We should be focused on that
Don't blame you at all for trying desperately to point elsewhere after you got caught making accusations you can't prove. At this point, I'm considering you were lying.
We should be focused on that
And why are you all focused on the one thing about selling another breeders snakes?
Don't blame you at all for trying desperately to point elsewhere after you got caught making accusations you can't prove. At this point, I'm considering you were lying.
Proof?
A bunch of it.
It seems truth is not your strong suit.
Send it.As I said, If you really want to see the convo, I can send it to you privately.
Me not showing you proof does not make me a liar.

Greg... since this is the first post on fauna that you've actually commented on I guess you don't understand the rules..
Gregg, as you appear new to posting on the BOI by your new Fauna membership, it is customary that when you bring forward an allegation that is relevant to a person's character on a BOI thread that you post supporting documentation. Screenshots (attached as images to your post) of transactions, requesting people who have purchased hognoses from Dan since the time of this event to post on here to corroborate your claims, etc., are all acceptable. Otherwise those of us who know nothing of the history of the current topic (which includes me) have no way of distinguishing he-said-she-said rhetoric from actual fact.

In the latest attachment (post #52), I see no mention of Dan claiming he was the breeder of snakes that were actually produced by Justin.
If Dan was selling snakes for Justin, or selling snakes he obtained from Justin, I do not see the big deal as long as the snakes weren't misrepresented.
Granted, I have not slept, for the past two days (going on 3 if I don't get to bed sometime soon LoL), but cannot see where I might be missing something.![]()
I didn't realize I had 2 accounts. Can one be deleted? Its not like I am trying to hide my identity.. Can this be corrected?
A couple things right off the bat, Gregg. There are versions of your claims that are not compatibly supported by your screen shots. Also, who are the parties in the conversation? One is Dan in one conversation. One appears to be Justin in another. However, by context, you are not the author of the blue text bubbles. Without a label, that makes the quotation anonymous.
I may see support for the claim that Dan may have sold snakes "for" Justin. It does seem like there is support that he sold snakes from Justin.