DavidBeard
The Louisville Lip
If refunding one customer will make your kids starve, then you have no business owning a bunch of animals. Sounds like another Pokemon-type keeper with their priorities screwed up.
p.s. and before I get a defensive response from you, let me just say this, i read one of your facebook posts ( all of us did in our group) where you were bumming because it wasnt going to be 420 on your birthday...wah....that wasnt the exact post...but I know you know I mean
I have only purchased one animal since this whole thing started. The Pastel male BP was my only purchase and only because it was a Great Deal and I sold my Uromastyx to pay for it! The Bearded Dragons were gifts or trades. Sorry you are trying to defamate my character but I told you I would pay when I could. I work at a small private owned zoo... I only work 2 weekends a month and I get paid once every month. I am a stay at home mom with 2 boys during the week.
Are you kidding me? Talk about hypocrite.





I noted the "lol" but here is a justification anyway. At least in my mind and why it has limited scope.
The only reason to post this
was to add some discredit somehow to the OP. No other reason. Her and her "group" were sitting around gossiping that he mentioned a 420 birthday. Watching his posts and thought she would add it to the conversation here.
Why? To disparage him.
Now, personally I could care less what either of them or anybody else does if they aren't hurting anyone else. She posted that here to hurt his credibility and character.
So, I think it is a legitimate rebuttal to the attempt to assassinate the character of one of the parties in this thread. It was extreme hypocrisy on her part and deserved a rebuttal.
Now her "group" can go gossip about all the lovey pictures of her pot plants and animals in her gallery on that site.
Since it was such a big deal that they were all talking about his statement.
Anyway, the OP should be allowed to defend himself. At least show the hypocrisy of those gossiping about it. Doesn't mean the whole thread should go off in that direction but at least a limited response.
He will get his last payment when I said he would. No getting pushed off the stove... I guess it would have been different if I had lied about the animals and said I traded straight out which is pretty much what I did... the money from the Uromastyx went towards the Pastel and nowhere else which was the intent in the first place. I made sure the animal was safe and sound at it's new home... then paid for the Pastel with the same money pretty much as if I had traded the Uro for the Pastel.
If refunding one customer will make your kids starve, then you have no business owning a bunch of animals. Sounds like another Pokemon-type keeper with their priorities screwed up.
BWUAAAHAHAHAHAHA!