA403} = auto (0)
* Scene Capture Type {0xA406} = standard (0)
* Image Unique ID {0xA420} = decc54fa923ac025b52392799c74993c

EXIF IFD1

* Compression {0x0103} = JPEG compression (6)
* X-Resolution {0x011A} = 72/1 ===> 72
* Y-Resolution {0x011B} = 72/1 ===> 72
* X/Y-Resolution Unit {0x0128} = inch (2)
* Embedded thumbnail image:

Canon Maker Note

* Camera Settings
Macro Mode = normal (2)
Self-Timer = n/a
Quality = fine (3)
Flash Mode = on + red-eye reduction (6)
Continuous Drive Mode = single frame or timer mode (0)
Unknown (0x0001.6) = 0
Focus Mode = one-shot auto-focus (0)
Unknown (0x0001.8) = 0
Record Mode = JPEG (1)
Image Size = large (0)
“Easy Shooting” Mode = manual (1)
Digital Zoom = no digital zoom (0)
Contrast = normal (0)
Saturation = normal (0)
Sharpness = 3
ISO Speed = 32767
Metering Mode = evaluative (3)
Focus Type = not known (2)
Auto Focus Point Selected = 0x0
Exposure Mode = manual (4)
Unknown (0x0001.21) = 65535
Lens Type = Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
“Long” Focal Length of Lens = 55 focal units
“Short” Focal Length of Lens = 18 focal units
Focal Units = 1 per mm
Maximum Aperture = 128
Minimum Aperture = 304
Flash Activity = flash did not fire (0)
Flash Details = internal / built-in flash (bit 13) / E-TTL (bit 3)
Unknown (0x0001.30) = 0
Unknown (0x0001.31) = 0
Focus Continuous Mode = single (0)
AE Setting = 65535
Image Stabilization = 65535
Display Aperture = 0
Zoom Source Width = 0
Zoom Target Width = 0
Unknown (0x0001.38) = 0
Unknown (0x0001.39) = 65535
Photo Effect = off (0)
Manual Flash Output = 32767
Color Tone = 0
Unknown (0x0001.43) = 32767
Unknown (0x0001.44) = 65535
Unknown (0x0001.45) = 65535
* Focal Length
Focal Type = zoom (2)
(Scaled) Focal Length = 27
Focal Plane X Size = 907
Focal Plane Y Size = 605
* Unknown / Flash Information? (0x0003) = 35,16,0,0
* Shot Information
Auto ISO = 0
Base ISO = 288
Measured EV = 108
Target Aperture = 160
Target Exposure Time = 224
Exposure Compensation = 0
White Balance = auto (0)
Slow Shutter = none (3)
Sequence Number = 0
Optical Zoom Code = 8
Unknown (0x0004.11) = 8
Unknown (0x0004.12) = 153
Flash Guide Number = 65535
AF Points In Focus (Used) = none / manual focus / 0 available focus points (bits 15-12)
Flash Bias /Exposure Compensation = 0
Auto Exposure Bracketing = off (0)
AEB Bracket Value = 0
Unknown (0x0004.18) = 1
Subject Distance (Focus Distance Upper) = 27 (in units of 0.01 or 0.001 m)
(Focus Distance Lower) = 35
F Number = 160
Exposure Time = 224
Unknown (0x0004.23) = 114
Bulb Duration = 0
Unknown (0x0004.25) = 0
Camera Type = EOS mid-range (252)
Auto Rotate = none (0)
ND Filter = 65535
Self Timer 2 = 0
Unknown (0x0004.30) = 0
Unknown (0x0004.31) = 0
Unknown (0x0004.32) = 0
Flash Output = 0
* Image Type = Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XTi
* Firmware Version = Firmware 1.0.4
* Owner Name = unknown;{{EM}};;;{{SOH}};;;{{RS}};;;{{SOH}};;;(;;;{{SOH}}
* Camera Serial Number = 30e6-31063
* Camera Information
1024 zero values omitted out of 1024 values provided.
* Custom Functions = 24,1,256,512,768,1024,1280,1536,1792,2048,2304,2560
* Camera Model = EOS Digital Rebel XTi / 400D / Kiss Digital X
* Picture / AutoFocus Information
Number AF Points = 9
Number Valid AF Points = 9
Image Width = 3888
Image Height = 2592
AF Image Width (as Shot) = 3504
AF Image Height (as Shot) = 2336
AF Area Width = 78
AF Area Height = 78
AF Area X Positions = 8
AF Area Y Positions = 64981
AF Points In Focus = 571
Primary AF Point 64605
Primary AF Point = 8
Unknown (0x0012.13) = 947
Unknown (0x0012.14) = 64981
Unknown (0x0012.15) = 571
Unknown (0x0012.16) = 8
Unknown (0x0012.17) = 504
Unknown (0x0012.18) = 270
Unknown (0x0012.19) = 270
Unknown (0x0012.20) = 4
Unknown (0x0012.21) = 4
AF Points Used = 4
Unknown (0x0012.23) = 65274
Unknown (0x0012.24) = 65274
Unknown (0x0012.25) = 65040
AF Points Used = 4
Unknown (0x0012.27) = 65535
* Unknown (0x13) = 0,159,7,112
* Serial Number Format = -1610612736
* Unknown (0x19) = 1
* Original Decision Data = 0
* File Information = 34,39004,240,0,0,0,65535,65535,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,119
* Lens Type = EF-S18-55mm f/3.5-5.6
* Internal Serial Number? = H1083769
 
maybe no editing took place after the photo was taken, but its very easy to turn the exposure up on the camera and make the gecko look white that way. I bet i can do it right now and post a pic of it.
 
When reading through the rest of the exif data you can see if any of the other settings in the camera itself were changed. But, with that being stated, even if you do look at the photo itself, if any alteration to the colors, saturation, exposure(which would cause major bleeding and blowout of colors), contrast, white balance, etc. Then you would also be seeing those same changes in the skin tone on her hands.
Being that the pictures are very clear, crisp and precise I would say that the images are not altered, including through settings on the camera itself.
That is not to say that the gecko received is anywhere near a representation of the one originally pictured as it is clearly no where near the same.
As someone suggested earlier, taking pictures of the gecko in the same or similar poses as the original photos would help to determine if any minute pattern differences line up between the two.
I would tend to lean towards it being a different gecko altogether. But pictures showing any discrepancies between the original and what was received would definitely help.
 
ok my camera is dead, but i'll try this later, taking two pics of him, one right after another, changing only the camera settings, and i'll post how much of a color difference i can get.
 
Actually, what is bothering me is that the gecko in Kim's pics is nowhere near 40+ grams.....I have met Kim at a show and she is a petite woman......even if her hands were the size of my gorilla paws that gecko would not be 40+ grams. I am now getting the idea the pics are not altered but they are of the gecko at a much younger and smaller age.


Even if this is true, i really doubt the gecko put on 15 grams and completely changed colors in the 15 hours is spend getting shipped to me, which means she deliberately sold it as something it is not, to be able to charge more for it.
 
Back
Top